exponential thermal tensor network approach for quantum
play

Exponential Thermal Tensor Network Approach for Quantum Lattice - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Exponential Thermal Tensor Network Approach for Quantum Lattice Models Chen et al., PRX 8 , 031082 (2018); arXiv:1811.01397 Andreas Weichselbaum Collaboration Bin-Bin Chen, Lei Chen, Ziyu Chen, Dai-Wei Qu, Han Li, Shou-Shu Gong, Wei Li


  1. Exponential Thermal Tensor Network Approach for Quantum Lattice Models Chen et al., PRX 8 , 031082 (2018); arXiv:1811.01397 Andreas Weichselbaum Collaboration Bin-Bin Chen, Lei Chen, Ziyu Chen, Dai-Wei Qu, Han Li, Shou-Shu Gong, Wei Li (Beihang University, Beijing), Jan von Delft (LMU, Munich) Supported by German Research Foundation (WE4819/3-1) National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) Department of Energy (DE-SC0012704)

  2. Outline q XTRG (exponential thermal tensor network renormalization group) } Tensor network representation of thermal states [Chen et al., for quasi-1D systems [in the spirit of 2D-DMRG, yet for finite ! ] PRX 8 , 031082 (2018)] } Entanglement in thermal states } Exponential energy scales and logarithmic " grid q Benchmark: performance (numerical cost and accuracy) [arXiv:1811.01397] q Application: 2D spin-half triangular Heisenberg model } Two temperature scales ! # and ! $ } `Roton-like’ excitations in intermediate regime ! # ≲ ! ≲ ! $ with significant chiral component q Summary & outlook

  3. Tensor network representation of thermal density matrix ) = + % &', - |/〉〈/| A … = @ " # ≡ % &'( A = ? A | ! = + ! (4 5 4 6 …4 8 ), (4 5 < ) |= > = ? … = @ 〉〈= > ( = B = 1, … , D ) < 4 6 < …4 8 2 2 A A A A A A = > = @ = > = @ = ? = ? matrix product ≡ ! ≡ operator = > = ? = @ = > = ? = @ (MPO) O B = 1, … , P A A A = > = @ = ? ∗ ! # ? ? " # = % &' ) L Ψ ) ≡ Ψ ) ?( ! = = ! # ? always positive = > = ? = @ Z = tr[! " # ] = = A A A = ? = @ ≡ Ψ Ψ = > purification = > = ? = @ N ≡ 1 N ≡ 1 ) L ≡ 1 )M NΨ N Ψ〉 M Z tr ! "M Z tr Ψ Z 〈Ψ M Verstraete (2004) Schollwoeck (review DMRG; 2010) Thermofield approach (de Vega, Banuls; 2015; Schwarz et al, 2018)

  4. Entanglement scaling in thermal states in 1D Many-body finite size spectrum (critical systems, or !" ≫ gap Δ ) q E minimal requirement for thermal simulations 0 / = 2 3 456 7 |9〉〈9| < ⇒ / ≳ !" ⇒ G ≲ , / " . !" finite size level-spacing !" ∼ 1/, , ∼ G " - entropy of thermal state ⇒ > ℓ ∼ A 9 〈9| > ℓ ∼ 2× A ℓ 3 log ℓ 6 log (ℓ) ⇓ ℓ → G Calabrese (2004) >(G) ∼ A 3 log (G) allows for efficient simulations More rigorous arguments based on conformal field theory (CFT) of thermal states (entanglement • J. Dubail [J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50 (2017) 234001] entropy comparable to pure • T. Barthel [arXiv:1708.09349 [quant-ph], 2017] states with periodic BC)

  5. Implication #1: Thermal correlation length and symmetries ! " ≲ $ % log " independent of ) for ) → ∞ q } finite correlation length - ∼ " in thermal state Therefore as long as - ≲ L q } can use finite system with open BC to simulate thermodynamic limit } can exploit all symmetries (abelian and non-abelian) in an optimal way (note that thermal state / can never be symmetry broken) 3 ⋅ 1 5 = ≡ 1 2 e.g. spin-half site: 7 ∈ {1, 1}

  6. Implication #2: Exponential energy scales Weak growth of block entropy of thermal state ! " ∼ $ % ln " q } suggests that linear imaginary time evolution schemes are ill-suited e.g. Trotter: " → " + * with * ≪ " , -./ ≃ , -. 1213 / , -. 455 / small Trotter error enforces small constant * for any " rather need to make bold steps when increasing " q to see a significant change in physical properties within a critical regime natural choice: " → Λ" ( Λ > 1 ) ⇒ :! ∼ const. simple choice: Λ = 2 B C * D → B C * D ∗ B C * D = B C 2* D → B C 2* D ∗ B C 2* D = B C 4* D → ⋯ exponential thermal " H = * D 2 H tensor renormalization * D 2* D 4* D 8* D 16* D group (XTRG)

  7. Benefits of logarithmic temperature grid Simple initialization of ( ! " q } can start with exponentially small ! " such that ( ! " = 1 − ! " , simply use the MPO of , ⇒ up to minor tweak, same MPO for ( ! " } q No Trotter error } no swap gates to deal with Trotter steps } simply applicable to longer range Hamiltonians } including (quasi-) 2D systems Maximal speed to reach large . with minimal number of truncation steps q Fine grained temperature resolution! q using / -shifted temperature grids . 0 = ! " 2 012 with / ∈ [0,1[ } ! " 2! " 4! " 8! " 16! " equivalent to using ! " → ! " 2 2 } } easy to parallelize: independent runs for logarithmically interleaved data sets

  8. Numerical cost of XTRG q Naively % % % ! " ! $ ! # & $ SVD → ) & * & & ! " ! $ ! # $ → 012 Variationally: + , ∗ + , − + / $, q & & × ~100 overlap → ) & 3 → )( & ∗ 3 ) & & Computational gain by using symmetries: & states → & ∗ multiplets q e.g. SU(2) spin-half Heisenberg: & ∗ ≃ &/4

  9. Brief comparison to coarse graining renormalization q Xie et al. (PRB 2012) Coarse-graining renormalization by higher-order singular value decomposition q starting point: Trotter gates q infinite tensor network } no clean orthogonal vector spaces } no symmetries used 2D Ising model ( D= 24) q no interleaved temperatures } „However, the number of temperature points that can be studied with this approach is quite limited […], since the temperature is reduced by a factor of 2 at each contraction along the Trotter direction.” } linearized imaginary time evolution largely favored ! " Similarly for Czarnik et al. (PRB 2015)

  10. Benchmark: performance $ Free energy ! = − % log * L=18 spin-1/2 Heisenberg chain (PBC; + = 1 ) q XTRG is most accurate q XTRG is clearly fastest speed gain (for D*=100,200) ×10 ×10 LTRG SETTN XTRG starting from the same - = -(1 2 ) , proceed - → - ∗ - XTRG . . exponential tensor renormalization group LTRG . . linearized tensor renormalization group - → - ∗ -(1 2 ) - → -(4) ∗ 5 6%7/9 SETTN . series expansion thermal tensor network

  11. Block entanglement entropy L=200 spin-1/2 Heisenberg chain (OBC; ! = 1 ) log. growth $ ∼ & ' log + with , = 0.999 This offers an alternative to compute central charge via finite- 2 simulation using open BC! In comparison to Calabrese (2004) for obtaining , from ground states with periodic BC • comparable block entropy scaling • no system size dependence as long as 3 ≳ 5 universal $ ∼ + 0 behavior for very large temperatures where $ ≪ 1 (irrespective of the physics or dimensionality of the model!)

  12. Specific heat and critical exponents L=300 spin-1/2 Heisenberg chain ( ! = 1 ) Specific heat at low temperatures $ % = &' () * with + = & , ⇒ $ = 0.996 at large temperatures: universal 1/* , behavior ( irrespective of the physics or dimensionality of the model!)

  13. Application Two Temperature Scales in the Triangular Lattice Heisenberg (TLH) Antiferromagnet arXiv:1811.01397 [cond-mat.str-el]

  14. 2D triangular Heisenberg model (S=1/2) q What is known (theory) } 120˚ magnetically ordered state at T=0: ! " = 0.205(15) , [White et al. (2007)] } paramagnetic at large T } problem [Kulagin et al (2013) using `sign-blessed’ BDQMC]: data extrapolates to disordered, i.e., non -magnetic state for + → 0 !? incipient 120 o order paramagnetic T J ??

  15. Zheng et al., PRB (2006) Roton-like excitations in the TLH Starykh et al., PRB(R) (2006) Magnon spectra [Zheng (2006)] linear spine wave theory (LSWT) LSWT + 1/S corrections series expansion effective `massive’ quasiparticles at finite energy with Δ ≃ 0.55 Zheng (2006): We have called this feature a “roton” in analogy with similar minima that occur in the excitation spectra of super-fluid 4 He and the fractional quantum Hall effect.

  16. Szasz et al. Triangular lattice Hubbard model (DMRG @ T=0) (condmat, 2018) YC4 data Non-magnetic intermediate phase q chiral and gapped ℏ = 2 q relevant in the large U limit (Heisenberg model) at finite ! ?

  17. Experimental progress q Ba 8 CoNb 6 O 24 - close to ideal 2D triangular Heisenberg material! } Perovskite, first synthesized [Mallinson et al. (Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2005)] } equilateral effective spin-1/2 Co2+ triangular layers separated by six nonmagnetic layers. } [Rawl et al., 2017] A spin-1/2 triangular Heisenberg antiferromagnet in the 2D limit } [Cui et al., 2018] Mermin-Wagner physics, (H,T) phase diagram, and candidate quantum spin-liquid phase in the spin-1/2 triangular antiferromagnet Ba 8 CoNb 6 O 24 magnetic contribution to specific heat (by ref. to non-magnetic compound Ba 8 ZnTa 6 O 24 ) Ba 3 CoNb 2 O 9 : 7.23Å (2 non-magnetic [Rawl (2017)] J=1.66 K layers)

  18. XTRG data For sufficiently large system sizes q consistently, two energy scales ! " ≃ 0.2 and ! ' ≃ 0.55 q in agreement with experiment (“thermodynamic limit”) q `roton’ contribution only relevant for ! ≳ ! " q strongly enhanced thermal entropy for ! ≲ ! " due to frustration TPO . . . tensor product operator method (complimentary to XTRG) RSBMF . reconstructed Schwinger boson mean field [Mezio et al, NJP (2012)] Roton . . roton contribution only [Zheng et al, PRB (2006)] HTSE . . high temperature series expansion (Elstner et al, PRL (1993)] Pade . . a particular way to deal with the low-T divergence of the partition function in HTSE [Rawl (2017)]

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend