Atomic PNC, a personal view in 2014 Luis A. Orozco Fundamental - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

atomic pnc a personal view in 2014
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Atomic PNC, a personal view in 2014 Luis A. Orozco Fundamental - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Atomic PNC, a personal view in 2014 Luis A. Orozco Fundamental Symmetry Tests with Rare Isotopes Amherst Center for Fundamental Interactions University of Massachusetts Amherst October, 2014 Thanks to: John Behr (TRIUMF) Dima Budker


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Atomic PNC, a personal view in 2014

Luis A. Orozco Fundamental Symmetry Tests with Rare Isotopes Amherst Center for Fundamental Interactions University of Massachusetts Amherst October, 2014

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Thanks to: John Behr (TRIUMF) Dima Budker (Berkeley, Mainz) Roberto Calabrese (Ferrara) Sidney Cahn (Yale) David DeMille (Yale) Andrei Derevianko (Reno) Victor Flambaum (New South Wales) Gerald Gwinner (Manitoba) Klaus Jungmann (KVI) Shelley Page (Manitoba) Mariana Safranova (Delaware) Fr work supported by: NRC, TRIUMF, and NSERC from Canada, DOE, and NSF from the USA, and CONACYT from Mexico.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

HPV = GF 2 (κ1iγ 5 −κnsd,iσ n ⋅α)δ(r)

Nuclear spin independent Interaction:

  • Coherent over all

nucleons.

  • Measurement increases

as Z3 Nuclear spin dependent interaction:

  • Only from valence nucleons.
  • Measurement increases as Z8/3
  • Main contribution from anapole

moment for heavy nuclei.

HPV

NSD

HPV

NSI

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Gwinner

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Safranova

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Gwinner

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Page

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Constraints on couplings

PDG 2013 Page

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Safranova

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Safranova/Flambaum

Dzuba et al, PRL, 109, 203003 (2012)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Weak charge of 133Cs

Experiment: Wood et al. (1997); Bennett and Wieman (1999) (Boulder group) Theory: V. A. Dzuba, J. C. Berengut, V.V. Flambaum, and B. Roberts, (2012)

1.5 σ agreement with the Standard Model

Derevianko

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Implications: extra Z bosons (Z’)

Specific example: Z’χ in SO(10) GUT result implies: LHC discovery reach: 5 TeV full luminosity

Derevianko/Flambaum

Also implications for Dark Z (Marciano)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

The Anapole Moment History 1958 Zel’dovich, Vaks 1980 Khriplovich, Flambaum 1984 Khriplovich, Flambaum, Shuskov 1995 Fortson (Seattle) bound from an experiment Thallium 1997 Wieman (Boulder) 15% measurement from an experiment Cesium

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Does weak N-N interaction change in heavy nuclei?

isovector isoscalar Behr

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Constraints of couplings (107) from future measurements of two francium isotopes (even and odd isotopes) based on the calculations of Flambaum and Murray.

210Fr

209Fr

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Gwinner

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Accuracy is affected by HV-amplifier noise, fluctuations of stray fields, and laser drifts → improved for the next phase

ζ/β=39(4)stat.(5)syst. mV/cm ⇒ |ζ|=(8.7±1.4)×10-10 ea0

Yb PV Amplitude Results (Berkeley)

Budker

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Experiment (1997):

  • |Hw| = 2.3 ± 2.9 (statistical) ± 0.7

(systematic) Hz

  • A. T. Nguyen et. al. Phys. Rev. A 56, 3453 (1997)

Theory (2010):

  • Hw ≈ 2 Hz
  • V. Dzuba and V. Flambaum (http://arxiv.org/abs/1001.1184)

18

Parity Nonconservation in Dy

Budker

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Atomic Parity Non-Conservation in a single Barium Ion Blinov and Fortson (U. Washington).

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Jungmann

Single ion work in Ra+ at KVI following a proposal by Fortson

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Jungmann

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Cahn

Using molecules to get at NSD-PNC

Diatomic molecules systematically have close rotation+hyperfine levels of opposite parity--B-field tuning can give ΔE ~ 10-11 eV.

[Sushkov, Flambaum, Sov. Phys. JETP 48, 608 (1978), Flambaum, Khriplovich, Phys. Lett. A

110, 121 (1985) Kozlov, Labzowsky, & Mitruschenkov, JETP 73, 415 (1991)], D. DeMille, S.B. Cahn, D. Murphree, D.A. Rahmlow, and M.G. Kozlov Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 023003 (2008)]

slide-23
SLIDE 23

FrPNC Collaboration (Fall 2014)

Seth Aubin; College of William and Mary, USA. John A. Behr, Matt R. Pearson, Michael Tandecki; TRIUMF, Canada. Victor V. Flambaum; University of New South Wales, Australia. Eduardo Gómez; Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, México. Gerald Gwinner SPOEKESPERSON Robert Collister, Kyle Shiells Michael Tandecki; University of Manitoba, Canada. Dan Melconian; Texas A&M, USA. Luis A. Orozco, Jiehang Zhang, Michael Kossin; University of Maryland, USA. Gene D. Sprouse; SUNY Stony Brook, USA. Yanting Zhao; Shanxi University, Taijuan, China.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

FrPNC

Commissioned in 2012 the trapping apparatus at TRIUMF. NEXT (December 2014 run): Commission Science chamber: transfer Fr from capture chamber to science chamber. Measure ground state HF splitting directly with microwaves and observe Stark mixing. TO DO list: Measurement of PNC in the hyperfine transition (spin dependent) of the ground state and extract anapole moments of a chain of Fr isotopes. Measure of Optical PNC (spin independent) and extract the weak charge.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Spectroscopy studies of francium

Ideal cold sample of trapped atoms (no Doppler broadening) Quantitative comparisons to ab initio calculations. Energy levels Excited state lifetimes (transition matrix elements) Hyperfine splittings (wavefunctions at the nucleus) Nuclear structure studies with atomic spectroscopy (magnetization).

slide-26
SLIDE 26

8s lifetime comparison with theory

a) Safronova et.al. b) Dzuba et.al. c) Johnson et.al. d) Dzuba et.al. e) Marinescu et.al. f) Theodosiou et.al. g) Biemont et.al. h) Van Wijngaarden et.al.

±0.8%

slide-27
SLIDE 27

HF Anomaly preliminary results

Dashed: Magnetic Radius change equal to Charge Radius change Green: Nuclear Structure Theory Blue and Red: Measurements

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Method

1.- Define handedness of the apparatus by the coordinate system 2.- Create superposition to interfere and enhance PNC signal:

3.- Measure rate of transition through resonance fluorescence. 4.- Change handedness of apparatus 5.- Repeat.

(iERF × BM1⋅ BDC)

Atotal = AM1

PC ± AE1 PNC

Signal ∝ Atotal

+ 2 − Atotal − 2

Rate ∝ Atotal

2

AE1 = 0.01 rad /s

Expected signal with 450 V/m

slide-29
SLIDE 29

M1 Rabi oscillations (50 Hz) with 105 Rb atoms in blue detuned (20 nm) dipole trap. Decoherence time 180 ms. While sitting at 37.5 ms, add a second microwave source with 104 attenuation, change of the phase and see the signal increase and decrease.

Oscillations and sensitivity test

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Number of atoms = N ~ 106 Interaction time = Δτ ~ 0.1s ΩE1 ~ 10 mrad

Signal Noise = 2ΩE1Δt N = 2

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Schematic of the capture assembly

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Fr beam onto Y foil

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Commissioning of Capture: Sep., Dec. 2012

  • Trapped atoms: > 2.5 ×106)
  • Efficiency ~ 0.5%
  • Trap lifetimes ~ 20s
  • Isotopes trapped 206, 207,

209, 213, 221.

  • Radioactive lifetime (τ1/2 =

50.5 s for 209Fr)

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Preparation of Science Chamber, commissioning in Dec 2014 Science Chamber

microwaves/ 506nm light Fr from capture chamber

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Precision tests of the weak interaction in atoms, they measure the weak charge and can give limits on the nucleon nucleon weak couplings. Experiments with trapped and cooled species starting (Fr, Ra+) and proceeding (Yb, Dy, molecules). Many isotopes. FrPNC will benefit from the 108 demonstrated at TRIUMF, FRIB is looking very interesting.

slide-36
SLIDE 36

THANKS!