exploring how student employment afgects the academic and
play

Exploring How Student Employment Afgects the Academic and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Exploring How Student Employment Afgects the Academic and Co-curricular Choices of Sophomores Richard T . Satterlee, Ph.D. Assistant Vice President of Student Development Loyola University Maryland 4501 N. Charles Street Baltimore, MD 21212


  1. Exploring How Student Employment Afgects the Academic and Co-curricular Choices of Sophomores Richard T . Satterlee, Ph.D. Assistant Vice President of Student Development Loyola University Maryland 4501 N. Charles Street Baltimore, MD 21212 (410) 617-5171 rsatter@loyola.edu November 7, 2009 16th National Conference on Students in Transition

  2. Gaps in the Literature on Student Employment • The literature is almost exclusively quantitative and explores the efgect of work on student outcomes based on arbitrarily defjned dichotomous or continuous variables • The literature does not explore students’ reasons and motivations for working and if these vary based on student difgerences (e.g., race, SES, gender) • The literature largely ignores the infmuence of institutional context on student work experiences • The literature has been criticized due it’s failure to explicitly identify theoretical models to guide the research (Riggert et al., 2006) November 7, 2009 16th National Conference on Students in Transition

  3. Theoretical Model Conceptual Model for College Student Employment as “Practice” Habitus Capital ( Taste of (Social/Cultural /Economic) Freedom/Taste of Necessity) Social Class of the Availability of Jobs Majority of Students Field Practice Tuition Policies Academic Policies (Type of Work/Whether to Work/Time on Job) November 7, 2009 16th National Conference on Students in Transition

  4. Research Questions • Overarching Research Question: How do the work choices of working class and middle-/upper-class students who attend one private four-year university refmect Bourdieu’s theory of social reproduction? • Sub-Questions: 1. What work choices do working class and middle-/upper-class students make and why do they make these choices? (e.g., whether or not to work; how many hours to work; on-campus vs. ofg-campus employment) 2. T o what extent do students’ work choices vary by class? November 7, 2009 16th National Conference on Students in Transition

  5. Research Questions • Sub-Questions: 3. How do the work choices of working class and middle-/upper-class students shape their academic and co-curricular choices? 4. How do the academic and co-curricular choices of working class and middle- class/upper-class students shape their work choices? 5. T o what extent do these patterns of relationships vary by class? November 7, 2009 16th National Conference on Students in Transition

  6. Research Questions • Sub-Questions: 6. How are the work choices of working class, middle-class and upper-class students infmuenced by institutional characteristics, policies, and practices? (e.g., tuition policies, academic requirements, social class of the majority of the student body, availability of jobs) November 7, 2009 16th National Conference on Students in Transition

  7. Methodology • Case Study (Cross-case analysis) – This study closely followed Yin’s (2003) classifjcation of a single case with multiple, embedded units of analysis – The case under investigation is the phenomenon of student employment at St. Luke’s College. The units of analysis for the study were students from difgerent social class groups (working class vs. middle-/upper-class) and administrators and student employers who were identifjed as informed experts • Case selection – St. Luke’s has high tuition and traditionally has had a conservative tuition strategy – St. Luke’s has a high percentage of upper- income students and “full payers.” For this reason the institution provided a dramatic contrast between the experience of working class and middle- and upper-class students – The cohort under investigation (Class of 2010) was the last class admitted before the institution began to meet full need for all students. November 7, 2009 16th National Conference on Students in Transition

  8. Methodology • Data sources: – Analysis of institutional level survey data (2006 CIRP and 2007 NSSE) – Interviews with sophomores • 12 second-year students (6 males/6 females) from working class backgrounds; 6 second-year students (3 males/3 females) from middle-class backgrounds; 6 second-year students (3 males/3 females) from upper-class backgrounds – Interviews with college administrators • Vice President for Enrollment Management • Director of Financial Aid • Dean of Academic Services • Dean of International Programs • Assistant Director of Residence Life • Director of Event Services November 7, 2009 16th National Conference on Students in Transition

  9. Subject Selection Student Father's Education Mother's Education Father's Occupation Mother's Occupation Social Class Maura Some College High School Grad. Comm. Waterman (25.61) Homemaker Working Class Job Coordinator (hardware) Sarah Some High School Potsecondary other than college Factory Worker (21.23) Working Class (26.59) Sukeina Some College High School Grad. Unemployed Insurance Agent (41.02) Working Class Sydney High School Grad. High School Grad. Factory Worker (21.23) Secretary (30.01) Working Class Alicia High School Grad. High School Grad. Butcher (21.63) Mobile Park Manager (33.91) Working Class Brooke High School Grad. High School Grad. Owner Printing Bus. (39.33) Owner Advertising Bus. (36.84) Working Class Home Attendant (elderly) Lou Some High School Grammar School or less Custodial Engineer (28.49) Working Class (25.98) Luis High School Grad. High School Grad. T ech Support (43.94) Homemaker Working Class David High School Grad. High School Grad. Fire Fighter (37.40) Maid (13.84) Working Class Carlos Some High School Associates Degree Cook (15.80) T eacher's Aid (30.06) Working Class T aylor High School Grad. High School Grad. Unknown Bus Matron (19.29) Working Class Paul High School Grad. High School Grad. Unknown Disabled Working Class Postsecondary other than Emma Potsecondary other than college Pool Business (44.57) Unemployed (Nurse) Middle-Class college Katy College Degree High School Grad. CPA (63.44) Elementary Para. Prof. (30.06) Middle-Class Claire High School Grad. College Degree Building Inspector (32.74) Artist (45.11) Middle-Class Alex Graduate Degree College Degree Minister (38.54) T eacher's Aid (30.06) Middle-Class Chris College Degree High School Grad. Manager T yco Elec. (46.10) Religious ed teacher (42.90) Middle-Class Red Some Grad School High School Grad. Risk Analyst (55.63) Pulminary T echnician (36.01) Middle-Class Anna College Degree College Degree Hotel Manager (55.18) Homemaker Upper-Class Karen College Degree College Degree Treasurer-Credit Union (54.01) Registered Nurse (63.57) Upper-Class Rebecca Graduate Degree Graduate Degree State Investigator (46.08) Business Executive (55.85) Upper-Class Gareth Graduate Degree Graduate Degree CPA (63.44) HR Professional (46.03) Upper-Class Nick College Degree Graduate Degree Stock Broker (59.51) Salesperson (43.47) Upper-Class Manny Graduate Degree Some College Physician (74.72) Registered Nurse (63.57) Upper-Class November 7, 2009 16th National Conference on Students in Transition

  10. Findings: Students’ Work, Academic and Co-curricular Choices by Class Student Class Job On-Campus Off-campus Hours Major Abroad Maura Working Class Desk Assistant (Residence Hall) Primate Keeper (Zoo) 16-20 Bio-Psych No Flower/Gift Clerk;Retail Sarah Working Class Office Assistant (Career Center) 16-20 Math No Clerk;Babysitting Sukeina Working Class Service Coordinator (CCSJ);Teach for America Coor. Food Expiditor (Red Robin) 31-35 Psychology No Sydney Working Class Event Staff 11-15 Political Science No Alicia Working Class RA:Office Assistant (Provost Office);Yearbook Editor 36 + Communications No Communications Rome Brooke Working Class RA; Office Assistant (Intramurals) Babysitting 11-15 Psychology Bangkok Lou Working Class RA; Building Supervisor (Rec. Center) 11-15 Biology No Luis Working Class Lab Assistant (Biology Dept.) 911 CAD Support 16-20 Communications No David Working Class RA; Lifeguard (Rec. Center) 16-20 Theology No Carlos Working Class Men's Baseball Manager 11-15 Sociology No Taylor Working Class Desk Assistant (Residence Hall) 6-10 Business No Paul Working Class Office Assistant (Admissions) Sales Associate (Gap Inc.) 26-30 Business Lueven Emma Middle-Class Office Assistant (Residence Life) 11-15 Katy Middle-Class Event Staff 21-25 Business Beijing Claire Middle-Class Waitress 21-25 Communications No Alex Middle-Class Event Staff 16-20 English Aukland Chris Middle-Class RA; Office Assistant (Campus Ministries) 11-15 Secondary Ed. Transferring Red Middle-Class RA Sales Associate at GNC 26-30 Business New Castle Cashier/Bed Runner (Tanning Anna Upper-Class 16-20 Business Paris Salon) Karen Upper-Class Waitress 21-25 Communications Lueven Education Melbourne Rebecca Upper-Class RA 11-15 Business Melbourne Gareth Upper-Class RA; Alpha Aid 11-15 Business No Nick Upper-Class Event Staff 6-10 Manny Upper-Class RA; Intramural Staff 11-15 Biology No November 7, 2009 16th National Conference on Students in Transition

  11. Findings Work Choices: • Working class students were more likely to work more hours and to combine on- campus and ofg-campus employment than their middle- and upper-class peers (RQ 1 & 2) November 7, 2009 16th National Conference on Students in Transition

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend