EPP 2009
HIV epidemic trends in the ART era Low level & concentrated epidemics
UNAIDS/WHO Working Group
- n Global HIV/AIDS & STI Surveillance
EPP 2009 HIV epidemic trends in the ART era Low level & - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
EPP 2009 HIV epidemic trends in the ART era Low level & concentrated epidemics UNAIDS/WHO Working Group on Global HIV/AIDS & STI Surveillance UNAIDS Estimation & Projection Package 2009 Objectives Build models of national
2009 en 2
2009 en 3
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 1 9 8 1 9 8 5 1 9 9 1 9 9 5 2 2 5 2 1 2 1 5 2 2
% HIV+
2009 en 4
2009 en 5
2009 en 6
2009 en 7
2009 en 8
– Must choose either generalized or concentrated
– What sub-epidemics and sub-populations are important in your country
– Size & demographics – Turnover and duration in group
2009 en 9
2009 en 10
Each “tab” represents a step in the process
Note new larger interface – more data shown, bigger graphs
New workbook trend fitting
2009 en 11
2009 en 12
Push here to save your data
move to next step
2009 en 13
2009 en 14
Moves on without changes to your file – yellow means review Select review mode here
2009 en 15
2009 en 16
New feature – MSW group New concentrated template Color coding – Blue – fit is done Magenta – not yet fit
2009 en 17
2009 en 18
2009 en 19
Turnover related controls Setting the populations
2009 en 20
Clients of sex workers (1000 men with 5 yr duration)
2009 en 21
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 1 9 8 1 9 8 3 1 9 8 6 1 9 8 9 1 9 9 2 1 9 9 5 1 9 9 8 2 1 2 4 2 7 No turnover Dur 10 yrs Data
2009 en 22
Living Thai ex-IDUs with 10 year duration
5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 1 9 8 1 9 8 3 1 9 8 6 1 9 8 9 1 9 9 2 1 9 9 5 1 9 9 8 2 1 2 4 2 7 10 yr duration
At peak this is 5.4% of adult male prevalence
Turnover is extremely important in countries with long-standing epidemics – much of the prevalence will now be outside at-risk pops
2009 en 23
Duration – time spent in the group Where to assign prevalence after they leave the group – and how to do it
2009 en 24
– e.g., HIV+ ex-sex workers, HIV+ ex-clients or HIV+ ex-IDUs
– e.g., ex-sex workers showing up in antenatal clinic data
– e.g., ex-IDUs may be missed because of limited male surveillance
2009 en 25
2009 en 26
– The HIV+ former at-risk group members are added to the HIV+ members of the target population – This means they have NOT been captured in surveillance there
– Some of the HIV+’s in the target population are assumed to come from the former at-risk group members – The remaining infections that occurred “within group” are calculated
2009 en 27
Why do we use “replace prevalence” here? Lower-risk women usually set by fitting ANC data, which includes ex-sex workers
2009 en 28
Why do we use “add prevalence” here? Lower-risk men are not captured in surveillance populations, so we can use this to accumulate their HIV prevalence and it’s contribution
2009 en 29
2009 en 30
2009 en 31
2009 en 32
Data is entered by sites for each sub-pop For each site give HIV prevalence & sample size
2009 en 33
– Remove outliers – Eliminate extremely small sample sizes – Decide your “site” structure – Consider how representative and consistent data is
– Remember we’re looking for trends – repeated measures of the same type in comparable populations
2009 en 34
Enters number
line ART nationally Divides that ART among the sub-populations
2009 en 35
2009 en 36
Without ART With ART
2009 en 37
Entrants by “birth” at age 15 Not at-risk population Uninfected at-risk population Infected at-risk population
E - Newly
eligible for ART Death
L1
First-line ART
U
Untreated
L2
Second-line ART Number gated by access slots. All untreated + newly eligible have equal chance Death
2009 en 38
– Default 0.86 (based on review of survival in cohorts [Lewden et al] and lost to FU [Brinkhof et al: 40% mortality overall; 47% mortality at public ART centers in sub-Saharan Africa]) – As countries increase early access, first year survival can increase (up to about .90?)
– Number nationally on 1st line, 2nd line ART + totals
– Prevalence impact depends on treatment numbers – We recognize it may be challenging to gather
2009 en 39
2009 en 40
2009 en 41
Fill in the two sets of cells indicated Click on “Project ART”
2009 en 42
Select the year in which to start projection Click OK Numbers are filled in
2009 en 43
2009 en 44
Can enter up to 3 surveys for each sub-pop
2009 en 45
you can calibrate to them later
– Consider how representative they are – Look at geographic origins and patterns of prevalence – Develop adjusted “national” value if necessary
– Consider effect of non-response on HIV prevalence: use adjusted HIV prevalence correcting for the effect of non-response – Consider the extent to which they capture at-risk populations and adjust for this before entering the value
2009 en 46