EPP 2007 EPP 2007
Working with concentrated epidemics new features and approaches
UNAIDS/WHO Working Group
- n Global HIV/AIDS & STI Surveillance
EPP 2007 EPP 2007 Working with concentrated epidemics new features - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
EPP 2007 EPP 2007 Working with concentrated epidemics new features and approaches UNAIDS/WHO Working Group on Global HIV/AIDS & STI Surveillance UNAIDS Estimation & Projection UNAIDS Estimation & Projection Package 2007 (EPP
2007 en 2
2007 en 3
– r – controlling the rate of growth – f0 – the proportion of new risk pop entrants – t0 – the start year of the epidemic – φ – behavior change parameter
– d – average time in group (duration)
2007 en 4
10 20 30 40 50
% HIV+
2007 en 5
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 1 9 8 1 9 8 5 1 9 9 1 9 9 5 2 2 5 2 1 2 1 5 2 2
% HIV+
2007 en 6
2007 en 7
2007 en 8
The tabs at the top take you through these steps
2007 en 11
Clients of sex workers (1000 men with 5 yr duration)
2007 en 12
You determine if turnover is on or off & enter duration in the group
2007 en 13
You adjust curves up or down (calibration) You determine what happens to people who leave the group if there is turnover
2007 en 14
– Many HIV+ ex-members of at-risk populations, e.g., HIV+ ex- sex workers or HIV+ ex-IDUs
– e.g., ex-sex workers showing up in antenatal clinic data
– e.g., ex-IDUs may be missed because of limited male surveillance
2007 en 15
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 1 9 8 1 9 8 3 1 9 8 6 1 9 8 9 1 9 9 2 1 9 9 5 1 9 9 8 2 1 2 4 2 7 No turnover Dur 10 yrs Data
2007 en 16
5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 10 yr duration
At peak this is 5.4% of adult male prevalence
2007 en 17
2007 en 18
– The HIV+ former at-risk group members are added to the HIV+ members of the target population – This means they have NOT been captured in surveillance there
– Some of the HIV+’s in the target population are assumed to come from the former at-risk group members – The remaining infections that occurred “within group” are calculated
2007 en 19
2007 en 20
2007 en 21
2007 en 23
– Bayesian melding
– Fuller exploration of possible solutions for r, f0, phi and t0 – Speed improvements
– Including adjustments for multiple national surveys
2007 en 24
2007 en 25
2007 en 26
2007 en 27
New button Adjust sliders
2007 en 28
2007 en 30
2007 en 31
Source: Adrian Raftery
32
33
2007 en 34
Botswana through 2003 – 50,000 curves tried
8 curves
2007 en 35
Senegal urban through 2003 – 50,000 curves tried
240 curves
36
37
38
2007 en 39
– We don’t know how to estimate uncertainty here yet
– Geographically – Access to populations is more limited (FSW, IDU, MSM, etc.) – Data often not representative – convenience samples
2007 en 40
2007 en 41
New button “Make initial guesses”
42
2007 en 43
Curve generation What to do with results
Possible curves display
Display controls Advanced
Start, Stop, and Status
2007 en 44
– Generally should accept the defaults – The more curves you generate, the better an initial guess you get
– Saves the guesses in a file (*.bm2 under eppproj/resample_results) – If not, hit “Keep current EPP fit” and you’ll be prompted to save the results for future reference
2007 en 45
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 1 9 8 1 9 8 5 1 9 9 1 9 9 5 2 2 5 2 1 2 1 5 2 2
% HIV+
High weight – fits the data closely
2007 en 46
Best fit found among curves created Other curves giving possible fits to the data
2007 en 47
Wide spread means many curves are possible fits to data
2007 en 48
Your result is transferred back to EPP, then click “Save and continue”
2007 en 49
You can keep this window
typing the r, f0, t0 and phi values into the Projection Page Count give an idea of the relative closeness in fitting the data. High count means a closer fit
2007 en 50
2007 en 51
– Values of r, f0, phi and t0 for those curves
– For example in preceding slide, more phi’s were generated around +100
2007 en 52
2007 en 53
2007 en 54
2007 en 55
2007 en 56
– Prev < 1% in 1985 will eliminate these
caution or you can eliminate valid curves
2007 en 57
(and documented in the EPP 2007 presentation handed out)
– Press the “Use best fit in EPP” – Click on “Show best” and enter the values for r, f0, t0 and phi you like on the Projection Page
– This is important – DON’T FORGET IT!!! (you’ll lose results)
2007 en 58
– Pushing “Output results” – On that display, pushing “Write Spectrum File” – This generates a *.spt file in the eppout directory
59
2007 en 60
Developed by Adrian Developed by Adrian Raftery Raftery & Leontine Alkema for EPP & Leontine Alkema for EPP
– Select a lot of (r, f0, phi and t0) values
– Calculate “goodness” of fit and assign a weight – Likelihood function is used as a weight on the curve – High likelihood means a curve is a good fit and gets a high weight
calculated
– But, resample according to the weight assigned – The curves that fit better get picked more often
2007 en 61
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 1 9 8 1 9 8 5 1 9 9 1 9 9 5 2 2 5 2 1 2 1 5 2 2
% HIV+
High weight – fits the data closely
2007 en 62
With 3000 resamples, only 6 high likelihood curves get selected
Zimbabwe urban data
2007 en 63
Botswana with 200,000 curves, resampling gives 46 unique ones
95% of resampled curves fall between two dashed lines
2007 en 64
Zimbabwe urban 200,000 curves, gives 55 unique ones
2007 en 65
Senegal urban 50 curves, gives 240 unique ones
2007 en 66
Botswana urban surveillance data through 2002
2007 en 67
Botswana urban using only data through 1995 – data still rising
2007 en 68
Botswana urban using only data through 2000 – points starting to level off
2007 en 69
Botswana urban using all data through 2002 – data has leveled off
2007 en 70
– Open a new generalized workset
– Define the sub-populations in your epidemic
– Enter the demographics
– Enter the HIV data for each
– Enter your calibrations (Calibrate page)
71
2007 en 72
2007 en 73
2007 en 74
2007 en 75
New button “Assess uncertainty”
76
2007 en 77
Results display
Display controls Curve generation Advanced
Start, Stop, and Status What to do with results
2007 en 78
– Generally should accept the defaults – For final national projections, probably want 200,000 initial curves
– Saves the uncertainty in a file (*.bm2 under eppproj/resample_results) – If not, hit “Keep current EPP fit” and you’ll be prompted to save the results for future reference
– This will not affect your uncertainty results
79
2007 en 80
Zimbabwe 200,000 Zimbabwe 1,000,000
2007 en 81
Parameters
curve found in sample Graph with: Surveillance data Unique curves (light gray) Bounds (dashed lines) Best curve (UA fit - red) Mean (blue) Median (black)
UA fit UA fit – – the curve with best fit to the available data of those sampled the curve with best fit to the available data of those sampled
2007 en 82
– Presented by site so you can see site trends
– “best fit” for us
– 95% confidence bounds (95% of curves fall between the dashed lines)
– Year by year, the mean & median of all resampled curves
2007 en 83
Red diamond is the survey value Black dotted lines – uncalibrated bounds Blue dotted lines – calibrated bounds
2007 en 84
2007 en 85
New button “Show uncertainty” Gives national uncertainty combining all the local uncertainty
2007 en 86
2007 en 87
2007 en 88
– This is important – DON’T FORGET IT!!! (you’ll lose results)
2007 en 89
– Pushing “Output results” – On that display, pushing “Write Spectrum File” – This generates a *.spt file in the eppout directory
national uncertainty results
– Pushing “Save Spectrum uncertainty file” on the National Uncertainty Results page – This generates a *.spu file in the eppout directory
2007 en 90