Employee Advancement System Bo a rd o f E duc a tio n Me e ting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

employee advancement system bo a rd o f e duc a tio n me
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Employee Advancement System Bo a rd o f E duc a tio n Me e ting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Employee Advancement System Bo a rd o f E duc a tio n Me e ting De c e mb e r 10, 2013 Vision of Excel Attract Retain Leverage a high-potential a high-performing expertise for continuous workforce workforce improvement in


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Employee Advancement System

Bo a rd o f E duc a tio n Me e ting De c e mb e r 10, 2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Vision of Excel

Attract

a high-potential workforce

Retain

a high-performing workforce

Leverage

expertise for continuous improvement in district-wide employee effectiveness

Align

a high-performing workforce to support district strategies and performance goals Compensate a high-performing workforce in a

Fiscally Sustainable

way

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Performance Advancement Cycle

Defining Effectiveness

  • Operationalizing the

“Marietta Difference”

  • Updating / Rewriting

Job Descriptions

Aligning Performance

  • Competency Def. &

Align.

  • Duties & Resp. Def.

Rewarding Effectiveness

  • Expanded Roles Comp.
  • Other forms of Recog.

Teacher Keys Effectiveness System (TKES) Teacher Keys Effectiveness System (TKES) ERS Compensation Redesign

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Employee Advancement System for Teachers

Yearly Effectiveness Raise Professional Pathways (Roles) Advanced Degree - Tuition Reimbursement

Ongoing Professional Development

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Phase I – FY14 Phase II – FY15 Phase III – FY16

  • Research and planning, job

descriptions of new roles,

  • utreach initiatives, seed

funding, implementation of new evaluation system (TKES), BOE approval

  • Pilot new teacher roles,

recalibration of pay for advanced degrees, continued research on effectiveness pay

  • Potential full

implementation

Timeline

EXCEL Presentation to Board Phase II of Teacher Compensation (December 2013) ERS Formal Engagement (April - September) Phase I: Explore Leadership and Other Certified (Non-Teaching) Staff Compensation Redesign (FY14) Phase II: Present Final Leadership and Other Certified Staff Compensation Redesign to Board of Education (FY15) Phase III: Implement Leadership and Other Certified Staff Compensation Plan (FY16)

Phased-In Approach for Teacher Compensation Redesign

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • Phase II-

Pilot Enhanced Teacher Roles

  • Ne w (E

nha nc e d) T e a c he r Ro le s

  • Purpo se : I

nc re a se c a re e r la dde r, pro fe ssio na l pa thwa y o ppo rtunitie s fo r te a c he rs

  • Go a l: Attra c t a nd re ta in hig hly e ffe c tive te a c he rs to ultima te ly inc re a se

stude nt a c hie ve me nt

  • Pre se nte d b y Ma rtha Gre e nwa y o f Gre e nwa y Stra te g y Ma na g e me nt

FY15 EXCEL PROFESSIONAL TEACHER PATHWAYS*

New Enhanced Roles Continuation of Current Roles School-Based Positions District-Level Positions

  • PLC Leader
  • Extended Learning

Program Leader

  • New Teacher

Mentor

  • Dept. Heads
  • Team Leaders
  • RtI Coordinator
  • 504 Coordinator
  • School Improve.

Spec.

  • Interventionist
  • IB Coordinator
  • Instructional

Coach

  • SPED Lead

Teacher

  • Literacy Int.

Specialist

*The evaluation and expansion of Excel Teacher Pathways will be an ongoing process to enhance MCS value proposition.

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Phase II-

Tuition Reimbursement

  • T

ra nsitio n to T uitio n Re imb urse me nt

  • Purpo se : Pro vide o ppo rtunitie s fo r te a c he rs to e a rn a dva nc e d de g re e s
  • Go a l: I

nc re a se te a c he r e ffe c tive ne ss in a ma nne r tha t is a lig ne d with distric t g o a ls a nd re se a rc h; a ttra c t a nd re ta in hig hly e ffe c tive te a c he rs

  • Pre se nte d b y Alliso n Mc Ma ho n, MCS Huma n Re so urc e s Dire c to r

Illustr ation of T uition Re imbur se me nt

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Budget Illustration Teacher Salaries

all figures in millions

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 Revenues State Salary Revenue $17.2 $17.9 $18.3 $18.8 $18.9 $19.2 State Benefits Revenue $8.4 $8.6 $9.2 $9.9 $10.6 $11.3 Federal Revenue $0.7 $0.8 $0.8 $0.8 $0.8 $0.8 Total Revenues $25.6 $26.6 $27.5 $28.6 $29.5 $30.5 Projected Expenditures Starting Salary $20.6 $21.5 $22.1 $22.6 $22.8 $23.0 Benefits %

40% 42% 44% 46% 49% 51%

Benefits $12.38 $13.63 $14.88 $16.22 $17.01 $18.04 Total Effectiveness Pay & Legacy Experience Pay $6.3 $6.0 $6.1 $6.2 $6.2 $6.3 Effectiveness Steps (Included in above) $0.0 $0.0 $0.3 $0.4 $0.4 $0.4 Tuition Reimbursement & Legacy Education Pay $4.1 $4.4 $4.4 $4.4 $4.0 $3.7 Tuition Reimbursement (Included in above) $0.0 $0.3 $0.6 $0.9 $0.9 $0.9 Additional Roles $0.00 $0.25 $0.35 $0.60 $0.70 $1.00 Marietta Difference $3.2 $3.5 $3.7 $3.9 $4.1 $4.2 Total Expenditures $46.5 $49.3 $51.4 $53.9 $54.8 $56.3 Total Expenditures (Local Contribution) $20.9 $22.7 $23.9 $25.3 $25.3 $25.8 Total MCS Spending on Experience, Effectiveness, & Education

$10.4 $10.4 $10.4 $10.6 $10.2 $10.0

Total State/Federal Revenue for Experience, Effectiveness, & Education

$6.9 $7.2 $7.3 $7.4 $7.4 $7.5

MCS Exp. & Ed. Budget Gap betw state & local funding

($3.5) ($3.2) ($3.1) ($3.2) ($2.8) ($2.5)

Current System MCS Exp. & Ed. Budget Gap betw state & local funding

($3.5) ($3.6) ($3.6) ($3.7) ($3.8) ($3.9)

ASSUMPTIONS: Increase in teachers of 1% per year. Roles and responsibilities start in FY15 at $250k, FY16 $350k, FY17 $600k, FY18 $700k, FY19 $1M. Marietta difference is increasing with increased number of teachers. Effectiveness steps begin FY16 per amounts in ERS model by quintile. Tuition reimbursement begins FY15.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

PROJECTED ENROLLMENT (FTE) 8613 9,098 9,098 9,098 9,280 9,466 REVENUES FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

LOCAL TAX REVENUE (advalorem and excise taxes, intangible taxes, RETT, net of collection fee to the City)

44,282,091 43,790,438 44,763,908 45,885,168 47,122,208 48,402,662

NET QBE REVENUE FROM STATE (net of QBE earnings, local fair share and austerity)

34,451,450 35,484,994 36,549,543 37,646,030 39,151,871 40,717,946

OTHER REVENUE (State grant revenue, miscellaneous local revenue)

1,790,000 1,490,000 1,494,470 1,501,942 1,509,452 1,524,547

FEDERAL REVENUE (Erate)

375,740 380,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000

PROJECTED TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUES

80,899,281 81,145,431 83,157,921 85,383,140 88,133,531 90,995,154 EXPENDITURES 81,293,088 82,008,762 84,469,025 87,003,095 89,613,188 92,301,584 PROJECTED DEFICIT (393,807) (863,331) (1,311,104) (1,619,955) (1,479,657) (1,306,430)

Budget Illustration 5-Year Projection

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Budget Considerations

  • Distric t b udg e ting is a c o mple x pro c e ss influe nc e d b y a

numb e r o f va ria b le s:

  • F

luc tua tio ns in e c o no my

  • L
  • c a l ta x dig e st
  • Cha ng e s in c ity de mo g ra phic s a nd re de ve lo pme nt
  • De c re a se in milla g e ra te (F

Y15)

  • Pro pe rty va lua tio ns
  • Sta te funding
  • F

e de ra l funding

  • Due to the se va ria b le s, we must c o ntinue to upda te o ur

b udg e t o utlo o k b a se d upo n ne w info rma tio n a s the da ta b e c o me s a va ila b le .

  • T

he MCS BOE ha s e xpe rie nc e d sig nific a nt suc c e ss due to the imple me nta tio n o f c a utio us fisc a l a ppro a c h; we will c o ntinue do wn this pa th.