Educational Equity Audit for the School District of Palm Beach - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

educational equity audit for the school district of palm
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Educational Equity Audit for the School District of Palm Beach - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Educational Equity Audit for the School District of Palm Beach County: First Interim Report Metropolitan Center for Research on Equity and the Transformation of Schools Roey Ahram, PhD | Director of Evaluation Maddy Boesen, MA | Research


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Educational Equity Audit for the School District of Palm Beach County: First Interim Report

Metropolitan Center for Research on Equity and the Transformation of Schools Roey Ahram, PhD | Director of Evaluation Maddy Boesen, MA | Research Associate July 29, 2015

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda:

  • Background
  • Students
  • Teachers and Administrators
  • Adult Education
  • Next Steps
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Background

  • Metro Center
  • Equity Report Project
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Mission:

Target issues related to educational equity by providing leadership and support to students, parents, teachers, administrators, and policy makers. About Metro Center

  • Educational research, policy, and practice
  • Partner and resource at local an national

levels toward improving access, opportunity, and quality of education Equity Audit: First Interim Report

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Equity Audit: First Interim Report

5

About the Equity Audit

  • Project work began in 2015
  • Identify inequities within the School District of Palm Beach County (SDPBC)
  • Identify the causes of identified inequities
  • Provide solutions to address identified inequities
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Equity Audit: First Interim Report

6

About the First Interim Report

  • Overview of the 2013-2014 school year

quantitative data provided by SDPBC to Metro Center

  • Examines:
  • Student achievement and discipline data
  • School programming and student placement
  • School and district staff human resources data
  • Adult education student data
  • About 179,000 students
  • About 1,500 teachers and administrators
  • Answers “what,” not “why”
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Findings on Student Academic Achievement and Opportunities

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Equity Audit: First Interim Report

Boykin, A. W., & Noguera, P. (2011). Creating the opportunity to learn: Moving from research to practice to close the achievement gap. Washington, DC: ASCD. Holzman, M., Jackson, J., & Beaudry, A. (2012). The urgency of now: The Schott 50 state report on public education and black males. The Schott Foundation. Jencks, C., & Phillips, M. (1998). The black-white test score gap. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics

National Research on Student Equity Issues:

  • “Achievement gaps” identified among different student groups:
  • Black and Hispanic students compared to White students
  • Black and Hispanic boys compared to their peer groups
  • Students from low-income backgrounds compared to their peer groups
  • English Language Learners compared to English-proficient peers
  • Gap areas:
  • High school graduation and college enrollment
  • Gifted and advanced course enrollment
  • Exam scores
  • Discipline referrals and suspension rates
  • Drop out
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Equity Audit: First Interim Report

Barton, P. E., & Coley, R. J. (2009). Parsing the achievement gap II: Policy information Report. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Barton, P. E., & Coley, R. J. (2010). The black-white achievement gap: When progress stopped. Policy information report. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

National Research on Student Equity Issues:

  • Equitable policies can improve achievement gaps:
  • Head Start
  • TRIO Programs
  • Pell Grants
  • Other policies that address out-of-school factors such as poverty
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Student Academic Achievement

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Equity Audit: First Interim Report

Academic Achievement: Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT)

  • Attainment of Level 3 (passing) scores in Math:
  • No differences based on gender
  • White and Asian students scored higher than their Black, Hispanic, and Multiracial peers
  • Students from low-income backgrounds scored lower
  • English Language Learners scored lower
  • Attainment of Level 3 (passing) scores in Reading:
  • Girls had higher scores than boys
  • White and Asian students scored higher than their Black, Hispanic, and Multiracial peers
  • Students from low-income backgrounds scored lower
  • English Language Learners scored lower
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Equity Audit: First Interim Report Grades 3-10 Student Attainment of Passing FCAT Developmental Scale Scores in the School District of Palm Beach County, 2014

Category Reading Mathematics All Students 55.2 61.6 Gender Female 56.6 48.7a Male 53.9 48.6a Race Ethnicity Asian 65.9b 72.2c Black 45.3 54.4 Hispanic 50.0 57.2 Multiracial 62.3 65.1 White 66.1b 69.5c School Type Elementary 44.0 42.3 Middle 31.3

  • High

98.3 100.0 Alternative 65.0 96.7 National School Lunch Program (Poverty) Eligible 46.9 54.9 Not Eligible 69.0 72.5 English Language Learner Status ELL 40.7 47.8 Not ELL 57.0 63.6

a Female and male students’ Mathematics attainment of Level 3 were not statistically different. b Asian and White students’ attainment of Level 3 were not statistically different for Reading exams. c Asian and White students’ attainment of Level 3 were not statistically different for Mathematics exams.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Equity Audit: First Interim Report

Academic Achievement: SAT and ACT Scores

  • SAT Scores:
  • Girls scored higher in Reading a Writing
  • Boys scored higher in math
  • White and Asian students scored higher than their Black, Hispanic, and Multiracial peers
  • Students from low-income backgrounds scored lower
  • English Language Learners scored lower
  • ACT Scores:
  • No differences based on gender for composite scores
  • White and Asian students scored higher than their Black, Hispanic, and Multiracial peers
  • Students from low-income backgrounds scored lower
  • English Language Learners scored lower
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Equity Audit: First Interim Report Mean SAT Scores in the School District of Palm Beach County, 2014

Category Math Reading Writing All Students 461 461 446 Gender Female 452 465 458 Male 472 457 433 Race Ethnicity Asian 540 ⱡ* 509 ⱡ*a 494 ⱡ* Black 391 394 381 Hispanic 447 446 433 Multiracial 488 ⱡ 492 ⱡ 475 ⱡ White 509 ⱡ 509 ⱡ*a 493 ⱡ* National School Lunch Program (Poverty) Eligible 418 416 403 Not Eligible 507 ⱡ 506 ⱡ* 492 ⱡ English Language Learner Status ELL 331 297 287 Not ELL 470 470 456

ⱡ Indicates a mean score at or above the mean score among Florida test takers. *Indicates a mean score at or above the 50th percentile for college-bound seniors. Note that reported mean scores represent all district test takers, not just college-bound seniors. Percentile indications are for illustrative purposes only.

a Asian and White students’ scores were not statistically different for Reading exams.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Equity Audit: First Interim Report

Category Math Reading English and Writing Science Composite All Students 19.5 ⱡ 20.5 ⱡ 13.4 19.0 ⱡ 19.2 ⱡ Gender Female 19.2 ⱡ 20.6 ⱡ 13.9 18.9 ⱡ 19.2 ⱡ d Male 19.9 ⱡ * 20.3 ⱡ 12.7 19.2 ⱡ 19.2 ⱡ d Race Ethnicity Asian 23.3 ⱡ * 22.5 ⱡ a 17.8 b 22.2 ⱡ c 22.2 ⱡ e Black 16.7 17.7 8.6 15.9 16.0 Hispanic 18.7 ⱡ 19.5 ⱡ 12.4 18.3 18.3 ⱡ Multiracial 20.6 ⱡ * 22.0 ⱡ a 15.2 19.9 ⱡ 20.6 ⱡ White 22.4 ⱡ * 23.6 ⱡ 18.3 ⱡ b 22.2 ⱡ c 22.6 ⱡ e National School Lunch Program (Poverty) Eligible 17.7 ⱡ 18.6 11.0 17.1 17.1 Not Eligible 22.3 ⱡ * 23.4 ⱡ 18.0 ⱡ 22.1 ⱡ 22.4 ⱡ English Language Learner Status ELL 15.9 15.5 4.7 14.9 14.2 Not ELL 20.2 ⱡ * 21.3 ⱡ 15.0 19.8 ⱡ 20.0 ⱡ

*Indicates a mean score approximately at or above the 50th percentile among test takers nationally. ⱡ Indicates a mean score approximately at or above the 50th percentile among test takers in Florida.

a Asian and Multiracial students’ scores were not statistically different for Reading exams. b Asian and White students’ scores were not statistically different for combined English and Writing exams. c Asian and White students’ scores were not statistically different for Science and Reasoning exams. d There were no significant gender differences for composite scores. e Asian and White students’ composite scores were not statistically different.

Mean ACT Scores in the School District of Palm Beach County, 2014

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Equity Audit: First Interim Report

Academic Achievement: End of Course Exam Scores

  • Differences:
  • Some score differences based on gender
  • White and Asian students scored higher than their Black, Hispanic, and Multiracial peers
  • Students from low-income backgrounds scored lower
  • English Language Learners scored lower
  • Mean scores for Black students was below passing level for all exams
  • Mean scores for English Language Learners was below passing level for all exams
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Equity Audit: First Interim Report Mean EOC Scores in the School District of Palm Beach County, 2014

Category Algebra Geometry Biology U.S. History All Students 405.2 405.5 404.7 406.6 Gender Female 408.3 406.7 404.8a 404.1 Male 402.4 404.4 404.5a 409.1 Race Ethnicity Asian 428.5 427.7 422.2 418.2 a Black 395.8 ⱡ 389.8 ⱡ 390.6 ⱡ 392.2 ⱡ Hispanic 402.0 402.7 401.0 403.9 Multiracial 408.5 408.9 411.3 413.2 White 416.1 417.1 417.0 418.8 a National School Lunch Program (Poverty) Eligible 399.9 397.7 397.2 398.5 Not Eligible 418.2 417.9 417.2 418.9 English Language Learner Status ELL 385.9 ⱡ 374.6 ⱡ 368.1 ⱡ 368.8 ⱡ Not ELL 408.6 408.7 408.5 410.7

ⱡ Indicates a mean score below the FLDOE level for passing.

a There were not significant gender differences for Biology exam scores.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Student ESE Classifications, Retention, and Alternative Education

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Equity Audit: First Interim Report

Exceptional Student Education (ESE) Classifications

  • 15.7 percent of students overall
  • Highest proportions in elementary schools,

followed by middle and high schools

  • Differences:
  • Higher proportion of boys than girls
  • Asian, Multiracial and White

students less likely than their Black and Hispanic peers

  • Higher proportions of students from

low-income backgrounds

  • Lower proportions of English

Language Learners

Category Percent All Students 15.7 Gender Female 10.6 Male 20.5 Race Ethnicity Asian 8.5 Black 17.7 Hispanic 16.2 Multiracial 14.0a White 14.3a School Level Elementary 16.8 Middle 15.0 High 12.4 National School Lunch Program (Poverty) Eligible 17.8 Not Eligible 12.1 English Language Learner Status ELL 12.0 Not ELL 16.1

a Percentages of White and Multiracial students with

ESE classifications were not significantly different.

Percentage of Special Education Students in the School District of Palm Beach County, 2014

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Equity Audit: First Interim Report

Student Retention

  • 3.2 percent of students overall
  • Highest proportions in high schools,

followed by elementary and middle schools

  • Differences:
  • Higher proportion of boys than girls
  • Asian, Multiracial and White

students less likely than their Black and Hispanic peers

  • Higher proportions of students from

low-income backgrounds

  • Lower proportions of English

Language Learners Percentage of Retained Students in the School District of Palm Beach County, 2014

Category Retained All Students 3.2 Gender Female 2.3 Male 4.0 Race Ethnicity Asian 1.0 Black 4.3 Hispanic 3.4 Multiracial 2.8a White 2.3 a School Level Elementary 2.8 Middle 0.1 High 3.7 National School Lunch Program (Poverty) Eligible 4.1 Not Eligible 1.7 English Language Learner Status ELL 3.0 Not ELL 5.0

a Retention rates for Multiracial and White students

were not significantly different.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Equity Audit: First Interim Report

Alternative Education

  • Differences:
  • Higher proportion of boys

than girls

  • Asian, Multiracial and

White students underrepresented, relative to the school district

  • Black and Hispanic

students overrepresented, relative to the school district

  • Higher proportions of

students from low-income backgrounds

  • Lower proportions of

English Language Learners Alternative Education Student Population versus Palm Beach County District General Population 2014

Category Alternative District Alternative School Population versus District Population Number of Students 1,042 179,102

  • Gender

Female 35.2 48.3

  • 13.1

Male 64.8 51.7 +13.1 Race Ethnicity Asian 0.4 3.1

  • 2.7

Black 65.2 27.9 +37.3 Hispanic 22.7 30.8

  • 8.1

Multiracial 1.4 3.0

  • 1.6

White 9.6 34.7

  • 25.1

National School Lunch Program (Poverty) Eligible 93.3 62.7 +30.6 Not Eligible 6.7 37.3

  • 30.6

English Language Learner Status ELL 1.1 11.4

  • 10.3

Not ELL 98.9 88.6 +10.3

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Student Placement in Advanced Courses

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Equity Audit: First Interim Report

Academic Opportunities: Advanced Courses

  • Programs:
  • Gifted designation
  • Honors classes
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • International Baccalaureate (IB)
  • Dual Enrollment
  • Advanced International Certificate of Education (AICE) programs
  • Students in these programs represent 26.6 percent of all students
  • Black students represent 27.9 percent of the district student population, yet only 19.5 percent of

the student population in gifted or advanced courses.

  • Hispanic students represent 30.8 percent of district students, yet 24.4 percent of gifted/advanced

students.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Equity Audit: First Interim Report Gifted Students and Students in Advanced Programs in the School District of Palm Beach County, 2014

Category Total Gifted Honors APa Dual Enrollmentb International Baccalaureateb AICEa All Students 26.6 5.7 12.3 2.6 3.9 2.1 12.9 Gender Female 28.4 6.1 13.6 3.0 3.1 2.3 14.9 Male 24.9 5.3 11.1 2.2 4.6 1.8 11.0 Race Ethnicity Asian 43.3 15.5 17.2c 7.0 3.3 6.6 16.1h Black 18.7 1.6 9.5 1.6 4.5 2.1 e 6.3 Hispanic 21.0 3.1 10.2 2.8 d 3.4 2.2 e 11.6h,i Multiracial 27.7 8.2 12.0 3.0 d 3.1 1.5f 13.6h,i White 36.4 10.3 16.0c 2.7 d 3.9 1.7f 18.0h National School Lunch Program (Poverty) Eligible 18.5 2.3 9.1 2.0 3.8 1.9 8.3 Not Eligible 40.1 11.4 17.6 3.2 4.0 2.3 18.6 English Language Learner Status ELL 5.6 0.2 2.4 0.3 2.0 0.5 1.5 Not ELL 29.3 6.4 13.6 2.5 4.1 2.2 13.6

a Includes only district high school students. b Includes only district middle and high school students. c Honors enrollment rates for Asian and White students were not significantly different. d AP enrollment rates for Hispanic, Multiracial, and White students were not significantly different. e IB enrollment rates for Black and Hispanic students were not significantly different. f IB enrollment rates for Multiracial and White students were not significantly different. g AICE enrollment rates for Multiracial and White students were not significantly different. h AICE enrollment rates for Asian, White and Multiracial students were not significantly different. i AICE enrollment rates for Hispanic and Multiracial students were not significantly different.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Student Placement in Choice Programs

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Equity Audit: First Interim Report

Academic Opportunities: Choice Programs

  • 16.5 percent applied to a choice program
  • 13.5 percent qualified to a choice program
  • 5.2 percent assigned to a choice program

Category Applicants Qualified Assigned District Overall Enrolled Population versus District Population Total Students 29550 24127 9,390 179,102

  • Gender

Female 54.2 52.1 52.9 48.3 +4.6 Male 45.8 47.8 47.1 51.7

  • 4.6

Race Ethnicity Asian 4.6 5.0 4.8 3.1 +1.7 Black 28.2 27.7 25.8 27.9

  • 2.1

Hispanic 26.4 25.7 25.8 30.8

  • 5.0

Multiracial 2.2 2.2 2.3 3.0

  • 0.7

White 37.9 38.7 40.5 34.7 +5.8

Student Application and Enrollment in Choice Programs in the School District of Palm Beach County, 2014

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Student Involvement with School Discipline

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Equity Audit: First Interim Report

Academic Opportunities: School Discipline

  • 13.0 percent of students overall were involved in a discipline referral
  • Differences:
  • Girls are less likely than boys to be involved in discipline incidents
  • Black, Hispanic and Multiracial students generally involved in discipline incidents at a higher

rate then their Asian and White peers

  • Students from low-income backgrounds more likely to be involved in discipline incidents
  • English Language Learners are less likely to be involved in discipline incidents
  • Black students represent 53.6 percent of the population of students suspended in or out of school

at least once in the school year, despite only making up 27.9 percent of the district population.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Equity Audit: First Interim Report Percent Disciplined Students in the School District of Palm Beach County, 2014

Category Incident & Referral Office Referral In-School Suspension Out-of- School Suspension Overall 13.0 1.4 4.5 5.7 Gender Female 8.9 0.8 3.0 3.6 Male 16.8 1.9 6.0 7.7 Race Ethnicity Asian 4.4 0.3 1.2 1.4 Black 22.7 2.8 8.0 11.9 Hispanic 10.4 1.0 3.6a 4.0 Multiracial 11.1 1.4 3.8a 4.5 White 8.4 0.7 2.9 2.7 School Level Elementary 6.6 4.3 1.0 3.2 Middle 20.4 5.4 8.6 11.1 High 20.3 2.1 7.6 7.4 Alternative 48.4 17.9 28.6 42.6 National School Lunch Program (Poverty) Eligible 16.3 1.9 5.7 7.9 Not Eligible 7.4 0.5 2.5 2.1 English Language Learner Status ELL 9.2 1.4 2.2 3.9 Not ELL 13.5 1.1 4.8 5.9

a ISS rates among Hispanic and Multiracial students were not significantly different. b Law Enforcement involvement rates were not significantly different among non-Black students.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Elementary Afterschool Programs

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Equity Audit: First Interim Report

Academic Opportunities: Afterschool Programs

  • Programming in 107 out of 108 elementary schools
  • Program types:
  • District-provided, fee-based program
  • District-provided, fee-based program serving additional students through federal 21st

Century Community Learning Center Grant

  • Partnership with Florida Atlantic University Environmental Center
  • Partnership with an outside non-profit organization (e.g., Boys and Girls Clubs; For

the Children, Inc.; New Beginnings, Inc.; etc.)

  • Some differences in programming provided based on high proportions of low income

students and students of color (“High-needs” schools)

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Equity Audit: First Interim Report Percentages and Numbers of Afterschool Programs in Elementary Schools in the School District of Palm Beach County, 2014

Programming Provider High Needs School Not High Needs School District 24.1 (7) 81.0 (64) 21st Century CLC Grant and District 37.9 (11) 17.7 (14) Florida Atlantic University Partnership* 0.0 (0) 1.3 (1) Non-Profit Organization 34.5 (10) 0.0 (0) No Programming Provided* 0.9 (1) 0.0 (0) Total 100.0 (29) 100.0 (79) *Not enough cases were available to determine statistical significance for differences in FAU Partnerships and schools that provided no programming.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Equity Audit: First Interim Report

Student Academic Achievement and Opportunities: Conclusions

  • Multiple disparities between Black and Hispanic students and their peers
  • Test scores
  • Placement in choice and advanced courses
  • Discipline
  • Findings on student disparities in Palm Beach County are consistent with national trends
  • Next steps:
  • Funding for student needs and tutoring support
  • Resources and school media centers
  • Cultural conflicts that may arise between groups of students, between students and

teachers, and between teachers and parents

  • Parent and community outreach, and engagement
  • Parent leadership councils and school advisory council equity
  • Changes over time
slide-34
SLIDE 34

Findings on Teachers and Administrators

slide-35
SLIDE 35

National Research on Educator Equity Issues:

  • U.S. teachers are predominantly white, middle class, and monolingual English-speaking1
  • Teachers of color can increase engagement and academic achievement for students of similar

backgrounds2

  • Black and Latino student overrepresentation in poorly funded schools and low teacher quality are

closely linked3

  • In Florida there is a 26 percentage point gap between the percentages of nonwhite teachers and

nonwhite students4 Equity Audit: First Interim Report

1 Sleeter, C. E. (2008). Preparing white teachers for diverse students. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, D. J. McIntyre & K. E. Demers (Eds.), Enduring questions in changing contexts (3rd ed., pp. 559-582). New York: Routledge. 2 Dee, T. S. (2004). Teachers, race, and student achievement in a randomized experiment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 195-210. 3 Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(1), 37-62. 4 Boser, U. (2014). Teacher diversity revisited: A new state-by-state analysis.. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress

slide-36
SLIDE 36

National Research on Educator Equity Issues:

  • Average annual salaries:1
  • White teachers: $49,570
  • Black teachers: $48,910
  • Hispanic teachers: $49,260
  • Potential explanations:
  • Teachers of color are more likely to teach in public schools in poorly funded and high

poverty urban communities2

  • Different levels of training and experience

Equity Audit: First Interim Report

1 Boser, U. (2011). Teacher diversity matters: A state-by-state analysis of teachers of color., Washington, DC: Center for American Progress. 2 Ingersoll, R., & May, H. (2011). Recruitment, retention and the minority teacher shortage. (No. Research Report #RR-69). Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in

  • Education. CPRE.
slide-37
SLIDE 37

Proportional Representation of Teachers and Administrators

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Equity Audit: First Interim Report

Proportional Representation

  • Compared to the student population, teacher and administrator groups have higher proportions of

people who are:

  • Female
  • White

District Students Teachers Administrators Gender Female 48.5 79.9 74.7 Male 51.5 20.1 25.3 Race Ethnicity Asian 3.1 1.4 1.6 Black 28.6 16.7 24.7 Hispanic 31.4 10.7 16.3 White 33.5 71.0 57.1

Notes: Information on race is collected differently for staff and for students. Proportions of Multiracial staff members were unavailable. All proportion differences between students and teachers and students and administrators were significant.

Proportions of Student Groups to Teachers and Administrators in the School District of Palm Beach County, 2014

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Equity Audit: First Interim Report Proportions of Student Racial Groups to Teachers by School Grade Level/Type in the School District of Palm Beach County, 2014

School Type Students Teachers Elementary (N=81,952) (N=9,332) Race Ethnicity Asian 3.2 1.4 Black 28.4 17.0 Hispanic 33.6 11.0 White 31.3 70.5 Middle (N=37,563) (N=3,064) Race Ethnicity Asian 3.0 1.7 Black 28.5 24.8 Hispanic 31.4 9.6 White 33.6 63.6 High (N=50,421) (N=3,920) Race Ethnicity Asian 3.2 1.7 Black 26.9 18.2 Hispanic 28.2 10.1 White 38.4 69.6 Alternative (N=1,027) (N=128) Race Ethnicity Asian 0.4 3.9 Black 65.5 53.3 Hispanic 22.4 6.3 White 9.5 35.9

Notes: Information on race is collected differently for staff and for students. Proportions of Multiracial teachers were unavailable. All proportion differences between students and teachers were significant for all school types.

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Placement of Teachers and Administrators

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Equity Audit: First Interim Report

Placement of Teachers and Administrators

  • In high-needs schools versus those that were not, no statistically significant differences were

found for placement of:

  • Highly qualified teachers
  • Teachers teaching out of field
  • There are very few of these types of teachers overall:
  • 2.4 percent are not highly qualified
  • 3.8 percent are out of field
slide-42
SLIDE 42

Teacher and Administrator Compensation

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Equity Audit: First Interim Report

Teacher and Administrator Compensation

  • Initial analysis only
  • All potential sources of income were combined to determine total annual compensation:
  • Base salary
  • Summer school instruction
  • Afterschool instruction
  • More
  • Analysis does not control for years of experience
  • Differences in earnings:
  • Men had higher compensation than women in both groups
  • Hispanic teachers earned less than their Black and White peers
slide-44
SLIDE 44

Equity Audit: First Interim Report Average Total Compensation* of Teachers and Administrators in the School District of Palm Beach County, 2014

District Teachers (N=13,897) Administrators (N=1,306) Total

49,929 80,386

Gender Female

49,463a 78,071d

Male

51,782a 84,369d

Race Ethnicity Asian

47,161 84,774

Black

50,307b 79,555

Hispanic

47,145b,c 76,477

White

50,317c 80,958

*Total compensation is not controlled for by any potential reasons for disparities, such as years of employment in the district, and should only be interpreted as a starting point for further investigation.

a Differences between female and male teachers’ total compensation were significant. b Differences between Hispanic and Black teachers’ total compensation were significant. c Differences between Hispanic and White teachers’ total compensation were significant. d Differences between female and male administrators’ total compensation were significant.

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Teacher and Administrator Professional Development Training and Retention

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Equity Audit: First Interim Report

Teacher and Administrator Training and Retention

  • Professional Development Training:
  • 58.3 percent received any
  • Black teachers and administrators more likely to receive than Hispanic and White peers
  • Retention:
  • 7.2 percent exited between FY13 and FY14
  • No significant differences in exits based on race
slide-47
SLIDE 47

Equity Audit: First Interim Report Teacher and Administrator Professional Development and Retention in the School District of Palm Beach County, 2014

Percent with Any PD Percent Exited District Since FY2013 for Any Reason All Staff 58.3 7.2 Race Ethnicity Asian 53.2 8.6 Black 61.5a 6.5 Hispanic 56.6a 7.6 White 57.8a 7.2 Job Type Administrator 62.5b 3.4c Instructor 57.9b 7.5c

a Black educators were more likely to receive training than their Hispanic and White

colleagues in 2014. No other between-group differences statistically significant.

b Administrators were more likely to have received professional development 2014. c Administrators were less likely to exit the district for any reason between 2013 and 2014.

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Teacher and Administrator Discipline

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Equity Audit: First Interim Report

Teacher and Administrator Discipline

  • Not enough cases to conduct

statistical analysis

  • Total incidents from FY2011-FY2014

displayed for illustrative purposes

  • nly

<10 Days Disciplined 10 or More Days Disciplined Termination Total All Staff 14 25 23 62 Gender Female 10 12 10 32 Male 4 13 13 30 Race Ethnicity Black 6 15 12 33 Hispanic 4 5 9 Native American 1 1 White 7 6 6 19 Job Type Administrator 1 1 2 Instructor 6 3 2 11 Non-instructor 7 21 21 49 Note: Not enough disciplinary actions were taken to determine if differences between different groups were significant. Amounts displayed are for illustrative purposes only.

Staff Discipline in the School District of Palm Beach County, 2011-2014

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Equity Audit: First Interim Report

Teacher and Administrator Findings: Conclusions

  • Some disparities:
  • Disproportionality to student population
  • Total compensation
  • Black staff more likely to receive PD
  • Next steps:
  • Staffing needs assessment regarding ELL and ESE capabilities
  • Educator professional development on race, culture, and language
  • Recruitment of teachers and administrators
  • Organizational culture related to equity in the district.
  • Placement and discipline will be investigated further due to small sample sizes
  • Changes over time
slide-51
SLIDE 51

Findings on Adult Education Students

slide-52
SLIDE 52

National Research on Adult Education

  • Can benefit both adult learners and their children1
  • Often classified into three areas:
  • Adult Basic Education (ABE)
  • College readiness
  • English language development – i.e., English as a Second Language (ESL) and English

for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) Equity Audit: First Interim Report

Chase-Lansdale, P. L., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2014). Two-generation programs in the twenty-first century. The Future of Children, 24(1), 13-39. Domina, T., & Roksa, J. (2012). Should mom go back to school? post-natal educational attainment and parenting practices. Social Science Research, 41(3), 695-708.

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Equity Audit: First Interim Report Adult Education Demographics in the School District of Palm Beach County, 2014

Category Number Percent Total 11,387 100.0 Gender Female 6,505 57.4 Male 4,882 42.6 Race Ethnicity Asian 368 3.3 Black 4,139 36.5 Hispanic 4,909 43.3 Multiracial 326 2.9 Native American 77 0.7 White 1,508 13.3 Language Spanish 4,152 36.7 English 4,040 35.7 Hatian Creole 2,290 20.2 Portuguese 267 2.4 Arabic 65 0.6 French 50 0.4 Chinese, Zhongwen 49 0.4 Fox 42 0.4 Russian 36 0.3 Vietnamese 30 0.3 Other Languages 306 2.7 End-of Year Action Continued 9,919 85.8 Completed 181 1.6 Withdraw 1,455 12.6

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Equity Audit: First Interim Report Adult Education Demographics in the School District of Palm Beach County, 2014

Category Continued Completed Withdrew Gender Female 86.2 1.3 12.5 Male 87.9 1.6 10.6 Race Ethnicity Asian 82.3 2.5 15.3 Black 84.1 1.3 14.3 Hispanic 89.3 1.0 9.7 Multiracial 87.5 0.0 12.5 Native American 96.9 0.0 3.1 White 85.8 3.2 11.0 Language Spanish 88.1 0.9 10.9 English 89.2 2.0 8.7 Hatian Creole 80.5 1.3 18.2 Portuguese 93.6 1.1 5.3 Other Languages 84.6 0.9 14.6

Adult Education

  • 11,387 overall
  • Most continued classes
  • Differences in withdraw rates were

present for race and language group, but were statistically weak

  • Next steps:
  • Differences in specific course

enrollment

  • Targeting efficacy
slide-55
SLIDE 55

Next Steps

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Future Study Directions

  • Interviews
  • Focus groups
  • Document review
  • Case studies of schools
  • Further quantitative analyses
  • Students
  • Teachers
  • School administrators
  • District administrators
  • Parents

Equity Audit: First Interim Report

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Thank You

Metropolitan Center for Research on Equity and the Transformation of Schools 726 Broadway, 5th Floor New York, NY 10003 212-998-5100 steinhardt.nyu.edu/metrocenter