Economy & Employment Land Study October 2013 Contents - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

economy employment land study
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Economy & Employment Land Study October 2013 Contents - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Wycombe District Council Economy & Employment Land Study October 2013 Contents Introduction The economy The property market Demand and supply in the long term New land Summary Introduction What have we been


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Wycombe District Council

Economy & Employment Land Study

October 2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Contents

  • Introduction
  • The economy
  • The property market
  • Demand and supply in the long term
  • New land
  • Summary
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction

  • What have we been asked to do?
  • In summary:
  • Look at where is the economy heading?
  • How can the Council help foster this?
  • What does this mean for the development plan?
  • Development control?
  • And new land?
  • Provide advice consistent with the National Planning

Policy Framework

  • Must be deliverable
  • And viable
  • And alighted with the emerging housing targets
  • In the Strategic Housing Market Assessment
slide-4
SLIDE 4

The economy

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Falling employment

  • In 2001-11 the district lost 12,500 jobs
  • (Experian data – estimates vary but the trend is clear)
  • Employment fell almost every year
  • Even before the recession
  • Against national and regional trend
  • Large losses of manufacturing
  • The decline came much later to Wycombe than elsewhere
  • But Wycombe failed to grasp the regional growth sectors
  • Office jobs
  • Sectors did well nationally and regionally
  • The ratio of jobs to workers fell
  • By about 20%
slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Job density in Buckinghamshire over time (note: SE is 0.8 in 2012)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

But the resident workforce still does well

  • 2,300 people claim Jobseeker’s Allowance (August 2013)
  • That’s 2.1% of the workforce
  • Same as South East region
  • Workplace earnings are well above the regional average
  • £480 per week in Wycombe
  • £430 in South East region
  • And higher than most of Bucks
  • Only South Bucks pay more
  • Residents’ earnings also exceed the SE average
  • Whether they work in the district or elsewhere
  • Many work in other districts
  • But mostly don’t travel far
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Why has the job loss not hurt?

  • The 2004 position may also have been unsustainable
  • Very few areas achieve a 1:1+ ratio
  • Almost all central London
  • The labour market is sub-regional
  • Extends well beyond the district boundary
  • And it’s a healthy labour market
  • Low unemployment
  • High activity rates
  • High earnings
  • Allowing for the recession
  • Which affects all places
  • So people have found jobs
slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11

The economy – summary

  • Wycombe lost jobs
  • As a district it performed very badly
  • Compared to the Region
  • Lost manufacturing
  • No surprise
  • But failed to grasp growth
  • Offices
  • Warehouses
  • But the residents still have jobs
  • Well paid jobs
  • They don’t need to commute far to work
  • Job density is no better; or worse than the South East
slide-12
SLIDE 12

The property market

slide-13
SLIDE 13

The office market

  • The stock is generally well occupied
  • There are always exceptions
  • At present new development is not viable anywhere
  • But the market should improve in the medium term
  • There should be development opportunities
  • Around High Wycombe and Marlow
  • Maybe on a smaller scale around Bourne End & Wooburn
  • Margins of the Thames Valley
  • But town centre offices are a problem
  • In High Wycombe and Marlow
  • Office development is not viable
  • And will not become so
  • Even maintaining existing offices may be unviable
  • Regeneration / intensification would need mixed uses
  • And / or public intervention
  • Competition from the Thames Valley core is fierce
  • Keeps Wycombe's more marginal market depressed
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Top quoting rents, 2013 Q2

slide-15
SLIDE 15

The industrial market

  • The stock is well occupied and financially healthy
  • Little warehousing
  • Partly because most the land is not suitable
  • Development opportunities
  • Best around Wycombe / Marlow / M40 J4
  • There is viable demand for new development
  • Despite the recession
  • But no land for it
  • On a smaller scale around Bourne End / Wooburn /M40 J3
  • Less so at Princes Risborough
  • Existing stock works well
  • But significant further development may be difficult
  • Market = local and long-established businesses
  • Risky
  • Hence capital values too low to support speculative schemes
slide-16
SLIDE 16

The market & economy

  • Bringing the story together…
  • For Industrial
  • Wycombe’s manufacturing economy restructured later than others
  • Elsewhere this may have been turned to warehouses
  • It was a growing sector
  • But not suited to much of the Wycombe land
  • So land was lost to housing..
  • For Offices
  • Lost out to the core of the Thames Valley
  • Wycombe has always been marginal
  • But in the boom times could compete
  • In the recession occupiers could pick up ‘bargain space’
  • In some of the best office locations in the UK
  • Many firms overlooked Wycombe?
  • Local workers followed the jobs…
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Demand and supply in the long term

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Approach

  • Where are we heading?
  • Crystal ball gazing is difficult
  • Experts can rarely agree
  • We have started with an economic forecast
  • How many jobs, in what sectors and how much land?
  • Supplied by the Local Enterprise Partnership
  • So an evidence base shared across the County
  • But all consultees told us this was too high
  • Too many new jobs
  • 1,350 new jobs a year
  • Mostly office based
  • Unrealistic
  • (including the LEP representative on our steering group)
  • Not aligned with the emerging housing numbers
  • Too many jobs and not enough new labour
  • So developed an alternative
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Demand for employment space 2011-31: balanced scenario

Change per annum Industrial Office Total B class Jobs

  • 69

589 519 Sq m per job 45 19 64 Floorspace (GIA), sq m

  • 3,125

11,189 8,065 Indicative sq m per hectare 4,000 6,000 Indicative site area, ha

  • 0.8

1.9 1.1 Total change (20 years) Jobs

  • 1,389

11,778 10,390 Floorspace (GIA), sq m

  • 62,498

223,789 161,291 Indicative site area, ha

  • 15.6

37.3 21.7

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Industrial balance

  • Forecast shows 16ha Industrial land loss 2011 - 2030
  • A much slower late of decline than seen in the past
  • 50ha loss 2001 – 2012
  • We have looked at this in detail
  • Compared to the planning pipeline
  • New land
  • Permitted Losses
  • Looked at the potential new land
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Industrial balance

  • Most existing sites are full
  • No scope for intensification
  • Committed losses are already 7.1ha
  • Sites with permission for alternative uses
  • Plus likely additional from Council's 2011 Position Statement
  • Leigh Street
  • Lane End (T&L, Springbank)
  • Total 5ha
  • So 12 ha already committed to release
  • There will be further losses
  • As sites become obsolete
  • And cannot viably re-used
  • Under any assumptions losses exceed 16ha
  • As a very simple guide ANY further losses need replacing on new land
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Offices

  • Most forecast demand is for offices
  • Under any scenario Wycombe needs new land for new jobs
  • How much is TBC
  • For offices LEP thinks our ‘labour balanced’ scenario is too high
  • Most offices today are well occupied
  • Little scope to intensify
  • For new land Handy Cross will help
  • But will provide only a fraction of what is needed
  • (8% of today’s stock)
  • The Town Centre will remain unviable for a while
  • Outside of these little supply
  • So we again have a supply problem
  • If Wycombe is to stand any chance of growing its jobs
  • It needs some new land
slide-23
SLIDE 23

New land

slide-24
SLIDE 24

New land

  • Where to look?
  • Almost all the population growth is likely to be in the

South

  • Also where the market potential is
  • Margins of the Thames Valley
  • Motorway Access…
  • Emerging suggestions:
  • Intensity the Air Park?
  • Additional local quality industrial & Warehousing?
  • A new office park at Marlow?
  • The market remains interested in Marlow
  • Possibly Viable?
  • M40 J 3a
  • Open up new land
  • We think for a mix of offices / high technology industrial
  • (continue to promote the town centre of Wycombe for

new offices)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

New land

  • Even if we proceed with all 3 areas of new land the

market will remain tight

  • Perhaps greatest concern is that if land continues to be

released for housing

  • The pressure on the employment stock will increase…
  • Will need further land
  • The only option will be in the

greenbelt

  • Or a much lower economic

aspiration?

  • Few jobs, more commuting?
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Summary

  • Almost any job growth in Wycombe requires new land
  • Either to return to 2004 job balance
  • The ‘peak’ of the local economy?
  • When Wycombe was a commuting destination?
  • Or simply to provide enough new jobs for any new local

residents

  • No obvious new land supply
  • The reserve sites help a little
  • So any option is likely to require greenbelt