does your patient really need a colonoscopy
play

Does your patient really need a colonoscopy? Using existing evidence to monitor and refer symptomatic patients for colonoscopy Cancer Council NBCSP Spotlight 17 Mar 2015 Dr. Hooi Ee Gastroenterologist, SCGH Lead Clinician, WA Bowel Cancer

0 downloads 1 Views 273 KB Size Report
  1. Does your patient really need a colonoscopy? Using existing evidence to monitor and refer symptomatic patients for colonoscopy Cancer Council NBCSP Spotlight 17 Mar 2015 Dr. Hooi Ee Gastroenterologist, SCGH Lead Clinician, WA Bowel Cancer Screening Implementation Team

  2. Bowel (Colorectal) Cancer • Second commonest internal cancer after prostate • Commonest cancer affecting Men and Women – Risk = 1 in 12 by 85 yrs • Risk: M = 1:10 F = 1:15 • WA in 2013 – 1281 new cases – 431 deaths AIHW and WA Cancer Registry

  3. Bowel cancer in Australia Incidence markedly increases after 50 yo AIHW 2015 Australian Cancer Incidence and Mortality

  4. Adenoma → Carcinoma 5 - 20 year sequence

  5. Bowel Cancer Diagnosis

  6. Colonoscopy in WA • Approximately 60,000 colonoscopies p.a. • Approximately 1200 cancers p.a. • 50 colonoscopies per cancer found • Of course, colonoscopy is not just for cancer

  7. Colonoscopy yield: WA • SCGH: 5% of colonoscopies yield Ca • Osborne Park Hospital: <2% yield cancer • NBCSP iFOBT (+): 3.4% cancer • Estimated population prevalence – 1:300-500 people >50 yo are harbouring an undiagnosed bowel cancer

  8. What drives colonoscopy demand? • Patients, referrers, endoscopists, media • Fear – Patients fear cancer – Doctors fear lawyers – Disproportionate fear of rare anecdotes • Misunderstandings – indications, screening, follow-up guidelines – mixed messages, re-scope in 1, 3, 5 years? – cancer progression times • Technology superior to doctors’ opinions • Financial

  9. Colonoscopy indications Most urgent • Palpable rectal mass • Palpable abdominal mass (usually RIF) • Abnormal imaging – CT scan – CT colography – PET scans – Barium enema

  10. Colonoscopy indications Urgent • Chronic rectal bleeding > 4 weeks • Iron deficiency anaemia – Male Hb <11 – Post-menopausal Female Hb <10 – Pre-menopausal Female Hb <9 • Change in bowel habit > 4 weeks plus alarm – Palpable mass, anaemia, weight loss • FOBT (+) • After acute diverticulitis, 1 st episode

  11. Colonoscopy indications Less urgent • Altered bowel habit without alarm symptoms • Chronic diarrhoea > 6/52 • Small polyp on imaging e.g. < 2cm

  12. Colonoscopy indications Low risk • Constipation • Bloating • Chronic abdominal pain • Family history • Post-surgical cancer surveillance • Polyp surveillance

  13. Low risk • Colonoscopy in last 5 years – <1% cancer – Even if presenting with symptoms – Examples • proven diverticula but repeat bleeding • bleeding but had colonoscopy <5 years ago

  14. Inadequate referrals • What’s the family history? • Which cancers? At what age?

  15. Inappropriate referrals • Why screen?

  16. Stopping polyp surveillance NHMRC Guidelines: Cancer Council Australia Colonoscopy Surveillance Working Party. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Surveillance Colonoscopy – in adenoma follow- up; following curative resection of colorectal cancer; and for cancer surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease. Cancer Council Australia, Sydney (December 2011).

  17. Patient Consultation Questionnaire 1. Blood from back passage 2. Changes in bowel habit a. Blood old/fresh a. Type of change b. Blood in/separate from stool b. Increased frequency c. Amount of blood c. Increased frequency time of day d. Frequency of blood d. Urgency e. Total length of time e. Total length of time f. In past month bleeding has f. In past month frequency has improved/worsened improved/worsened g. Normal bowel habit • Various symptoms have different scores 3. Slime +/- mixed blood 4. Incomplete bowel movement • Composite score made 5. Symptoms around back passage 6. Abdominal pain • Score determines a. Type of symptom a. Location of pain b. Total length of time b. Bloating c. Abdominal symptoms total length of time probability of cancer = Risk d. In past month symptoms have improved/worsened category • Devised for UK, still being tested in WA 7. Weight loss 8. Loss of appetite 9. Excessive tiredness 10. Medications 11. Previous illnesses 12. Family history of cancer 13. Previous colonoscopy 14. Other information

  18. Colonoscopy hazards • Significant problem for elderly, comorbid • Fluid shifts, haemodynamic compromise • Electrolyte abnormalities • Falls risk • Anaesthetic/sedation risks • For what benefit?

  19. Colonoscopy summary • Colorectal cancer is very common • Colonoscopy is best diagnostic test for cancer • Colonoscopy is expensive, demanding – Risk stratification improves yield • Appropriate use improves priority, accessibility, equitability

Recommend Documents


the simulation trainer for gastro
The simulation trainer for gastro-

Version 201601 The simulation trainer for gastro- enterology and colonoscopy

17 th june 2014 introduction increasing demand for
17 th June, 2014 Introduction

The FIT for Follow-Up Study Sensitivity of annual Faecal Immunochemical Tests

colonoscopy screening issues and controversies
Colonoscopy Screening: Issues and

Colonoscopy Screening: Issues and Controversies Symposium on GI Cancers St.

disclosure
Disclosure SCREENING COLONOSCOPY: No

Disclosure SCREENING COLONOSCOPY: No relevant financial relationships exist

the role of the global rating scale in colonoscopy quality
The Role of the Global Rating Scale

The Role of the Global Rating Scale in Colonoscopy Quality Donald MacIntosh

colorectal cancer screening colonoscopy potential and
Colorectal Cancer Screening:

Colorectal Cancer Screening: Colonoscopy, Potential and Disclosures: None

giecat kids
GiECAT KIDS G astrointestinal Endoscopy

GiECAT KIDS G astrointestinal Endoscopy Competency Assessment Tool for

colorectal cancer screening
Colorectal Cancer Screening Fall 2018

Colorectal Cancer Screening Fall 2018 Agenda CRC Screening Landscape

core philosophy
Core Philosophy Council Patient- and

HIIN Patient and Family Engagement July 21, 2017 Summit PATIENT AND FAMILY

and interpretation of patient reported data patient
and interpretation of patient reported

How does health literacy impact the collection and interpretation of patient

risk management
Risk Management STEVEN WELLER B.SC.

Risk Management STEVEN WELLER B.SC. MONASH, MORSSA 08-05-18 Definition of a

head and neck ultrasound training
HEAD AND NECK ULTRASOUND TRAINING-

HEAD AND NECK ULTRASOUND TRAINING- THE HULL EXPERIENCE This came about as

arcs pharmacovigilance update
ARCS Pharmacovigilance update Richard

ARCS Pharmacovigilance update Richard Hill Medical Officer, Signal

p53 1 1
p53

p53 1 1 1. p53 2.p53

making guidelines for colon cancer screening
Making guidelines for colon cancer

Mind the Gap, September 27, 2016 Making guidelines for colon cancer screening:

overview
Overview Colon/Rectum/Appendix 2009

Collecting Cancer Data: Colon 11/5/2009 Collecting Cancer Data:

gut club index of cases fall 2003 to present fall 2003
Gut Club Index of cases Fall 2003 to

Gut Club Index of cases Fall 2003 to present Fall 2003 Infantile

dr leslie
Dr. Leslie Saturday Seminar Unknown

Dr. Leslie Saturday Seminar Unknown Case Case History A 47 year old woman is

braemar gp seminar
Braemar GP Seminar (i) Capsule

Braemar GP Seminar (i) Capsule endoscopy (ii) CRC screening Graeme Dickson

assessing hyperinsulinism
Assessing Hyperinsulinism Lesley

Assessing Hyperinsulinism Lesley Tetlow Consultant Clinical Scientist Royal

www mf um si mf um si t 386 2 2345 821 f 386 2 2345 820
www.mf.um.si | mf@um.si | t +386 2

Taborska ulica 8 SI - 2000 Maribor, Slovenia www.mf.um.si | mf@um.si | t +386

report of a workshop on dose response approaches for
Report of a Workshop on Dose-Response

Report of a Workshop on Dose-Response Approaches for Nuclear Receptor-