ARCS Pharmacovigilance update
Richard Hill Medical Officer, Signal Investigation Unit, PMSB, TGA 12 March 2015
ARCS Pharmacovigilance update Richard Hill Medical Officer, Signal - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
ARCS Pharmacovigilance update Richard Hill Medical Officer, Signal Investigation Unit, PMSB, TGA 12 March 2015 Contents Patient support programs Reports from (social) media Information requests from TGA MedDRA coding 1
Richard Hill Medical Officer, Signal Investigation Unit, PMSB, TGA 12 March 2015
1
– a program run by a company with or without involvement from a health consumer organisation, with the aim of increasing patient compliance and positive patient health outcomes.
– call/information centres – periodic contacts to ensure treatment compliance – nurse visits for medication administration – delivery of educational materials
– not designed to collect adverse event information – may be managed by a third party – may be long duration
2
– Solicited reports are those derived from organized data collection systems, which include clinical trials, registries, post-approval named patient use programs, other patient support and disease management programs,… – solicited reports … should have an appropriate causality assessment by a healthcare professional or an MAH
3
– 1.2.2: Sponsors should have permanently and continuously at their disposal a person in Australia responsible for pharmacovigilance... The person responsible for pharmacovigilance should be experienced in pharmacovigilance, and if not medically qualified, they should have ready access to a medically qualified person – 2.7.1 Minimum data elements: an identifiable patient
4
5
infusions for his Crohn’s Disease.
6
with leg spasms, very bad back pain and general pains.
7
– follow-up as needed – identify concomitant medications; suspect as appropriate – non-serious reports do not have to be sent to TGA on an expedited basis
8
identifiable patient
– Sponsors should regularly screen internet or digital media under their management or responsibility, for potential reports of suspected ARs.
9
– line listings – “public case details”
10
Case example:
96 year old Male patient who was treated with EPO-analogue for an unknown
concomitant medications and past drugs were reported. On an unspecified date, the patient had overdose of EPO-analogue. It was reported that a nurse was contacted, who advised to monitor haemoglobin levels at about 95 hours after administration. No adverse event reported in association with overdose, no need to report!
11
Case example:
form, frequency: not reported). On an unspecified date therapy with drug was
disease relapsed in lungs and lymph glands.”
patient died on 12 June 2012 from cancer” No need to report!
12
Case example:
ankylosing spondylitis. The patient stopped drug-x and decided to try drug-y for convenience while travelling. The patient reported that drug-y gave reasonable control, but he felt drug-x helped his ankylosing spondylitis more. The patient began treatment with drug-x, again, dose, dates and frequency unspecified.
recovering from right hip replacement. The reporter did not provide causality between right hip replacement and drug-x.”
replacement and suspect drug
13
Case example:
abdomen due to a chronic liver condition. The patient had been on the liver transplant list since August 2008. She was also suffering from pneumonia and was given increasing levels of pain- relieving drug and other pain medication. Dose, date and route of administration of drug were not reported.”
“dark, concentrated urine” and had a bloated abdomen. The patient was released on 26-Dec- 2008, blood test results showed a clear deterioration in her renal function. Her condition worsened and she returned to hospital on 27-Dec-2008 before dying there on 29-Dec-2008. The primary cause of death was listed as multi-organ failure.”
distension; vomiting; post-procedural drainage], however no clear relationship with suspect drug.
14
Case example:
date, the patient was deceased . Cause of death was not provided.”
admitted to hospital, passed away at nursing home. No other details known. The patient had a past medical history of previous silent myocardial infarction and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.”
15
Case example:
to help with shoulder pain caused by a pre-existing injury. She has been applying the product to the shoulder approximately 3 times a day when needed, on and off, for a number of years. She stated they do not use topical drug for longer than 2 weeks at a time. She finds the topical drug very effective at relieving the pain. The patient’s doctor advised her to use the product while awaiting shoulder surgery. On the patient’s recent visit to her surgeon they identified the bone in the shoulder was brittle and calcification had occurred making her ineligible for
imperfecta] – genetic disorder, unrelated to drug
16
Case example:
female patient who was on an anticoagulant (formulation, dosage, frequency, indication, dates of therapy not reported). On an unreported date, the patient had a car accident and the hospital was unable to stop the bleeding. The patient is in a critical condition. Several specialists involved are trying to stop the bleeding. Information on the treatment provided, if any, was not reported. The outcome of the event was not reported.
17
Case example:
It was reported that the patient had stopped therapy with monoclonal antibody due to financial constraints and since then she had developed a increased ascites and increased lymphoedema of both legs. The company assessed the events toxicity and increased lymphoedema of both legs as medically significant and increased ascites as non-serious. No further information was reported.”
suspect drugs [monoclonal antibody] [chemotherapy agent]
18
Case example:
developed melaena and was sent to hospital where he received a transfusion. The patient experienced a colon haemorrhage and tubulovillous adenoma was found.”
19
Case example:
unknown date, the patient reported that the blood pressure had raised in the morning ... The patient reported having had scarlet fever which had a similar effect.”
20
LLT is lost
“Concomitant disease aggravated”, etc.
21
during pregnancy” helps to clarify the story
22
23