Diesel Quality-Current Global Scenario Maximum On-Road Diesel Sulfur - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Diesel Quality-Current Global Scenario Maximum On-Road Diesel Sulfur - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Advances in ULSD catalyst systems Alex C. Pulikottil Indian Oil Corporation Ltd, R&D Centre, Faridabad, India 16-17 April 2012 Refining Challenges and Way Forward New Delhi Diesel Quality-Current Global Scenario Maximum On-Road Diesel
Diesel Quality-Current Global Scenario
Maximum On-Road Diesel Sulfur Limit
Diesel Fuel Quality Changes
50 100 3 16 30
% NOx Conv. Efficiency
S (ppm)
0.05 0.1
3 16 30
PM (CDPF) g/bhp.h
S (ppm)
Sulfur (ppm) max 5-10 Aromatics (vol%) max 15 Polyaromatics (vol%) max 2 Density (kg/m3) max 820 Cetane number min 55 Distillation Point (T90) (o C) max 320
Major spec of diesel in WWFC category 4
Regulatory push major driver for innovation in HDS catalysis Tier Nox g/kW.h PM g/kW.h Euro-3 5.0 0.10 Euro-4 3.5 0.02 Euro-5 2.0 0.02
Major emission limits for diesel engine
Desulfurization Catalyst System
- Mo based catalyst system workhorse for HDS since 1940
- Ni and Co promote significant activity enhancement in the system
- Significant improvement in performance of these systems since last
decade
- Deeper insight on the active sites of the catalyst
- Understanding of the chemistry of desulfurization
To produce S free diesel conversion levels of more than 99.9% required Paradigm shift from a simple fuel processing to molecular chemical transformation
Desulfurization Catalyst System
- Dynamically evolving, flexible and versatile system
- Adapts itself in different reaction conditions
Different feed stocks from light naphtha to Vacuum residue Wide range of H2 partial pressures ( 5-200 bar) and H2S levels (0.5 to 10 vol%) Temperature range of 260 – 430 oC
- Response to facilitate numerous reaction changes
Exotic reactions like hydro dechlorination at low temperature and low H2 partial pressure Diene saturation and isomerization at low temperature SO2 hydrogenation at 1 bar and 300-400 C
MoOx NiO MoOxSx NiSx MoSx MoSx decorated with NiSx NiSx MoSx decorated with NiSx MoSx decorated with NiSx NiOxSx MoOxSx
Typical life cycle of HDS catalyst system
Evolution of active phase of HDS catalyst
Conversion to metal sulfides
- Finely dispersed oxides transformed
to sulfide
- Large oxide crystals do not get fully
sulfided
- Interaction of metal with support
changes
- Interaction of sulfides of Co(Ni) with
Mo to form edge decorated Co(Ni)S
- Formation of separate phases of
MoS2 and Co(Ni)S
- Migration and agglomeration of
sulfides during reaction cycle
Active phase of HDS catalyst
- Widely believed to be Co(Ni)MoS phase
Exist as either Type-I and Type-II
- Type-II has high intrinsic activity compared to Type-I
Type-II characterized by increased stacking and weaker support interaction Type-I predominantly governed by stronger metal support interactions and single stack Type-II formed at high temperature sulfiding
- Preparation methodology and sulfidation conditions
influences the nature of active sites
Metal-support interaction Metal loading approaches Dispersion of active sites
Active CoMoS Phase Schematic of alumina supported catalyst (Topsoe et al)
Equilibrium morphologies in HDS condition
MoS2 phase CoMoS NiMoS
Mo Co Ni
Structure of active phase of HDS catalyst
MoS2 structure is hexagonal Mo sandwiched with hexagonal S Creates Mo edges Creates S edges CoMoS is an ensemble of MoS2 with Co (Ni) located at the edge Co(Ni) in the same plane of Mo Local coordination of Co(Ni) different depending on Mo or S edge Localized metallic states can be located at the cluster edge due to perturbation of electronic structure near edge High hydrogenation function
Chemistry of desulfurization
Two major pathways for HDS Direct desulfurization route (DDS)
Pre-Hydrogenation route (HYD)
Conversion of refractory S compounds proceeds by prehydrogenation route Presence of other compounds in feed changes relative role of HYD and DDS pathways
Nitrogen compounds mainly inhibit HYD pathway H2S mainly inhibits DDS pathway
HYD pathway favored at Mo edge (brim sites) and S edge for DDS pathway
Design of high active DHDS catalyst
- Enhance active site density
Increase active metal loading
Surface loading in commercial catalysts in the range of <2-10 metal/nm2
Increase active metal dispersion
Active phases with 7-8 Mo atoms corresponding to about 10 A theoretically feasible
- Prevent active site agglomeration/
deactivation
- Effective balance of hydrogenation
function for deep desulfurization
Influence of metal loading on accessible active site
DDS
- +
HYD ++ + I Type II Loading
Low High
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 TYPE-I (Low loading) TYPE-II (Low loading) TYPE-I (High loading) TYPE-II (High loading) DBT 4,6 DMDBT
Reactivities of different reactants are different Reactivities of reactants dependent on type of active site Increased metal loading in Type-I phase have less influence than in Type-II phase
Reactivity of DBT and 4, 6 DMDBT
Tailor the type of active phase based on feed characteristics/ operating conditions
Design of high active DHDS catalyst
INDICAT-Series of DHDS Catalyst
Active metals Ni & Mo Support
- alumina
Surface area (m2/g) > 200 Extrudate shape Trilobe Diameter (mm) 1.2 INDICAT-DH-IV Catalyst TEM of sulfided catalyst
5nm
High dispersion of nano-crystallite active sites Optimized distribution of high intrinsically active TYPE-II NiMoS phase
INDICAT-DH-IV Catalyst Performance: Case Studies
Case 1: SRGO feedstock and low pressure operation (49 bar) Case 2: Commercial operation at low pressure (55 bar) Case 3: Feed mix of SRGO and cracked stocks at 100 bar
Catalyst Performance
Catalyst Performance-Case-1
100 200 300 400 500 325 335 345
Relative Activity Indicat Base
Temperature, oC
Operating Conditions Pressure 49 bar LHSV 1.5 hr-1 H2/Oil 350 Nm3/m3
15
Catalyst performance- Case 1 (Contd…)
Feed Product Sulfur (ppm) 15000 30 Nitrogen (ppm) 185 5 Density (g/cc) 0.8466 0.8353 Aromatics (%) 27.9 18.2 Distillation(D-86)(Vol%/oC) 10 50 90 243 304 386 231 302 384
Operating Conditions WABT 345oC Pressure 49 bar LHSV 1.5 hr-1 H2/Oil 350 Nm3/m3
200 400 600 50 100 150 200 Relative volume activity Days on stream
Sustained performance with deactivation rate of only <0.3 oC/month
Time-on-stream Studies
Catalyst performance- Case 1 (Contd…)
Catalyst Performance- Case 2
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 345 365 Product Sulphur, ppm Product Cetane
Temperature o C Pressure 55 bar LHSV 0.7 hr-1 H2/Oil 300-350
Feed Sulphur 1.7% Feed Cetane – 54.9
Catalyst performance- Case 2 (Contd…)
Diesel product sulfur with Time-on-stream
Sustained performance of catalyst (99% conversion) to produce low-sulfur diesel (<50 ppm) from a feed with 1.3-1.8% sulfur
40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0 60.0 65.0 70.0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 Cetane index Number of days
Product
Catalyst performance- Case 2 (Contd…)
Product cetane with time-on-stream
Feed
20
Catalyst performance- Case 2 (Contd…)
Percent desulfurization of VGO with time-on-stream
50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
Days on Stream Percent Desulphurization Flexibility for VGO desulfurization
Catalyst Performance- Case 3
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 335 350 Product Sulphur, ppm Delta Cetane
Temperature, deg c Feed: SRGO/ CGO 75:25 Feed Sulphur 0.24% Feed Density 0.8857
Pressure 100 bar
Catalyst performance- Case 3
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Sulphur Nitrogen Feed Product
1.1%
48 ppm
168 ppm