deterring cheating in online environments
play

Deterring Cheating in Online Environments Henry Corrigan-Gibbs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Deterring Cheating in Online Environments Henry Corrigan-Gibbs Nakull Gupta Curtis Northcutt Stanford University Microsoft Research India MIT Edward Cutrell William Thies Microsoft Research India Microsoft


  1. Results: Cheating vs. Score Cheating doesn’t pay! 40 (p < 0.0001) 30 Frequency 20 10 0 0% 50% 100% 0% 50% 100% Scores (Honest) Scores (Cheating)

  2. Results: HC and Warning 50% 40% 31.7% Percentage cheating 25.9% 30% 20% 14.6% 10% 0% Control Honor Code Warn Online Exam

  3. Results: HC and Warning 50% Honor code group saw a drop in cheating rate 
 40% (not stat. signif.) 31.7% Percentage cheating 25.9% 30% 20% 14.6% 10% 0% Control Honor Code Warn Online Exam

  4. Results: HC and Warning 50% 40% 31.7% Percentage cheating 25.9% 30% 20% 14.6% 10% 0% Control Honor Code Warn Online Exam

  5. Results: HC and Warning 50% Warning has an effect 
 ( N =398, p < 0.001) 40% 31.7% Percentage cheating 25.9% 30% 20% 14.6% 10% 0% Control Honor Code Warn Online Exam

  6. Results: HC and Warning 50% 40% 31.7% Percentage cheating 25.9% 30% 20% 14.6% 10% 0% Control Honor Code Warn Online Exam

  7. Results: HC and Warning 50% 41.6% 35.8% 40% 31.7% Percentage cheating 25.9% 30% 18.3% 20% 14.6% 10% 0% Control Honor Code Warn Control Honor Code Warn Online Exam MTurk (India)

  8. Where we go from here…

  9. Where we go from here… • Does the effect of a warning diminish over time?

  10. Where we go from here… • Does the effect of a warning diminish over time? • Do warnings scare off honest and dishonest users at different rates?

  11. Where we go from here… • Does the effect of a warning diminish over time? • Do warnings scare off honest and dishonest users at different rates? • Can we use honey pots to automate the detection of unethical behavior online? Abuse, etc.

  12. Where we go from here… • Does the effect of a warning diminish over time? • Do warnings scare off honest and dishonest users at different rates? • Can we use honey pots to automate the detection of unethical behavior online? Abuse, etc. • Can warnings help deter other bad behavior online? Nasty comments, etc.

  13. Summary 50% 40% 31.7% Percentage cheating 25.9% 30% 20% 14.6% 10% 0% Control Honor Code Warn Online Exam

  14. Summary • We studied the effect of an honor 50% code and a warning at deterring cheating in an online course and 40% 31.7% Mechanical Turk . Percentage cheating 25.9% 30% 20% 14.6% 10% 0% Control Honor Code Warn Online Exam

  15. Summary • We studied the effect of an honor 50% code and a warning at deterring cheating in an online course and 40% 31.7% Mechanical Turk . Percentage cheating 25.9% 30% • We find evidence that the warning 20% 14.6% was effective in online settings… 10% less so the honor code. 0% Control Honor Code Warn Online Exam

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend