Dashboard Indicators Presentation to Board of Trustees June 9, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

dashboard indicators
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Dashboard Indicators Presentation to Board of Trustees June 9, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dashboard Indicators Presentation to Board of Trustees June 9, 2011 Dashboards A visual display of key metrics that summarize an institutions performance in implementing its strategic priorities and fulfilling its mission. Development


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Dashboard Indicators

Presentation to

Board of Trustees

June 9, 2011

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Dashboards

A visual display of key metrics that summarize an institution’s performance in implementing its strategic priorities and fulfilling its mission.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Development Process

Strategic Priorities Key Performance Drivers

SP1 KPD KPD KPD SP2 KPD KPD KPD SP3 KPD KPD KPD

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Strategic Priorities

  • Student Access and Enrollment
  • Student Outcomes
  • Faculty and Scholarship
  • Research Performance
  • Finance
  • Fund Raising
  • Hospital and Clinical Practice
  • Diversity
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Key Performance Drivers: Student Access and Enrollment

  • Number of Freshmen Enrolled
  • Acceptance and Yield Rates
  • Percent Pell Grant Eligible
  • Percent Freshmen from Under-Represented Groups
  • ACT Score and High School Class Rank
  • Number of Transfer Students Enrolled
  • Transfer Students from Underrepresented Groups
  • Number of Freshmen Applicants
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Peer Groups

University of Illinois at Chicago

Arizona State University Florida State University Michigan State University Wayne State University Temple University University of Arizona University of California - Davis University of California - Irvine University of California - Riverside University of California - Santa Barbara University of Delaware University of Florida University of Georgia University of Hawaii - Manoa University of Massachusetts - Amherst University of Maryland - College Park University of Oregon - Main Campus University of Utah University of Vermont & State Agricultural College Virginia Commonwealth University Virginia Polytechnical Institute & State University

University of Illinois at Springfield

Auburn University - Montgomery Clark University College of Charleston Georgia College and State University Iona College Lake Superior State University Marist College Northern Michigan University Shippensburg Univ. of Pennsylvania SUNY College at Brockport Trinity University Union College University of South Dakota University of Wisconsin - Green Bay

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

University of California - Berkeley University of California - Los Angeles University of California - San Diego University of Michigan - Ann Arbor University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill University of Texas - Austin University of Washington University of Wisconsin - Madison University of Virginia

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Percent* of First-Time Freshman Applicants Admitted Fall 2006 – Fall 2010

University of Illinois at Chicago is on par with its peers . University of Illinois at Springfield is more selective than its peers. University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign is less selective than its peers.

35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

University of Illinois at Chicago Peer Average

35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

University of Illinois at Springfield Peer Average

35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign Peer Average

* Percent Admitted = Percent of (total admits divided by total applicants)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Percent of First-Time Freshman Admissions Yield* Fall 2006 – Fall 2010

Though the trend is declining, University of Illinois at Chicago has a higher admissions yield than the peer average. University of Illinois at Springfield has higher admissions yield than the peer average. Admissions yield at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign has fallen below the peer average.

30 32 34 36 38 40 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

University of Illinois at Springfield Peer Average

30 32 34 36 38 40 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

University of Illinois at Chicago Peer Average

* Admission Yield = Percent of (total enrolled divided by total admits) 30 35 40 45 50 55 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign Peer Average

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Campus-Level Dashboards Dashboards Developed by Administrative Units Dashboards Inform Strategic Planning Regular Presentation of Dashboard Items to BOT

Going Forward