Dapagliflozin and CV outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

dapagliflozin and cv outcomes in patients with type 2
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Dapagliflozin and CV outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

American College of Cardiology Scientific Meeting 2019 Dapagliflozin and CV outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and prior myocardial infarction: a sub-analysis from DECLARE TIMI-58 Remo H. M. Furtado, et al. On behalf of the DECLARE


slide-1
SLIDE 1

American College of Cardiology Scientific Meeting 2019

Remo H. M. Furtado, et al.

On behalf of the DECLARE TIMI-58 Executive & Steering Committees and Investigators

Dapagliflozin and CV outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and prior myocardial infarction: a sub-analysis from DECLARE TIMI-58

NCT01730534

DECLARE TIMI-58 was funded by a grant from AstraZeneca to Brigham and Women’s Hospital

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Background

Wiviott et al. N Eng J Med 2019; 380: 347 ~ 60 % with no prior athero CV disease > 90 % eGFR > 60 ml/min/1.73 m2

(CVD/MI/Ischemic Stroke)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Background

Zelniker et al. Lancet 2019; 393: 31 Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD): Multiple Risk Factors (MRF):

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Das et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72: 3200

Background – ACC guidelines

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Background

Cavender et al. Circulation 2015;132:923

MACE in REACH registry (n = 19,699) across the spectrum of atherothrombotic risk

Adj K-M (%) Months Diabetes + only risk factors Diabetes + ASCVD without prior ischemic event Diabetes + ASCVD with prior ischemic event CV death, MI or stroke

slide-6
SLIDE 6

To investigate the benefit of dapagliflozin in the particular subgroup

  • f

patients with T2DM and prior MI

Objective

slide-7
SLIDE 7

DECLARE TIMI-58 trial randomized patients with T2DM and either established ASCVD or only MRF to dapagliflozin 10 mg QD versus placebo

Prior MI was pre-specified as a subgroup of interest

The risks of MACE and CVD/HHF (dual primary EPs) in patients with and without prior MI were compared in the placebo arm, with adjustment for baseline differences (Cox model)

Efficacy of dapagliflozin regarding both MACE and CVD/HHF was evaluated stratified by history of MI

Treatment-by-subgroup interactions for the absolute risk reductions (ARR) were analyzed using Gail−Simon test.

Methods

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Results - Baseline

Prior MI (n = 3,584) No prior MI (n = 13,576) P value Age, yrs, median (IQR) 62 (57 , 68) 64 (60 , 68) < 0.001 Female sex (%) 24 41 < 0.001 Duration of DM, yrs, median (IQR) 10 (5 , 16) 11 (6 , 16) < 0.001 Insulin (%) 46 40 < 0.001 GFR, ml/min/1.73 m2, median (IQR) 88 (73 , 97) 89 (75 , 96) 0.10 Hypertension (%) 87 91 < 0.001 Dyslipidemia (%) 93 77 < 0.001 Current smoker (%) 16 14 0.086 Heart failure (%) 22 7 < 0.001 Prior Ischemic Stroke (%) 6 7 0.27 Prior PAD (%) 8 6 < 0.001

slide-9
SLIDE 9

% with events: 17.8 % (prior MI) vs. 7.1 % (no prior MI) Adj HR* (95 % CI) = 2.28 (1.96 to 2.65); p < 0.001

* Adjusted for: age, sex, race, weight, diabetes duration, region, baseline insulin, HF, dyslipidemia, hypertension, smoking, ischemic

stroke and peripheral artery disease.

Event rates in placebo arm

MACE – CV death, MI or ischemic stroke

20% 10% 0% 15% 5%

12 24 36 48

No prior MI Prior MI Months

Cumulative incidence

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10% 5% 0% 7.5% 2.5%

12 24 36

No prior MI Prior MI

48

12.5% Months

Event rates in placebo arm

CV death or hospitalization for HF

* Adjusted for: age, sex, race, weight, diabetes duration, region, baseline insulin, HF, dyslipidemia, hypertension, smoking, ischemic

stroke and peripheral artery disease.

% with events: 10.5 % (prior MI) vs. 4.5 % (no prior MI) Adj HR* (95 % CI) = 1.77 (1.46 to 2.14); p < 0.001

Cumulative incidence

slide-11
SLIDE 11

10% 5% 0%

360 24 36 48

15%

Prior MI – Placebo (N = 1,807) Prior MI – Dapagliflozin (N = 1,777) No Prior MI – Placebo (N = 6,771) No Prior MI – Dapagliflozin (N = 6,805)

Patients with prior MI % with events: 17.8 % vs. 15.2 % HR (95% CI) = HR 0.84 (0.72 to 0.99) Patients without prior MI % with events: 7.1 % vs. 7.1 % HR (95% CI) = HR 1.00 (0.88 to 1.13)

20% Months

ARR = 2.6 %

P-int HR = 0.11

P-int ARR = 0.048

CV outcomes with dapagliflozin

MACE – CV death, MI or ischemic stroke

12

ARR = 0.0 %

Cumulative incidence

slide-12
SLIDE 12

10% 5% 0% 7.5% 2.5%

12 24 36 48

12.5%

Patients with prior MI % with events: 10.5 % vs. 8.6 % HR (95% CI) = HR 0.81 (0.65 to 1.00) Patients without prior MI % with events: 4.5 % vs. 3.9 % HR (95% CI) = HR 0.85 (0.72 to 1.00)

Months

P-int ARR = 0.01

P-int HR = 0.69

CVD or HF hospitalization

CV outcomes with dapagliflozin

ARR = 1.9 %

Prior MI – Placebo (N = 1,807) Prior MI – Dapagliflozin (N = 1,777) No Prior MI – Placebo (N = 6,771) No Prior MI – Dapagliflozin (N = 6,805)

ARR = 0.6 %

Cumulative incidence

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Study Endpoints by History of MI

HR P-interaction for HR Dapagliflozin % Placebo % 0.78 0.99 0.80 1.08 0.64 1.01 9.2% 11.7% 6.7% 2.0 % 3.2 % MI

Type 1 MI Type 2 MI

3.4% 3.4% 8.3% 2.5% 2.3% 0.9% 0.9% 0.082 ARR P-interaction for ARR 2.5% 0.0% 1.6%

  • 0.2 %

1.1% 0.0 % 0.019

  • 5.0 -4.0 -3.0 -2.0 -1.0 0.0 1.0

Prior MI (N = 3,584) No Prior MI (N = 13,576)

Placebo better Dapagliflozin better Placebo better Dapagliflozin better

CV outcomes with dapagliflozin

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Study Endpoints by History of MI

Placebo better Dapagliflozin better

0.92 1.03 4.9% 5.3 % CV death 2.3% 2.3 % 0.93 1.05 0.71 0.75 0.97 3.7% 3.9% 4.6% 0.54 Ischemic stroke HHF 2.5% 2.4% 6.3% 1.9% 2.5% 0.56 0.77

  • 0.1 %
  • 0.1 %

0.3 % 1.8 % 0.6 % 0.50 0.001 0.56

Placebo better Dapagliflozin better

All cause death 0.83 8.6% 10.3% 5.5% 5.7% 0.22 0.4 % 1.7 % 0.1 % 0.084

  • 5.0 -4.0 -3.0 -2.0 -1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0

0.25 0.50 1.0 2.0

HR P-interaction for HR Dapagliflozin % Placebo % ARR P-interaction for ARR

CV outcomes with dapagliflozin

Prior MI (N = 3,584) No Prior MI (N = 13,576)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

MACE by time from last MI

Placebo better Dapagliflozin better

HR

P-interaction (trend)

0.84 0.007

Dapagliflozin % Placebo % Overall (N = 3,584) 15.2% 17.8% 13.8% 20.3%

≤ 12 months (N = 488) 12-24 months (N = 356) 24-36 months (N = 339) > 36 months (N = 2,400)

11.8% 25.7% 15.8% 18.8% 15.8% 15.8%

0.66 0.42 0.83 1.01

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Summary

Patients with T2DM and prior MI are at heightened risk

  • f both MACE and CV death/HF hospitalization

Dapagliflozin appeared to robustly reduce the risk of MACE, and particularly MI, in patients with prior MI

This 22 % RRR in MI with dapagliflozin is comparable to other established therapies used in secondary prevention, like DAPT1 and intensive lipid lowering2

1- Bonaca et al. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372: 1791 2- Sabatine et al. Circulation. 2018; 138: 756

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Patients with T2DM and prior MI derived important CV events reductions with dapagliflozin.

Those findings add new relevant information to recent guidelines, reinforcing that these patients should be strongly considered for SGLT2 inhibitors when selecting glucose-lowering agents.

The mechanisms which could explain the reduction in recurrent MI with SGLT2 inhibitors should be clarified in future studies.

Conclusions

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Additional Information

Article available at www.ahajournals.org Slides available at www.TIMI.org