CRASH COURSE OR COURSE CRASH: Gaming, VR and a Pedagogical Approach - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

crash course or
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

CRASH COURSE OR COURSE CRASH: Gaming, VR and a Pedagogical Approach - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CRASH COURSE OR COURSE CRASH: Gaming, VR and a Pedagogical Approach Dr. Brent Chamberlain Landscape Architecture & Regional and Community Planning Kansas State University DLA Conference 2015 June 6, 2015 BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT


slide-1
SLIDE 1

CRASH COURSE OR COURSE CRASH:

Gaming, VR and a Pedagogical Approach

  • Dr. Brent Chamberlain

Landscape Architecture & Regional and Community Planning Kansas State University DLA Conference 2015 June 6, 2015

slide-2
SLIDE 2

BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT

  • Geospatially-focused course
  • Graduate and undergraduate Mix
  • Little GIS knowledge, none for City Engine and Unity
slide-3
SLIDE 3

QUESTION

How might I augment existing curriculum to grow spatial thinking, improve spatial design, and solidify fundamental landscape planning concepts (using new and fun techniques)?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

TASK(S)

Develop a City

  • Using a design process
  • Learning about data needs
  • Real-time interaction &

feedback

Develop our City

  • City of Manhattan, KS
  • Implement CityEngine

“wireframe”

  • Aggieville representation
  • Unity Migration
slide-5
SLIDE 5

METHODSsimcity

  • Game-based pedagogy

(with no game training)

  • Team-based
  • Objectives: budget, approval rating,

population size, creativity

  • Unlimited funds
  • Trial edition (4 hour limit)
slide-6
SLIDE 6

WATER AIR POLLUTION EDUCATION FIRE RISK WIND POTENTIAL RESOURCES (IRON ORE)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

RESULTSsimcity

slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Mix residential, Isolated industrial (down wind); Transit-oriented development, Rapid transit on loop, to: maximize happiness

slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15

METHODScityengine

Develop our City

  • City of Manhattan, KS
  • Implement City Engine “wireframe”
  • Aggieville representation
  • Unity Migration
slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25

RESULTScityengine

  • Completed development of GIS dataset
  • Infastructure representation
  • CityEngine wireframe and Unity Integration
slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28

DISCUSSIONsimcity

  • Excellent learning opportunity
  • Need to (slightly) modify game conditions

How enjoyable was the experience working with SimCity in class? (4.8, +0.4 of 5.0) How useful was the SimCity exercise for understanding the use of geospatial information for decision making and/or suitability analyses (4.4, +0.6 of 5.0)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

DISCUSSIONcityengine

How enjoyable was the experience working with CityEngine in class (3.5, +1.1 of 5)? Would you have like to spend more time working with CityEngine (4.1, +0.9 or 5.0)?

slide-30
SLIDE 30

CONCLUSION

  • Continued use of SimCity
  • Excellent tool for data-informed design
  • CityEngine integration requires course overhaul
  • Useful tool for visualization
  • Students are interested, but lose attention quickly
  • Requires new set of tutorials and training
  • A qualitative improvement in spatial thinking, design,

and understanding of fundamental landscape planning concepts.

slide-31
SLIDE 31
  • Dr. Brent Chamberlain

Landscape Architecture & Regional and Community Planning Kansas State University http://brentchamberlain.org DLA Conference 2015 June 6, 2015