CONSTRUCTION LOGISTICS PROGRAMME Construction Logistics Improvement Group Meeting 4
Ref Item Timing Lead Introductions and review of actions from working 1 20 GD groups Construction Logistics Plans: update to guidance 2 50 Arup and tool Discussion: How should we communicate the 3 20 Construction Logistics Programme? GD 4 15 Break Investigating the construction industry’s use of HGV 5 20 WSP types Investigating the impacts caused by construction 6 25 Aecom delivery inefficiencies Isle of Dogs and South Poplar Opportunity Area - 7 transport and movement 25 TfL Next steps and AOB 8 5 GD
Introductions ▪ Organisation and role ▪ Review of Working Group actions
Standard method of communications Actions Workstreams 1 and 2 Establishing industry change initiatives Item Action Progress CLIG to review report on planning and A monitoring report from London Data sources and supply data from MPA and also info Aggregates Working Group has now been collection from LAWG (in progress – currently provided by Ian Brooker) trying to source report from MPA. Wharves Mapping TfL / PLA to incorporate the points TfL is meeting with Canal & River Trust on 3 rd April to start the ball rolling and study based on Water freight toolkit from CLIG into study then to include PLA in follow up session A call has gone out with the meeting Tipper Rigid study Invite CLIG members to participate in minutes and WSP will present on 29th so the study further opportunities for engagement through that session Dan presenting at the meeting and will CLPs have an update covering the actions and Various actions were on Dan at Arup will also provide a hand out for the draft CLP template
Standard method of communications Actions Workstream 3 Establishing industry change initiatives Item Action Progress Existing rail and water IB to source C & RT report and contact IB has provided the Aggregates freight activity LAPW for materials moved by water Monitoring report from London and river Aggregates Working Group dated September 2016, but has not been able to get the CRT report Review collaboration CLIG to review and put forward some Suggest a call goes out to CLIG for methods that support case studies that demonstrate logistics this logistics efficiency efficiency FORS TfL to ensure consolidation centres are TfL actioning ranked the level of FORS specified in contracts rather than the fleet operated. All centres need to be specifying CLOCS Standard as a minimum Consolidation centres CLIG to discuss and agree the criteria AOB at CLIG if time – otherwise for table for another CLIG meeting that defines a consolidation centre and identify the business benefits and best practices as part of directory update Barriers study Various actions on SDG SDG no longer presenting at the meeting and are currently focussing on increasing the numbers of interviews – further updates to be given at the next CLIG
Standard method of communications Actions Workstream 4 Establishing industry change initiatives Item Action Progress OAPFs Develop methodology for establishing Suggest for discussion at future CLIG the key elements of high impact session construction sites within OAPFs to help inform a document on infrastructure plans and routes Inefficient deliveries AECOM to include interviews with AECOM to give an update as part of study drivers as part of inefficient deliveries their presentation at CLIG study i.e. who gave instructions, how their journeys are planned Environmental Garry Lewis (Tarmac) attends the Standing item to be included in WG impact LoCITY steering group as CLIG representative and provide feedback on LoCity developments and progress Re timing Some work needs to be done on this CLIG to review – suggest tabling at a future meeting programme retiming programme as currently not fit for purpose DVS consultation CLIG members to express views as to Remind at CLIG – consultation how TfL can practicably achieve the closing date is 18 April Mayor’s commitment to the current HGV DVS consultation Working groups To be done Merge WG3 and WG4 into one WG on Planned Measures
Construction Logistics Plans – Update to guidance and tool
Construction Logistics Plan Project: Update to CLIG Wednesday 29 March Dan Evanson
Presentation Scope • CLP Technical Guidance Update • CLP Training update • Forthcoming project dates of note • Questions
Technical Guidance ipdf update
Key Technical Guidance Alterations As a reminder, we aimed to consider the following: • Content and language have been refined – SIMPLE • There is less ambiguity in the guidance – CLEAR • There are now multiple levels – PROPORTIONATE • The guidance follows a clearly defined structure – CONSISTENT • Tables required are produced automatically by the Trip Generator Template that accompanies the Guidance – EFFICIENT • The use of a standardised methodology will enable accurate review – COMPARABLE
CLP Technical Guidance Update • Since I last presented the ipdf to you it has been discussed at the CLIG Workstream 2 working Group group meeting • The output of this is a revised draft of a new CLP Technical Guidance Document • Major changes are few but…. it will be printable! • Reined in some of the language so that we reiterate rather than re-write existing CLP policy • Have added definitions to deliver the clarity and consistency required
CLP Technical Guidance Update Medium impact site • For developments with a medium impact, the overall programme will need to be identified including the start of demolition/enabling works and the peak period of activity. High impact site • For developments with a high impact, the pre-contract engagement of a contractor or construction logistics expert is suggested to ensure the Outline CLP is as accurate and realistic as possible. The programme for the works should be defined including start and end dates for each stage of construction and a description of how works are expected to occur at the different stages.
CLP Technical Guidance Update • We would like to confirm some areas of the guidance with you: • Outline CLP • Medium impact
CLP Technical Guidance Update • We would like to confirm some areas of the guidance with you: • Outline CLP • High impact
CLP Technical Guidance Update • We would like to confirm some areas of the guidance with you: • Detailed CLP • Medium impact
CLP Technical Guidance Update • We would like to confirm some areas of the guidance with you: • Detailed CLP • High impact
CLP Trip Generation Template From this….. To this!
CLP Training Update • Engaging interactive sessions that provide delegates with the opportunity to both explore the new guidance and then put their learning into practice • The training takes a balanced approach – acknowledging the challenges that individuals face and providing them with the opportunity to consider solutions and ways around these • Brings together individuals from across the industry facilitating collaboration opportunities and allowing them to network • Accredited by the CILT
Last time I told you we were adopting a novel training approach. This time I thought I’d just show you:
Forthcoming dates of interest • Late February: Tech Guidance Draft Shared with CLIG volunteers • 14 April: Final Draft Guidance submitted (original date was 13 March) • By 1 May: Pilot training delivered • This is a key focus – we are holding 5/6 May (Thursday/Friday) • please let us know if you would like to attend? • 22 May: Full training delivery begins • There will be some 200 funded places, please register your interest with me
Any Questions? dan.evanson@arup.co.uk
Open discussion: How should we communicate the Construction Logistics Programme?
Standard method of communications Standard method of communications Establishing industry change initiatives Establishing industry change initiatives Some effect but no industry wide movement Localised action but not debated in any detail
Background to successful communications Powerful industry-led change initiatives Over 400 champions signed up Over 4000 operators accredited Over 1000 stakeholders involved
Communicating construction logistics Where do we want to be?
Communicating construction logistics How are we going to get there? Research Construction • industry’s use of HGV types Impacts caused by • construction delivery inefficiencies Barriers to River and • Rail Old Oak and Park • Royal Construction Logistics Strategy
Communicating construction logistics Discussion points • Should the programme be positioned as industry led or TfL led? • Should the programme develop a branding identity that is carried through all assets? • Should the programme develop a web presence that is independent from the TfL dot gov domain? • How does the programme engage with the wider industry, what does the stakeholder look like? • Are there any other communications points to consider? How should programme communications be funded?
Break
Investigating the construction industry’s use of HGV types
Investigating The Construction Industry’s Use Of HGV Types Presentation to TfL CLIG March 2017
Recommend
More recommend
