coherent thz radiation at newsubaru
play

Coherent THz radiation at NewSUBARU NewSUBARU, LASTI, Y. Shoji - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Coherent THz radiation at NewSUBARU NewSUBARU, LASTI, Y. Shoji University of Hyogo Introduction to NewSUBARU SPring-8 SR 1 GeV linac Circumference 118.7 m Injection Energy 1.0 GeV Electron Energy 0.5 - 1.5 GeV Type of Bending cell


  1. Coherent THz radiation at NewSUBARU NewSUBARU, LASTI, Y. Shoji University of Hyogo

  2. Introduction to NewSUBARU SPring-8 SR 1 GeV linac Circumference 118.7 m Injection Energy 1.0 GeV Electron Energy 0.5 - 1.5 GeV Type of Bending cell DBA with Inv.B RF Frequency 499.956 MHz Natural Emittance 38 nm (1GeV) Natural Energy Spread 0.047% (1GeV) New Material(1998) Photo-chemical(1998) NewSUBARU Inteferometry(1998) Microscope(2001) Long Undulator Short Undulator LIGA(1997) EUVL(1997) LIGA(1997) LIGA(2004) Optical Klystron R & D (1997)

  3. Special design: Invert Bend Momentum compaction factor Change η in the invert bends --> change α 1 ∆ L / L 0 ≡ α 1 δ + α 2 δ 2 + α 3 δ 3 + . . . . keeping achromatic condition δ ≡ ( Ε−Ε 0 )/Ε 0 34 o -8 o +34 o =60 o 2 α 1 =0 1.5 dispersion function (m) α 1 =0.0014 1 0.5 Q3 Q4 Q3 Q4 0 BEND INV.BEND BEND -0.5 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 s (m) Normal Bend Invert Bend

  4. Control of momentum compaction factor Momentum compaction factor ∆ L / L 0 ≡ α 1 δ + α 2 δ 2 + α 3 δ 3 + . . . . δ ≡ ( Ε−Ε 0 )/Ε 0 α 1 =1.3 × 10 -3 → ≈ 0 Q3 & Q4 α 2 = 0 SF, SD, (SB) α 3 ≈ 0.5 no control knob α 4 ≈ -20 no control knob

  5. Types of CSR Normal radiation 10 1 CSR burst multi-bunch; normal a1 normal α 1 , high peak current single-bunch; normal a1 10 0 relative radiation power / bunch multi-bunch; low a1, high Vrf --> WIRMS2007 10 -1 10 -2 Steady state CSR small α 1 (quasi-isochronous ring) 10 -3 Beam physics ---> Instability threshold 10 -4 Acc. technology ---> stability problem 10 -5 Linac Pulse CSR --> morning session 10 -6 No laser induced CSR 10 -7 10 -4 10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 10 0 10 1 10 2 stored beam current per bunch (mA) NewSUBARU has bunch shortening limit What limit the bunch shortenning?

  6. Bunch shortenning at NewSUBARU Deviation from the scaling law 10 0.24 uA/bunch; 120kV σ T ∝ α 1 is valid for α 1 > 2 × 10 − 5 0.24 uA/bunch; 300kV 1.8 uA/bunch; 120kV 8 bunch length ( σ ; ps) 1.8 uA/bunch; 300kV σ T − MIN ≈ 1.4ps at α 1 ≈ 1 × 10 − 5 6 Instability ? No V RF =120kV no I B dependence at I B <2 µ A 4 V RF =300kV 2 Problem of monitor ? No Measured by a streak camera α 1 does not reduce σ T 0 V RF does reduce σ T 0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 /α 1 BESSY & ANKA do not have that problem!

  7. Comparison of NewSUBARU with BESSY BESSY II NewSUBARU Natural Energy Spread 0.08% 0.047% 30 π 30 π Natural Emittance (nm rad) α 1 -1.4x10 -6 5x10 -6 α 3 -0.01 0.5 Damping time 8ms 12ms Lattice non-achromatic DB DBA+IB

  8. Ripple & stability of magnets Magnet Power supply Effect resolution ripple resolution ripple ∆ E/E = 1E-6 B < 1E-6 ∆ B/B = 1E-6 * Inv Bend < 1E-5 Q4 1.5E-5 (16bit) < 2E-6 ∆α 1 = 4E-6* ∆α 1 = 6E-7 ∆α 2 = 2.6E-3 * ∆α 2 = 2E-4 Sext-F 2.4E-4 (12bit) < 2E-5 ∆τ = 0.1 ps RF with FB < 0.02 deg * Imbalance between B and IB main power supply * α 1 =4X10 -6 --> σ T =0.6 ps ( E 0 =1GeV, V RF =300 keV) 270A Eastern Western arc IB arc IB * stability condition; α 1 +2 α 2 δ + 3 α 3 δ 2 >0 2.36A 2.36A −−> α 1 > 4.5 X 10 -6

  9. Effect of IB field ripple -- path-length ripple Dipole field error produces longitudinal oscillation β S β ( s ) [ ] Deflection θ S ∆ x ∆ x ( s ) = 2sin πν θ S cos ψ ( s ) − ψ S − πν ∆ E E = − η S x ( s ) ∫ L 0 ∆ L 0 = = η S θ S θ S ρ ( s ) ds ∆ L --> ∆ E α L 0 0 Evidence of path-length ripple (at normal operation) 1.5 COD drift with harmonic freq. horizontal displacement ( µ m ) 60Hz sine component 1 (60Hz, 120Hz, 180Hz, . . . .) 0.5 ⎧ ⎫ ⎪ ⎪ β S β ( s ) ] − η S η ( s ) 0 ⎨ ⎬ [ x ( s ) = 2sin πν cos ψ ( s ) − ψ S − πν θ S ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ α L 0 ⎭ -0.5 -1 agreed with expected COD cosine component -1.5 for IB ripple ; ∆ B/B <4X10 -7 4 6 8 10 12 BPM number

  10. Pathlength ripple & RF ripple Forced Oscillation pathlength ripple d τ dt = − α 1 ε + ∆ C e j ω t RF ripple 2 d ε dt = ω S ( τ + ∆ P e j ω t ) − 2 α E ε α 1 2 ∆ P τ = (2 α E + j ω ) ∆ C − ω S j ω t e 2 − ω 2 + 2 j ωα E ω S 2 ε = ( ω S ∆ C + j ω∆ P e j ω t ) 2 − ω 2 + 2 j ωα E α 1 ω S

  11. Pathlength ripple & RF ripple (180 Hz) 10 -1 10 2 (a) (b) natural spread ( σ ) natural spread ( σ ) 10 -2 relative energy spread 10 1 bunch length (ps) 10 -3 pathlength 10 0 10 -4 ε l ) fluctuation ( l pathlength 10 -5 τ l ) fluctuation ( l 10 -1 10 -6 10 -2 rf phase 10 -7 fluctuation ( l ε l ) rf phase fluctuation ( l τ l ) 10 -8 10 -3 10 -6 10 -5 10 -4 10 -3 10 -6 10 -5 10 -4 10 -3 momentum compaction factor momentum compaction factor

  12. Measured energy fluctuation (1) 20Hz (dBm) 20 60Hz (dBm) 60 120Hz (dBm) 120 180Hz (dBm) 180 -30 240Hz (dBm) 240 360Hz (dBm) 360 -40 ∆ X at BPM8 (dBm) -50 -60 -70 The oscillation is harmful -80 BESSY & ANKA have -90 2 3 4 5 0.5 1 no Invert Bend ! fs (kHz)

  13. Feed-back control Energy feed-back S t o r a g e R i n g S i n g l e - P a s s B P M Feed-back OFF ON C i r c u i t y B P M x F e e d - B a c k C o n t r o l l e r b i - p o l a r A C p o w e r s u p p l y (below; with LPF; x2) D i p o l e M a g n e t FB works at normal α 1 but not at small α 1 because of non-linearity?

  14. Non-symmetry for + ∆ E and - ∆ E The bunch length was not always shortest at where the f S was the smallest. It strongly depended on δ (or ∆ f RF ) at small α 1 ( α 1 = 1 × 10 -5 ). 499955.480 kHz 499955.500 kHz 499955.520 kHz 900 5 800 4 700 f S (kHz) relative strenghth +15Hz 3 600 500 2 400 1 300 -30 -20-10 0 10 20 30 0 ∆ f RF (Hz) 0 10 20 30 40 time (ps) bunch shape. FFT spectrum of the beam signal Synchrotron Oscillation is enhanced at δ >0

  15. Non-symmetry for + ∆ E and - ∆ E Non-symmetry has stored current dependence 499955530 Hz 499955550 Hz 0 0 30Hz 0.47mA 0.47mA 50Hz 50Hz 0.02mA 0.02mA 70Hz -20 -20 FFT power (dB) FFT power (dB) -40 -40 -60 -60 -80 -80 -100 -100 -1000 -500 0 500 1000 -1000 -500 0 500 1000 f - f RF (Hz) f - f RF (Hz) Current dependence of fs side-band. f RF peak is normalized to 0dB. White noise is subtracted from the data at 0.02mA

  16. Conclusion ・ Some problems in QI operation are enhanced at NewSUBARU probably because of the Invert Bend. ・ Ring stability is a main technical point of QI operation ・ Higher order α would be the other problem ・ Still there is a phenomenon not understood.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend