Cofiring Coal with Coal with Switchgrass Switchgrass: : Cofiring - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

cofiring coal with coal with switchgrass switchgrass
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Cofiring Coal with Coal with Switchgrass Switchgrass: : Cofiring - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Cofiring Coal with Coal with Switchgrass Switchgrass: : Cofiring The Chariton Valley Biomass Project The Chariton Valley Biomass Project Prepared for: Public Policy Virginia, Biofuels Meeting Charlottesville, VA March 30, 2006 Presented


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Cofiring Cofiring Coal with Coal with Switchgrass Switchgrass: :

The Chariton Valley Biomass Project The Chariton Valley Biomass Project

Prepared for:

Public Policy Virginia, Biofuels Meeting Charlottesville, VA March 30, 2006

Presented by:

Kevin Comer

ANTARES Group Incorporated ● www.antaresgroupinc.com Landover, MD Office: 301-731-1900 ; Harrisonburg, VA Office: 540-442-9848

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Presentation Objective Presentation Objective

  • Provide project background & update

– for more see www.cvrcd.org/ biomass.htm

  • Describe on-going test burn activities
  • Photos of equipment (this is real, now)
  • Describe Antares’ role in the project
  • Review next steps . . .
slide-3
SLIDE 3

What is What is Switchgrass Switchgrass? ?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Switchgrass Switchgrass Cofiring Cofiring

Ottumwa, Iowa Ottumwa, Iowa

  • Ottumwa Generating Station

– Alliant Energy / Mid-American – 726 MW, PRB Coal, 1982 startup – Twin furnace T-fired PC boiler – 2.5 to 5% heat input from switchgrass, 12.5 to 25 ton/ hr – Separate biomass injection, 2 - 4 ports

  • Status

– 2000 hr continuous test burn on-going – Newly constructed facility completed – Long term test to investigate fouling, slagging, and corrosion impacts

  • Fuel

– 3’ x 4’ x 8’ switchgrass bales – 2-step milling process to 1/ 8” minus

slide-5
SLIDE 5

How big is a 726 MW power plant? How big is a 726 MW power plant?

Boiler (Steam Generator) Steam Turbine & Electric Generator

slide-6
SLIDE 6

How big is a 726 MW power plant? How big is a 726 MW power plant?

Boiler (Steam Generator) Steam Turbine & Electric Generator 6 ft tall man

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Project Background Project Background

  • Drivers

– Local rural income & environmental benefits – Hedge against carbon regs & portfolio standards

  • Funding (started in 1996)

– Cost share between U.S. Dept. of Energy & Project Partners – Approx. $16 million from DOE through end of FY06 – Farm Bill considerations will be key to commercial viability

  • Test & Phase I Commercial Facility (“Grass Station”)

– Designed for 12.5 ton/ hour, 24 hr/ day – 25,000 tons of switchgrass for 2,000 hour continuous test burn accumulated from 4,000 acres over several years – Contains several innovative, first-of-a-kind pieces of equipment (which are working great) – 17.5 MW of BASELOAD Renewable Energy – Automated control & monitoring system – Would require 100,000 tons/ yr, from 25k to 75k acres initially – Concept based on operating Danish straw-fired plants

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Chariton Valley Project Timeline Chariton Valley Project Timeline

Feedstock Development Power Plant Testing Economics, Market Devel. Environmental Impacts 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Emphasize Crop Establishment, Planning, Begin Harvest & Storage, Ag R&D, Outreach, Prepare for First Test Burn 2008 PROJECT START COMMERCIALIZATION Analyze Test Results, Modify Equipment Design, Economic Peer Review, Continue Harvest & Storage, Continue Ag R&D, Detailed Planning, Prepare for Interim Test Burn First Test Burn Interim Test Burn Acceptable Power Plant Impacts Ash Approval Economics Peer Review Air Permits Fuel Supply Contract Signed Acceptable Power Plant Impacts Analyze Test Results, Modify Equipment Design, Continue Harvest & Storage, Complete Ag R&D, Prepare for Long Term Test Burn, Outreach Analyze Test Results, Prepare for Commercial Operations, Outreach Long Term Test Burn Acceptable Power Plant Impacts NOTE: Dashed lines indicate GO / NO-GO Milestones Feedstock Development Power Plant Testing Economics, Market Devel. Environmental Impacts 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Emphasize Crop Establishment, Planning, Begin Harvest & Storage, Ag R&D, Outreach, Prepare for First Test Burn 2008 PROJECT START COMMERCIALIZATION Analyze Test Results, Modify Equipment Design, Economic Peer Review, Continue Harvest & Storage, Continue Ag R&D, Detailed Planning, Prepare for Interim Test Burn First Test Burn Interim Test Burn Acceptable Power Plant Impacts Ash Approval Economics Peer Review Air Permits Fuel Supply Contract Signed Acceptable Power Plant Impacts Analyze Test Results, Modify Equipment Design, Continue Harvest & Storage, Complete Ag R&D, Prepare for Long Term Test Burn, Outreach Analyze Test Results, Prepare for Commercial Operations, Outreach Long Term Test Burn Acceptable Power Plant Impacts NOTE: Dashed lines indicate GO / NO-GO Milestones

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Chariton Valley Biomass Project Chariton Valley Biomass Project

Equipment Development

Bale Accumulator Bale Handling Biomass Processing Baler Development

Equipment Development

Bale Accumulator Bale Handling Biomass Processing Baler Development

Research / Reports

Crop Studies & Cost Soil Stability/Erosion/Carbon Air/Ash/Water Impacts Harvest Impacts on Wildlife

Outreach

Public Outreach Web Outreach Publications

Outreach

Public Outreach Web Outreach Publications

Processing Facility

August 2005 September 2005 November 2005 June 2005 August 2005 September 2005 November 2005 June 2005

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Growing Season After Frost, Before Harvest During Harvest After Harvest

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Hoop Building (Straw Storage) Straw Palace (Straw Storage) OGS Main Plant Building “Biosilo” (Straw Storage & Processing)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

OGS Site OGS Site Plan Plan

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Replacing up to 5% of this . . . . with this . . . .

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Processing System at OGS Processing System at OGS

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Front End of Processing System . . . Front End of Processing System . . .

  • Teleboom loading
  • Automated bale handling

– Moisture, w eight, reject, de-string, debale, m etal rem oval, m ill, burn

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Back End of Processing System . . . Back End of Processing System . . .

  • High-efficiency cyclone

and baghouse for dust control and filtering

  • Emissions test last week
  • 2-stage milling process to

reduce particle size

  • Final product fed into 2 blow

lines to boiler

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Switchgrass blow lines transporting ground switchgrass into boiler house (left) and boiler (right).

Ground switchgrass and pressurized transport air into OGS boiler Ground switchgrass and pressurized transport air to OGS boiler

slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19

CHARITON VALLEY BIOMASS PROJECT Daily Switchgrass Processing Chart (Friday March 10, 2006)

  • 200

400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400

0:00 2:00 4:00 6:00 8:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 0:00

Time Bale Weight (lbs)

  • 6.0

12.0 18.0 24.0 30.0 36.0 42.0

Bale Moisture (%) and Feed Rate (ton/hr)

Bale Weight (lbs.) Ave Bale Moisture (%) Feed Rate (ton/hr)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Automated Fuel Supply Hall (Future) Automated Fuel Supply Hall (Future)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Automated Crane in Danish Plant Automated Crane in Danish Plant

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Next Steps . . . . . Next Steps . . . . .

  • Complete Long Term Test Burn

– Prove technical viability / no unacceptable impacts at power plant – Currently operating under a limited-term fuel supply contract during test burn

  • Obtain value for environmental benefits

– SO2 credits, Renewable Energy Credits, Carbon Credits

  • Changes needed in Farm Bill to allow switchgrass

harvest from CRP acres

– Large impact on supply availability and economics

  • Execute signed commercial fuel supply contract

– Prove no large risk factors to power plant / boiler – Demonstrate attractive economics for suppliers and power company

  • Enlist switchgrass suppliers for commercial operation
slide-23
SLIDE 23

THE END . . . . . .