Coastal Mobility & Livability Working Group Encinitas Coastal - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
coastal mobility livability working group
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Coastal Mobility & Livability Working Group Encinitas Coastal - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sep 10, 2022 130 likes •483 views

Coastal Mobility & Livability Working Group Encinitas Coastal Mobility & Livability Study Meeting #6 September 13, 2017 2 AGENDA 1. Agenda Review 2. Call to Order / Meeting Notes 3. Public Comment 4. Briefings & Updates a.

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Encinitas Coastal Mobility & Livability Study

Coastal Mobility & Livability Working Group

Meeting #6 September 13, 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

AGENDA

2

  • 1. Agenda Review
  • 2. Call to Order / Meeting Notes
  • 3. Public Comment
  • 4. Briefings & Updates
  • a. CMLS Process
  • 5. Working Session:
  • a. Parking Study
  • b. Rail Corridor Crossings
  • c. Active Transportation
  • d. Quiet Zone
  • e. Verdi Crossing
  • 6. Wrap Up / Next Steps
slide-3
SLIDE 3

KEY OBJECTIVES FOR TONIGHT

3

 Parking Study:

  • CMLWG provide input on parking recommendations. CMLWG recommend

project team consider input and revise draft accordingly.  Rail Corridor Crossings:

  • CMLWG provide input on the locations and types of crossings. CMLWG

recommend project team consider input and revise draft accordingly.  Active Transportation Plan:

  • CMLWG provide input on the locations and types of bicycle and pedestrian
  • facilities. CMLWG recommend project team consider input and revise draft

accordingly.  Quiet Zone:

  • CMLWG recommend the project team proceed with the next steps of the quiet

zone process.  Verdi Avenue Crossing:

  • CMLWG provide input on the concept plans. CMLWG recommend project team

refine the concept and develop cost estimates and visual simulations.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

CMLS UPDATE

 Study process:

CMLWG Meetings Public Open House & City Council Workshop

Existing Conditions 1st Draft Improvements 2nd Draft Improvements Final Vision 9/13

TODAY

11/7 9/27 11/29

City Council Final Adoption

Early 2018

slide-5
SLIDE 5

PARKING STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS

slide-6
SLIDE 6

KEY OBJECTIVES FOR TONIGHT

6

 Parking Study:

  • CMLWG provide input on parking recommendations. CMLWG recommend

project team consider input and revise draft accordingly.  Rail Corridor Crossings:

  • CMLWG provide input on the locations and types of crossings. CMLWG

recommend project team consider input and revise draft accordingly.  Active Transportation Plan:

  • CMLWG provide input on the locations and types of bicycle and pedestrian
  • facilities. CMLWG recommend project team consider input and revise draft

accordingly.  Quiet Zone:

  • CMLWG recommend the project team proceed with the next steps of the quiet

zone process.  Verdi Avenue Crossing:

  • CMLWG provide input on the concept plans. CMLWG recommend project team

refine the concept and develop cost estimates and visual simulations.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

RAIL CORRIDOR CROSSINGS

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

CMLWG RECOMMENDATIONS, 1/25/17

9

 Move forward with El Portal Below-Grade Crossing – “comfortable consensus”1  This CMLWG recommendation was predicated on the following caveats:

  • Present design and receive input from Paul Ecke Central Elementary and Leucadia 101

Main Street

  • Concern expressed regarding the potential for establishment of a below-grade crossing to be

a road block to future, potential trenching

  • Request that City explore the potential for the design of the below-grade crossing to be

completed in a manner that could accommodate future trenching

  • Reiteration that the Working Group’s long term vision for the corridor includes moving the rail

corridor to the Interstate 5 corridor or trenching the rail corridor

  • Request that trenching be explored in a future Working Group meeting, including the

provision of background information on trenching

1Consensus by all Working Group Members present at the table; except one, who preferred “comfortable

consensus”

  • “Consensus” – All Working Group members feel satisfied with a recommendation.
  • “Comfortable consensus” – Working Group members may not enthusiastically support, but would not

actively oppose.

  • Concern expressed regarding the potential for

establishment of a below-grade crossing to be a road block to future, potential trenching

  • Request that City explore the potential for the design of the

below-grade crossing to be completed in a manner that could accommodate future trenching

  • Reiteration that the Working Group’s long term vision for

the corridor includes moving the rail corridor to the Interstate 5 corridor or trenching the rail corridor

  • Request that trenching be explored in a future Working

Group meeting, including the provision of background information on trenching

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

KEY OBJECTIVES FOR TONIGHT

13

 Parking Study:

  • CMLWG provide input on parking recommendations. CMLWG recommend

project team consider input and revise draft accordingly.  Rail Corridor Crossings:

  • CMLWG provide input on the locations and types of crossings. CMLWG

recommend project team consider input and revise draft accordingly.  Active Transportation Plan:

  • CMLWG provide input on the locations and types of bicycle and pedestrian
  • facilities. CMLWG recommend project team consider input and revise draft

accordingly.  Quiet Zone:

  • CMLWG recommend the project team proceed with the next steps of the quiet

zone process.  Verdi Avenue Crossing:

  • CMLWG provide input on the concept plans. CMLWG recommend project team

refine the concept and develop cost estimates and visual simulations.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

CORRIDOR CROSS- SECTIONS

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

KEY OBJECTIVES FOR TONIGHT

19

 Parking Study:

  • CMLWG provide input on parking recommendations. CMLWG recommend

project team consider input and revise draft accordingly.  Rail Corridor Crossings:

  • CMLWG provide input on the locations and types of crossings. CMLWG

recommend project team consider input and revise draft accordingly.  Active Transportation Plan:

  • CMLWG provide input on the locations and types of bicycle and pedestrian
  • facilities. CMLWG recommend project team consider input and revise draft

accordingly.  Quiet Zone:

  • CMLWG recommend the project team proceed with the next steps of the quiet

zone process.  Verdi Avenue Crossing:

  • CMLWG provide input on the concept plans. CMLWG recommend project team

refine the concept and develop cost estimates and visual simulations.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

QUIET ZONE FEASIBILITY

slide-21
SLIDE 21

QUIET ZONE FEASIBILITY

 Conducted preliminary risk analysis  Key findings to achieve citywide quiet zone:

  • Improvements required at all grade crossings:
  • Leucadia Boulevard
  • Encinitas Station
  • D Street
  • E Street
  • Chesterfield Drive: Already in progress (via San Elijo Double Track)

 Next Steps:

  • Conduct site diagnostic meeting with CPUC & NCTD
  • Achieve CPUC concurrence
  • File federal notice of intent to establish quiet zone
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Simulation: 4 quad gates Example: Pedestrian gates

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Example: 4 quad gates Example: Pedestrian gates Example: 4 quad gates with median

slide-24
SLIDE 24

KEY OBJECTIVES FOR TONIGHT

24

 Parking Study:

  • CMLWG provide input on parking recommendations. CMLWG recommend

project team consider input and revise draft accordingly.  Rail Corridor Crossings:

  • CMLWG provide input on the locations and types of crossings. CMLWG

recommend project team consider input and revise draft accordingly.  Active Transportation Plan:

  • CMLWG provide input on the locations and types of bicycle and pedestrian
  • facilities. CMLWG recommend project team consider input and revise draft

accordingly.  Quiet Zone:

  • CMLWG recommend the project team proceed with the next steps of the quiet

zone process.  Verdi Avenue Crossing:

  • CMLWG provide input on the concept plans. CMLWG recommend project team

refine the concept and develop cost estimates and visual simulations.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

VERDI AVENUE CROSSING

slide-26
SLIDE 26

AT GRADE

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

GRADE SEPARATED

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

GRADE SEPARATED

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

AT GRADE

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

GRADE SEPARATED

slide-31
SLIDE 31

KEY OBJECTIVES FOR TONIGHT

31

 Parking Study:

  • CMLWG provide input on parking recommendations. CMLWG recommend

project team consider input and revise draft accordingly.  Rail Corridor Crossings:

  • CMLWG provide input on the locations and types of crossings. CMLWG

recommend project team consider input and revise draft accordingly.  Active Transportation Plan:

  • CMLWG provide input on the locations and types of bicycle and pedestrian
  • facilities. CMLWG recommend project team consider input and revise draft

accordingly.  Quiet Zone:

  • CMLWG recommend the project team proceed with the next steps of the quiet

zone process.  Verdi Avenue Crossing:

  • CMLWG provide input on the concept plans. CMLWG recommend project team

refine the concept and develop cost estimates and visual simulations.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

WRAP UP & NEXT STEPS

slide-33
SLIDE 33

CMLS UPDATE

 Study process:

CMLWG Meetings Public Open House & City Council Workshop

Existing Conditions 1st Draft Improvements 2nd Draft Improvements Final Vision 9/13

TODAY

11/7 9/27 11/29

City Council Final Adoption

Early 2018

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Encinitas Coastal Mobility & Livability Study

Coastal Mobility & Livability Working Group

Meeting #6 September 13, 2017