Clean Coffee Team 17 Introduction Context Client Problem - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

clean coffee
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Clean Coffee Team 17 Introduction Context Client Problem - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Kirk Brink Chris Greaves Erik Karlson Paul Bootsma Clean Coffee Team 17 Introduction Context Client Problem Progress Initial Method of Attack Obstacles Overcome Final Plan of attack Sensitivity Studies Optimization Sustainability


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Clean Coffee

Team 17

Kirk Brink Chris Greaves Erik Karlson Paul Bootsma

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction

Context Client Problem

Progress

Initial Method of Attack Obstacles Overcome Final Plan of attack Sensitivity Studies Optimization Sustainability

Moving Forward

Testing Larger Sizes

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Context

Courtesy of makegoodcoffee.com

Coffee Roaster Afterburner

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Client

Courtesy of Vortx Kleanair

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Problem

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Why We Care

Courtesy of NASA Space Place

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Progress

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Initial Method of Attack

Research Model Revise Test

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Obstacles

Courtesy of Walmart.com

slide-10
SLIDE 10

New Plan of Attack

Incoming Flow Variables Particle Properties Cyclone Tube Geometry Separation Behavior

slide-11
SLIDE 11

New Plan of Attack

Incoming Flow Variables Particle Properties Cyclone Tube Geometry Separation Behavior Cyclone Tube Geometry Separation Behavior

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Sensitivity Studies

Rx R

Rd

Cyclone Geometry

Courtesy of Gas Cyclones and Swirl Tubes

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Base Case

R[m] 0.2794 Rx[m] 0.127 S[m] 0.3937 H[m] 1.314 Hc[m] 0.8128 Rd[m] 0.0762

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • 100%
  • 50%

0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 250% 300% 350% 400%

  • 100%

0% 100% 200% 300%

X 50 Dimension

Cut Diameter Sensitivity Study

R Rx S H Hc b Rd

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • 200%

0% 200% 400% 600% 800% 1000% 1200%

  • 100%

0% 100% 200% 300%

Delta P Dimension

Pressure Loss Sensitivity Study

R Rx S H Hc b Rd

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • 40%
  • 20%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  • 100%

0% 100% 200% 300%

Total Cost Dimension

Cost Sensitivity Study

R Rx S H Hc Rd

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Optimization - Cost

R

  • 45%

Rx

  • 47%

S

  • 87%

H

  • 22%

Hc 27% Rd

  • 7%

Base Case Optimized +/- Cost [$] 761.8 399.8

  • 48%

x-50 [µm] 7.5 6.5

  • 14%

dP [Pa] 482 1400 190%

slide-18
SLIDE 18

R 0% Rx

  • 6%

S

  • 87%

H 33% Hc 3% Rd 28%

Optimization – Cut Diameter

Base Case Optimized +/- x-50 [µm] 7.5 3.4

  • 55%

Cost [$] 761.8 865.5 14% dP [Pa] 482 1400 190%

slide-19
SLIDE 19

R 0% Rx 0% S 0% H 0% Hc 0% Rd 0%

Optimization – Pressure Loss

Base Case Optimized +/- dP [Pa] 482 482 0% Cost [$] 761.8 761.8 0% x-50 [µm] 7.5 7.5 0%

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Optimization - Balanced

Base Case Optimized +/- Cost [$] 761.8 667.4

  • 12%

x-50 [µm] 7.5 5.542

  • 26%

dP [Pa] 482 912.6 89% R

  • 11%

Rx 12% S

  • 16%

H

  • 13%

Hc

  • 14%

Rd 0%

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Optimization - Balanced

R 0% Rx 40% S 0% H 0% Hc 0% Rd 0% Base Case Optimized +/- Cost [$] 640.3 667.4 15% x-50 [µm] 5.39 5.542 3% dP [Pa] 580.7 912.6 43%

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Sustainability

0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 50 100 150 200 250 CO2 Emissions [kg] Batch Size [kg]

Carbon Emissions

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Sustainability

Courtesy of Toper NK

Arsenic and its components 1 mg/Nm3 Cadmiyum and its components 0.009 g/Nm3 CO 330-1050 mg Flora hydrolik acid and inorganic Florin components 0.85 g/Nm3 lead and its components 0.018 g/Nm3 NO2 Nitrogen Oxide 1100-3500 mg Sulfur dioxide 0.85 g/Nm3

Volatile Organic Compounds

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Moving Forward

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Testing

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Questions?