childho o d e duc a tio n a nd we lfa re re se a rc h a
play

Childho o d, E duc a tio n a nd We lfa re : Re se a rc h a nd Po - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Childho o d, E duc a tio n a nd We lfa re : Re se a rc h a nd Po lic y I nsig hts Wo rksho p Pre se nta tio n Ba rb a ra Wo lfe , Ric ha rd A. E a ste rlin Pro fe sso r o f He a lth E c o no mic s, Unive rsity o f Wisc o nsin-Ma diso n a


  1. Childho o d, E duc a tio n a nd We lfa re : Re se a rc h a nd Po lic y I nsig hts Wo rksho p Pre se nta tio n Ba rb a ra Wo lfe , Ric ha rd A. E a ste rlin Pro fe sso r o f He a lth E c o no mic s, Unive rsity o f Wisc o nsin-Ma diso n a nd Unive rsity o f Me lb o urne – F a c ulty o f Busine ss a nd E c o no mic s E mine nt Re se a rc h Sc ho la r 2017

  2. Go a l o f my ta lk  Bro a d q ue stio n: Ho w c a n re se a rc he rs a nd po lic y ma ke rs wo rk to g e the r to impro ve c hildho o d e duc a tio n, he a lth a nd o ve ra ll we ll-b e ing ?  Are re se a rc he rs wo rking o n the “rig ht re se a rc h”? Ho w do we impro ve the c o nve rsa tio n b e twe e n “us”?  Are po lic y ma ke rs “liste ning ” to wha t re se a rc he rs ha ve le a rne d?  My a ppro a c h this mo rning :  Se t o ut so me q ue stio ns whic h I ho pe a re use ful to g uide disc ussio ns o f the wo rksho p  Sha re a fe w e xpe rie nc e s fro m the U.S. with yo u

  3. Bro a d Que stio ns fo r to da y  Ho w do we e nc o ura g e pro duc tive disc ussio n b e twe e n re se a rc he rs a nd po lic y ma ke rs?  Ho w do re se a rc he rs a nd a c a de mic s c o mmunic a te so tha t re le va nt re se a rc h is use d in the po lic y a re na ? Ho w c o nfide nt do re se a rc he rs ne e d to b e to c o nve y “a nswe rs fro m re se a rc h” to po lic y ma ke rs?  Wha t type o f e vide nc e / pre se nta tio n do po lic y ma ke rs find c o nvinc ing ?  Wha t a re future c ha lle ng e s – ma jo r issue s tha t de se rve a tte ntio n fro m the re se a rc h c o mmunity? Ho w to ide ntify future “g ra nd c ha lle ng e s? ”  Do we fo c us o n whe the r pa rtic ula r inte rve ntio ns o r po lic ie s wo rk suc h a s a pa rtic ula r mo de l fo r pre sc ho o l? Or is the re a dditio na l pa yo ff to sta rting with de fine d g o a ls fo r c hildre n a nd the n a sking ho w b e st do we a c hie ve the m?

  4. E xpe rie nc e s tha t she d so me lig ht o n the se q ue stio ns.  1. Cha ir o f Na tio na l Ac a de my Wo rksho p o n Stre ng the ning Be ne fit-Co st Ana lysis fo r E a rly Childho o d I nte rve ntio ns  Wha t is the Na tio na l Ac a de my?  Na ture o f Wo rksho p a nd its o utput  Cha lle ng e s ide ntifie d  2. Me a ns te ste d he a lth insura nc e a nd re duc e d wo rk e ffo rt. Stro ng e mpiric a l wo rk he lpe d le a d to po lic y c ha ng e whic h re mo ve d e lig ib ility fo r me a ns te ste d he a lth insura nc e fro m pa rtic ipa tio n in c a sh suppo rt  3. Gro wing a tte ntio n to ”sc ie nc e ” e vide nc e o f influe nc e o f po ve rty o n the b ra in.

  5. T he Na tio na l Ac a de mie s  T he Na tio na l Ac a de my o f Sc ie nc e s is a priva te , no npro fit, se lf-pe rpe tua ting so c ie ty o f disting uishe d sc ho la rs e ng a g e d in sc ie ntific a nd e ng ine e ring re se a rc h, de dic a te d to the furthe ra nc e o f sc ie nc e a nd te c hno lo g y a nd to the ir use fo r the g e ne ra l we lfa re .  Upo n the a utho rity o f the c ha rte r g ra nte d to it b y the Co ng re ss in 1863, the Ac a de my ha s a ma nda te tha t re q uire s it to a dvise the fe de ra l g o ve rnme nt o n sc ie ntific a nd te c hnic a l ma tte rs  T he Na tio na l Ac a de my o f Me dic ine (o ne c o mpo ne nt o f the Na tio na l Ac a de mie s)wa s e sta b lishe d in 1970 b y the Na tio na l Ac a de my o f Sc ie nc e s to se c ure the se rvic e s o f e mine nt me mb e rs o f a ppro pria te pro fe ssio ns in the e xa mina tio n o f po lic y ma tte rs pe rta ining to the he a lth o f the pub lic .

  6. Ho w do e s a po lic y ma ke r de c ide whic h c hildho o d inte rve ntio ns a re the b e st inve stme nt? A wo rksho p o n Stre ng the ning the use fulne ss o f Be ne fit c o st a na lysis fo r c hildho o d inte rve ntio ns  Go a l: ide ntify suc c e ssful c hildho o d inte rve ntio ns.  Ma jo r I SSUE S :  Sa mple se le c tio n.  Sa mple se le c tio n, o n the pa rt o f the pro g ra m de sig ne r o r the pa rtic ipa nts, in e ithe r the initia l re c ruiting pro c e ss o r the sub se q ue nt b a se line e va lua tio n, o r b o th  Attritio n  L e ng th o f fo llo w-up pe rio ds Ma ny o f the e c o no mic re turns to c hildho o d inte rve ntio ns a nd, e spe c ia lly, e a rly c hildho o d inte rve ntio ns o c c ur re la tive ly fa r into the future .  Size a nd c o mpo sitio n o f Sa mple s studie d. Ge ne ra liza b ility  Re plic a b ility

  7. Pa rtic ula r c ha lle ng e fo r pro g ra ms ta rg e te d a t c hildre n, e spe c ia lly yo ung c hildre n  Asse ssing lo ng -te rm o utc o me s  A c ha lle ng e tha t c uts a c ro ss studie s a nd do ma ins is ide ntifying a nd me a suring o utc o me s tha t pe rsist o r sho w up lo ng a fte r the inte rve ntio n is c o mple te d  L o ng itudina l da ta a re e xpe nsive to c o lle c t, a ttritio n o f pa rtic ipa nts o ve r the ye a rs c a n b e a se rio us pro b le m, a nd, b y de finitio n, the da ta pro duc e a nswe rs o nly ye a rs a fte r the inte rve ntio n b e g ins.  Appro a c he s to ma ke b e tte r use o f e xisting da ta : (1) po sing ne w q ue stio ns tha t c a n b e a nswe re d using e xisting da ta , (2) me rg ing ne w info rma tio n into e xisting da ta se ts, a nd (3) me rg ing se ve ra l e xisting da ta se ts.

  8. Curre nt Co mmitte e o f Na tio na l Ac a de my  T he c o nundrum we fa c e is this: vo lume s o f re se a rc h studie s a re b e ing pro duc e d. So me studie s a ddre ss spe c ific po lic y q ue stio ns a nd o the rs pro vide va lua b le b a c kg ro und o n the myria d o f so c ie ta l c ha lle ng e s tha t c o nfro nt a nd c o nfo und po lic yma ke rs. Ye t a g a p e xists (so me sa y a c ha sm) b e twe e n the pro duc tio n o f re se a rc h a nd its utiliza tio n b y po lic yma ke rs.  An impo rtant ac tivity o f an o rg anizatio n like the Me lb o urne I nstitute o r the I nstitute fo r Re se arc h o n Po ve rty (b o th unive rsity b ase d) o r the Natio nal Ac ade mie s are to c lo se this g ap. But ho w?

  9. Cha lle ng e s I de ntifie d: An e xa mple o f a n e ffe c tive g ro up tha t b ridg e s the re se a rc h c o mmunity a nd po lic y ma ke rs: Wa shing to n Sta te I nstitute fo r Pub lic Po lic y  Se t up to to pro vide a na lysis o f po lic y o ptio ns fo r la wma ke rs. T he institute ha s b e c o me a va lua b le re so urc e fo r sta te le g isla to rs,  loc a lly ba se d a nd c lo se ly tie d to the c o mmunity a nd the la wma king pro c e ss.  sta ff ha s c lo se working re la tionships with the la wma ke rs,  the y kno w e xa c tly whic h o ne s to a ppro a c h o n a g ive n issue .  I nc lude info rma tio n fro m ma ny so urc e s, o fte n c o nduc t o wn me ta a na lyse s, distill a nswe rs to the pre c ise q ue stio ns tha t a re c urre nt in the sta te .  Pre se nt the ir info rma tio n in c o nsiste nt wa ys (the y use a Co nsume r Re po rts –type fo rma t) so it is e a sy fo r b usy le g isla to rs to find wha t the y ne e d a nd unde rsta nd the b a sis fo r the c o nc lusio ns.  Nonpar tisan ; b e ne fit-c o st a na lysis the mo st use ful to o l fo r he lping De mo c ra ts a nd Re pub lic a ns to ide ntify a n a ppro a c h the y c a n a g re e o n, re g a rdle ss o f the pro b le m. Be c a use the institute ha s b e e n willing to re c o mme nd c utting pro g ra ms whe n e vide nc e e me rg e s tha t the y do no t wo rk, the y ha ve b uilt trust in the e vide nc e -b a se d a ppro a c h

  10. E xa mple 2: Re se a rc h tha t is time ly, like ly to impro ve we ll-b e ing AND sa ve do lla rs  “T he E ffe c t o f the Me dic a id Pro g ra m o n We lfa re Pa rtic ipa tio n a nd L a b o r Supply” b y Ro b e rt Mo ffitt a nd Ba rb a ra Wo lfe in T he Re vie w o f E c o no mic s and Statistic s and “ Me dic a id, We lfa re De pe nde nc y, a nd Wo rk: I s T he re a Ca usa l L ink? ” in He alth Care F inanc ing Re vie w .  Use d Surve y o f I nc o me and Pro g ram partic ipatio n to e stimate the e ffe c t o f Me dic aid (me ans te ste d he alth insuranc e tie d to re c e ipt o f c ash assistanc e ) and private he alth insuranc e o n partic ipatio n in c ash assistanc e and e mplo yme nt fo r fe male he ads o f ho use ho lds.  F o und 1) inc re ase s in value o f Me dic aid le ad to inc re ase d take up o f c ash assistanc e and Me dic aid and de c re ase d e mplo yme nt 2) inc re ase d availab ility o f private insuranc e at the wo rkplac e inc re ase d e mplo yme nt and de c re ase d c ash assistanc e and Me dic aid take -up.  Simulatio n fo und that if private c o ve rag e similar to Me dic aid o ffe re d wo uld de c re ase tho se o n c ash assistanc e b y 25% and inc re ase e mplo yme nt b y 18%

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend