Chemical Exposures Associated with Clandestine Associated with - - PDF document

chemical exposures associated with clandestine associated
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Chemical Exposures Associated with Clandestine Associated with - - PDF document

Chemical Exposures Associated with Clandestine Associated with Clandestine Methamphetamine Laboratories National Jewish Medical National Jewish Medical and Research Center Shawn Arbuckle Multi-Agency Cooperation North Metro Drug Task


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Chemical Exposures Associated with Clandestine Associated with Clandestine Methamphetamine Laboratories

National Jewish Medical National Jewish Medical and Research Center

Shawn Arbuckle

Multi-Agency Cooperation

  • North Metro Drug Task Force
  • North Metro Drug Task Force
  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
  • Tri-County Health Department
  • High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area
  • U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency

N ti l J i h M di l d R h C t

  • National Jewish Medical and Research Center
slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Methamphetamine Myths

  • The chemicals used are just household chemicals

and will not hurt anyone and will not hurt anyone.

  • If it doesn’t hurt the cooks, it can’t hurt anyone else.
  • As long as you don’t smell a chemical odor,

everything will be OK.

  • Exposures only last for a short time and therefore

will not hurt anyone.

  • Exposures are usually below current standards and

do not present a hazard for anyone.

Meth Lab Responses: Inactive

  • Responded to suspected clandestine laboratories

Responded to suspected clandestine laboratories

  • Hotel Rooms
  • Homes
  • Apartments
  • Vehicles
  • Mobile Homes
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Definitions

  • Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL)

p ( )

  • 8 hour time-weighted average (TWA)
  • Occupational exposures only
  • Ceiling Value
  • A concentration that should not be exceeded during any part
  • f the working exposure
  • Short Term Exposure Limit (STEL)

p ( )

  • Not to be exceeded for a 15 minute TWA
  • Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health (IDLH)
  • Irreversible health effects or death after 30 minutes of

exposure

Other Definitions

  • PPM – common measurement of
  • PPM

common measurement of airborne compounds

  • 1 minute in 2 years
  • 1 inch in 16 miles
  • 1 drop in 185 cans of beer

 g – common measurement of mass

 1/1000th of a milligram

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Phosphine

  • Invisible with slight fish or garlic odor
  • Symptoms

Sy pto s

– Severe pulmonary irritant – Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, chest tightness, cough, headache, may be caused by exposures as low as 10 ppm – Pulmonary edema has caused death I li t d i d th t M th L b – Implicated in deaths at Meth Labs

  • Current Exposure Standards
  • PEL = 0.3 ppm
  • STEL = 1 ppm
  • IDLH = 50 ppm

Phosphine Exposure Levels

  • Red P and Hypophosphorous cooks:

Red P and Hypophosphorous cooks:

– ND to 3.5 ppm (10 x the PEL of 0.3 ppm) – In the area of the cook in a home it averaged 0.94 ppm

  • The cook temperature and water content

may have a significant effect on the amounts

  • f phosphine generated
  • f phosphine generated
  • Phosphine may be present in “death bag” at

high concentrations

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Iodine

  • Sharp, metallic smell
  • Iodine – Airborne
  • Iodine

Airborne

– Irritant of the eyes, mucous membranes, and skin – May cause chest tightness and difficulty breathing – Levels of 1.63 ppm will cause eye irritation in all exposed within 5 minutes – Skin rash due to hypersensitivity can occur

  • Current Exposure Standards
  • PEL = 0.1 ppm Ceiling
  • IDLH = 2 ppm

Iodine Exposure Levels

  • Measured Exposure Range

Measured Exposure Range

– 0.23 ppm – 3.7 ppm (almost 2x the IDLH)

  • Levels measured in the house cook

– Cook area = 0.16 ppm – Down the hall = 0.04 ppm Down the hall 0.04 ppm

  • Levels measured in the hotel cook

– 0.001 ppm – 0.05 ppm

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Anhydrous Ammonia

  • Symptoms

– Severe irritant of the eyes, respiratory tract, and Severe irritant of the eyes, respiratory tract, and skin – After 70 ppm, most individuals will report irritation – Levels over 2500 may cause corneal irritation, bronchospasm, chest pain, and pulmonary edema. Bronchitis and pneumonia may also occur – Tolerance may be acquired

  • Current Exposure Standards
  • PEL = 25 ppm
  • STEL = 35 ppm
  • IDLH = 300 ppm

Cook Results: Anhydrous

PEL = 25 ppm IDLH = 300 ppm

  • Cook area: 410 ppm
  • Across room: 130 ppm
  • Well Ventilated
  • Non-Vented

Real time instruments: Overloaded Highest measurement: > 3,000 ppm

  • Cook area: 190 ppm
  • Across room: < 66 ppm
slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Hydrochloric Acid

  • Colorless gas with pungent odor
  • Symptoms

Airborne

  • Symptoms – Airborne

– Upper respiratory tract irritation – cough, burning throat, choking, burning eyes, chest pain – Acute symptoms may occur as low as 5 ppm – Skin contact may cause burns and ulceration

  • Current Exposure Levels

Current Exposure Levels

  • Ceiling = 2 ppm
  • IDLH = 50 ppm

Hydrogen Chloride Exposure Levels

  • Average exposures during entire cook period:

Average exposures during entire cook period:

– 0.3 – 2.3 ppm (slightly above the 2 ppm Ceiling)

  • Average exposure during salting out:

– 3.8 – 7.2 ppm ( > 3 x the Ceiling)

  • Peak concentrations during salting out:

– 60 ppm – 155 ppm ( > 3 x the IDLH)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Methamphetamine

  • Symptoms

– Very little known regarding low level chronic exposures – Irritation of the skin, eyes, mucous membranes, and upper respiratory tract – High levels may cause dizziness, headache, metallic taste, insomnia, high or low blood pressure, etc. – Chronic exposures may cause irritability, personality changes, anxiety, hallucinations, psychotic behavior – Smaller infants, altered behavior patterns, lower IQ scores, teratogenic affects cerebral hemorrhage teratogenic affects, cerebral hemorrhage

  • Current Standards

– Surface contamination: 0.1 – 0.5 g/100 cm2 – No Effect Level Unknown – Therapeutic dose = 5 mg (2 - 3 x per day)

Methamphetamine

  • n Surfaces
  • Ranged from non-detect to 16,000

g/100 cm2 g/100 cm

– Average: 499 g/100 cm2

  • Levels inside microwaves were high
  • Levels on air returns were elevated

suggesting airborne quantities

  • Levels on flat surfaces in the lab area

were very high

  • Levels exceeding the standard were

found in every verified lab

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Methamphetamine on Surfaces After One Cook

  • Vertical Surfaces

– 36 inches from Cook: 130 g/100 cm2 – 88 inches from Cook: 120 g/100 cm2 – 146 inches from Cook: 30 g/100 cm2 – 200 inches from Cook: 11.6 g/100 cm2 – Hallway 216 inches from Cook: g/100 cm2

  • Clothing Contamination

– 1 g/sample to 580 g/sample – Highest during salting out – Higher in Red P Methodology

Airborne Methamphetamine Using Red P Method

4200 g/m3 – 5500 g/m3

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Exposure Conclusions

  • Exposures to iodine, phosphine, anhydrous

p , p p , y ammonia, and hydrochloric acid may exceed

  • ccupational standards
  • Hydrochloric acid, Iodine, and anhydrous ammonia

may exceed IDLH Levels

  • Significant amounts of airborne methamphetamine

are released during the cook and deposited on both horizontal and vertical surfaces

Conclusions (cont)

  • Entering the cook area will contaminate clothing with

g g methamphetamine and other chemicals

  • The entire area of the home is contaminated by the

generated compounds

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

What About After the Cook?

  • Meth in Carpet Dust

Exposures 24 Hours After Cook

  • Meth in Carpet Dust
  • 59 g/m2 – 270 g/m2
  • Airborne Methamphetamine
  • During the Cook: 520 – 780 g/m3
  • Walking Around: 70 – 117 g/m3
  • Mild Activity: 106 – 170 g/m3
  • Heavy Activity: 100 – 210 g/m3
  • Majority of airborne meth is less than 1 m diameter

– Easily inhaled – Travels to deepest part of lungs and directly into the blood

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Entry Only Contamination:

24 hours After Cook

  • All individuals that entered the home
  • All individuals that entered the home

came out with measurable contamination

– Foot Contamination

  • 0.78 – 49 g/wipe

– Hand Contamination

  • 29 - 56 g/wipe

– Neck

  • All positive but most below 1.0 g

Lab Bust Contamination

  • Suspects

Suspects

  • 0.9 g/wipe to 17.4 g/wipe
  • Children
  • 0.2 g/wipe to 1.18 g/wipe
  • Pets
  • 1.89 g/wipe (fur)
  • Law Enforcement Officers
  • 0.5 – 0.93 g/wipe
slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Meth “Smoking” Experiment

E: Wall over sink F: Wall in shower area C:

ND 0.17 0.39 0.94

E:

0.03 0.17 0.22 0.70 2.8

F:

0.04 0.20 0.32 0.98 4.8

  • Detectable levels of meth

are found when smoking

A: (Counter top) B: (Mirror) C: (Wall with wallpaper) D: (Table) Tile A Tile D 18’ 23’ A:

0.07

B:

0.10 0.22 1.50 3.0 12 4.7

D:

ND 0.25 0.50 2.60 17 ND 32 22

Smoking Area

g as little as 0.1g

Room heater G: Heater Tile G 11’

0.31 1.36 3.80 16

G:

0.04 0.26 0.50 1.90 8.5

Legend: Results are ug/100cm2 Pre wipe First 0.1g 2nd 0.1g 0.25g 2.0g

ND 35

Methamphetamine “smoking” experiment 03/02/04

Methamphetamine wipe results

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

What Does This Mean?

  • Anyone entering or taken from the lab area will be

contaminated with low levels of methamphetamine contaminated with low levels of methamphetamine

  • In some cases, these levels may not be high
  • The potential for high contamination levels does exist

– Accidents, fires, entry during the cook, etc.

  • Contamination may involve more than meth
  • There is no adequate method for direct detection at

this time

Symptoms Among Responders

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

At Risk Personnel

  • Local, State and Federal Law Enforcement

– Clan lab investigator

  • Narcotics agents
  • Chemists
  • Hazmat removal
  • First Responder

– Street Officers f h – Firefighters – Paramedics

  • Social Services
  • Waste Removal

Exposure to Chemicals

  • > 90 % reported exposures:

Direct skin contact with – Direct skin contact with chemicals – Inhaled fumes and gases – Smelled odors from the laboratory – Handled contaminated clothing

  • r other items
  • > 90% reported requiring

decontamination at the lab scene at some time

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Active Lab Investigations and Respirator Use

Ever entered active lab active lab (n= 70) Mean # active labs investigated per person (range) 55 (1-600) Normally wear a respirator 80 % Mean # active lab investigations 111 g w/ respirator (range) 111 (0-600) Mean # active lab investigations w/o respirator (range) 57 (0-675)

Health Effects

Grouped health effect Ever had effect (n= 93)

Symptomatic & sought medical

effect (n 93)

treatment

Headache 56 (60%) 5 (9%) Sore throat 42 (45%) 4 (10%) Respiratory 41 (44%) 6 (15%) Skin 38 (41%) 7 (18%) CNS 29 (31%) 3 (10%) Eye 28 (30%) 3 (11%) Cardiovascular 14 (15%) 3 (21%) Gastrointestinal 11 (12%) 0 (0%)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

What About Children? Methamphetamine Exposures (Hotel Cook)

Teddy Bear:

  • Sweater:

3,100 g/100 cm2

  • Layer under sweater:

2,100 g/100 cm2 pH: < 1

  • pH: < 1
slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Dose Estimates

  • vs. Exposure
  • Calc. Dose

Basis for Dose (mg/ kg-day)

RfD – Prenatal Development

0.005

RfD – Neurotoxicity Endpoints

0.007

5 mg oral dose to 70 kg Adult

0.07

Illicit usage - 150 mg for Adult

2.14

Infant exposed to 499 ug/100 cm2

0.41

Infant exposed to 0.1 g/100 cm2

0.00008

How can I Protect Myself?

  • Wear the appropriate personal protective equipment.

– Initial entry – SCBA, Protective Clothing (fire and chemical), Gloves, Boots – After stabilization – Air Purifying Respirators may be OK

  • Assume that everything in the building is contaminated

Assume that everything in the building is contaminated

  • Establish good decon procedures
slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Decontamination Questions

  • Who?

– Children suspects pets responders inadvertent – Children, suspects, pets, responders, inadvertent exposures, evidence

  • Where?

– On scene, hospital, fire station, group home, etc.

  • How?

– Wet decon dry decon clothing removal and Wet decon, dry decon, clothing removal and replacement, clothing cover and transport – How should contaminated clothing be handled

Decontamination

  • Thought out in advance

– Hospital decon should be planned. p p – What will happen to clothing? – What about evidence shipment? – Child friendly

  • Involve the least contact possible

Hospital ambulance vehicles – Hospital, ambulance, vehicles

  • Confine exposures to one area
  • EMERGENCIES
slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Decontamination:

Wet and dry decon appears to be equally effective

Unanswered Questions

  • Chronic health effects

– Children Children – Law enforcement personnel

  • Decontamination Methodologies

– Effectiveness of decontamination – Law enforcement, child protective services, emergency services personnel Child d lt d it i th b ildi – Children, adults, and items in the building.

  • Education

– Law enforcement – Medical Facilities – Child Protective Services