during pregnancy and offspring adiposity
play

During Pregnancy and Offspring Adiposity in Mid-childhood Kai Ling - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Maternal Physical Activity Before and During Pregnancy and Offspring Adiposity in Mid-childhood Kai Ling Kong, Ph.D., M.S. Post-doctoral Associate Division of Behavioral Medicine Department of Pediatrics School of Medicine and Biomedical


  1. Maternal Physical Activity Before and During Pregnancy and Offspring Adiposity in Mid-childhood Kai Ling Kong, Ph.D., M.S. Post-doctoral Associate Division of Behavioral Medicine Department of Pediatrics School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences State University of New York at Buffalo E-mail: kkong4@buffalo.edu Note: for non-commercial purposes only

  2. BACKGROUND – Impact of Maternal Physical Activity Maternal Outcomes Fetal Outcomes Long-term Offspring Outcomes Gestational Birth Later Weight Gain Weight Obesity Observational: Observational: Observational: • • • Clapp et al., 1995 Owe et al., 2009 Clapp et al., 1996 • • • Haakstad et al., 2007 Juhl et al., 2010 Clapp, 1998 • • • Olson et al., 2003 Mudd et al., 2012 Mattran et al., 2011 • Stuebe et al., 2009 RCTs: RCTs: • • RCTs Clapp, 2000 Kong et al., 2014 • • Polley et al., 2002 Santos et al., 2005 • • Barakat et al., 2009 Barakat et al., 2009 • • Mottola et al., 2010 Hopkins et al., 2010 • • Haakstad et al., 2011 Haakstad et al., 2011 • • Phelan et al., 2011 Kong et al., 2014 • Kong et al., 2014

  3. BACKGROUND – Previous Research on Maternal Physical Activity and Childhood Obesity • Four known studies (n = 23 – 104) • Ages: 6 months (Kong et al., 2014) • 12 months (Clapp et al., 1998) • 18 to 24 months (Mattran et al., 2011) • 5 year (Clapp, 1996) • • Overall results: Null to low inverse association (Kong et al., 2014; Clapp et al., 1998; Mattran et al., 2011) • Significant inverse association (Clapp, 1996) • • Limitation: Measure of adiposity (i.e. Ponderal Index, skinfold thicknesses )

  4. AIM 1: Offspring Leisure time physical activity adiposity before and during pregnancy outcomes in mid-childhood AIM 2: measured by dual-energy X- Change in leisure time physical ray activity before and during absorptiometry pregnancy (DEXA)

  5. METHODS

  6. Pre-birth cohort • n = 2,128 • Established Aug 1999 • Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates • Massachusetts, USA Pre-pregnancy PA Pregnancy PA (n = 1,683) (n = 1,620) DXA measures Mid-childhood DXA measures (n = 735) 7-10 year old (n = 718)

  7. Exposures: Maternal total leisure time physical activity (LTPA) • Pregnant women self-reported their activities • Pre-pregnancy: initial visit reported 12 months before pregnancy • Mid-pregnancy: mid-pregnancy visit reported preceding 3 months • 3 classes of LTPA: walking, light-to-moderate, and vigorous • Total LTPA = (walking) + (light-to-moderate) + (2x vigorous)* • Change in LTPA = (mid-pregnancy PA) – (pre-pregnancy PA) *2008 U.S. Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans

  8. Outcomes: Mid-childhood overall and central adiposity • Height and weight measurements • Whole body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) (Hologic, Bedford, MA) • Overall- Total fat mass index (FMI) • Central- Truncal fat mass index (TFMI) • Formula: [FMI (or TFMI) in kg]/(height in meters)²

  9. Potential confounders • Maternal race/ethnicity, education, age at enrollment, pre-pregnancy BMI, marital status, smoking status, mid-pregnancy total energy intake, annual household income • Paternal BMI (reported by mothers) • Child’s birth weight, gestational age and sex

  10. Data analysis • LTPA reported as categorical and continuous variables in hours/week • Multivariable linear regression models to examine associations, adjusting for confounders • Confounders selection- based on >10% change in beta after adding a confounder

  11. RESULTS

  12. Table 1. Sample characteristics

  13. Table 1. Sample characteristics cont.

  14. Table 1. Sample characteristics

  15. Maternal physical activity and offspring FAT mass index Model 1: child age of DXA measures, gender Model 2: maternal race/ethnicity, education, age, pre- pregnancy BMI, marital status, and smoking status

  16. Maternal physical activity and offspring FAT mass index Model 1: child age of DXA measures, gender Model 2: maternal race/ethnicity, education, age, pre- pregnancy BMI, marital status, and smoking status

  17. Maternal physical activity and offspring TRUNCAL fat mass index Model 1: child age of DXA measures, gender Model 2: maternal race/ethnicity, education, age, pre- pregnancy BMI, marital status, and smoking status

  18. CHANGE in physical activity and offspring FAT mass index Model 1: child age of DXA measures, gender Model 2: maternal race/ethnicity, education, age, pre- pregnancy BMI, marital status, and smoking status Model 3: pre-pregnancy leisure time physical activity

  19. CHANGE in physical activity and offspring FAT mass index Model 1: child age of DXA measures, gender Model 2: maternal race/ethnicity, education, age, pre- pregnancy BMI, marital status, and smoking status Model 3: pre-pregnancy leisure time physical activity

  20. CHANGE in physical activity and offspring TRUNCAL fat mass index Model 1: child age of DXA measures, gender Model 2: maternal race/ethnicity, education, age, pre- pregnancy BMI, marital status, and smoking status Model 3: pre-pregnancy leisure time physical activity

  21. CONCLUSIONS • U.S. pre-birth cohort- White, married and high socio- economic status pregnant women • Maternal physical activity were not associated with offspring overall and central adiposity in mid-childhood. • Maintained or increased physical activity during pregnancy was not associated with lower mild-childhood adiposity. • Other benefits of maternal physical activity (i.e. pre- eclampsia, gestational diabetes, low back pain)

  22. Strengths • Relatively large sample size (n = 700+) with long-term follow-up • Included pre-pregnancy physical activity  change from pre-pregnancy to pregnancy • Research-quality of measures  DXA adiposity measures. Limitations • Self-reported physical activity. • Only one time point of PA measurements during pregnancy • No report on occupational physical activity

  23. ACKNOWLEDGMENT • Co-authors • Matthew Gillman, Sheryl Rifas-Shiman and Xiaozhong Wen • Project Viva research team and participants • The Power of Programming 2014 organizing committee CONFLICT OF INTEREST All authors declare no conflicts of interest.

  24. Questions or comments? E-mail: kkong4@buffalo.edu

  25. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS

  26. Maternal physical activity and offspring LEAN mass index

  27. CHANGE in physical activity and offspring LEAN mass index

  28. Compared to excluded women: slightly older [mean, 32.2 (SD, 5.3) y vs. 31.6 (5.2) y], slightly longer gestational age at delivery [39.6 (1.7) weeks vs. 39.3 (2.1) weeks] heavier at birth [3505 (547) g vs. 3434 (617) g] more educated (% graduate, 34.5 % vs. 26.2 %), higher in white race (69.8% vs. 64.5%), higher in household income (% > $70000, 64.8% vs. 58.7%), higher in female infants (51.3% vs. 46.8%) lesser in women who smoked during pregnancy (9.4% vs. 14.6%).

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend