the biggest loser
play

The Biggest Loser: Are Weight Loss Attempts Doomed? Melinda M. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Biggest Loser: Are Weight Loss Attempts Doomed? Melinda M. Manore, PhD, RD, CSSD, FACSM College of Public Health and Human Sciences Oregon State University 1 Todays Focus 1. Biggest Loser What did we learn? 2. Weight loss/Mgt


  1. The Biggest Loser: Are Weight Loss Attempts Doomed? Melinda M. Manore, PhD, RD, CSSD, FACSM College of Public Health and Human Sciences Oregon State University 1

  2. Today’s Focus 1. Biggest Loser – What did we learn? 2. Weight loss/Mgt – What can we recommend? 3. Rethinking how we talk about weight management. 2

  3. 1. The Biggest Loser: What have we learned? Before After Bill Germanakos from Biggest Loser 3

  4. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2012 Obesity, 2016 Kevin Hall, PhD NIDDK Eric Ravussin, PhD Pennington Biomedical Research Center

  5. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2012 Question: 1. Does a weight loss program of diet restriction and vigorous exercise preserve FFM and RMR? 2. Does metabolic ‘adaptation” occur to counter weight loss and contribute to weight regain? Subjects: Biggest Loser Participants (n=16; M=7; F=9) measured before & after weight loss (0,6,30wk) (33±10y). Methods: Housed in isolated ranch in LA, with 1 contestant voted out every 7-10 d (n=11 at 6wk); 4 stayed for 13 wks. Participants returned home & continued program on their own (30 wk). Exercise: 90min/d supervised (6d/wk, aerobic/strength) + encourage to do another 3 h/d. Min PA=2h/d; Mean PA=3 h/d Diet: 65-70% of baseline energy requirements ( 1300 kcal/d ).

  6. Body Size/En Expenditure Baseline (n=16) Week 30 (n=16) Change ∆ Anthropometrics (DXA) Body Wt (kg) 149.2 (38.0) (330lbs) 91.6 (22.9) 57.6 kg (127lbs) BMI (kg/m 2 ) 49.4 (9.4) 30.4 (6.4) 19.0 Wt Change (%) 39.9 (9.1) FFM (kg) 75.7(20.2) 65.2(15.5) 10.5 (17.4% Wt Loss) 47.1 (82.6% Wt Loss) FM (kg) 73.5 (21.1) 26.4 (13.8) Body Fat (%) 49(5) 28(10) 21% Energy Expenditure RMR (kcal/d) 2,679(624) 1,890 (423) -789 Predicted RMR (kcal/d) 2,393 (466) Metabolic Adapt (kcal/d) -504 (171) (n=14) (7% ↓ kcal/kg FFM) 6 TEE (kcal/d) 3900 (957) 3114 (571) -786

  7. ∆ Body Size/En Expenditure Baseline (n=16) Week 30 (n=16) Change ∆ Anthropometrics (DXA) Body Wt (kg) 149.2 (38.0) (330lbs) 91.6 (22.9) 57.6 kg (127lbs) BMI (kg/m 2 ) 49.4 (9.4) 30.4 (6.4) 19.0 Wt Change (%) 39.9 (9.1) FFM (kg) 75.7(20.2) 65.2(15.5) 10.5 (17.4% Wt Loss) 47.1 (82.6% Wt Loss) FM (kg) 73.5 (21.1) 26.4 (13.8) Body Fat (%) 49(5) 28(10) 21% Energy Expenditure (DLW) RMR (kcal/d) (mea) 2,679(624) 1,890 (423) -789 kcal/d Predicted RMR (kcal/d) used baseline data 2,393 (466) Metabolic Adapt (kcal/d) -504 (171) (n=14) (20% ↓kcal/kg FFM) 7 TEE (kcal/d) 3900 (957) 3114 (571) -786 kcal/d

  8. Metabolic Changes Significant Improvements (mean ∆) : • Fasting Glucose ↓ 19 mg/dl (20%) • HOMA-IR ↓ 40%* • C-Peptide ↓50% • TAG ↓ 64 mg/dl (216%)* • HDL-Chol ↑ 12 mg/dl 8

  9. Summary (Baseline-30 wks) • Despite FFM preservation, high exercise did not prevent the slowing of RMR more than predicted based on weight loss. • Metabolic adaptation persisted through weight maintenance, which may increase risk of weight regain unless high level PA maintained and energy restriction remained. Alan Smith 9

  10. Obesity, 2016 Kevin Hall Objective: 1. Measure long-term changes in RMR & body composition in participants of “Biggest Loser”. Subjects: Biggest Loser participants (n=14/16; M=6; F=8) returned to NIH 6y after weight loss. 1 subject maintained wt loss; 5 subjects were with 1% of baseline or above. Methods: For 2 wk prior to 3-d NIH Clinical Ctr stay, remote body weight monitoring occurred (bluetooth; electronic). RMR, TEE (DLW) and body composition (DXA), and hormones & metabolite measurements done. Fothergill et al, 2016

  11. Body Size/En Expend. at 6 y N=14 Baseline Week 30 6 y Age=34.9y Age= 35.4y Age = 41.3y Anthropometrics (DXA) Body Wt (kg) 148.9 90.6 131.6 (87% of baseline) BMI (kg/m 2 ) 49.5 (10.1) 30.2 (6.7) 43.8 FFM (kg) 75.5(21.1) 64.4(15.5) 70.2 (93% baseline) FM (kg) 73.4 (22.6) 26.2 (13.6) 61.4 (84% baseline) Body Fat (%) 49(5) 28(9) 44.7 (91% baseline) Energy Expenditure (DLW) PA (kcal/kg/d) 5.6±1.8 10.0 ± 4.6 10.1±4.0 RMR (kcal/d) (mea) 2,607(649) 1,996 (358) 1,930 (466) Predicted RMR (kcal/d) 2,577 (574 2,272 (435) 2,403 (507) Metabolic Adapt (kcal/d) -275 (205) -499 (207) TEE (kcal/d) 3804 (957) 3,002 (573) 3,429±581 11

  12. Body Size/En Expend. at 6 y N=14 Baseline Week 30 6 y Age=34.9y Age= 35.4y Age = 41.3y Anthropometrics (DXA) Body Wt (kg) 148.9 90.6 131.6 (87% of baseline) BMI (kg/m 2 ) 49.5 (10.1) 30.2 (6.7) 43.8 FFM (kg) 75.5(21.1) 64.4(15.5) 70.2 (93% baseline) FM (kg) 73.4 (22.6) 26.2 (13.6) 61.4 (83% baseline) Body Fat (%) 49(5) 28(9) 44.7 (91% baseline) Energy Expenditure (DLW) PA (kcal/kg/d) 5.6±1.8 10.0 ± 4.6 10.1±4.0 RMR (kcal/d) (mea) 2,607(649) 1,996 (358) 1,930 (466) Predicted RMR (kcal/d) 2,577 (574 2,272 (435) 2,403 (507) Metabolic Adapt (kcal/d) -275 (205) -499 (207) TEE (kcal/d) 3804 (957) 3,002 (573) 3,429±581 12

  13. Individual ∆ BW, FFM & FM Body Weight Fat Free Mass Fat Mass Regained FFM Fat Mass Gains 13

  14. Individual ∆ RMR & Metabolic Adaptation ∆ RMR 14

  15. Who experienced the most metabolic adaptation? 1. Weight regain was not significantly correlated with metabolic adaptation. 2. Subjects who maintained weight loss at 6 y experienced the greatest metabolic adaptation. Wt regained from Baseline 15

  16. Biggest Loser Summary 1. Participants regained 87% of their lost weight in 6 y. UNSUCCESSFUL? 2. 50% of participants maintained at least a 10% weight loss. SUCCESS? 3. Metabolic adaptation was NOT related with weight regain – but with long-term weight loss. 4. Long-term weight loss requires vigilant combat against weight regain. 16

  17. 2. Weight Loss – What can we recommend? Diet + Exercise vs Diet?

  18. PLoS One, 2009 Subjects : M/W (n=48); Age: 38y; BMI=27.8(kg/m 2 ); <2d/wk PA Diet: (TEE determined by DLW over 14-d); Wk 1-12 & 22-24 all food provided; Wks13-22 self-selected diets based on targets; 30% FAT; 15% PRO; 55% CHO • Control (ad libitum diet); • Caloric restriction (CR) (↓ 25% of en); • CR (↓12.5% en) + Ex (↑12.5% en; 5d/ wk, 45-55 min/d using HRM) • Low calorie diet (LCD) = 890 kcal/d until lost 15% BW then maintenance Duration: 6 months Data collection body comp (DXA): baseline, 3, 6.

  19. CR = ↓ 25% CR + EX = 12.5% ea LCD = 900 kcal/d 6 mo ↓25% en Key point: Weight loss the same with CR (- 10.4%↓) and CR + EX ( - 10%↓).

  20. CR = ↓ 25% CR + EX = 12.5% ea CR+Exercise LCD = 900 kcal/d + 129±86 Caloric Restriction only -240±114 kcal Redman et al PLoS 2009

  21. Dr. Barbara Rolls, Distinguished Professor Penn State University Author: “Volumetrics Weight-Control Plan: Feel Full on Fewer Calories” & “The Volumetrics Eating Plan”

  22. Low Energy Density (LED) (kcal/g) Diet Characteristics of Foods Types of Foods: High fiber & water content = • • Whole fruits High volume/weight • Whole Vegetables • Less energy (kcal) per weight (g) • High fiber whole grains of food (kcal/g) • Low fat foods (dairy/meat) • Aid in satiety & promote feeling of fullness • Low in fat; no sweetened bev Summary: LED diets may result greater losses in BW & reduction in kcals + with no reduction in portion sizes. Rolls et al, 2004 ¼ c raisins vs. 1 2/3 c grapes

  23. Results: 2006, AJCN. Energy Density Effects: Portion Size Effects: - -575 kcal/d; 24% ↓ kcals 231 kcal/d; 10%↓ kcal

  24. Examples of very low, low, medium, and high energy dense foods Very-low Low Medium High (< 0.6 kcal/g) (0.6-1.5 kcal/g) (1.5-4.0 kcal/g) (>4.0 kcal/g) Most whole fruits, Other fruits: Dried fruits: Nuts and nut berries bananas, papayas apricots, raisins, butters apples Most whole Starchy vegetables: Whole wheat (WW) Cookies, muffins, peas, corn, winter breads, bagels, pastries; foods with vegetables squash, baked English muffins added sugar and fat potato Skim milk; low-fat Fat-free cottage Mozzarella or Swiss Other cheeses- yogurt/dairy cheese cheese cheddar, Brie-, mayo, sour cream Broth based soups Cooked whole Baked snack Potato chips, grains:(oatmeal, foods: pretzels, regular tortilla brown rice) tortilla chips chips, pretzels Legumes, low-fat Eggs, sirloin steak, Candy-all types, meats pork chops chocolate 24

  25. Challenges to Weight Mgt  Recommendations from ACSM Position Paper for Weight Control for adults (Donnelly et al. MSSE 2009):  Prevent weight gain = 150 -250 min/wk (20-35 min/d)  Improve weight loss = 150 -250 min/wk (20-35 min/d) + moderate energy restriction  Keep weight off after dieting =>250 min/ wk  3-5% ↓ in wt can significant ↓ CHD factors  People who lose wt and keep it off typically exercise at least ~1 1h/day (NWCR data).

  26. 3. Surviving our obesogenic environment?  Weight management is difficult in today’s food/built environment.  Identify what you can manipulate & understand what you cannot change.  Identify a weight that is ‘healthy’ and allows you participate in physical activities.  Remember your diet & PA level is the sum total of the small everyday choices you make!

  27. Thank you! Questions?

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend