UPBEAT study: Association between physical activity in obese pregnant women and health of the offspring
Louise Hayes
- n behalf of the UPBEAT Consortium
Note: for non-commercial purposes only
Association between physical activity in obese pregnant women and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
UPBEAT study: Association between physical activity in obese pregnant women and health of the offspring Louise Hayes on behalf of the UPBEAT Consortium Note: for non-commercial purposes only Overview Maternal obesity and offspring health
Note: for non-commercial purposes only
Endo et al, Gynecol Endocrinol 2006
T1 T2 T3
* p<0.05
Deierlein et al Diabetes Care 2011
Boney et al Pediatrics 2005
Balkau et al Diabetes 2008
Knowler et al. NEJM:2002
Knowler et al. NEJM:2002
Reduction in incident diabetes: Lifestyle - 58% Metformin - 31%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 16 week gestation 28 weeks gestation 36 weeks gestation 16 week gestation 28 weeks gestation 36 weeks gestation High intensity Low intensity Pre-exercise Post-exercise
Women at high risk of GDM (n=22)
Ruchat et al, Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2012
2 4 6 8 10 12
No exercise (n=720) Any exercise (n=473)
GDM prevalence
OR = 1.9 (1.2, 3.1)
Source: Dye et al, American Journal Epi 1997 Relative risk of GDM Source: Dempsey et al, Diab Res Clin Prac 2004
0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2 Inactive Any PA Inactive Moderate PA Vigorous PA
(0.29, 1.02) (0.19, 0.63) (0.33, 0.80)
Tobias et al Diabetes Care 2011
Source: RCOG Statement No 4
(smaller reduction in normal weight – 1269 steps)
– Graded, SMART goals, self-monitoring, provision of feedback, problem solving of barriers, social support and social comparison
– Dietary advice – consumption of low GI foods, reduction of saturated fats – PA advice – increase daily steps walked incrementally, monitored by pedometer
Baseline (n=159) 28 weeks (n=109) 35 weeks (n=89) Sedentary*† 1008 (197) 1050 (198) 1118 (189) Active*† 412 (184) 382 (193) 306 (189) Light activity*† 355 (172) 332 (183) 259 (165) MVPA* 57 (93) 51 (67) 47 (78)
Figures are mean minutes (SD) per day * Significant difference between baseline and 28 weeks † Significant difference between 28 and 35 weeks
Baseline (n=133) 28 weeks (n=75) 35 weeks (n=54) Sedentary* 592 (133) 588 (117) 572 (98) Active* 221 (61) 202 (75) 203 (64) Light activity* 181 (52) 168 (72) 176 (58) MVPA† 41 (20) 34 (17) 27 (15)
Figures are mean minutes (SD) per day * Significant difference between baseline and 28 weeks † Significant difference between 28 and 35 weeks
Control (n=54) Intervention (n=56) Difference (95% CI) Sedentary 1068 (177) 1020 (226)
(-115,16) Active 367 (175) 410 (219) 45 (-16, 106) Light activity 333 (165) 340 (204) 11 (-46, 68) MVPA 34 (52) 70 (78) 34 (9, 59)
Figures are mean minutes (SD) per day Differences are adjusted for baseline activity Poston et al BMC Preg & Childbirth 2013
Control (n=39) Intervention (n=36) Difference (95% CI) Sedentary 1175 (86) 1197 (77) 21 (-13, 55) Active 209 (82) 194 (68)
(-42, 19) Light activity 175 (81) 161 (61)
(-38, 19) MVPA 34 (18) 33 (15)
(-9, 5)
Figures are mean minutes per day Differences are adjusted for baseline activity Poston et al BMC Preg & Childbirth 2013
Baseline (n=61) 28 weeks (n=43) 35 weeks (n=34) Sedentary (mins/d)
0.435* MVPA (mins/d)
Figures are Pearson correlations
Objectively measured PA and newborn abdominal circumference
Cardiac disease Severe anaemia Vaginal bleeding Restrictive lung disease Unevaluated arrhythmia Dizziness Incompetent cervix Chronic bronchitis Excess shortness of breath Multiple gestation at risk of premature labour Poorly controlled DM, HT, seizures, hypothyroidism Headache Chest pain Persistent bleeding Morbid obesity (BMI 40+) Muscle weakness Placenta previa (> 26 wks) Extreme underweight Calf pain or swelling Premature labour IUGR Preterm labour Ruptured membranes Extremely sedentary Decreased foetal movement Preeclamspia/HT Heavy smoker Amniotic fluid leakage Taken from ACOG guidelines
Weight management before, during and after pregnancy
Self-assessment tool
Implementing NICE guidance 2010
NICE public health guidance 27
NICE public health guidance 27
Dempsey JC, Butler CL, Williams MA. No need for a pregnant pause: physical activity may reduce the occurence of gestational diabetes mellitus and preeclampsia. Exercise & Sport Sciences Reviews. 2005;33(3):141-9. Duncombe D, Skouteris H, Wertheim EH, Kelly L, Fraser V, Paxton SJ. Vigorous exercise and birth outcomes in a sample of recreational exercisers: a prospective study across pregnancy. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics &
Dye TD, Knox KL, Artal R, Aubry RH, Wojtowycz MA. Physical activity, obesity, and diabetes in pregnancy. American Journal of
Evenson KR, Siega-Riz AM, Savitz DA, Leiferman JA, Thorp JM, Jr. Vigorous leisure activity and pregnancy outcome. Epidemiology. 2002 Nov;13(6):653-9. Hegaard HK, Pedersen BK, Nielsen BB, Damm P. Leisure time physical activity during pregnancy and impact on gestational diabetes mellitus, pre-eclampsia, preterm delivery and birth weight: a review. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2007;86(11):1290 - 6. Kramer MS, McDonald SW. Aerobic exercise for women during pregnancy. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2006; 3: CD000180. Morris SN, Johnson NR. Exercise during pregnancy: a critical appraisal of the literature. Journal of Reproductive Medicine. 2005 Mar;50(3):181-8. Rooney BL, Schauberger CW. Excess pregnancy weight gain and long-term obesity: one decade later. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2002 Aug;100(2):245-52. Rooney BL, Schauberger CW, Mathiason MA, Rooney BL, Schauberger CW, Mathiason MA. Impact of perinatal weight change on long-term obesity and obesity-related illnesses. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2005 Dec;106(6):1349-56. Sorensen TK, Williams MA, Lee IM, Dashow EE, Thompson ML, Luthy DA. Recreational physical activity during pregnancy and risk
Zavorsky GS, Longo LD. Exercise guidelines in pregnancy: New perspectives. Sports Medicine. 2011;41(5):345-60.