Carver Data DIG Presentation Michael LaMont 3/28/2017 APS Data + - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
carver data dig presentation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Carver Data DIG Presentation Michael LaMont 3/28/2017 APS Data + - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Aug 24, 2023 177 likes •838 views

Carver Data DIG Presentation Michael LaMont 3/28/2017 APS Data + Information Group (DIG) Content Graduation Rate Performance Comparison District State National Performance Drill-Down CCRPI Percentiles

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Carver Data DIG Presentation

Michael LaMont 3/28/2017 APS Data + Information Group (DIG)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Content

  • Graduation Rate
  • Performance Comparison
  • District
  • State
  • National
  • Performance Drill-Down
  • CCRPI
  • Percentiles
  • Progress
  • Resources
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Content

  • Graduation Rate
  • Performance Comparison
  • District
  • State
  • National
  • Performance Drill-Down
  • CCRPI
  • Percentiles
  • Progress
  • Resources
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Cohort graduation rate

Short version: percentage of students in 2016 cohort who graduate in four years

  • 2016 cohort is students who entered 9th grade in 2012
  • Mobile students are only attributed to their last school

attended

slide-5
SLIDE 5

APS Cohort 2016 4-year Graduation Rates

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Cohort graduation rate

All cohort 2016 students who graduate in four years All cohort 2016 students who graduate in four years All cohort 2016 students who drop out

2016 Cohort: all students who entered ninth grade in 2012, and therefore should graduate in 2016

All cohort 2016 students who are still enrolled

+ + Cohort Graduation Rate = Not included in equation: students who transfer to another school

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Graduation Rate

133 Graduates 133 Graduates 46 Dropouts 21 Still Enrolled

+ + Carver HS 2016 Cohort Grad Rate = 133/200 = 66.5% =

  • Above calculation does not include transfers from Carver to a different

school

  • Dropout codes
  • 30 Unknown
  • 6 Other adult education
  • 10 (other reasons)
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Carver HS Graduation Rate by Gender

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Content

  • Graduation Rate
  • Performance Comparison
  • District
  • State
  • National
  • Performance Drill-Down
  • CCRPI
  • Percentiles
  • Progress
  • Resources
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Elementary Milestones Results

slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Middle School Milestones Results

slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18

High School Milestones Results

slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22

District Comparison

  • Challenge index
  • Includes poverty, ELL, and mobility rates
  • Rates are combined according to formula that best

predicts test scores

  • Explains 94% of variance in test scores
  • Does not include charters, but state comparison will
slide-23
SLIDE 23

APS 2016 Milestones Score vs Challenge Index: Elementary

slide-24
SLIDE 24

APS 2016 Milestones Score vs Challenge Index: Elementary

slide-25
SLIDE 25

APS 2016 Milestones Score vs Challenge Index: Middle

slide-26
SLIDE 26

APS 2016 Milestones Score vs Challenge Index: High

*High school challenge index does not include mobility

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Content

  • Graduation Rate
  • Performance Comparison
  • District
  • State
  • National
  • Performance Drill-Down
  • CCRPI
  • Percentiles
  • Progress
  • Resources
slide-28
SLIDE 28

State Comparison

  • Test scores vs needs index
  • Uses combination of variables that best predict test

scores

  • Includes poverty, ELL, and race/ethnicity
  • Index created by Jarod Apperson
  • Challenge index explains 80% of variance at state

level

  • Less than district model
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Georgia 2016 Milestones Score vs Challenge Index: Elementary

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Georgia 2016 Milestones Score vs Challenge Index: Elementary

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Georgia 2016 Milestones Score vs Challenge Index: Elementary

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Georgia 2016 Milestones Score vs Challenge Index: Middle

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Georgia 2016 Milestones Score vs Challenge Index: Middle

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Georgia 2016 Milestones Score vs Challenge Index: Middle

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Georgia 2016 Milestones Score vs Challenge Index: High

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Georgia 2016 Milestones Score vs Challenge Index: High

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Georgia 2016 Milestones Score vs Challenge Index: High

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Content

  • Graduation Rate
  • Performance Comparison
  • District
  • State
  • National
  • Performance Drill-Down
  • CCRPI
  • Percentiles
  • Progress
  • Resources
slide-39
SLIDE 39

National Comparison

  • Reardon et. Al.
  • Milestones conversion
slide-40
SLIDE 40

United States Poverty vs. Grade Level

Image from The Upshot, data from Reardon et al

slide-41
SLIDE 41

United States Poverty vs. Grade Level

Image from The Upshot, data from Reardon et al Atlanta Public Schools

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Milestones National Percentiles

Scale score vs. national percentile, APS eighth grade Science Milestones, 2015

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Grade Beginning Developing Proficient Distinguished Dev & Above Proficient & Above 3 33.2% 31.8% 26.6% 8.4% 66.8% 35.0% 4 30.5% 34.2% 26.2% 9.1% 69.5% 35.3% 5 25.0% 34.3% 34.5% 6.2% 75.0% 40.7% 6 31.5% 29.2% 32.0% 7.2% 68.5% 39.2% 7 27.2% 34.4% 32.9% 5.6% 72.8% 38.5% 8 20.1% 35.9% 35.8% 8.2% 79.9% 43.9%

Milestones ELA Distribution: Georgia

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Milestones to National Conversion

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Content

  • Graduation Rate
  • Performance Comparison
  • District
  • State
  • National
  • Performance Drill-Down
  • CCRPI
  • Percentiles
  • Progress
  • Resources
slide-46
SLIDE 46

CCRPI Components

Components # of Elements Wt./ Pts. Elements Achievement 3 50

  • Content Mastery
  • Post E/M/H School Readiness
  • Predictor for High School Graduation

Progress 4 40

  • 4 core subject areas

Achievement Gap 4 10

  • Gap Size and Gap Progress

Challenge Points 2 10 (Max.)

  • ED/EL/SWD Performance
  • Exceeding the Bar
  • CCRPI is a complex system that includes many components.
  • However, many of the parts are determined by performance on the Georgia

Milestones.

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Elementary CCRPI

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Middle School CCRPI

slide-49
SLIDE 49

High School CCRPI

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Content

  • Graduation Rate
  • Performance Comparison
  • District
  • State
  • National
  • Performance Drill-Down
  • CCRPI
  • Percentiles
  • Progress
  • Resources
slide-51
SLIDE 51

Percentiles

  • State percentile rank of average Milestones score
  • Better for making comparisons across years
slide-52
SLIDE 52

Price Percentiles

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Sylvan Percentiles

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Carver Early College Percentiles

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Carver Arts Percentiles

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Content

  • Graduation Rate
  • Performance Comparison
  • District
  • State
  • National
  • Performance Drill-Down
  • CCRPI
  • Percentiles
  • Progress
  • Resources
slide-57
SLIDE 57

Progress

  • Percentage of students making medium or high

growth

  • Used in CCRPI
  • State average is 65
slide-58
SLIDE 58

Price Progress

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Sylvan Progress

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Carver Early College Progress

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Carver Technology Progress

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Carver Health Progress

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Carver Arts Progress

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Content

  • Graduation Rate
  • Performance Comparison
  • District
  • State
  • National
  • Performance Drill-Down
  • CCRPI
  • Percentiles
  • Progress
  • Resources
slide-65
SLIDE 65

Resources

  • APS R&E website
  • APS home page > Departments > Research and

Evaluation

  • Or: atlantapublicschools.us/research-and-evaluation
  • APS Data Blog: APSgraphs.blogspot.com