Carolyn Persoon, EPA Region 5 Michigan Clean Diesel Coalition October - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

carolyn persoon epa region 5 michigan clean diesel
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Carolyn Persoon, EPA Region 5 Michigan Clean Diesel Coalition October - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Carolyn Persoon, EPA Region 5 Michigan Clean Diesel Coalition October 13, 2011 What is MCDI? Together with federal, state and local governments, private companies, and non profit organizations, the Midwest Clean Diesel Initiative (MCDI) is a


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Carolyn Persoon, EPA Region 5 Michigan Clean Diesel Coalition October 13, 2011

slide-2
SLIDE 2

What is MCDI?

Together with federal, state and local governments, private companies, and non‐ profit organizations, the Midwest Clean Diesel Initiative (MCDI) is a voluntary program to reduce diesel emissions and diesel fuel usage in the Midwest (Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin).

slide-3
SLIDE 3

MCDI Steering committee:

  • Setting the MCDI objectives and carrying them

through the state coalitions

  • Work with state coalitions to set focus areas
  • Providing feedback on state coalition best practices

to share across states or areas to improve

  • Set up small groups to address region wide issues

and communicate them throughout the state coalitions

  • Track and report projects, emissions reductions and

fuel saving from clean diesel actions.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Goals for Coalitions

State Coalitions:

  • Create networks of clean diesel partners within

each state.

  • Educate each other and develop educational
  • pportunities for others.
  • Develop funding mechanisms for clean diesel

actions.

  • Communicate opportunities.
  • Identify interested fleets for clean diesel actions.
  • Implement clean diesel projects.
slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6

MCDI Communication tools:

  • www.epa.gov/midwestcleandiesel
  • Webinars
  • MCDI e‐Update
  • To get on board: maietta.anthony@epa.gov
slide-7
SLIDE 7

EPA Funding

Historic EPA Funding

  • FY 2003‐2007 National Clean Diesel Campaign

– $32M nationally for school bus projects – $7.6M nationally for non‐school bus projects

  • FY08 National Clean Diesel Campaign

– $49.2M nationally (combines all sectors)

  • FY09 ARRA

– $300M nationally (combines all sectors)

  • FY09 National Clean Diesel Campaign

– $60M nationally (combines all sectors)

  • FY2010 National Clean Diesel Campaign

– $60M (combines all sectors)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Grants:

  • DERA (Energy Policy Act of 2005) allowed for

up to $200 million/year nationally; appropriated at $50M/$60M per year since 2008

  • Reauthorized by congress for 2012‐2016

(DERA 2)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

EPA Funding for States

State allocations

– Given each year, State can match – RFP’s, loan programs,

  • ther

activities

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Non‐EPA sources of Funding

  • CMAQ and DOE funds
  • State funds
  • SEPs
  • Other sustainable activities

– Policies – Advocacy

slide-11
SLIDE 11

What has EPA been up to in the last year?

  • ARRA Close outs
  • FY09/FY10 RFP and State Allocations
  • FY11 RFP
slide-12
SLIDE 12

FY2011 Funded Projects

Grantee Funding Amount Greater Lansing Area Clean Cities 725,000.00 $ Leonardo Aacdemy 900,000.00 $ Illinois EPA 822,308.00 $ Heart of Illinois Regional Port Districy 400,000.00 $ Clean Fuels Ohio 716,073.00 $ IN DOT 640,000.00 $ Mid‐Ohio Regional Planning Commission 400,000.00 $ Michigan Infrastructure & Transportation Assoc. 524,926.00 $ Minnesota Environmental Initiative 485,419.00 $ Total Competative 5,613,726.00 $

Total Michigan Competitive Awards: $1,249,962

slide-13
SLIDE 13

DERA 2

  • Congress reauthorized for 2012‐2016
  • Budget remains unknown
  • Changes from DERA 1 to 2:

– State Allocations can only fund verified /certified – States that have not drawn down DERA 1 – DERA 2 funding will not be released – Reporting changes – Changes to EPA competitive

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Verified technologies

– Tested to determine efficacy and useful life – In combination with EPA’s Diesel Emission Quantifier, allows grantees to easily estimate emission reductions – Emerging Tech program to put new technologies

  • n the list

– CARB verified technology list

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • Changes to competitive

– Potential rebate programs – Potential centralization of EPA competitive applications – Still take into account non‐attainment and EJ areas

slide-16
SLIDE 16

New NAAQS effects

  • Areas redesignated non‐attainment
  • Areas to be designated under 2008 ozone

standard

NOTE: Underlined dates indicate court-ordered or settlement agreement deadlines Next Ozone Review: Proposal in June 2013 and Final in March 2014

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Current Non‐Attainment Areas

  • No Michigan counties non‐attainment for

1997 8‐hour ozone standard

  • Detroit Area still non‐attainment for 2006 24‐

hr PM2.5 standard

Designations Based on 2006-2008 Air Quality Data

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Thanks!

Carolyn Persoon (312)353‐8290 Persoon.caarolyn@epa.gov

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Photos

slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21