BCPS High School Capacity & Conditions Study: Community Outreach Strategy
By: Anirban Basu Sage Policy Group, Inc.
On Behalf of Baltimore County Public Schools December 11th, 2018
Capacity & Conditions Study: Community Outreach Strategy By: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
BCPS High School Capacity & Conditions Study: Community Outreach Strategy By: Anirban Basu Sage Policy Group, Inc. On Behalf of Baltimore County Public Schools December 11 th , 2018 The Nature of the Endeavor Over the next 10 years,
On Behalf of Baltimore County Public Schools December 11th, 2018
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Woodlawn Western School of Technology Towson Sparrows Point Randallstown Pikesville Perry Hall Patapsco Parkville Owings Mills Overlea New Town Milford Mill Loch Raven Lansdowne Kenwood Hereford G.W. Carver Franklin Eastern Technical Dundalk/Sollers Point Dulaney Chesapeake Catonsville
Enrollment Capacity
Focus Groups Location June 18th Catonsville High School June 19th Loch Raven High School June 20th Pikesville High School June 25th Dundalk High School Gallery Walks Location July 9th Catonsville High School July 12th Carver High School July 17th Dundalk High School September 18th New Town High School September 24th Eastern Technical High School October 2nd Loch Raven High School
Small group discussions: gathered feedback informed the scenarios presented tonight
Online questionnaires through which all stakeholders may provide feedback
Public information sessions where stakeholders can view the options and complete the online survey
Dates Location Community Focus Groups June 18th Catonsville High School June 19th Loch Raven High School June 20th Pikesville High School June 25th Dundalk High School Principal’s Focus Group June 29th Greenwood, Building E
Focus group participants indicated that:
1,400 seats;
to them could be improved;
attend the same school, including as they transition to middle/high;
fund a workable solution.
Region Responses % of Total
Central
1,068 31.9%
Northeast
721 21.5%
Northwest
231 6.9%
Southeast
197 5.9%
Southwest
1,123 33.5%
Other
12 0.4%
Total
3,352 100.0%
Relationship w/ BCPS Responses % of Total Current student 267 4.8% Parent/relative 1,495 26.8% Relative prospective 1,037 18.6% Alumni 416 7.4% Live neighborhood 1,420 25.4% Volunteer 180 3.2% Interested 486 8.7% Other 285 5.1% Total 5,586 100.0%
Should BCPS use all seats at schools that have surplus capacity, even if it means redistricting students in significant numbers?
40.2% 61.2% 54.0% 48.7% 22.3% 40.3% 57.0% 34.9% 40.8% 46.5% 75.0% 56.4% 2.9% 3.8% 5.2% 4.8% 2.7% 3.3%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Central Northeast Northwest Southeast Southwest Overall Favor Disfavor Neutral
Favor = “Strongly Agree” + “Somewhat Agree” Disfavor = “Strongly Disagree” + “Somewhat Disagree” Neutral = “No Opinion”
Favor = “Strongly Agree” + “Somewhat Agree” Disfavor = “Strongly Disagree” + “Somewhat Disagree” Neutral = “No Opinion” 73.4% 81.9% 85.2% 79.9% 72.5% 76.2% 13.3% 8.0% 8.4% 12.5% 12.6% 11.5% 13.3% 10.1% 6.4% 7.6% 15.0% 12.4%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Central Northeast Northwest Southeast Southwest Overall Favor Disfavor Neutral
What do you view as the largest enrollment a high school can maintain and still supply a high quality educational experience?
20.2% 25.9% 33.7% 33.0% 13.3% 20.8% 44.0% 44.4% 41.3% 46.0% 30.7% 39.6% 17.4% 20.5% 14.3% 10.2% 20.8% 18.6% 8.9% 4.9% 4.1% 4.5% 15.6% 9.7% 9.5% 4.4% 6.6% 6.3% 19.6% 11.3%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% Central Northeast Northwest Southeast Southwest Overall 1,000 students or fewer 1,400 students or fewer 1,700 students or fewer 2,000 students or fewer No limit
What is the maximum amount you would support BCPS spending on meeting its high school capacity challenges?
7.4% 11.0% 16.1% 18.5% 7.3% 9.4% 18.0% 28.5% 24.9% 22.5% 20.2% 21.8% 20.4% 24.2% 22.3% 22.5% 19.7% 21.3% 22.2% 17.1% 18.7% 12.7% 19.0% 19.1% 32.0% 19.1% 18.1% 23.7% 33.8% 28.3%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Central Northeast Northwest Southeast Southwest Overall
Well below $300 million About $300 million About $400 million About $500 million About $600 million
Favor = “Strongly Agree” + “Somewhat Agree” Disfavor = “Strongly Disagree” + “Somewhat Disagree” Neutral = “No Opinion” 16.41% 24.76% 30.57% 25.86% 12.60% 18.5% 79.81% 67.30% 62.18% 66.67% 81.30% 75.5% 3.78% 7.94% 7.25% 7.47% 6.10% 5.9%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Central Northeast Northwest Southeast Southwest Overall Favor Disfavor Neutral
On July 27th, Superintendent Verletta White issued a letter explaining that the study would be expanded to include these three considerations via:
A new set of scenarios
Stakeholders wanted facility conditions to be included in the analysis
Feeder patterns designed to keep students from the same neighborhood together are critical
A solution should improve instructional opportunities for students
Region Responses % of Total Central 2,927 46.5% Northeast 929 14.8% Northwest 399 6.3% Southeast 359 5.7% Southwest 1,647 26.2% Other 30 0.5% Total 6,291 100.0%
14.4% 48.3% 49.6% 52.4% 37.3% 28.9%
33.4% 33.9% 27.3% 16.1% 42.9% 34.2% 52.3% 17.7% 23.1% 31.5% 19.8% 36.9%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Central Northeast Northwest Southeast Southwest Overall
Scenario A Scenario B Scenario C
71.3% 26.7% 25.8% 28.5% 40.2% 52.6% 8.3% 19.9% 23.3% 28.5% 6.5% 11.7% 20.4% 53.4% 50.8% 43.1% 53.3% 35.8% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Central Northeast Northwest Southeast Southwest Overall Scenario A Scenario B Scenario C