Broadband Infrastructure in Broadband Infrastructure in North Asia - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Broadband Infrastructure in Broadband Infrastructure in North Asia and Central Asia North Asia and Central Asia

Markets, Infrastructure, and Policy Options for Markets, Infrastructure, and Policy Options for Enhancing Cross Enhancing Cross‐ ‐Border Connectivity Border Connectivity

Michael Ruddy Director of International Research Terabit Consulting

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Part 1: Background and Methodology Part 1: Background and Methodology

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Project Scope Project Scope

Between June and November 2013, Terabit Consulting performed a detailed analysis of broadband infrastructure and markets in 7 strategic markets in

• No. & Central Asia:

– Azerbaijan – Kazakhstan – Kyrgyz Rep. – Russian Fed. – Tajikistan – Turkmenistan – Uzbekistan

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Scope (cont Scope (cont’ ’d.) d.)

• The data and analysis for each country included:

 Telecommunications market overview and analysis of competitiveness  Regulation and government intervention  Fixed‐line telephony market  Mobile telephony market  Internet and broadband market  Consumer broadband pricing  Evaluation of domestic network connectivity  International Internet bandwidth  International capacity pricing  Historical and forecasted total international bandwidth  Evaluation of international network connectivity including terrestrial fiber, undersea fiber, and satellite  Evaluation of trans‐border network development and identification of missing links  Identification of key highway and rail projects

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Sources of Data Sources of Data

• Terabit Consulting has completed dozens of

demand studies for submarine and terrestrial fiber networks worldwide

– Constant contact with operators, ISPs, and other stakeholders

• Terabit Consulting’s published

reports include:

– The Undersea Cable Report (1,500+ pages) – International Telecommunications Infrastructure Analysis (1,000+ pages)

• Terabit Consulting’s data and

intelligence covers infrastructure, demand, traffic flows, pricing, and market share

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Part 2: State of North and Central Asia Part 2: State of North and Central Asia Bandwidth and Broadband Markets Bandwidth and Broadband Markets

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Overview of Broadband Status Overview of Broadband Status

GDP per Capita, YE 2012 (PPP, USD) Int’l. Band‐ width per Capita (Kbps) Int’l. Connect‐ ivity Domestic Connect‐ ivity IP Transit Price Competitive‐ ness of Telecom Market Fixed and Mobile Broadband Infra‐ structure Annual 1 Mbps Broadband Subscription + Installation as %

• f Nominal GDP

per Capita Azerbaijan $10,800 22.4 Moderate Adequate Reasonably Priced Somewhat Competitive Relatively Strong Reasonable Kazakhstan $14,000 16.5 Moderate Relatively Strong Reasonably Priced Somewhat Competitive Relatively Strong Reasonable Kyrgyz Republic $2,400 0.893 Weak Limited Very Expensive Somewhat Competitive Limited Very Expensive Russian Federation $20,900 17.4 Moderate Relatively Strong Inexpensive Competitive Strong Extremely Affordable Tajikistan $2,300 0.313 Weak Limited Very Expensive Somewhat Competitive Very Limited Very Expensive Turkmenista n $9,600 0.125 Weak Limited Very Expensive Not Competitive Very Limited Very Expensive Uzbekistan $3,500 0.259 Weak Limited Very Expensive Somewhat Competitive Limited Very Expensive

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

International Internet Bandwidth, YE12 International Internet Bandwidth, YE12

Turkmenistan: >1 Gbps Tajikistan: 2.5 Gbps Kyrgyz Republic: 5 Gbps Uzbekistan: 7.8 Gbps Azerbaijan: 205 Gbps Kazakhstan: 275 Gbps Russian Federation: 2.5 Tbps

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Int Int’ ’l. Internet Bandwidth per Capita

• l. Internet Bandwidth per Capita (Kbps)

(Kbps)

Difference between Turkmenistan and Azerbaijan: 179x

1 Kbps per Capita or Less: SERIOUS OBSTACLE TO DEVELOPMENT

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

International Fiber Connectivity International Fiber Connectivity

• The Study identified and analyzed 30 trans‐border

fiber optic links in the region

– Across borders within the region and at the edge of the region (e.g. to China, Iran, and Afghanistan)

• Some transborder links form segments of

multinational networks

– Trans Asia‐Europe (TAE) – Proprietary limited‐participation networks such as

• Transit Europe Asia (Rostelecom), TTK Eurasia Highway
• Europe‐Kazakhstan‐Asia
• Europe‐Russia‐Mongolia‐China (via Mongolia Railway)

– Europe‐Persia Express Gateway (EPEG)

• Only one border without connectivity

– Armenia‐Azerbaijan

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

International Bandwidth Infrastructure International Bandwidth Infrastructure

AZERBAIJAN, RUSSIA, KAZAKHSTAN: INTERNATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE SUFFICIENT BUT NOT OPTIMAL KYRGYZ REPUBLIC, TAJIKISTAN, TURKMENISTAN, UZBEKISTAN: INTERNATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE IN CRITICAL NEED OF EXPANSION

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Russian Federation: Russian Federation: Int Int’ ’l. Infrastructure

• l. Infrastructure
• 7 international submarine fiber optic cables

– reach is limited to adjoining regions (Scandinavia, Black Sea/Eastern Mediterranean, Sea of Japan/East Sea)

• Europe‐Asia transit networks operated by

Rostelecom, VimpelCom, and TTK; new transit networks recently activated by MTS and MegaFon

– ‘Big Four’ + TTK = 750,000+ route km of fiber

• Trans‐border links within the study region:

Azerbaijan/EPEG (4), Kazakhstan (at least 3 crossings, multiple interconnections)

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Kazakhstan: Kazakhstan: Int Int’ ’l. Infrastructure

• l. Infrastructure
• TAE (to China, Kyrgyz Republic, Uzbekistan)
• Kazakhstan benefits from at least 10 trans‐border

fiber crossings within the study region

• Kazakhtelecom international connectivity = 290 Gbps

as of mid‐2013:

– Russian Federation: Rostelecom, VimpelCom, MegaFon, TTK – Kyrgyz Republic: Kyrgyztelecom, ElCat, Saima Telecom – China: China Telecom, China TieTong, China Unicom – Turkmenistan: Turkmentelecom – Uzbekistan: Uzbektelecom

• Kazsat‐2 (2011), Kazsat‐3 (2015)

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Azerbaijan: Azerbaijan: Int Int’ ’l. Infrastructure

• l. Infrastructure
• TAE (to China, Kyrgyz Republic, Uzbekistan)
• Russian links to Rostelecom, MegaFon, TTK
• Link to Turkey via Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic
• TIC Iran link forms primary connection to Nakhchivan
• EPEG: Delta Telecom = transit operator
• Instrumental in spearheading TASIM initiative

– Will include Trans Caspian Link

• AzerSat‐1 (launched February 2013), LEO satellite (2015), 2nd

telecom satellite (2016)

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Uzbekistan: Uzbekistan: Int Int’ ’l. Infrastructure

• l. Infrastructure
• TAE (to Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan)
• Additional crossings to Kazakhstan (2), Kyrgyz

Republic, Tajikistan

• Afghanistan (used as part of Rostelecom’s ‘Europe‐

Afghanistan’ network)

• Uzbekistan is ‘doubly landlocked’ – making its

continued reliance on trans‐border links impractical

– Places country at mercy of at least two transit operators

• IP Transit: $1,510 in 2010; $347 in mid‐2013

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Kyrgyz Republic: Kyrgyz Republic: Int Int’ ’l. Infrastructure

• l. Infrastructure
• TAE (loop to Kazakhstan completed in 2000;

redundant segment added in 2007)

• Kyrgyztelecom links to Tajikistan, Uzbekistan
• Kyrgyztelecom link to China intended to reduce

reliance on Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan transit, but China Telecom reported interconnection issues

• ISP ELCat aggressively implementing fiber to

China, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Tajikistan & Turkmenistan: Tajikistan & Turkmenistan: Int Int’ ’l. Links

• l. Links
• Tajikistan: Trans‐border links to Kyrgyz Republic,

Uzbekistan, Afghanistan, China (unconfirmed)

• Turkmenistan: TAE to Iran and Uzbekistan, links to

Kazakhstan and Afghanistan

– restrained network development due to ISP license revocations in 2000, shutdown of MTS in 2010 (only competitor to Turkmentelecom/Altyn Asyr/ Turkemenistan Online)

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Part 3: Why a Coherent, Part 3: Why a Coherent, Open Open‐ ‐Access, Cost Access, Cost‐ ‐Effective Effective Pan Pan‐ ‐Asian Fiber Infrastructure Asian Fiber Infrastructure Would Benefit the Region Would Benefit the Region

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

In Kyrgyz Republic, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, the development of telecommunications and Internet services, as well as each country’s

• verall economy, has greatly suffered as a

result of weak international infrastructure.

Reason #1 Reason #1

Why a Coherent Pan Why a Coherent Pan‐ ‐Asian Infrastructure Would Benefit the Region Asian Infrastructure Would Benefit the Region

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

The Impact of Low International Bandwidth & The Impact of Low International Bandwidth & Weak International Infrastructure Weak International Infrastructure

• At the macro level: a major obstacle to economic and

human development

– Detachment from digital economy – Continued economic inefficiencies and restrained growth – Lack of access to critical social development tools including telemedicine, distance learning, scientific/research networks

• More specifically within the telecom environment:

higher wholesale and consumer prices, and lower broadband adoption rates

– Kyrgyz Republic, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan: IP Transit >$100 per Mbps per month

• Compared to Singapore: $10 per Mbps
• Compared to Russia: $4 per Mbps
• Compared to USA: $1 per Mbps

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Weak Int Weak Int’ ’l. Bandwidth Impacts Consumer Pricing

• l. Bandwidth Impacts Consumer Pricing

1 Mbps Broadband Connection: Annual Subscription + Installation as a % of Per‐Capita GDP

Higher Int’l. Bandwidth and/or Better Int’l. Infrastructure Yields Lower Consumer Broadband Prices

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Despite their developed international connectivity, the three wealthiest markets in the study (Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, and Russia) would greatly benefit from improved pan‐regional terrestrial fiber.

Reason #2 Reason #2

Why a Coherent Pan Why a Coherent Pan‐ ‐Asian Infrastructure Would Benefit the Region Asian Infrastructure Would Benefit the Region

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Pan Pan‐ ‐Regional Fiber Would Also Benefit Wealthy Markets Regional Fiber Would Also Benefit Wealthy Markets

• Pan‐regional fiber would compensate for existing

shortcomings of the countries’ international networks and help to place them on a par more connected markets in Western Europe, Southeast Asia, and North America

– Russia’s submarine connectivity is limited to adjoining regions – Existing Europe‐to‐Asia transit infrastructure can’t compete

• Stimulating demand in Kyrgyz Republic, Tajikistan,

Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan would benefit entire region

– By creating larger addressable opportunities for neighboring markets, in telecom as well as other sectors of the economy – Increased demand for Russian content

• 96% of Uzbek users visit Russian‐language websites
• 90% of downloaded content in Kyrgyz Republic is Russian language

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Coherent pan‐Asian terrestrial fiber optic infrastructure would benefit markets across the continent and beyond, and help address one of the international bandwidth industry’s most pressing concerns, namely the lack of reliable, cost‐effective Europe‐to‐Asia bandwidth. In financial terms, the viability of constructing coherent pan‐ Asian terrestrial fiber optic connectivity can likely be guaranteed by capturing even a small portion of bandwidth demand between East Asia and Western Europe.

Reason #3 Reason #3

Why a Coherent Pan Why a Coherent Pan‐ ‐Asian Infrastructure Would Benefit the Region Asian Infrastructure Would Benefit the Region

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Strong Europe Strong Europe‐ ‐to to‐ ‐Asia Bandwidth Demand Asia Bandwidth Demand

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

FLAG Europe‐Asia (FEA) (formerly FLAG ) 20 50 50 50 110 140 Sea‐Me‐We‐3 (SMW3) 150 150 200 200 200 200 i2i (ISCN) 160 160 310 640 640 640 TGN‐TIC (Tata Indicom India‐Singapore (TIIS)) 320 320 480 480 480 960 Sea‐Me‐We‐4 (SMW4) 640 640 1,500 1,500 1,700 2,000 Falcon 500 500 1,390 1,390 2,590 2,590 Seacom / TGN Eurasia 80 100 110 240 India‐Middle East‐Western Europe (I‐ME‐WE) 260 640 2,560 Europe‐India Gateway (EIG) 240 240 Gulf Bridge International Cable System (GBI) /MENA 480

TOTAL ACTIVATED EUROPE‐TO‐ASIA SUBMARINE CAPACITY (Gbps) 1,790 1,820 4,010 4,620 6,710 10,050 CAGR (2007‐2012) 41.2%

Source: The Undersea Cable Report 2013 by Terabit Consulting

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Terrestrial as a Solution for Submarine Terrestrial as a Solution for Submarine

Source: The Undersea Cable Report 2013 by Terabit Consulting

The global telecommunications industry is desperate for a cost‐effective solution that would avoid undersea choke points.

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

A Pan A Pan‐ ‐Asian Terrestrial Network Would Be More Asian Terrestrial Network Would Be More Competitive than Europe Competitive than Europe‐ ‐Asia Submarine Asia Submarine

Submarine Terrestrial Connectivity Cable station to cable station, with expensive backhaul POP‐to‐POP Repair Faults take weeks to repair; ships running costs $50,000+ per day Networks accessible by highway can be quickly repaired at low cost Capacity and Upgrades Long‐haul limited to 8 fiber pairs; submerged electronics poses limitation Unlimited capacity with proper duct installation and maintenance Costs Unrepeatered 3‐fiber pair cable: $12,500 per km, marine services $20k‐$40k / km $1,250 per km with marginal fiber costs of as low as $60 per km Risk and Reliability No viable alternative to Egyptian bottleneck Mesh configuration could offer “five nines” if properly designed

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Part 4: The Case for Installing a Terrestrial Part 4: The Case for Installing a Terrestrial Pan Pan‐ ‐Asian Fiber Optic Network Asian Fiber Optic Network Along Highway Rights Along Highway Rights‐ ‐of

• f‐

‐Way Way

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

International Highway Infrastructure International Highway Infrastructure

• In the near‐term, many of the countries in the region will be

upgrading existing highway infrastructure and installing new links

• Simultaneous installation of high‐capacity fiber and ducts

would be a negligible marginal cost in most projects

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Major Investments in Transport Infrastructure Major Investments in Transport Infrastructure

Country Major Upcoming Transport Investments Azerbaijan ‐ Modernization of all major highways by 2015. ‐ Baku‐Tbilisi‐Kars railway (with access to Europe). Kazakhstan ‐ USD$19 billion in new highways by 2014, focusing on China‐to‐Asia. ‐ New China‐Europe rail link. Kyrgyz Republic ‐ Bishkek‐Osh‐Sary Tash North‐South highway will undergo a USD$800 million reconstruction over the next five years. Russian Federation ‐ By 2020, Russian Federation expects to build or reconstruct 7,400 kilometers of federal highways and 6,700 kilometers of regional and municipal roads. Tajikistan ‐ Construction and improvement of several hundred kilometers of roads, especially linkages with China, has been undertaken with funding from the ADB and the Chinese government. Turkmen‐ istan ‐ Improvement of highway links to Turkmenbashi is anticipated as part of EU’s TRACECA program. Uzbekistan ‐ May, 2013: Uzbekistan and the ADB signed a loan agreement for USD$220 in financing for the country’s national highway project. ‐ Nov., 2013: Uzbekistan and China signed an agreement for a USD$400 million loan to include construction of rail linkages to China.

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Installing Fiber within a Road Project Installing Fiber within a Road Project

• In the US (high labor‐cost market), conduit+fiber

installation during open road construction costs between USD$6,000 and USD$18,000 per kilometer

• Road installation costs at least USD$1.8 million per

lane, per kilometer

• Cost of fiber network installation during open road

construction: much less than 1% of project total

Photos: Terabit Consulting

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Part 5: The Case for Intervention to Part 5: The Case for Intervention to Ensure Network Development Ensure Network Development

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Market Failure: Broadband Divide Market Failure: Broadband Divide

• The analysis showed that the growing chasm

between the broadband “have” and “have‐not” markets results in vast differences in:

– international fiber connectivity – domestic connectivity – the pricing of IP transit capacity – the competitiveness of telecommunications and Internet market – fixed and mobile broadband infrastructure – the affordability of consumer broadband services

• This impacts overall economic growth and

development.

• Landlocked markets can’t compete using the

existing trans‐border (bilateral) infrastructure.

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

The Need for Intervention The Need for Intervention

Intervention (by government or int’l. organizations) is required to ensure the implementation of a pan‐ Asian terrestrial fiber optic network for 5 reasons:

1.To overcome the region’s vast broadband inequality and assist landlocked nations. 2.To ensure that the region receives broadband services on a par with more developed markets. 3.To finance or assist in financing a major capital project that is unlikely to be fully financed by the private sector. 4.To pool and leverage private‐sector resources which are disparately insufficient. 5.To stimulate and facilitate future private investment through market development and maturation.

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Options for Government/UN Participation Options for Government/UN Participation

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Available Public Available Public‐ ‐Private Partnership Options Private Partnership Options

Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) Model with Government/Organizational Shareholding

• Network operators form a special purpose vehicle to assume full responsibility for the development, operation, and maintenance of

the pan‐Asian terrestrial network.

• Government, organizational, and/or developmental entities make capital contributions to the SPV and receive equity stakes and/or

capacity on the network.

• The contributor(s) receive a seat on the board of the SPV, thereby ensuring that policy goals are achieved.
• A regulatory framework is adapted to ensure that the SPV’s outcome fulfills policy goals and improves the overall welfare of the

region.

• The contributor’s equity stake may be divested once certain milestones are achieved, or alternatively may be held until the winding‐

down of the SPV.

Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) Model with Government/Organizational Contribution

• Network operators form a special purpose vehicle with full responsibility for the pan‐Asian terrestrial fiber optic network.
• The government, organizational, and/or developmental entities make capital contributions to the SPV.
• The contributor(s) do not receive equity or capacity on the network.
• However, the contributor(s) do participate in the creation of the SPV’s governance framework, and receive a seat on the board of the

SPV.

• Mechanisms are instituted to ensure that policy goals are met.

Build‐Operate‐Transfer (BOT)

• Following an open tender process, a concession is granted to one or more network operators for a fixed long‐term duration (typically

20 years).

• The network operators are assigned full responsibility for financing, operating, and maintaining the cable.
• Certain market privileges may be accorded to the network operators.
• The operators are allowed to retain all revenues during the period of its concession.
• Once the concession agreement expires, ownership of the network is assigned to the government(s) at no cost.

Awarding of Project Management Contract

• A tender is issued to select one or more network operators responsible for the construction, operation, maintenance, and

commercialization of the pan‐Asian terrestrial fiber optic network.

• The contract recipient is paid to manage the cable and assume these responsibilities, including the sales of capacity to operators. The

contract recipient’s management fees may be fixed or based on a percentage of revenue.

• The network remains the property of the Government(s), which collect all profits (less management fees).

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Part 6: Principles to Guide Part 6: Principles to Guide Network Development Network Development

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Principles to Guide Future Network Development Principles to Guide Future Network Development

• 1. Fully integrated and coherent

– Mesh configuration to allow for in‐network healing in the event of physical cable outages or political instability affecting connectivity in specific countries.

• 2. Functioning and monitored as single, uniform network

– Existing multi‐national terrestrial networks cannot offer uniform quality‐

• f‐service guarantees between endpoints (as good as “weakest link” or

“weakest operator”).

• 3. Leveraging existing infrastructure

– Right‐of‐way procurement and uniform construction techniques would be enabled through the use of the Asian Highway network, Pan‐Asian Railway project, or power transmission networks.

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Principles to Guide Future Network Development Principles to Guide Future Network Development

(Continued) (Continued)

• 4. Cost‐effective

– With suitable transmission capacity and fiber count, a pan‐regional terrestrial fiber network could compete effectively with submarine cable

• n both a regional and intercontinental basis.
• 5. Open access and non‐discriminatory pricing

– In order to achieve development and policy goals, as well as to serve the region’s consumers, all purchasers of capacity must be able to access the network on an equal, non‐discriminatory basis.

• 6. Developed and managed by a Special Purpose Vehicle

(SPV)

– SPV shareholding would ensure the neutrality and efficiency of the network – Allows participation by all stakeholders while still maintaining arm’s‐ length terms over all capacity sales and leases.

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Part 7: Part 7: Gaining Support for the Project Gaining Support for the Project

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Stakeholder Participation is Key Stakeholder Participation is Key

• The Study (pp. 34‐38) identifies more than 100

potential stakeholders in North and Central Asia that should be involved in the project, including:

– National Regulatory Authorities – Incumbent Operators and Major International Gateway Operators – Competitive Telecommunications Operators and ISPs – Road and Railway Authorities/Operators

• Suppliers and contractors should also be

consulted in the development stage.

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Convincing Governments of the Project Convincing Governments of the Project’ ’s Advantages s Advantages

• 1. Benefits to consumers

– Better, more cost‐effective connectivity in the region will greatly reduce consumer prices in less developed markets and improve broadband reliability throughout the region.

• 2. Economic growth

– Improvement in ICT infrastructure yields:

• Increased demand for the output of other industries (demand multiplier)
• New opportunities for production in other industries (supply multiplier)
• New goods and services for consumers (final demand)

– It also increases firms’ innovation capabilities and increases the probability of new products, innovations, and organizations

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Convincing Governments of the Project Convincing Governments of the Project’ ’s Advantages s Advantages

(Continued) (Continued)

• 3. Increased government revenue

– Growth in economic output from ICT investment results in greater tax revenue – Increased employment in the telecommunications sector – Greater collections from telecom licenses and excise

• 4. Regional stability through better international

and intercultural relations

– More efficient routing of trans‐border traffic would encourage trans‐border initiatives in the education, healthcare, and research sectors that would not otherwise be possible.

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Road Map / Next Steps Road Map / Next Steps

• Critical international connectivity weaknesses

throughout Asia are being identified by Terabit Consulting

• As more market analyses are completed, the viability
• f a coherent pan‐Asian network is becoming clearer
• Detailed Feasibility Study (DFS) should be undertaken
• Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) costing exploration

should be initiated

• Determination of support among stakeholders
• Identification of financing options

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

Terabit Consulting Terabit Consulting’ ’s Overall Thoughts s Overall Thoughts

• Terabit Consulting has worked on dozens of key fiber

infrastructure projects in every region of the globe

• The Pan‐Asian network opportunity is among the strongest

it has seen

• Commercially viable; initial evaluation of business case

inputs are very positive

• The network would be critical to ensure broadband equality

and promote regional economic/social development

• Urgently needed by global telecommunications operators

who must compensate for submarine cable choke‐points

• Urgently needed by governments and communications‐

critical industries that are compromised by submarine cable choke‐points and network isolation in landlocked countries

• However, the project can only be achieved with persuasive

intervention by UNESCAP and governments

www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com www.t www.tera rabitconsulting.com

T Təşə əşəkk kkü ür edir r edirə əm m