Board End Measures College Balanced Scorecard Presentation Board - - PDF document

Board End Measures – College Balanced Scorecard Presentation

January, 2013

Board End #5: Support and Resources – Madison College proactively provides support and resources to the enhancement of collaborative community efforts to the extent resources will allow.

Board End #5, Outcome 1 – K-12 Partnerships Results

Measure Definition: Percent of Madison College service area school districts currently offering courses in one

• r more Madison College subjects.

Comments:

There are 40 public school districts in the Madison College service area. 35 districts currently have some kind of articulation agreement with Madison

• College. Cambria-Friesland, Fall River,

Rio, Westfield, and Wonewoc currently do not have an agreement with Madison college. The number shows a reduction due to schools eliminating their advanced standing courses. Some of these districts are revising their curriculum and will be providing dual credit courses in the fall of 2013. These are all small districts with limited ability to add courses. We are working to partner districts so they can provide dual credit courses on line and/or through ITV.

2010 2011 2012

Partner Public School Districts 37 38 35 Source:

• 1. Madison College K-12 Partnership

agreements.

• 2. Madison College Data Warhouse.

For more information regarding these results please contact Keith Cornille, Vice President, Student Development at (608) 246-6464. Rationale for Rating: This indicator gets a green light. Lack of course offering in 5 school districts is based on distance, need and local resource restrictions in those districts. Madison College continues to maximize opportunities for local High School students to take our course work.

Board End Measures – College Balanced Scorecard Presentation

January, 2013

Board End #5, Outcome 2 – Postsecondary Partnerships Results

Measure Definition: Number of transfers from Madison College to 4 year colleges each year and number of postsecondary institutions with articulation agreements allowing Madison College graduates to participate in a Bachelors degree completion option. Comments: The chart to the right shows transfers from Madison College from 2008-2012. These were obtained by searching the National Student Clearinghouse, a database that tracks enrollment at colleges across the nation. Transfers have increased steadily between 2008 and 2012. 2012 transfers were 418 students (13.3%) above those in 2011. We currently have 128 program-to- program articulation agreements with 28 four-year colleges and universities. These agreements enable students to transfer the credits earned in a technical program and complete a bachelor’s degree. Madison College students may transfer to hundreds of other four-year colleges using specific course-to-course and

• ther articulation agreements. Madison

College remains the largest transfer institution to the UW System and to the UW Madison.

• 331 new UW Madison students

transferred credits from Madison College in 2010-11.

• 733 new UW System students

transferred credits from Madison College in 2011.

• Madison College also sends transfer

students to UW who enter without transferring credits. 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 % Inc from Prior Year 6.6% 11.0% 21.3% 11.3% 13.3% Sources: 1. Madison College query of National Student Clearinghouse Data. 2. Madison College articulation agreements. 3. UW System Memo: Undergraduate Transfer Students: 2010-11

For more information regarding these results please contact Keith Cornille, Vice President, Student Development at (608) 246-6464. Rationale for Rating: The increasing number of students and opportunities for Bachelors degree completion warrants a green light for this indicator.

Board End Measures – College Balanced Scorecard Presentation

January, 2013

Board End #5, Outcome 3 – Public Perception Results

Measure Definition: Overall Score given by a random selection of district residents on an eight question survey. Comments: Madison College contracted with NBS Solutions to do the DaneTrak Survey again in 2012 after not doing the survey in 2011. DaneTrak is a phone survey of district

• residents. This survey involves phone

interviews with 400 district residents in Dane County and 200 residents

• utside of Dane County. Each

respondent is asked to grade the college in 8 categories. Overall ratings are shown to the right. This is shown as an overall grade point average on the chart to the right. The 2012 DaneTrak overall ratings showed significant improvement over

• 2010. The Madison College

Referendum was passed during this

• time. The higher rating likely reflects a

vote of confidence for the direction taken by the college.

Data Note: The scale for the 2012 survey was changed from an A-F grade scale to a 5-point Lickert rating scale. Previous year ratings were adjusted for comparability.

Madison College Community Contribution Survey An internal Madison College Employee Community contribution survey was done in 2012 to assess employee contribution in professional and community organizations. 409 Madison College employees were surveyed concerning their participation in non-profit organizations.

• 191 employees (47%) participated

in at least one community

• rganization.
• 170 employees (42%) held

leadership positions. Categories are listed at the right.

• Madison College Employees play

a significant role in a diverse array

• f community and professional

non-profit organizations. Madison College Community Contribution Survey

Number of Organizations 1 2 3 Responses 191 98 38 Percent 47% 24% 9%

Board End Measures – College Balanced Scorecard Presentation

January, 2013 Source:

• 1. DaneTrak survey report, NBS

Solutions.

• 2. Madison College Employee

Community Participation Survey For more information regarding these results please contact Diane Walleser, Vice President for Enrollment Management at (608) 246-6550. Rationale for Rating: This indicator gets a green light as perceptions are generally positive, as shown by consistently high marks with this indicator as well as high degree of participation in non-profit community and professional

• rganizations.