Biotechnology and Forest Tree Pests and Diseases Kevin J. Hackett, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

biotechnology and forest tree pests and diseases kevin j
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Biotechnology and Forest Tree Pests and Diseases Kevin J. Hackett, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Biotechnology and Forest Tree Pests and Diseases Kevin J. Hackett, Ph.D., USDA-ARS NASEM Study Panel December 1, 2017 American Poplar Chestnut Blight Chinese Areas of Forest and Ag Biotech Overlap Application of forest biotech research


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Biotechnology and Forest Tree Pests and Diseases Kevin J. Hackett, Ph.D., USDA-ARS NASEM Study Panel December 1, 2017 Poplar Chestnut

Blight Chinese American

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Areas of Forest and Ag Biotech Overlap

  • Application of forest biotech research to

control of pests and diseases of:

– Ornamental trees – Orchard trees

  • Woodlands as potential harbors of pests and

diseases

  • Protecting pollinators from pesticides used in

forests

  • The regulatory approval process for GM-trees
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Ornamentals

Ash Maple Oak Ailanthus

ALB EAB Lanternfly GM

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Ornamentals

Ash Maple Oak

ALB EAB Gypsy Moth

Double strand RNA- mediated RNA interference through feeding in larval gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera: Erebidae)

SAIKAT KUMAR B. GHOSH and DAWN

  • E. GUNDERSEN-RINDAL
  • Eur. J. Entomol. 114: 170–178, 2017

RNA interference in the Asian Longhorned Beetle: Identification

  • f Key RNAi Genes and

Reference Genes for RT-qPCR

Thais B. Rodrigues 1, Ramesh Kumar Dhandapani1, Jian J. Duan2 & Subba Reddy Palli1 SCiEntiFiC REPOrTS | 7: 8913 | 21 August 2017

Development of RNAi method for screening candidate genes to control emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis

Thais B. Rodrigues 1, Lynne K. Rieske1, Jian J. Duan2, Kanakachari Mogilicherla1 & Subba R. Palli1 Scientific REPOrTS | 7: 7379 | 7 August 2017

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Questions: Ornamentals

  • What are prospects for creating biotech

version of these trees, and, if they are created, getting them through regulatory and certification hurdles?

  • Do biotech trees affect biocontrol agents?
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Orchard Trees

Plum Papaya

Plum Pox Virus Papaya Ringspot

Citrus

Citrus Greening

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Orchard Trees

Plum Pox Virus Papaya Ringspot

Stable transformation of papaya via microprojectile bombardment Fitch et al. 1990. Plant Cell Reports 9:189-194. Virus resistant tomato plants derived from tissues bombarded with the coat protein gene of papaya ringspot virus. Fitch et al.

  • Biotechnol. 10 Nov 2002
slide-8
SLIDE 8

FasTrack

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Traditional breeding of stone fruits is a 3-4+ year cycle. Breeding, carried out in the field, is affected by climate, diseases, and insect pests. Not every year is successful.

Pollination Field planting seedlings

The Problem

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • After 3 - 4 years in the field

the seedlings will produce their first crop of fruit that can be evaluated.

  • Each year 3,000 to 6,000

peach and nectarine seedlings are produced, the results of approximately 12,000 to 24,000 hand pollinations.

  • Less than 1% of these

seedlings become advanced selections.

  • Less than 10% of advanced

selections will become named varieties.

Bounty peach Sentry peach

Earliscarlet nectarine

Bluebyrd plum Sweet-N-UP peach

Crimson Rocket peach

TruGold peach Orablue plum

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Early Flowering Research at the Appalachian Fruit Research Station

  • Used a

flowering gene (PtFT) from poplar

  • Some of the

transgenic plum plantlets flowered within 2 months of regeneration

slide-12
SLIDE 12

FasTrack plums: Designing plants for space exploration.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Most fruits come from woody perennial plants not suited to such growing systems.

FasTrack – The Future of Space Exploration!

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Orchard Trees

Citrus Greening An Existential Threat to World Citrus Industries

  • Long known in Asia, first identified in Florida in August 2005
  • Vectored by the Asian Citrus Psyllid, in FL since 1998, widespread in FL

&TX, spreading in CA, finds in AZ.

  • Associated with a phloem limited bacterium, Liberibacter asiaticus, Within a

few years of infection, many citrus trees become weak, have poor quality fruit, with lots of fruit drop, and trees may die or become useless

  • Estimated that ~80% of FL citrus trees are infected, and some groves no

longer productive

  • In FL, estimated average crop reduction of 40% compared to healthy trees

(Singerman, 2015) - many folks out of business

Photos Bové, 2006

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Trend in Florida Citrus Production

60% reduction in 9 yrs from post-HLB peak 72% since 03-04 Lowest in 70 yrs 3 hurricanes 2004 Latest estimate for 2017/18 projects another 15% reduction

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Citrus micrantha

True species: Very narrow germplasm base

www.flckr.com

Citrus reticulata Citrus maxima Citrus medica

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Xcc Infiltration results with transgenic plants containing thionin, D4E1 and chimera

Non transformed control Thionin-C12

10 107 10 106 10 10

5

10 104 10 107 10 106 10 105 10 104

Chimera-C9

10 107 10 105 10 106 10 104

D4E1-C20

10 106 10 104 10 107 10 105

Thionin and chimeral antimicrobial peptides, designed by Goutam Gupta (Los Alamos National Laboratory)

Chimera of a citrus serine protease (cyan) joined to the lytic D4E1 peptide (red) by a GSTA linker (yellow)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

New Tissue-specific Promoters

  • Almost all transgenics in commercial use have “1st generation”

construct components, like promoters that express the genes everywhere & all of the time (constitutive promoters like D35S)

  • Working with Bill Belknap & Jim Thomson, have “new” genes

FROM CITRUS for new tools

  • Tissue specific promoters, perhaps the 1st to be highly active
  • Gene architecture for very high phloem expression and very

high root expression (also abscission zone/ fruit specific)

SCAmpP 396SS phloem-specific GUS D35S constitutive GUS

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Other Citrus Biotech

  • Antibody (ScFv) directed to external CG-pathogen

epitopes (Hartung designed)

  • Peptides directed at the insect vector gut (Shatters

identified)

  • De-novo peptides designed based on biophysical

models of interaction with bacterial membranes (Gupta)

  • Transgenes designed to disrupt CG-pathogen quorum-

sensing

  • Recombinase mediated cassette exchange (Thomson

designed) to remove antibiotic markers and facilitate gene stacking

  • RNAi and CRISPR Studies
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Grape – Citrus Connection

Pierce’s Disease of Grapevine

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Other Approaches

  • Para-transgenesis: Synthesizing Insect-Vectored,

Plant-Colonizing and Cross-Protecting Bacteria Citrus Greening

  • Gene Drives
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Questions/Other Ideas

  • Where might there be additional areas of

productive collaboration to produce useful biotechnologies, or shared knowledge of ecological impacts, for the forest and agricultural communities?

  • Please share other connections might you uncover

in your study, e.g., tree architecture?

  • Will a combined exogenous/endogenous

transgene approach be best?

  • Is there any work on self-reporting or self-treating

trees?

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Areas of Forest and Ag Biotech Overlap

  • Application of forest biotech research to

control of pests and diseases of orchard and

  • rnamental trees.
  • Woodlands as potential harbors of pests and

diseases.

  • Protecting pollinators from pesticides used in

forests.

  • The regulatory approval process for GM-trees.
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Woodlands as Pest and Disease Harbors

Brown Marmorated Stink Bug Pierce’s Disease of Grapevine

Glassy-winged Sharpshooter

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Question: Forest-Ag Border Areas

  • Are there areas of potential cooperation in

shared border areas?

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Areas of Forest and Ag Biotech Overlap

  • Application of forest biotech research to

control of pests and diseases of orchard and

  • rnamental trees.
  • Woodlands as potential harbors of pests and

diseases.

  • Protecting pollinators from pesticides used in

forests.

  • The regulatory approval process for GM-trees.
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Protecting Pollinators

Maple Ash

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Questions: Pollinators

  • Can biotech-based pest and disease control

protect pollinators better than chemical approaches?

  • What are examples of such approaches and

what are the gaps in our knowledge that, when addressed, will help us better protect pollinators and other species of interest to biodiversity, e.g., the monarch butterfly?

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Areas of Forest and Ag Biotech Overlap

  • Application of forest biotech research to

control of pests and diseases of orchard and

  • rnamental trees.
  • Woodlands as potential harbors of pests and

diseases.

  • Protecting pollinators from pesticides used in

forests.

  • The regulatory approval process for GM-trees.
slide-30
SLIDE 30

The Regulatory Process Development of a GE virus resistant plum variety

Gene discovery, Vector construction, Transformation 1990 - 1992 Plant establishment, Propagation, Greenhouse testing 1992 - 1995 Field testing U.S. (APHIS) 1995 – 2005 Field testing Europe 1996 – 2005 Research and regulatory data accumulation 1990 – 2005 (Over 30 publications from this work) Stakeholders input Regulatory submissions APHIS 2004, FDA 2006, EPA 2007

14 Years could be shortened

Next time - submit to 3 agencies simultaneously

6 Years

Regulatory Approval

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Questions: Regulatory

  • What is the status and the need for long-term

persistence studies for biotech products?

  • How will biotech tree stocks affect assessment
  • f the invasive risk of pests and pathogens?
  • Can we use transient expression of Cas9 and

sgRNA to reduce regulatory hurdles?

slide-32
SLIDE 32

i5K and EBP

slide-33
SLIDE 33

GLOBAL NETWORK OF COMMUNITIES

International EBP working group already established.

Open access Compliance with the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS)

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Questions: Earth BioGenome Project

  • What is known about the genomes of forest trees

and their pests and fungal pathogens, and how might EBP help resolve critical problems with these pests and pathogens in forests?

  • Which forest vegetation and pest and eukaryotic

pathogen species are in repositories?

  • Has DNA been extracted from these species?
  • What are the sequencing priorities for forest trees

and their pests and eukaryotic diseases?

  • Who are potential partners in this effort?
slide-35
SLIDE 35

Biotech Forest ↔ Crop ?↔?

Poplar Orange

Thank you!

How can we apply discoveries in forest biotech to crop biotech, and how might crop biotech speed progress in development and regulatory approval of forest tree biotech?

slide-36
SLIDE 36
slide-37
SLIDE 37

The Challenge

Tree fruits could significantly improve crew diet as source of antioxidants and high impact, fresh foods Candidate food crops for space restricted thus far to herbaceous species

slide-38
SLIDE 38

FasTrack for Phenolics

  • A plum selection with 2x higher phenolic

levels than those found in commercial varieties.

  • Breeding this trait using the FasTrack system.

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

Total Phenolics

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Grape

$3.5B crop/$162B impact Research needs

  • Disease resistance
  • Fruit quality
  • Abiotic stress tolerance
slide-40
SLIDE 40

From Foe to Friend: Synthesizing Insect-Vectored, Plant- Colonizing and Cross-Protecting Bacteria: A strategy for rapid development, deployment and dissemination of crop-protecting organisms

USDA ARS, University of Florida, Synthetic Genomics, Inc.

  • Produce first synthetic “proto-Liberibacter defensorium” strain

containing a CLas-Lcre hybrid synthetic genome

– Outcompete and/or kill the pathogenic CLas – When desired, acquired and transmitted by Asian citrus psyllids only – Culturable – Modular genome for easy manipulation of traits – Trackable and distinguishable from other Liberibacters – Replaceable with upgraded versions – Do everything above in the most acceptable package we can make to gain permission for release. – For more information, contact Bob Shatters, robert.shatters@ars.usda.gov

slide-41
SLIDE 41

EBP Strategy 1: The Phylogenomic Wave

  • Domains: 3 (Eubacteria, Archaea, Eukarya)
  • Eukaryotic Kingdoms: 5 (animal, plant, fungi, chromista and protozoa)
  • Eukaryotic Phyla: 61 (35 animal; 10 plant; 2 fungi; 14 chromists+protozoa)
  • Eukaryotic Classes: 266
  • Eukaryotic Orders: 1253
  • Eukaryotic Families: 9330 (Phase I; reference quality)
  • Eukaryotic Genera: 140,000-200,000 (Phase II)
  • Eukaryotic Species: ~1.5 million known (Phase III)
slide-42
SLIDE 42

EBP Strategy 2: “Google Life”

  • Location Sampling (e.g. Ocean Sampling Day Consortium; Genomic

Observatories Network; NEON; Critical Zone Observatory; CALeDNA)

  • Sequence all organisms in a particular geographical area (e.g., within

biodiversity hotspots); soil, land, water and air

  • Enables studies of the effect of environmental change on biodiversity

(genomic ecology)

  • Produce a multidimensional and dynamic view of life on earth