e-laws EASM m member su urvey rega arding th e charter rs and - - PDF document

e laws easm m member su urvey rega arding th e charter rs
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

e-laws EASM m member su urvey rega arding th e charter rs and - - PDF document

e-laws EASM m member su urvey rega arding th e charter rs and by Present tation o of the re esults General in nformation : Al l 442 curre nt EASM me embers wer re individua ally invited o on 20 th Jan 2 2018 to pa rticipate


slide-1
SLIDE 1

EASM m Present

General in

  • Al

the

  • In

ind

Fo lin Al re Th be 17 Th Note: All data f make the are consid for Paul Jo are presen be change Next steps 15 28 31 sha 23

member su tation o

nformation

l 442 curre e anonymou

  • rder to ma

dividually se

  • r two mem

nk deleted ll members minded via he survey w ecause som 77 membe he online su from the m process as dered for t

  • hnson, an

nt below h ed and how s: Feb 2018 Feb 2018 Mar 201 are them w & 24 201

urvey rega

  • f the re

:

nt EASM me us online su ake sure on ent to the m

mbers a sec (total samp s who did n a email. was closed me member rs (40%) st urvey was embership s transpare the change n external p he will prov w the respe 8: Presentin 8: Sending 8: Expecte within the bo 8: Discuss

arding th esults

embers wer rvey. ly members

  • embers. The

cond indivi ple 444). not particip

  • n Saturda

rs asked fo tarted the s conducted p survey ar ent as poss es of the ch person with vide recom ective para ng the resul the consol ed recomm

  • ard

sion of the

Page 1/24

e charter

re individua can partici e link could

idual link w pated in the ay 10th Feb

  • r an extens

survey and via the so re available

  • ible. In ord

harters and h legal exp mmendation agraphs sh lts within E idated resu mendation draft within

rs and by

ally invited o pate individ not be used

was created e survey be b 2018, so sion. 114 (25.8

  • ftware pro

e and acc der to ensu d bye-laws

  • pertise. Ba

ns how the

  • uld be ex

ASM’s Exe ults to Paul for the ch n the Execu

e-laws

  • n 20th Jan 2

dual links we d a second

d and the r efore 4th Fe

  • me days la

8%) comple vider “unip essible for ure that all s, the resul sed consol charters a xpressed. ecutive Com Johnson hanges from utive Comm

2018 to pa ere created time.

results from eb 2018 w ater than a eted the su park”. r interested ideas and lts were co lidated res and bye-law mmittee m Paul Joh mittee boar

rticipate in and

m the first were finally announced urvey. d people to d comments

  • nsolidated

ults, which ws have to hnson and rd meeting

  • s

d h

  • d
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Bef Diversity At presen might mak Please sel new board Rank C 1 Ex 2 Co 3 Ag 4 G 5 N 6 Ke g.

  • r

Pa C fore 31 Ma y of Boar t, we have ke sense to lect from th rd members riteria xperience

  • mpetencie

ge Gender ationality ey Position ., ESMQ ed r Incoming ast Confere hair) ay 2018: P rd membe e a solely

  • think muc

his list up s: Mo es (e. ditor / ence Presenting ers nationality ch broader to three ca

  • dus

Me

(ST

1 1.6

(.72

1 1.7

(.71

2 2.0

(.06

3 2.1

(.89

3 2.3

(.74

3 2.6

(.62

Page 2/24

the final dr y-based de here. ategories t ean

TD)

Frequ Top 64

24)

4

(50

70

15)

4

(44

09

684)

4

(18

11

94)

1

(34

34

45)

8

(16

68

26)

3

(8.

raft to the m efinition of that you de uency 1 (%) Fre To 45

.0%) (3

45

.6%) (4

4

.2%) (5

3

.2%) (2

8

.0%) (3

3

1%) (1

members diversity i eem most equency

  • p 2 (%)

F T 32

35.6%)

41

40.6%)

12

54.5%)

8

21.1%)

17

34.0%)

6

16.2%)

in the char important Frequency Top 3 (%) 13

(14.4%)

15

(14.8%)

6

(27.3%)

17

(44.7%)

25

(50.0%)

28

(75.7%)

  • rter. Yet, it

for finding Sample n=90 n=101 n=22 n=38 n=50 n=37 t g

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Electing How do y have a no

  • r would y

Please let

Figure 1: O

Provided a No I w Tra imp nom It is and No par EA The No No

6

members you see the

  • mination c

you prefer us know h

Overview of

arguments

  • minations

would appre ansparancy portant role mination co s important d procedur

  • mination c

rtners. SM nomina e best way

  • mination c
  • mination c

61 60%

s of the E e procedure committee, a mixture ere:

f the membe

for a nomi by membe eciate a no y is impor e in establi

  • mmittee

t that EASM res. committee ation comm for the pro comittee committee s Executive e for electi should the

  • f both?

er’s attitude

ination com ership to the

  • mination c

rtant and shing trans M establish which rec mittee

  • cedere is

should be n

19 19%

Page 3/24

e Board ing membe ere be nom

in terms of

mmittee e nominati committee I believe sparancy. hes a Nom ceives reco to have a nice

21 21%

ers of the e minations fr

the nomina

  • n commit

a nomina ination Co

  • mmendatio

nomination

1 %

executive b rom the me

tion commit

ttee. ation com

  • mmittee w
  • ns from E

n committe Pro nomin Contra no Mixture o board? Sho embership

ttee (n=101

mittee can with well-de EASM mem ee. nation com

  • mination c
  • f both
  • uld EASM

base only,

)

n play an fined remit mbers and mittee committe M , n t d

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The qua sho wit the

  • nl

By boa me ma (if wit The eva sho I be the A app Giv goa nom me acc The ind fed bas It s fro the Provided a No e nominati alifications

  • uld come

th suggestio eses sugge line. having a ard memb embership b ake sense fo necessary) th the mem ere should aluation of

  • uld be nom

elieve that ere should b nomination propiate ca ven that th al of the n mination c eet the crite cepted in a e procedur dividual pe deration, w se would b hould have m the mem emselves. arguments

  • mination c
  • n commi

. The com from mem

  • ns. The co

stions and nominatio ber recruit basis there

  • r prospec

short list bership an be a nomi f the sugge minations o EASM sho be nomina n committe andidates f here are cr

  • mination
  • mmittee s

eria and p a neutral fo re with a n ersons onl with associa be more su e an indep

  • mbers. The

against a committee n ttee itself i mmittee itse bers (indiv

  • mmittee s

d show the n committe tment and e is the pos ctive candid the applica nd partake ination com ested cand

  • f people n
  • uld have a

tions from e can be v for becomi riteria to b committee shall not g present the

  • rm.

nomination y (associa ations as m itable. pendent No e nominatio nomination never work

Page 4/24

is value a elf should viduals) to m hould wor eir evaluat ee we ena d successi ssibility tha dates to ap

  • ants. Those

in the vote mmittee wh didates don not membe a nominatio the membe very helpfu ing an EAS be fulfilled e must be t give any a e respectiv committee ation). If t members th

  • mination C
  • n Commit

n committe ked well. ble as it s not make make sure, k with a pr tion for al able a stra

  • n planni

t what we pply to the e on the s e at the AG hich should ne by the ers of EASM

  • n committ

ership base ul in the w SM board by nomine to control f dvices but ve informa e would be the forma hen the nom Committee ttee is also ee should “ch

  • wn sugg

, everybod re agreed l suggestio tegic appr

  • ng. If it

have is rat Board wh hort list ca GM as was propose c members. M tee. e only way to ide member. ees to be for these c

  • nly secu

tion for ev e better sin t of the o minations f who recei

  • allowed

heck” the c

  • gestions. S

dy is able to check list t

  • ns prior t

roach to b is solely ther ad ho

  • then aut

an then co the case i candidates I do not entify and possibly e

  • riteria. Ho

ure that all very nomin nce the me

  • rganisatio

from the m ives sugge to nomina candidates uggestions

  • come up

to evaluate to the GA e taken to from the

  • c. It would

horise and mmunicate n Bern. s after their think there approach lected, the wever, the nominees nee that is embers are

  • n was a

membership estions also te persons s s p e A

  • e

d d e r e h e e s s e a p

  • s
slide-5
SLIDE 5

No The The kno pro ann I d acc com the not ind me I th vot No On Me nom No nom Bot can The Me Fro I w I p ext No No No Bot

  • , not at all

e executive e past yea

  • w the na
  • cedure ca

nounced in do not agr count all mmittee is ey chose sp t consult ef dividuals b embers. hink the ex tes of the b

  • minations

nly nominat embership minations f

  • minations

minations f ttom up: m n become p e opportun embership

  • m member

would prefe refer only tra involvem

  • minations
  • minations
  • minations

ttom-up-app l--I firmly be e board, Pr rs have sh ames of al an be run in n good time ree with a members vague and pecific can ffectively w ased upon ecutive bo board, and from the m tions from base nomi from all me from the m from he me members sh part of the ity of nomi base rship base r nominatio nomination ment in EA from the m from the m from mem proach: no elieve in th resident, V

  • wn that w

ll the cand n a transpa e, … We d a nominatio and their d weak an ndidates is with all peo n set criter ard should then the b membership the membe nations. embers membership embership

  • uld elect

board onc inations fro

  • nly.
  • ns from th

ns from the SM. membership membership bership

  • minations

Page 5/24

e power a VP, SG and we don't n didates ne arent way don't need

  • ns comm

competen d the justif very poor

  • ple that p

ria that the d be the m board votes p base only ership base p base. base new exec ce they are

  • m the mem

he member e members p base p from the m nd compet d Treasurer eed a NC either did without a any group mittee, it is

  • ncies. The

fication pro rly explaine put their na ey deemed atter of the s for the Ex y e utive board e elected by mbership b rship base ship base o membership tence of the , should be . Last year the contac

  • NC. 1) the

p/NC to ra bias and rationale

  • vided by
  • ed. As far

mes forwa d importan e board. T xec board. d members y the memb ase would

  • nly.
  • nly, beca

p base e General e elected b r the NC d ct all of t e empty po ank the can d does not e for a no them rega r as I know ard rather t nt, not the The genera

  • s. Also non

bers. be great use they s Assembly. by the GA. didn't even hem!! The

  • sitions are

ndidates. t take into

  • minations

arding why w they did they chose board or l assembly n members hown their n e e

  • s

y d e r y s r

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Mixture of In g Ma mix Pro bas Bot I w bas tha giv con I w how EA EA

  • f t
  • pi

bec Mix A m I gu Mix Mix A m Mix a m i w I w No bot a m A m f both general, I w aybe a mix xture of bo

  • posals fro

se - th would vote f se and the

  • at. After this

ve the mem nfirm the no would prefe w really w SM and n SM even b the EASM inion, you cause those xture of bo mixture of b uess mixtur xture sound xture mixture of b xture of bo mixture of b would like a would prefe

  • minations

th mixture of b mixture of b would be p xture of bot th m the nom for a mix t en a nomi s process a mbers a d

  • minations

er a mixtur wants to be not just for bigger en b and expa need a n e are the p

  • th

both is pre re should b ds good. both

  • th

both a mixture o r a mixture by membe both both pro nomina th mination co hat would nation com a second r decision in s. re of both. part of the r there ow better then nd that cou

  • mination

people how ferable be the right f both e of both. ers or mixtu

Page 6/24

ations from

  • mmittee as

first be ba mmittee co round woul the final I think it's e EASM Fa wn goals. S it already urse to ach committee w already c t procedure ure. the memb s well as f ased on no

  • uld provid

ld go throu stage bef s important amily and Someone h

  • is. Someon

hieve grea e and first committed t e. er base, bu rom the as minations f de suggeste ugh by the

  • re the no

t to have p doing it b how really ne how ca ter goals. A look insid themselfs to ut not exclu ssembly/m from the m ed nomina members

  • mination

people on because the y wants to n mentain And theref de the EAS

  • the EASM

usive. membership membership ations from in order to committee the board ey love the make the the course fore, in my SM Family, M Family. p p m

  • e

d e e e y ,

slide-7
SLIDE 7

A cou trus nom Mix Mix Bot Inst A m fro mix I w bef nom A m A m bes No me Mix Mix Mix A m I th mix A m A m bot Mix Mix I th bot mixture of uld be bias st to provid minations f x method: xture of bo th titute both mixture mig m each xture of bo would have fore the vo minate one mixture of b mixture of st to remain

  • mination

embers' vot xture - com xture of bo xture mixture of b

  • no no

hink mixture xture mixture of b mixture of th cases, w xture of bo xture of bo hink a nom ttom-up no both wou

  • sed. There

de excellen from the me nomination

  • th

a nominati ght be a s th e no probl

  • te. In rela

e or two pe both membersh n member- committee tes mmittee to p

  • th

both

  • mination

e of both is both sound both: nom with assessm

  • th
  • th

mination co minees/ca uld be bes are many t service o embership n committe ion commit uitable opt ems with tion to the eople that t ip-based n based and for a Pr pre-screen a committee, s better. ds good. inations fro ment from t

  • mmittee c

ndidates s

Page 7/24

t; as only

  • utstandin

n a nomina base only ee + applic ttee and al tion, e.g w potential b e presidenc they feel ar nominations d avoid the resident o and memb , nominatio

  • m membe

the NC could help hould be p nominatio g scholars ation comm and nomin ation and low nomin with 50 per board mem cy, it would re suitable s and a no reproduct r Secretar bers to deci

  • ns from th

ership and with attra possible.

  • ns from th

whom the mittee. nation by c vote of the ations from rcent of the mbers app d make se to lead the

  • minations

ion of simil ry Genera de e members Nominatio acting the he membe EASM me committee e members m the memb e candidat lying for n ense for the e associatio committee lar individu al; others ship base o

  • n committ

right cand rship base embers can bership. tes coming nomination e board to

  • n.

e would be uals based on

  • nly

tee and, in didates but e n g n

  • e

n n t

slide-8
SLIDE 8

I b me No com for yes I w mix Mix wh EA ele ago Mix A m to a I th I w Mix Mix Mix Mix Mix I pr Further rec Exe lea … ann If, reg Wh com believe a embership b

  • mination f

mmunity to more trans s, a mixture would prefe xture xture of bo

  • take the

SM memb ecting mem

  • )

xture but w mixture of a nominati hink a mixtu would prefe xture xed and a xture of bo xture of bo xture of bo refer mixtu commenda ecutives sh ast one yea 2) nomina nounce for in worst c gulated tha hat I find mmittee mu mixture o base will g from the m

  • be part o

sparency. e r a combin

  • th - the n

e time to ru bers are les mbers, may with very cle both seem

  • n commit

ure of both r a mixture nominatio

  • th
  • th
  • th

re of both ations hould alwa r before th ation dead

  • ex. June 1

cases, the t a person crucial is ust be clea f both a give the bes membership f the assoc nation of bo

  • mination

un through ss aware o y convince ear commu ms to be a tee. would be e of both. n committe ys have th hey go for a dline is ear st - that wi General can be a N that the ro rly defined

Page 8/24

nominatio st pool for p base is

  • ciation. A
  • th.

comittee a h the dossi

  • f capaciti
  • thers to

unication a way to co good. ee would b he experie a position rlier then n ill give the Assembly NC membe

  • les, respo
  • d. Furtherm

n committ possible Ex interesting A mixture c are usually ers of the ies - and t vote for th and scope nsider the be a good i nce of bei in the exec now, for e candidate decides t er for max

  • nsibilities
  • re, the EA

ee and su xecutive Bo because

  • uld event

experts, a electing m he disadva hem (as w members' idea ng on the cutive boar ex May 1s s a fair run to keep th 2 years. and duties ASM board uggestions

  • ard memb

it enables tually be a and consist members - antage is, we have ha

  • pinion a

EASM bo rd. st and 3) c

  • n. …

he NC it s for the n d and the n s from the bers. the entire ppreciable t of people

  • while the

that some ad 3 years dditionally

  • ard for at

candidates should be nomination nomination e e e e e e s y t s e n n

slide-9
SLIDE 9

com The

  • f E

Appointm Given the Secretary Assembly If you hav

Figure 2: M

  • n the prop

In favour o Yes Yes Ag Tot

  • rg

com its 5 8% 8% 3 5% 5% mmittee sho e experienc EASM. ment of S e importanc General, based on ve ideas rel

Member’s op posal by the

  • f appointi

s suggested s, SG shou ree!! tally agree ganisation mmittee do fine

  • uld be wo

ce from the Secretary ce of this o we would the propos lating to th

pinion abou e board (n=

ing the Sec d by the EA uld be prop e, the bo works and

  • es not kno

14 14 22% 22%

  • rk closely

e previous y General

  • ffice, and

d suggest t sal of the b is suggestio

ut appointin 63)

cretary Gen ASM Board posed by th ard are t d and such w this

Page 9/24

together a years was l (rather d given the to appoint board.

  • n, we wo

ng the Gene

neral by th d and appo he board. the only h they kno 41 41 65% 65% and sare co s frustrating than elec e long-term t the Secre

  • uld love to

eral Secretar

e General

  • inted bu t

people wh

  • w the ope
  • mmon inte

g and dam ction)

  • rientatio

etary Gene

  • hear them

ry by the Ge

assembly: teh GA. ho genuin erational is In favou Not n fa undecid In favou conditio erests and maged the

  • n of the ta

eral by th m via this fo

eneral asse

ngly know ssues - a n ur as propo avour as pr ded ur under ce

  • n(s)

principles. reputation asks of the e General

  • rm:

mbly based

w how the nomination

  • sed

roposed rtain n e l

d

e n

slide-10
SLIDE 10

I ag I be Ag I co

  • n

I ag Yes sou I am I w pro inst Tha som I ag Ag yes Fin Ag Thi it's Sou Ag Ag Thi Thi Ag

  • k

Thi YES yes me me kno gree with a elieve this reed with t

  • nsider this

a mid term gree s unds reaso m fine with would supp

  • posed for

titutional su at is a goo meone for t gree

  • ree. As pe

s e like that ree s seems re good idea unds logic. ree with th reed s is fine! s is a very ree s is a good S I agree s, I agree; embers can embers can

  • wing the w

appointmen proposal is the above s a key po m mandate nably h this

  • rt this mo

the positio upport nee

  • d idea an

the role of er previous asonable a, I accept . Go for it! he suggestio good idea d idea. the GA h n best estim nnot (and workload) nt s great. suggestion

  • sition. Sec
  • tion but it
  • n of SG

ded to effe d I know o Secretary comment.

  • n

a. has an imp mate who a it is easy

Page 10/24

n retary gen is importa needs to b ectively per

  • f other or

General. portant but and what t to compla eral should ant to spec be very cle rform their ganisation t time inte they need ain and co d be a pro ify that the ear of their role, and t s that also nsive role for what p mment on

  • fessional r

e person w r responsib to accept t

  • use this w

to fulfill. purpose; th the board

  • le, based

who will be bilities and hem. way to find the board he broader d ... know d e d d d r w

slide-11
SLIDE 11

I su Go I A I ag Tha Ag You I ag I ac Not in fav Sam boa info Ele I w no Ele can is t Undecided I do No I ha In favour assembly: Ap ass I th the a p upport this

  • od

Agree on yo gree with y at's a good ree. ur suggesti gree ccept with vour of app me as pre ard memb

  • rmation th

ection work would sugge ection is the n invest in hat a boar d in terms

  • not know
  • comments

ave no ide under ce ppointment sembly can hink the SG e General A practical is suggestion

  • ur point o

your sugge d process fo ion makes us. pointing the

  • evious. The

bers vote he general ks. est that the e best, but the job an rd can app

  • f appoint

w enough to s. a. ertain cond by the Ge n nominate G should b Assembly. ssue here t n. f view estion

  • r the app

sense e Secretary e general for the S assembly w election a the differen d that thei point someo ing the Sec

  • have an

dition(s) to eneral Asse individual e accounta According

  • o: How c

Page 11/24

  • intment o

y General b assembly Secretary g will not be allows for a nt candida r institution

  • ne that the

cretary Ge

  • ppion.
  • appoint

embly with s to the po able to the gly, SG sho can the bo

  • f the Secre

by the Gen votes for general, a e familiar w a more tran ates must al n support it e members neral by th the Secre the provis

  • sition.

board an

  • uld be ap
  • ard, which

etary Gene neral assem the board as board with. nsparent pr so explain

  • t. The dang

s do not fee he General tary Gene so that mem d the boar ppointed by h is more o ral. mbly: d members members rocess. n how much ger with ap el is the rig assembly: eral by the mbers of th rd be acco y the board

  • r less new

s, then the will have h time they ppointment ght person. : e General he general

  • untable to
  • d. There is

w because e e y t l l

  • s

e

slide-12
SLIDE 12

the wil No to n Ap eva It d vol Ap app Fin avo Thi yea The som inst sho as A p EA ma I th I su avo Wh ere are elec l practicall

  • t only base

nominate i ppointment aluation by depends on untary pos ppoint on pointment e in princi

  • id accusa

s can be a ars maximu e job of Ge me profess titution or

  • uld not be

long as the possible su SM memb ade by the hink you sh upport this

  • id inertia

hy the prop ctions at th y have to b ed on the p ndividuals could wo y the Gene n the Secre sition, GA e Board rec ple, but th tions of 'cr an option b um eneral secr sional supp EASM an e appointed ere’ll be mo uggestion to bership (or General A

  • uld consid

idea, perh posal of the he General be the old proposal o also. rk if the t ral Assemb tary Gener elects

  • mmendat

e process ronyism'. but it shoul retary invol port (mate nd to secu d by electio

  • re than on
  • the appo

a subset Assembly. der an EO haps even e board? W

Page 12/24

l Assembly board!

  • f the Board

term is set bly periodic ral's positio tion but g needs to b ld be set th lves time a erial, time, ure some l

  • ns

ne candida

  • intment of
  • f EASM

I process limit it to 5 Why not fro y, suggest a

  • d. The Ge

t in advan cally and n

  • n; if hired

et membe be transpar he maximu nd dedicat people a long-term e ate propos f the Secre members 5 years in

  • m the GA

a SG? If th eneral Asse ce (not in nearing the d, then he b r comment rent to ens um period tion and so and/or fina efficency a ed this cou tary Gener hip) appro

  • ffice to en

A? he board s embly shou ndefinite) a e end of the board elec t on the c ure inclusiv for such po

  • meone tha

ancial) fro and effica uld work ral would b

  • ve the ap

nsure circu suggests, it uld be able and up for e term cts, if it is a criteria for vity and to

  • sition 4-6

at also has

  • m her/his

cy she/he be to have ppointment ulation and t e r a r

  • 6

s s e e t d

slide-13
SLIDE 13

New Boa The Scien they are n further tho EASM con Scientific C No by SC I do he/ by …. wh kee No The No The fra ede eva The app per i th Sci It is Wh The rela So ard posit tific Chair not yet par

  • ughts on f

nstitution? Chair:

  • scientific

the board. should be

  • n't think t

/she is not the GA. … The Scien at makes eping the r

  • , but the a

e SC and E

  • , it would

e Scientific mework fi eological b aluation wh e Charter pointed by rson should hink should entific cha s right and hat is the ra ey should ation to a m far the ele tions and the ES rt of the ch further role chair shou . e a membe that the Th t a membe … ntific Chai them diffe

  • les of the

above two a ESMQ shou reduces fle c Chair an xed by th behaviours hen the con should sp y the Boar d be appro be change ir should b proper to ationale fo be voting major prod ections have SMQ Edito harter and es and pos uld stay out r elected fr e Scientific er of the Ex r is an im erent could board as are of para uld be on t exibility of nd the ESM he charter in rejectin ntributions ecify that

  • rd. If the
  • ved by the

ed be elected b fix these tw

  • r including

members duct of EAS e worked w

Page 13/24

  • r have bec

bye-laws, sitions on t tside the b rom the bo c Chair ha xecutive Bo portant ro d be argue it currently amount imp the charter

  • rganisatio

MQ Editor and bye- ng certain are multid the Scient publisher e Board. by the GA wo roles in g them in th

  • f the Boa

SM (confere well; I do n come quite which sho the board board as th

  • ard. …

s to be a

  • ard, if so

le, but so ed and is y stands portance to and bye-la

  • n within t

r have to

  • laws. This

contributio isciplinary tific Chair

  • f the Jou

. … the EASM he charter? ard if they ence, journ not see any e important

  • uld be cha

that should hey are con part ot the he/she sh are other subjective.

  • be includ

aws. he board. refere to o s should h

  • ns withou

. and ESM urnal nomin M constitutio ? Importan y have suc nal) y reasons to t during the

  • anged. Do

d be reflec ntractually e Charter/B hould also roles on t . I am in ded.

  • ne scient

help to av t respect to MQ Editor nates a pe

  • n.

nt in what s ch importa

  • change t

e past, but

  • you have

cted in the appointed Bye-Laws if be elected the board, favour of ific ethical void some

  • collegial

should be erson, that sense? nt roles in the system. t e e d f d , f l e l e t n

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Boa tran (as I d role diff goa bet sho aca The Yes Sci yes I th (I s To futu the If th an I b app Ear ESMQ Ed … issu … Bye adj ESM ver ard should nsmitting th scoiations,

  • not thin

es are imp ferent targe

  • als. Howev

tween scie

  • uld not b

ademia. ey should b s, I agree entific Cha s, change i hink the Ch till do not g strenghten ure of the a e Charter a he importa ad hoc fun believe tha propriately rlier they h itor: ESMQ ed ue concern The forma e-Laws inc junct boar MQ meetin ry year bef d have als he results a , governem k that Scie portant but ets and ne ver, I do se nces and b be working be automat that these air could be is necessar air and ES get what th n the acade association nd bye-law ance of the nction then at the ch y trained pe ave been t ditor should ning financ al relations luding wh rd member

  • ng. One id

fore the an so people and comm ments). entic Chair do not req eeds a Scie ee the need

  • business. E

g in acade tically part e two posi e included ry SMQ Editor his charter emic pillar

  • n. Therefore

ws. se two pos yes chang airman an ersons. that ex offic d be a me ial and con between t ether the

  • r. In the sa

dea could nual confe

Page 14/24

and resp itting key r and ESM quire a pos entific Cha d for a pos EASM has emia but s

  • f the cha

itions are in the Boa r should be will help in r of EASM e, I absolut sitions is b ge the bye- nd board cio even if mber ex o ntractual E the Board ESMQ Ed ame way th also be a rence. ponsibilities practitione MQ Editor sition on th air and an ition on the lost this U she should arter and by important ard. e included n this regar seems to tely suppor eyond that

  • laws
  • f direct

that has n

  • fficio, but

SMQ matte and ESMQ ditor is a he Scientifi joint EASM linked to rs to enga should be he board. T ESMQ Ed e board to SP over th have a s ye-laws. for EASM in the chap rd) be an imp rt the idea t which co tors should

  • t been in

without vo ers. Q has to be full board c Chair co M-ESMQ-m

  • impact o

age into de

  • n the bo

The board ditor to ach strengthen he years. T sound kno M but think pter and by portant asp to make th uld be take d be com the charte

  • ting rights

e in the C member

  • uld be inv

meeting in

  • f science,

evelopment

  • ard. Both

has many hieve these ns relations This person wledge of k that only ye-laws. pect for the hem part of en care as mposed of r. s on every harter and

  • r just an

vited to the September , t h y e s n f y e f s f y d n e r

slide-15
SLIDE 15

All fav No und The SC No und The fra ede eva sec The app per i th … It is und I th fun Wh [als The rela SC So [als Boa tran (as I d role board me vour of them

  • , but the a

der the SC e SC and E C section]

  • , it would

der the SC e Scientific mework fi eological b aluation wh ction] e Charter pointed by rson should hink should ESMQ edi s right and der the SC hink the Ed ndamental r hat is the so mention ey should ation to a C section] far the ele so mention ard should nsmitting th scoiations,

  • not thin

es are imp embers are m becomin above two section] ESMQ shou d reduces section] c Chair an xed by th behaviours hen the con should sp y the Boar d be appro be change itor and bo d proper to section] ditor of the role in the rationale f ned under t be voting major prod ections have ned under t d have als he results a , governem k that Scie portant but volnuteers g a board are of par uld be on t flexibility o nd the ESM he charter in rejectin ntributions ecify that

  • rd. If the
  • ved by the

ed [also m

  • ard need t
  • fix these t

e journal s Associatio for includin the SC sect members duct of EAS e worked w the SC sect so people and comm ments). [also entic Chair do not req

Page 15/24

s, teh ESM member if ramount im the charter

  • f organis

MQ Editor and bye- ng certain are multid the Scient publisher e Board. [a entioned u to be indep two roles i should be

  • n and Jour

ng them in tion]

  • f the Boa

SM (confe well; I do n tion] and resp itting key

  • mentione

r and ESM quire a pos MQ editor is f they are t portance t r and bye-la ation with r have to

  • laws. This

contributio isciplinary tific Chair

  • f the Jou

also mentio under the S pendent of n the EASM built into t rnal. n the chart ard if they rence, jour not see any ponsibilities practitione ed under th MQ Editor sition on th s not, henc

  • be paid.
  • be includ
  • aws. [also

in the boa refere to o s should h

  • ns withou

. [also men and ESM urnal nomin

  • ned under

SC section] f the ESMQ M constitut he constitu ter? Impo y have suc rnal) [also y reasons to linked to rs to enga he SC sectio should be he board. T ce, I would . …

  • ded. [also

mentioned

  • ard. [also
  • ne scient

help to av t respect to ntioned un MQ Editor nates a pe r the SC se Q board.

  • tion. [also

ution as th

  • rtant in w

ch importa mentioned

  • change t
  • impact o

age into de ion]

  • n the bo

The board d not be in mentioned d under the mentioned ific ethical void some

  • collegial

der the SC should be erson, that ction] mentioned ey have a hat sense? nt roles in d under the the system.

  • f science,

evelopment

  • ard. Both

has many n d e d l e l C e t d a ? n e , t h y

slide-16
SLIDE 16

diff goa bet sho aca The the yes I th [als (I s SC ESM To futu the If th an sec I b app Ear me Other thou I w be stud Res Rol qua Edu Gra ferent targe

  • als. Howev

tween scie

  • uld not b
  • ademia. [a

ey should b e SC sectio s, change i hink the Ch so mention still do not C section] MQ Editor strenghten ure of the a e Charter a he importa ad hoc f ction] believe tha propriately rlier they h entioned un ughts: would sugge elected by dent semin sponsible f le/position ality improv ucation ad student ets and ne ver, I do se nces and b be working also mentio be automat n] is necessar hair and ES ned under t get what t should be n the acade association nd bye-law ance of the unction the at the ch y trained pe have been nder the SC est to have y the boar nars and th

  • r involvin

n on Sport vement representa eeds a Scie ee the need

  • business. E

g in acade

  • ned under

tically part ry [also me SMQ Edito the SC sect this charter a standing emic pillar

  • n. Therefore
  • ws. [also m

se two pos en yes cha airman an

  • ersons. [als

that ex of C section] e at least on

  • rd. Ideally

e other PhD g new mem Managem ation

Page 16/24

entific Cha d for a pos EASM has emia but s r the SC sec t of the cha entioned un

  • r should b

tion] r will help g board ro r of EASM e, I absolut mentioned u sitions is b ange the nd board so mention fficio even ne student two of the D seminars mbers/univ ment educa air and an ition on the lost this U she should ction] arter and b nder the SC be included in this rega

  • le

seems to tely suppor under the S eyond that bye-laws [

  • f direct

ned under t if that has representa ese roles w s and perha versities/co

  • ation. Crea

ESMQ Ed e board to SP over th have a s ye-laws. [a C section] d in the ch ard) [also be an imp rt the idea SC section] t which co [also ment tors should the SC sect s not been ative for two where one aps one of

  • untries sho

ate somethi ditor to ach strengthen he years. T sound kno also mentio hapter and mentioned portant asp to make th uld be take tioned und d be com tion] in the cha wo years, w have focu f each gend

  • uld be use

ing like CO hieve these ns relations This person wledge of

  • ned under

d bye-laws. d under the pect for the hem part of en care as der the SC mposed of

  • arter. [also

which could us towards der. eful. OSMA for e s n f r e e f s C f

  • d

s r

slide-17
SLIDE 17

I do intr PhD Wo to b Rep I d per In wit I w in t I th stud Ear Please put purpose: Suggesti Be nam ma Imp I a com no sem tha He The

  • n
  • not know

roduction o D candidat

  • uld think a

bridge the presentativ

  • n't need

rson is goin line with t th all its du would make the board s hink, it is dents' repr rly Career t any othe ions conc more ope me is eu anagement prove visib am unsure mpetition w EASM tea minars but at reason, E lp young d e aims and the Board w the positio

  • f permane

te about some gap betwe ve of sportm extra / o ng to contr his, the EA ties and re e difference should hav important resenting p Researche r suggestio cerning th en to indus ropean as ility in inte about the with Univer achers, an they shoul EASM shou doctors and d objective strategic r

  • ns and by

ent workin eone to de een academ managers i

  • ther positi

ribute to the ASM stude esponsibiliti es between ve pointed to instituti erson. r?

  • ns for the

he missio stry people ssociation rnational s e 'teaching rsities and d there sh d rely on i uld be a or d researche es are rathe role, which

Page 17/24

ye laws we ng groups, eal with the my and pro n practice

  • ns but I

e (very lon nt repesen ies. n sportsma representa ionalize (h charter an

  • n of EAS

e, business for sport sports medi g sport ma teaching hould not b institutions rganiser, a ers to find t er clumsy a needs to b ell enough e.g. - fo e profession

  • fession

would like g) list of ai ntative shou anagement atives from however, n nd bye-law SM s people a t manage ia anagement institutions be EASM and indivi facilitator their first jo and repeti be explicit. to commen r social m nal sector i e to see ho ms, object uld be def and sports both world not restrict ws in the fie and profess ment not t mission , that are teachers. iduals who but not a

  • b by broa

tive at time . There is a nt. edia - stu in sport ma

  • w each p

tives and p fined as a smarketing ds too much elds provid sionals in for sport that could members. EASM can

  • are mem

teacher p adcasting jo

  • es. There i

a need to udents and anagement posittion / properties. clear role g, positions h) also the ded for this

  • sport. The

t research d come in There are n organise

  • bers. For

per se.

  • b offers

s no word discuss the d t / e s e s e h n e e r d e

slide-18
SLIDE 18

role and arti Fur car

  • pp

It i aim res spo dia spo the dev To the Stre com in p I th sam som Eas as Co Eas Cre res I b gen wit It s e of differe d include icle 2 Seat rther encou reer resea portunities. s strange ms, object earching/l

  • rts organi

alogue with

  • rts organis

e Future foc velopment strengthen e organizat engthening mpanies, g publication hink the list me 'level'. mething co sm should well as pra

  • ntinue the

sm should eate and earchers a elieve that nerally and th career o hould be c ent commis the permis t - the EASM uragement

  • archers. G

. that relatio tives and lecturing in

  • sations. EA

h them (sci sations, list cus to be h n the link b tion for the g the posit government ns. t of Aims, O I rather se mparable) facilitate a actitioners Student an differentiat coordinate around the t to contac d to send th r they job. clearly state ssions and ssible sourc M office sh

  • f PhD le

Grants / s

  • ns with sp

propertie n sport ma ASM should entists shou ten to wha highlighted between ac business s tion of res t represent Objectives ee one clea and than and promo in sport ma nd PhD orie te in sports e some o world t with the hem scient ed that to o

Page 18/24

their form ces of fina hall be at th evel researc scholarship ports orga es of the anagement d try to inc uld confron t they are d, anticipa cademia a sector) search in tatives, ma and Prope ar goal. Im a list with t te exhchan anagemen entation smanageme

  • pen rese

people of ific article

  • rganize th
  • mation. Se

ancing of he Secretar ch and su ps / resea nisations a e associat if we are clude sport nt their res interested i tion and a and busine sports In jor brands erties is too mproving s things we d nge of rese t ent and sp earch proj sports scie

  • r other im

he EASM c ction 9 ne

  • EASM. C

ry General pport / op arch and are not ev

  • tion. Wha

not seekin ts organisa earch with in/what co acting as a ess (increas volve soci ,.... during

  • long. Als

sportmanag

  • do. In orde

earchers, te

  • rtsmarketi

jects that ence and m mportant id

  • nference

eeds to be Consider a institution pportunities teaching ven mentio at is the ng dialogu ations more h the reality

  • uld help th

agent of ch se the imp etal exper g the confe so they are gement in er to do so eachers an ing could be manageme deas which is the main expanded by-law to . s for early exchange ned in the goal of ue with the e and seek y faced by hem, etc). hange and portance of rtise; more erence and e all on the Europe (or ..... ..... nd students joined by ent science help them n task. d

  • y

e e f e k y d f e d e r s y e m

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Please put purpose: Suggesti sho In dur an an wh a m exc Ma the Bec the tha mo day

  • ne

Ge the listi par sho

  • th

Ma pro sho Ma mig

  • ut

Allo dis t any othe ions conc

  • rter
  • rder to a

ring the co easy way email and y it is impo member at cluded of w aybe you st e location th cause of th eir voting r at they ca

  • rning?). W

y of each c e Annual G eneral Mee e GA. I am ing names rticipation

  • rter or at

her issues. M ake it less a

  • posed sev
  • uld elect t

aybe some ght be valu tside partie

  • w for a f

cussion. r suggestio cerning th attract eng

  • nference th

y the days d/or provid

  • rtant to pa

t the days what to do till want to he risk is th he below rights in th n now be Would the a calendar y General Me

  • eting. --- W

not sure th who atten in the GA. least conc More netw administrat veral weeks he Scientif invitation uable cont es. free and fr The testine

  • ns for the

he EASM gagement f he EASM G before the ding a info articipate a during th

  • during th

participate hat potentia clause, the e GA 'tha ecome me alternative year? 6 eeting of th We should his is the c ded on the centrating working tive and mo s before the ic chair to non-EAS tributors to rank discus ess, and be

Page 19/24

charter an General from the n General As e GA takes

  • rmation s

and what w e GA take he confere e and watc al members ere are co at' year's c mber prio resolving t .4.3 The m he Genera d monitor h case at the e website) the confer

  • re open t

e date. SM membe dissemina ssion at the ehavior of, nd bye-law Assembl newest me ssembly sh s place. Th sheet durin will happen es place, nce if you ch it but wi s lose inter

  • nference d

conference

  • r the GA

the issue b membership al Assembl how many

  • moment. A

could be s ence time

  • discuss f

ers (e.g po ate the ide e Assembly , I believe ws in the fie ly mbers and

  • uld try to

is could be g the stay n during th chances a can't do ithout any f rest and wa delegates w . By-laws a (i.e., Tue be member p year sha y to the en and who (m A special 'e

  • mething t

and leave ew, but fun liticians, sta as and aim y, where c it was the elds provid d potentia educate o e done by

  • f when t

he GA. If y are that yo anything a further info alk away. who canno amendmen esday?, W rship to beg ll be from nd of the ne member) is e-thank yo towards en e at the en ndamental takeholders ms of EAS critique is p general se ded for this l members

  • r inform in

y providing the GA is, you are not

  • u will feel

at the GA.

  • rmation at
  • t exercise

nts suggest Wednesday gin the 1st the end of ext Annual s attending u' (and/or ncouraging nd visits or , questions s etc.) who M through part of the ecretary, a s s n g , t l t e t y t f l g r g r s

  • h

e a

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Ge at gen The poo con Do pos Peo sho Inc Co and I be Please put purpose: Suggesti No rule NO You tha If s an say The Giv It is ele atte erman gent the Gene ntleman's n ese event n

  • r and m

nference. cuments a sted on the

  • ple who c
  • uld be ab

reased me

  • mmunicatio

d there sho elieve that t any othe ions conc

  • Nominati

es of EASM O NOMINA u should o at have give sport comm academic ying that ac e procedur ve preferen s a proble

  • ection. Ano

endences. tleman who eral Assem name). needs to be many deleg according e website th can not at le to submi embers from

  • n should
  • uld be a m

it should b r suggestio cerning th ion Commi M are in lin ATION CO

  • nly be ab

en a reaso mercial org c institution cademics s e in Bern w nce to secre em that onl

  • ther bette

For geo

  • may have

mbly in Be e made mo gates use to the Ag hat all mem tent should it a video / m Asia. be direct w monthly new be made up

  • ns for the

he electio ittee neede ne with EU OMMITTEE le to vote n for abse anisations ? It might should rem was a bit u et ballot G ly member er rule co

  • graphic el

Page 20/24

e been a D

  • ern. (My
  • re relevan

the AGM enda of t mbers could d be allow / audio sp with memb ws bulletin p of differe charter an

  • n

ed No pro rules.

  • n people

nce. become m be to cau ain the ma unclear whi Give prefer rs that atte

  • uld be to

igibility, pa Dean of Sc apologies t to the me M to have he EASM d read. wed to let s eech. bers about ent people e nd bye-law

  • xy voting

e who are members, h utious, but ajority of in ich caused ence to sho nded the l

  • approve

assport sho hool of Bu but I ca

  • mbers. At

a half d General A someone ta all aspects every time. ws in the fie Make sur present at how making I would li dividuals o irritation.

  • rt mandat

ast confere members

  • uld be the

siness was annot reme ttendance t day away Assembly alk in their s to do wit . elds provid re that the the GA o g sure EAS ke seeing

  • n the boa

Needs to b tes ence are e s with two e only crite s appalling ember the tends to be from the should be r behalf or h the GA - ded for this nationality

  • r on those

SM remain something rd. be clearer. eligible for

  • or three

ria. g e e e e r

  • s

y e n g r e

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Ca a l pro The end pro Ski Ele the The adm Ca fro sug gua Set Ma and nee imp tha few Pro ens Co EA bef See

  • nl

Please put purpose: ll for cand letter in w

  • vided to a

e election w dorse stron

  • fessional.

p country ection shou e conferenc e voting pr minister the ndidates s m differen ggestion s arantee co t up a more ake sure yo d the peo eds to be d portant tha at I'm not a w people a

  • cess and

sure all p

  • nference,

SM for a l fore the EA e suggestio ly members t any othe idacy shou which each all EASM m was extrem nger leade

  • ratios. The

ld be onlin ce ( as hap rocess in B e vote. should be t nations w hould be ntinuity an e formal ev

  • u have a

ple that im done on re t an ESMQ a board me re aware o eligibility aid up m and thus t east a yea ASM Confe

  • n for nom

s should be r suggestio uld be ope candidate member a fe mely poorly ership and candidate ne so all m pens in a n Bern was a suggested with differe supporte d team spi vent rather good bal mplement m esearch, th Q member, ember anym

  • f the chara

should be embers ha these votes

  • ar. Onlin

erence. ination com e elected a

  • ns for the

Page 21/24

en prior EA e would e ew weeks y run in Be thought to e with the m members p number of amateurish by three ent gender ed by min irit. than distri lance betw more/link he academ takes activ more, I sta acteristics e made cle ave a vot s would be ne voting w mmittee on and decide charter an ASM confer express the prior to the

  • ern. As wa
  • make the

most votes s participate,

  • ther Acad

and we n EASM mem r and three nimum thre buting card ween the p with prac ic level of vely part in rted to rea

  • f publishi
  • ear. Proxy
  • te. This w

e from me would allow ly addition d nd bye-law

  • rence. Resu

eir ideas a e election. s the gene e election should be e prior to th demic asso need to em mbers outs e EASM b ee EASM ds to the a pure high s titioners. EASM (up n EASM bo alise that -w ng in journ y voting sh

  • uld mean

mbers who w the new n to election ws in the fie umes (and and aims) eral meetin and assem elected. he confere

  • ciations)

mbrace tech side of EA board mem board m udience standard a Much m pgrade). I f

  • ard meeti

within the b nals like ES hould be a n voting b

  • have be

Board to b n process elds provid potentially should be

  • g. I would

mbly more ence not at hnology to ASM board

  • mbers. This

embers to academics, more work find it very

  • ngs. Now

board- only SMQ. allowed to before the een part of be in place ded for this y e d e t

  • d

s

  • ,

k y w y

  • e

f e s

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Suggesti Sho Rep wo visi Min Ele If a be det the Please put purpose: Suggesti De the bus 6.2 tha sho I am eas are yea Sho 3 y exe term 2 y ions conc

  • uld includ

presentativ

  • men (e.g.

ible. nutes of the ection by ge a board m filled for termined u e term they t any othe ions conc pending o ere should b sinesses. 2.1 perso at decides.

  • uld in the

m critical to sily becom e difficult to ar of servic

  • uld follow

years maxi emplary se ms but with years cerning th de Scientific ves from sp at least 1/ e EC meeti eneral asse ember step a full term under what should res r suggestio cerning th

  • n the incr

be a paid n appointe The boar end be de

  • electing

es a way t

  • remove.

ce at the la w good gov mum, but w ervice and h the oppo he Execut c chair ports organ /3). Our fi ngs should embly ps down o m (not the t situations ign.

  • ns for the

he terms reasing wo SG or 2) a ed by the rd can app livered by

  • utgoing m

to prolong I think they test. vernance p with the op shown b rtunity to re

Page 22/24

tive Com nisations sh ield really d be shared

  • r takes on

remainde s that if the charter an

  • f office
  • rkload EA

a hired EA board . I t point indiv the board members a board me y should b principle (a pportunity boundless e eturn after mittee hould be in needs to m d between another b r of the in e board m nd bye-law ASM should ASM office think the b viduals to (maybe ju s president mbership a e elected i ge limit, m for renewa

  • energy. A
  • ne cycle
  • ncluded. Sh

make wom all Board M board role ncumbent's ember's st ws in the fie d carefully manager board shou seek advic st a phrasi ts or vice p and once e into these p ax 2 or 3 t al for those maximum

  • ut of the l

hould be a men researc Members. their posit s term). It tatus chang elds provid y discuss 1 to run the uld remain ce, but the ing issue). presidents, elected the positions in terms) e who have m of two c loop. a quota for chers more tion should should be ges during ded for this 1) whether day-to-day the organ e approval because it se persons n their fifth e provided consecutive r e d e g s r y n l t s h d e

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Ma to me The link just Lim Alte add In f the Rot Please put purpose: Other su low Tha In t Ag coo No con I re pub The new num

  • f

to inc aybe we ca explain du embers can e term for ked to the r t once this mited to 2 te ernate term ded. four years ey job. tating syste t any othe uggestion wer costs of ank you for the bye-law ain, it sho

  • peration/
  • other sug

ntribute als ecommed t blic sectors e activities wsletter) to mbers of m benefits ea the confe luding bac an do a su uring the e agree to a an elected reminaing limits the t erms in one ms so ther because t em, which r suggestio ns f participat r your serv ws, clubs,

  • uld be me

/dialogue w gestions; k so this way that EASM s.

  • f EASM

avoid just

  • members. In

ach membe rence, we ck issues p ggest a ter election wh a longer te d board m time when ime to be a e role and re is some he executiv is originally

  • ns for the

tion ice! leagues a entioned th with the spo keep up the . Greetin M should ha have to be formal wa n the sectio er will get eekly news plus hard c

Page 23/24

  • rm. For exa

hy they wa erm if neces member sho people ste an EASM b not more t e knowledg ve commit y was charter an and athlete hat one o

  • rts sector.

e good wo ngs Kari ave much m e shared o ay of comm

  • n Become

as a mem sletters, fu

  • pies (whe

ample 4 or nt to have ssary / we

  • uld be in

epped dow board mem than 4 term ge on the tee must b nd bye-law s unions s f the goal

  • rk. It is goo

more stron n the webs munication e a Membe ber, for ex ll access en ordered r 6 years a e a shorter/ elcome. all cases

  • wn. With th

mber. ms overall board as be have ve ws in the fie should be s of EASM

  • d to give

g conectio site more o that would er it has to xample red to the ES d) and late and that pe /longer te three yea he rule to g new me ry much ti elds provid explicitly m M should b members

  • n with IFs
  • ften (not o

d help to in

  • be clear

duced regis SMQ journ est articles eople have

  • rm. So the

rs and not get relected embers are me to saw ded for this mentioned. be to seek possible to and sport

  • nly on the

ncrease the what kind stration fee nal online, (incl. DOI) e e t d e w s k

  • t

e e d e , )

slide-24
SLIDE 24

pub ma we acc com inc hav and eac All ma Exe me I tr res §7 67 wa blished ah anagement ebsite to pr cess to the mmunity, d luded in th ve to be e d give add ch two wee has been atter of taki ecutive Co embers - thi ust on the ponsible p .5.2 (1) sh % of the p as made. Th head of p related e romote an e a platfo discount on he list of e lected at le ded value eks to be s raised dur ng things u

  • mmittee m

s should be creativity, persons in d hould be de present mem his is a usu print, full mployment d search f rm for scie n books th experts-revi east for 2 for Associ een wider. ring previo up and follo members r e made tra seriousity, developing

  • eleted. It m

mbers think ual possibil

Page 24/24

access to t opportun for sport m entific coo hat EASM iewers dat years that

  • ation. So

.

  • us meeting
  • w up; her

receive gr ansparent t , engagem g EASM. Th must be pos k so. It can ity in demo

  • the adv

ities and f manageme

  • peration a

has coope tabase and t could be cial netwo gs and I th re there we eater EAS

  • all memb

ment, comm hank you fo ssible to pu n have com

  • cratic org

vertise an funding, fu nt related among the eration wit d etc. N more inclu

  • rks of EAS

ink easm is ere some b SM suppor bers. mitment and

  • r that.

ut a new ca me up a ca anizations d search ull use of scientific e e sport ma th, opportu New Board uded in th SM must b s well awa barriers in t rt than ot d intelligen ase on the ase since th

  • s. .

for sport the EASM events, full anagement unity to be d members e activities be updated

  • are. It is a

the past. her board nce of you agenda if he agenda t M l t e s s d a d u f a