Assoc
- ciation
- ns, S
Sal ales es T Tax, a and the W e Wayfair C Case se
PRESENTED BY COHNREZNICK, LLP MAY 22, 2019
Assoc ociation ons, S Sal ales es T Tax, a and the W e - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Assoc ociation ons, S Sal ales es T Tax, a and the W e Wayfair C Case se PRESENTED BY COHNREZNICK, LLP MAY 22, 2019 PLEASE READ T his pre se nta tio n ha s b e e n pre pa re d fo r info rma tio na l purpo se s a nd g e ne ra l g uida
PRESENTED BY COHNREZNICK, LLP MAY 22, 2019
T his pre se nta tio n ha s b e e n pre pa re d fo r info rma tio na l purpo se s a nd g e ne ra l g uida nc e o nly a nd do e s no t c o nstitute pro fe ssio na l a dvic e . Yo u sho uld no t a c t upo n the info rma tio n c o nta ine d in this pub lic a tio n witho ut o b ta ining spe c ific pro fe ssio na l a dvic e . No re pre se nta tio n o r wa rra nty (e xpre ss o r implie d) is ma de a s to the a c c ura c y o r c o mple te ne ss o f the info rma tio n c o nta ine d in this pub lic a tio n, a nd Co hnRe znic k L L P, its me mb e rs, e mplo ye e s a nd a g e nts a c c e pt no lia b ility, a nd disc la im a ll re spo nsib ility, fo r the c o nse q ue nc e s o f yo u o r a nyo ne e lse a c ting , o r re fra ining to a c t, in re lia nc e o n the info rma tio n c o nta ine d in this pub lic a tio n o r fo r a ny de c isio n b a se d o n it. T his pre se nta tio n a nd its c o nte nt a re the pro pe rty o f Co hnRe znic k L L P a nd is pro te c te d b y a pplic a b le c o pyrig ht la ws. Any una utho rize d use o f the info rma tio n he re in will b e c o nside re d a vio la tio n o f inte lle c tua l pro pe rty rig hts. Unle ss sta te d o the rwise he re in, no pa rt o f this pre se nta tio n ma y b e c o pie d, distrib ute d, o r pub lishe d, in who le o r in pa rt, witho ut the prio r writte n a g re e me nt o f Co hnRe znic k L L P.
2
Janene Mitchell, CPA Wendy Zee Galex, JD, LLM Senior Manager, Not-For-Profit and Education Practice Manager, State & Local Tax Services Janene.mitchell@cohnreznick.com Wendy.galex@cohnreznick.com
3
4
Misconception #1 “I am a Not-For-Profit, therefore I do not need to pay sales tax on my purchases!” Misconception #2 “I am a Not-For-Profit therefore, I do not need to collect sales tax on my sales!” Misconception #3 “I don’t have offices in other states and only sell on-line, so not applicable!” Misconception #4 “Exemption status is automatically granted at the State level because it was granted at the Federal level!”
5
Sales Tax:
services Use Tax:
taxable tangible personal property or services when the retailer did not collect the sales tax due
6
sales tax or self-assess use tax on taxable retail transactions
7
subject to the state’s tax jurisdiction.
nexus with an out of state company and they are the following:
8
Prior to Wayfair, nexus was established by the following methods:
9
On May 1, 2016, South Dakota enacted economic nexus provisions for sales and use tax purposes. The State looked to establish Nexus based on economic activity not just physical presence. In South Dakota remote sellers are subject to the provisions if they meet one of two thresholds in either the current or previous calendar year:
10
U.S. Supreme Court Struck Down the Physical Presence Nexus Standard On June 21, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the physical presence nexus standard
established in Quill Corp. v. North Dakota and Natl. Bellas Hess. v. Illinois Dept. of Rev. – a standard which had been in place for over 50 years The majority opinion, written by Justice Kennedy in a 5 – 4 split, determined that the physical- presence rule of Quill was "unsound and incorrect" and overruled it. Other notable comments made by the majority:
technological and social changes
11
The keys to the U.S. Supreme Court upholding South Dakota’s economic nexus statute were the following:
considerable amount of business in the State – that is, if the remote seller meets the economic thresholds that are being established on a state by state basis.
through one of the traditional methods (i.e., physical presence, agency, etc.).
(i.e., physical presence, agency, etc.) is still the active standard!
12
Since the Wayfair Decision was rendered, many states have been enacting legislation similar to the rule promulgated by South Dakota
13
margin into a negative gross margin
14
15
July 1, 2017 September 1, 2018 February 1, 2019 Tennessee (Rule is stayed pending litigation) Mississippi Wyoming October 1, 2017 October 1, 2018 April 1, 2019 Massachusetts (Cookies) Alabama Minnesota California Illinois Nevada August 17, 2017 Indiana North Dakota June 1, 2019 Rhode Island* (Cookies, Election state) Kentucky Washington* Idaho Maryland Wisconsin January 1, 2018 Michigan July 1, 2019 Ohio (Cookies) Arkansas November 1, 2018 New Mexico April 1, 2018 New Jersey South Carolina Virginia Pennsylvania* (Election state) North Carolina South Dakota June 21, 2018 December 1, 2018 New York Colorado* Connecticut July 1, 2018 January 1, 2019 Hawaii Oklahoma (Election state) District of Columbia Nebraska Maine Vermont Georgia Utah Iowa (Cookies) West Virginia Louisiana *Rule change after enforcement date took effect
16
17
18
19
20
For More Not-for-Profit insights, go to: https://www.cohnreznick.com/industries/public- sector/not-for-profit-and-education
21