apt technical cpd maf
play

APT TECHNICAL CPD - MAF TRANSFER PRICING AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

APT TECHNICAL CPD - MAF TRANSFER PRICING AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Transfer Pricing and performance evaluation Nicholas Riemer Nicholas.Riemer@firstrand.co.za Agenda Workflow to understanding Transfer pricing and performance evaluation


  1. APT TECHNICAL CPD - MAF TRANSFER PRICING AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

  2. Transfer Pricing and performance evaluation Nicholas Riemer Nicholas.Riemer@firstrand.co.za

  3. Agenda • Workflow to understanding Transfer pricing and performance evaluation • What is Performance management? Generic Problem • What is Transfer pricing? Generic problem • Industry considerations? • What is the specific problem? • How to incorporate into your file

  4. TP and performance Workflow Approach

  5. Generic problem Performance evaluation • Strategy: Long-term plan of action • Budgeting: Short-term plan of action • Performance Evaluation • Control function • Historic • Performance Management • Planning function • Future

  6. Performance evaluation • Central structure vs. Divisionalized/Decentralized • Can top management control operations? • Risk of divisionalization that it does not ensure goal concurrence • Develop performance measure that ensures goal concurrence • Financial vs. Non financial measures • Strategy

  7. Divisionalization • Advantages • Speed and quality of decisions • Self – fulfillment • Strategic planning • Risks/Disadvantages • Goal concurrence NB • Loses control

  8. Divisionalization • Pre-requisites • Diversified activities • Independent (autonomous) • Relation must be regulated (Transfer Pricing)

  9. Performance evaluation • Divisional vs. Managerial • CONTROLABALITY (Profit/cash & Investment) • Can only measure performance on what manager/division control! • Every expense is controlled by someone – include at the relevant level • Manager • Division

  10. Performance evaluation Performance evaluation Manager Controllability Compare divisions with each other: Avoidability DON’T TAKE INTO Division ACCOUNT Unavoidable Head Office Costs Compare with external comp: TAKE INTO ACCOUNT

  11. Performance evaluation • Investment/Asset-base (Controllability) 1. Economic value? 2. Replacement cost? 3. Original cost? 4. Written down value?

  12. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION • Purpose of performance evaluation: • Checks position / communicate position / confirms position / compels improvement • Controllability & choice of basis (method) • Controllability : though not always fully controllable, the measure should at least be influence by the person or unit being measured • Choice of method: “what you measure is what you get”.  Centre's: cost / profit / investment (mostly required to measure)

  13. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION • Profit based measures: • Basis / problems • ROI • Controllable profit/controllable assets • Profit Centre (not investment Centre) • Residual Income • Profit and Investment Centre.

  14. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION • Wealth creation measures: • EVA = EBIAT – ((Assets – current liabilities) x Cost of capital) • 173 adjustments to Acc numbers • Adjustments to bring closer to cash • (controllable profit) – (a cost for the capital employed) = value added • Controllable cost of capital: based on risk profile • ST Assets controllable by manager? • MVA = PV of all future EVA’s

  15. The components/principles of an ideal performance evaluation system • Should be based on controllability • Should look at the short/medium and long term • Should comprise a basket of measures • Should ensure goal congruency • Should consist of financial as well as non-financial measures • Must ensure execution of strategy (These principles can be used as a structured means in order to criticise an existing performance evaluation system)

  16. Industry Considerations • Banks a big user of Divisionalization • Inter division funding costs or FTP Funding transfer price • SLA Service level agreements between divisions • 2018 APT Banking case study • Big move in financial sector to NIACC neutral charges on loans or other services in an attempt to bring on the client from a transactional banking point of view. • Service industries applying Divisionalzation, key issues have been incorrect performance remuneration. Purely on profits, thus decisions not made in the best interest of the company. • Move toward correct performance evaluation, managers also rewarded for joint revenue generated in other divisions. • Deloitte Report move toward decentralization, Impact on industries and challenges facing the adoption. 16

  17. Specific problems • Currently a centralized process wants to move to Divisionalization • Currently incorrect performance management, need to assist. • Assisting with the different types of management assessments which can be made as well as divisional performance management. • Assisting with new strategy of goal congruence by implementing initiatives to drive the company as a whole forward as opposed to just the division.

  18. Transfer Pricing Generic issue

  19. Transfer Pricing Introduction • Purpose of transfer pricing (criticise or evaluate) • Goal congruency (good economic decisions) • Performance evaluation/Managing performance • Further practical issues • Taxation; Consolidations, Segmental reporting, International transfer pricing.

  20. Different Transfer Pricing Options Purpose • Goal congruency • Relevancy principals • Performance Measurement • Wants to include profit • Wants to cover fixed costs as well

  21. Transfer Pricing Options Goal Concurrency Performance COMPETITIVE MARKET EXISTS  Market Price P P NO EXTERNAL MARKET EXISTS  Variable Cost + Profit Margin x x  Full Cost + Profit Margin P x  Marginal/Variable (without markup) P x  Full Cost (without mark-up) x x  Marginal/Variable cost + Opportunity cost P x (variable but taking market value into account – refer example above) NEGOTIATED TRANSTER PROCESS Module and Working example

  22. Negotiated Transfer Price • The minimum T/F price • From the point of view of the transferring division • Variable cost plus opportunity cost minus internal savings • BASIC PRINCIPLE • Relevancy – want to be at least in the same position as before the transfer

  23. Negotiated Transfer Price • Maximum T/F price • From the point of view of the receiving division • BASIC PRINCIPLE • Relevancy – want to be at least in the same position as before the transfer • Point where contribution = 0 • Maximum price limited to Market price!

  24. Transfer prices conclusion • Perfect market exists • Use market prices • Imperfect market exists • Negotiated price method (relevancy principles to determine minimum and maximum) • No external market exists • Long run marginal cost • Variable • Fixed lump sum • Treat as Cost Centre • Use standards 24

  25. Other important discussions • Capital budgeting • EVA • EVA and NPV • ROI and ARR • Valuations • EVA • Budgeting

  26. Building a file • Coverage!!!!! • Summarized Theory • Practical information summarized industry • Link to previous lectures and develop the same technique for each trigger. • Good luck for Assessment 2

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend