air quality regulations associated with tanker emissions
play

Air Quality Regulations Associated with Tanker Emissions Board of - PDF document

1/20/15 Air Quality Regulations Associated with Tanker Emissions Board of Directors Meeting January 22-23, 2015 Anchorage, Alaska Austin Love Project Manager Terminal Operations A T ALE OF T WO R EGULATIONS 1 . MARPOL A NNEX VI A.


  1. 1/20/15 ¡ Air Quality Regulations Associated with Tanker Emissions Board of Directors Meeting January 22-23, 2015 Anchorage, Alaska Austin Love Project Manager Terminal Operations A T ALE OF T WO R EGULATIONS 1 . MARPOL A NNEX VI A. International Regulation B. Codified through the U.S. Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships C. Implemented by the U.S. EPA, enforced by the United State Coast Guard 2 . V ISIBLE E MISSIONS S TANDARDS A. State Regulation B. Applicable to Marine Vessels and Stationary Sources C. Implemented and enforced by ADEC 1 ¡

  2. 1/20/15 ¡ D EFINITIONS IMO - International Maritime Organization MARPOL - International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships SOx - Sulfur Oxides NOx - Nitrogen Oxides ECA - Emissions Control Area MARPOL Annex VI - Prevention of Air Pollution from Ships 1. P ARTICULATE M ATTER A. Increased risk of lung cancer B. Associated with low birth weight, preterm birth, infant mortality C. Can double the chance of autism during third trimester of pregnancy 2. S ULFUR D IOXIDE A. Apnea and shortness of breath B. Airway constriction C. Acidification of soils and water bodies 3. N ITROGEN O XIDES A. Lung inflammation B. Associated with increased heart disease C. Nutrient enrichment of aquatic ecosystems 2 ¡

  3. 1/20/15 ¡ MARPOL Annex VI – North American Emissions Control Area MARPOL Annex VI – Sulfur Dioxide Control Two Ways to Comply 1. Use cleaner fuel 2. Install equivalent controls Fuel Sulfur Standard (max % by weight) ECA Sulfur Cap Global Sulfur Cap On and after Aug. 1, 2012 1.00% On and after Jan. 1, 2012 3.50% On and after Jan. 1, 2015 0.10% On and after Jan. 1, 2020 0.50% 3 ¡

  4. 1/20/15 ¡ Sulfur in Fuel Used by Valdez Tankers 3.5 Percent Sulfur by Weight in Fuel 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Date MARPOL Annex VI – Nitrogen Oxides Control Tiered Approach Tier III – 2.0 g NOx/kWh Achieved by Engine Modifications • Fuel injection timing Tier II – 7.7 g NOx/kWh • Combustion chamber geometry • Valve timing Tier I – 9.8 g NOx/kWh at ≥ 2,000 RPM • Turbochargers Applicable Nitrogen Oxides Standards ECA Nitrogen Cap Global Nitrogen Cap Jan. 1, 2000 - Jan. 1, 2011 Tier I Jan. 1, 2000 - Jan. 1, 2011 Tier I After Jan. 1 2011 Tier II After Jan. 1 2011 Tier II After Jan. 1 2016 Tier III 4 ¡

  5. 1/20/15 ¡ MARPOL Annex VI – Expected pollution reduction from tankers in Prince William Sound 400 40 35 350 Metric Tonnes Metric Tonnes 30 300 25 250 20 200 15 150 10 100 5 50 0 0 Coarse Particulate Fine Particulate Nitrogen Dioxides Sulfur Dioxide Matter Matter 2002 2020 Projected Emissions * Emissions * Data Source: U.S. EPA. 2009. Regulatory Impact Analysis: Control of Emissions of Air Pollution from Category 3 Marine Diesel Engines. Assessment and Standards Division, Office of Transportation and Air Quality. MARPOL Annex VI – Expected Heath and Economic Impacts in the United States Particulate Matter 2.5 – Related Impacts Annual Benefits of MARPOL VI Standards Average 2020 Annual Health Effect Reduction in Ship Related Incidents Description 2020 Premature Death 5,300 Adults (age 30+) Annual Net Benefits 14,000 Adults (25+) (Millions of 2006 $) 20 Infants (< 1 year) $45,000 to Non-fatal Heart 8,800 3 percent discount rate $110,000 Attacks $40,000 to Acute Bronchitis 8,500 7 percent discount rate $98,000 (ages 8-12) Asthma 95,000 Exacerbation (ages 6-18) 720,000 Work Loss Days Data Source: U.S. EPA. 2009. Regulatory Impact Analysis: Control of Emissions of Air Pollution from Category 3 Marine Diesel Engines. Assessment and Standards Division, Office of Transportation and Air Quality. 5 ¡

  6. 1/20/15 ¡ V ISIBLE E MISSIONS S TANDARDS 1. Vessels cannot reduce visibility by more than 20% A. When at berth up to time that initial startup complete B. Exceptions: I. For 3 minutes in any one hour II. For 3 minutes during initial vessel startup 2. When visibility reduced by 15%, start observations 3. If observations show visibility reduction of 20% or more, must report deviation to ADEC SeaRiver Sierra, August 3, 2008 (Photo: Tom Kuckertz, PWS RCAC) V ISIBLE E MISSIONS – 2014 V IOLATION ( S ) - - - - July 31, 2014 - - - - Ship – SeaRiver Sierra Average Visibility Reduction – 60% Duration – 18 minutes Cause – Startup/Shutdown of Engine SeaRiver Sierra, August 31, 2014 (Photo: Mark Swanson, PWS RCAC) 6 ¡

  7. 1/20/15 ¡ EPA M ETHOD 9 – Q UANTIFYING O PACITY WITH H UMAN O BSERVERS 7 ¡

  8. 1/20/15 ¡ S UPPLEMENTAL I NFORMATION Fuel ¡Type ¡ Cost ¡($/Metric ¡Ton) 1 ¡ Intermediate ¡Fuel ¡Oil ¡180 ¡ 300.00 ¡ Low ¡Sulfur ¡Fuel ¡180 ¡(1.0% ¡Sulfur) ¡ 345.00 ¡ Low ¡Sulfur ¡Marine ¡Gasoil ¡(0.10% ¡Sulfur) ¡ 509.00 ¡ 1. December 31, 2014 Rotterdam, Netherlands prices from Bunkerworld.com 8 ¡

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend