a quantitative description of hawking radiation
play

A quantitative description of Hawking radiation. Drouot Alexis Les - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A quantitative description of Hawking radiation. Drouot Alexis Les Houches, May 22nd 2018 Quantum field theory Particles are represented by wave functions . Quantum field theory Particles are represented by wave functions .


  1. A quantitative description of Hawking radiation. Drouot Alexis Les Houches, May 22nd 2018

  2. Quantum field theory ◮ Particles are represented by wave functions ψ .

  3. Quantum field theory ◮ Particles are represented by wave functions ψ . ◮ Quantum fields are wave function functionals: E : ψ �→ E ( ψ ).

  4. Quantum field theory ◮ Particles are represented by wave functions ψ . ◮ Quantum fields are wave function functionals: E : ψ �→ E ( ψ ). ◮ If the particle dynamics is given by a propagator U ( t , 0), i.e. ψ t = U ( t , 0) ψ 0 then the state dynamics must satisfy E t ( ψ t ) = E 0 ( ψ 0 ) ⇔ E t ( U ( t , 0) ψ 0 ) = E 0 ( ψ 0 ) ⇔ E t ( ψ t ) = E 0 ( U (0 , t ) ψ t ) .

  5. Quantum field theory ◮ Particles are represented by wave functions ψ . ◮ Quantum fields are wave function functionals: E : ψ �→ E ( ψ ). ◮ If the particle dynamics is given by a propagator U ( t , 0), i.e. ψ t = U ( t , 0) ψ 0 then the state dynamics must satisfy E t ( ψ t ) = E 0 ( ψ 0 ) ⇔ E t ( U ( t , 0) ψ 0 ) = E 0 ( ψ 0 ) ⇔ E t ( ψ t ) = E 0 ( U (0 , t ) ψ t ) . ◮ If you want to study the dynamics of quantum fields, you must study the backward propagation given by U (0 , t ) .

  6. Quantum field theory ◮ Particles are represented by wave functions ψ . ◮ Quantum fields are wave function functionals: E : ψ �→ E ( ψ ). ◮ If the particle dynamics is given by a propagator U ( t , 0), i.e. ψ t = U ( t , 0) ψ 0 then the state dynamics must satisfy E t ( ψ t ) = E 0 ( ψ 0 ) ⇔ E t ( U ( t , 0) ψ 0 ) = E 0 ( ψ 0 ) ⇔ E t ( ψ t ) = E 0 ( U (0 , t ) ψ t ) . ◮ If you want to study the dynamics of quantum fields, you must study the backward propagation given by U (0 , t ) . ◮ This reduces the analysis of quantum fields to (a) a PDE problem and (b) a (possibly difficult) computation.

  7. The Schwarzschild–de Sitter space ◮ It describes spherically symmetric black holes with positive cosmological constant.

  8. The Schwarzschild–de Sitter space ◮ It describes spherically symmetric black holes with positive cosmological constant. ◮ It is the manifold R × ( r − , r + ) × S 2 , with Lorentzian metric r 2 dt 2 − r 2 g = ∆ r dr 2 − r 2 d σ S 2 ( ω ) ∆ r � � 1 − Λ r 2 ∆ r = r 2 − 2 M 0 r , Λ , M > 0 3 ∆ r ( r ± ) = 0 , ∆ r > 0 on ( r − , r + ) .

  9. The Schwarzschild–de Sitter space ◮ It describes spherically symmetric black holes with positive cosmological constant. ◮ It is the manifold R × ( r − , r + ) × S 2 , with Lorentzian metric r 2 dt 2 − r 2 g = ∆ r dr 2 − r 2 d σ S 2 ( ω ) ∆ r � � 1 − Λ r 2 ∆ r = r 2 − 2 M 0 r , Λ , M > 0 3 ∆ r ( r ± ) = 0 , ∆ r > 0 on ( r − , r + ) . ◮ This metric can be extended beyond the horizons r = r + and r = r − .

  10. The Schwarzschild–de Sitter space ◮ It describes spherically symmetric black holes with positive cosmological constant. ◮ It is the manifold R × ( r − , r + ) × S 2 , with Lorentzian metric r 2 dt 2 − r 2 g = ∆ r dr 2 − r 2 d σ S 2 ( ω ) ∆ r � � 1 − Λ r 2 ∆ r = r 2 − 2 M 0 r , Λ , M > 0 3 ∆ r ( r ± ) = 0 , ∆ r > 0 on ( r − , r + ) . ◮ This metric can be extended beyond the horizons r = r + and r = r − . ◮ The surface gravities of the black hole and cosmological horizons are characteristic parameters given by: κ ± = | ∆ ′ r ( r ± ) | . 2 r 2 ±

  11. Collapsing star in SdS ◮ We set another system of coordinates S ∗ by ( t , x , ω ) with dr = r 2 dx ⇒ g = ∆ r r 2 ( dt 2 − dx 2 ) − r 2 d σ S 2 ( ω ) ∆ r Radial geodesics propagate along t ± x = cte and r + , r − get send to + ∞ and −∞ , respectively.

  12. Collapsing star in SdS ◮ We set another system of coordinates S ∗ by ( t , x , ω ) with dr = r 2 dx ⇒ g = ∆ r r 2 ( dt 2 − dx 2 ) − r 2 d σ S 2 ( ω ) ∆ r Radial geodesics propagate along t ± x = cte and r + , r − get send to + ∞ and −∞ , respectively. ◮ Massive particles in radial free-fall to the black hole follow curves ( t , x ( t ) , ω ) with x ( t ) = − t − Ae − 2 κ − t + O ( e − 4 κ − t ).

  13. Collapsing star in SdS ◮ We set another system of coordinates S ∗ by ( t , x , ω ) with dr = r 2 dx ⇒ g = ∆ r r 2 ( dt 2 − dx 2 ) − r 2 d σ S 2 ( ω ) ∆ r Radial geodesics propagate along t ± x = cte and r + , r − get send to + ∞ and −∞ , respectively. ◮ Massive particles in radial free-fall to the black hole follow curves ( t , x ( t ) , ω ) with x ( t ) = − t − Ae − 2 κ − t + O ( e − 4 κ − t ). ◮ A collapsing star is a timelike submanifold B = { ( t , x , ω ) : x = z ( t ) } where z ( t ) = − t − Ae − 2 κ − t + O ( e − 4 κ − t ) is a smooth decreasing function.

  14. Collapsing star in SdS ◮ We set another system of coordinates S ∗ by ( t , x , ω ) with dr = r 2 dx ⇒ g = ∆ r r 2 ( dt 2 − dx 2 ) − r 2 d σ S 2 ( ω ) ∆ r Radial geodesics propagate along t ± x = cte and r + , r − get send to + ∞ and −∞ , respectively. ◮ Massive particles in radial free-fall to the black hole follow curves ( t , x ( t ) , ω ) with x ( t ) = − t − Ae − 2 κ − t + O ( e − 4 κ − t ). ◮ A collapsing star is a timelike submanifold B = { ( t , x , ω ) : x = z ( t ) } where z ( t ) = − t − Ae − 2 κ − t + O ( e − 4 κ − t ) is a smooth decreasing function. ◮ We want to study quantum fields in this space. We need an evolution equation for particles.

  15. The evolution equation ◮ We consider spin-0 particles with mass m in the Schwarzschild–de Sitter spacetime. The equation is given by ( � g + m 2 ) u = 0 .

  16. The evolution equation ◮ We consider spin-0 particles with mass m in the Schwarzschild–de Sitter spacetime. The equation is given by ( � g + m 2 ) u = 0 . ◮ We put reflecting boundary conditions on the collapsing star. We study the backward propagation starting at time T → + ∞ :  ( � g + m 2 ) u = 0  u | B = 0  ( u , ∂ t u )( T ) = ( u 0 , u 1 ) . This is the mathematical basis for Hawking radiation.

  17. The evolution equation ◮ We consider spin-0 particles with mass m in the Schwarzschild–de Sitter spacetime. The equation is given by ( � g + m 2 ) u = 0 . ◮ We put reflecting boundary conditions on the collapsing star. We study the backward propagation starting at time T → + ∞ :  ( � g + m 2 ) u = 0  u | B = 0  ( u , ∂ t u )( T ) = ( u 0 , u 1 ) . This is the mathematical basis for Hawking radiation. ◮ We will need to (a) study asymptotic of u ( t = 0) when T → + ∞ and (b) compute a certain functional E ( u ( t = 0)) where E is the vacuum quantum state.

  18. The evolution equation ◮ We consider spin-0 particles with mass m in the Schwarzschild–de Sitter spacetime. The equation is given by ( � g + m 2 ) u = 0 . ◮ We put reflecting boundary conditions on the collapsing star. We study the backward propagation starting at time T → + ∞ :  ( � g + m 2 ) u = 0  u | B = 0  ( u , ∂ t u )( T ) = ( u 0 , u 1 ) . This is the mathematical basis for Hawking radiation. ◮ We will need to (a) study asymptotic of u ( t = 0) when T → + ∞ and (b) compute a certain functional E ( u ( t = 0)) where E is the vacuum quantum state. ◮ We will focus only on (a) in this talk.

  19. Asymptotic of scalar fields Theorem [D ’17] Consider u 0 , u 1 smooth with compact support, and u solution of  ( � g + m 2 ) u = 0  ( u , ∂ t u )( T ) = ( u 0 , u 1 )  u | B = 0 .

  20. Asymptotic of scalar fields Theorem [D ’17] Consider u 0 , u 1 smooth with compact support, and u solution of  ( � g + m 2 ) u = 0  ( u , ∂ t u )( T ) = ( u 0 , u 1 )  u | B = 0 . There exist scattering fields (see later) u − , u + smooth and exponentially decaying; and c 0 > 0 such that for t near 0 , � 1 � � � u (0 , x , ω ) = r − x r u − ln , ω e − κ − T κ − + u + ( T − x , ω ) + O H 1 / 2 ( e − c 0 T ) . ( κ − is the surface gravity of the black-hole.)

  21. Pictorial representation ( u 0 , u 1 ) t t = T B x � 1 � �� � � �� � �� r − � x u + ( T − x ) r u − ln e − κ − T κ −

  22. Comments ◮ The black hole temperature κ − / (2 π ) emerges.

  23. Comments ◮ The black hole temperature κ − / (2 π ) emerges. ◮ The fields u − and u + are Freidlander’s radiation fields; they do not depend on B .

  24. Comments ◮ The black hole temperature κ − / (2 π ) emerges. ◮ The fields u − and u + are Freidlander’s radiation fields; they do not depend on B . ◮ Thus the result gives exponential convergence to equilibrium. The rate c 0 can be computed explicitly: it depends only on κ − , κ + and the first resonance of the K–G equation on the black-hole background.

  25. The Hawking effect ◮ Let E H ,β the Bose–Einstein state at temperature 1 /β with respect to a Hamiltonian H .

  26. The Hawking effect ◮ Let E H ,β the Bose–Einstein state at temperature 1 /β with respect to a Hamiltonian H . ◮ Let H 0 be the black-hole Klein–Gordon Hamiltonian in S ∗ : the K–G equation takes the form ( ∂ 2 t − H 0 ) u = 0.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend