A Focus on PARCC: Data Presentation Manville School District - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SLIDE 1

A Focus on PARCC:

Data Presentation

Manville School District

Presented by:

RoseMary Perrotti

Supervisor of Assessment Data Analysis/Math, K-12

October 2016

SLIDE 2

We believe in the potential of our students, the ability of our teachers and administrators, and the support of our parents and community. Every

• child. Every day.

Assumptions in Support of the Manville Vision/Mission Statement:

• All students will learn.
• Administrators, teachers, parents, the Board of Education

and community foster learning.

• All students will demonstrate on-going growth towards

meeting or exceeding the Common Core State Standards, the NJCCCS and 21st century fluencies.

• The active brain is the learning brain.
• All students will realize their potential, gaining the skills

needed for college and career readiness.

SLIDE 3

A Focus on PARCC: Data Presentation

• Performance Levels
• PARCC New Jersey State Results
• PARCC District Results
• Science Results (NJASK4/8 & Biology)
• MHS – PSAT, SAT, AP, Accuplacer & ASVAB
• Current Graduation Requirements
• Where are we going with the data?

SLIDE 4

Performance Levels

4

SLIDE 5

Five Performance Levels

Place a purple frame around images

PARCC uses five performance levels that delineate the knowledge, skills, and practices students are able to demonstrate:

Level 1: Did Not Yet Meet Expectations Level 2: Partially Met Expectations Level 3: Approached Expectations Level 4: Met Expectations Level 5: Exceeded Expectations

SLIDE 6

PARCC New Jersey State Results

6

SLIDE 7

New Jersey’s 2015 and 2016 PARCC English Language Arts / Literacy

Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5) % Change in Level 1 and Level 2 % Change in Level 4 and Level 5 (College and Career Ready) 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 Grade 3 15.1% 13.5% 17.8% 16.0% 23.7% 23.0% 38.6% 41.3% 4.9% 6.2% 3.4% 4.1% Grade 4 7.8% 8.2% 14.5% 13.5% 26.6% 24.8% 39.4% 40.8% 11.7% 12.7% 0.6% 2.4% Grade 5 7.2% 6.7% 15.1% 14.7% 26.1% 25.3% 45.1% 46.4% 6.4% 6.9% 0.9% 1.7% Grade 6 7.9% 7.5% 15.5% 14.1% 27.8% 26.2% 39.7% 41.3% 9.1% 11.0% 1.9% 3.5% Grade 7 10.8% 9.5% 14.5% 12.5% 23.1% 21.6% 33.9% 35.6% 17.7% 20.7% 3.3% 4.7% Grade 8 11.5% 10.1% 14.6% 13.0% 22.3% 21.7% 39.1% 40.7% 12.5% 14.5% 3.0% 3.6% Grade 9 17.6% 12.9% 19.0% 15.0% 23.6% 23.1% 30.3% 35.8% 9.5% 13.2% 8.7% 9.2% Grade 10 25.3% 20.9% 17.7% 14.2% 20.3% 20.4% 25.6% 31.0% 11.0% 13.4% 7.8% 7.7% Grade 11* 16.7% 18.5% 18.7% 18.1% 23.5% 23.3% 30.1% 31.7% 10.9% 8.4% 1.1% 0.9%

*Grade 11 does not include students who took an AP/IB test.

SLIDE 8

New Jersey’s 2015 and 2016 PARCC Mathematics

* Note: Approximately 30,000 New Jersey students participated in the PARCC Algebra 1 assessment while in middle school. Thus, PARCC Math 8

• utcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole.

Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5) % Change in Level 1 and Level 2 % Change in Level 4 and Level 5 (College and Career Ready) 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 Grade 3 8.3% 8.1% 18.5% 15.9% 28.3% 24.3% 36.9% 39.0% 8.0% 12.7% 2.8% 6.8% Grade 4 7.2% 8.0% 21.9% 18.6% 30.3% 26.8% 36.3% 41.2% 4.3% 5.4% 2.5% 5.9% Grade 5 6.1% 6.2% 20.7% 18.3% 32.1% 28.2% 34.9% 38.4% 6.1% 8.8% 2.3% 6.2% Grade 6 7.6% 8.9% 21.4% 19.1% 30.2% 29.1% 34.8% 35.6% 6.0% 7.3% 1.0% 2.2% Grade 7 7.7% 9.0% 22.3% 20.1% 33.3% 32.3% 33.0% 33.5% 3.8% 5.2% 0.9% 1.9% Grade 8* 21.9% 21.5% 26.2% 25.3% 28.4% 27.5% 23.0% 24.9% 0.5% 0.7% 1.3% 2.1% Algebra I 13.8% 12.8% 25.3% 21.3% 25.0% 24.8% 32.9% 37.3% 3.1% 3.9% 5.0% 5.2% Algebra II 31.7% 33.5% 24.5% 22.6% 19.9% 18.8% 22.3% 22.7% 1.6% 2.4% 0.1% 1.1% Geometry 12.4% 10.5% 35.6% 31.1% 29.7% 31.4% 19.5% 23.2% 2.9% 3.8% 6.3% 4.6%

SLIDE 9

SLIDE 10

PARCC District Results

10

SLIDE 11

2015 and 2016 PARCC Outcomes English Language Arts / Literacy

Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5)

2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016

Grade 3

13% 15% 20% 16.8% 20% 22.4% 44% 43.9% 3% 1.9%

Grade 4

12% 11.3% 20% 14.5% 30% 26.6% 35% 41.1% 3% 6.5%

Grade 5

10% 6.3% 17% 16.1% 30% 33% 38% 42.9% 5% 1.8%

Grade 6

9% 5.7% 25% 20% 27% 31.4% 37% 39% 2% 3.8%

Grade 7

8% 5.8% 17% 21.4% 31% 24.3% 34% 35.9% 10% 12.6%

Grade 8

7% 5.3% 14% 16.8% 22% 23% 45% 44.2% 12% 10.6%

Grade 9

18% 5.4% 27% 15.2% 25% 22.8% 27% 43.5% 4% 13%

Grade 10

20% 16.7% 25% 12.2% 20% 22.2% 17% 38.9% 18% 10%

Grade 11

11% 9.4% 31% 16.7% 30% 27.1% 24% 30.2% 4% 16.7%

SLIDE 12

2015 and 2016 PARCC Outcomes Mathematics

* Note: Approximately 30,000 New Jersey students participated in the PARCC Algebra 1 assessment while in middle

• school. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole.

Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5)

2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 Grade 3

9% 8.3% 16% 26.9% 26% 30.6% 44% 29.6% 5% 4.6%

Grade 4

11% 8.9% 34% 21.8% 34% 25.8% 21% 41.1% 0% 2.4%

Grade 5

7% 3.6% 23% 19.6% 27% 42% 39% 33% 5% 1.8%

Grade 6

6% 10.4% 31% 17.9% 30% 28.3% 28% 32.1% 5% 11.3%

Grade 7

5% 13% 31% 26.1% 37% 33.7% 27% 23.9% 0% 3.3%

Grade 8*

22% 11.1% 22% 40.7% 49% 32.1% 8% 16% 0% 0%

Algebra I

14% 12.8% 30% 21.3% 23% 24.8% 30% 37.3% 2% 3.9%

Algebra I (ABIS)

0% 0% 0% 0% 22% 9.5% 73% 90.5% 5%

0%

Algebra I (MHS)

22% 7.8% 47% 35.9% 24% 37.5% 7% 18.8% 0%

0%

Algebra II

13% 22% 42% 31.9% 36% 27.5% 9% 18.7% 0% 0%

Geometry

41% 6.9% 22% 29.9% 18% 42.5% 18% 19.5% 0% 1.1%

SLIDE 13

Percent Change between 2015 and 2016 PARCC Outcomes

% Change in Level 1 and Level 2 % Change in Level 4 and Level 5 District State District State Grade 3

1.2%

3.4%

1.2%

4.1% Grade 4

6.2%

0.6%

9.6%

2.4% Grade 5

4.6%

0.9%

1.7%

1.7% Grade 6

8.3%

1.9%

3.8%

3.5% Grade 7

2.2%

3.3%

4.5%

4.7% Grade 8

1.1%

3.0%

2.2%

3.6% Grade 9

24.4%

8.7%

25.5%

9.2% Grade 10

16.1%

7.8%

13.9%

7.7% Grade 11*

15.9%

1.1%

18.9%

0.9% % Ch1.1ange in Level 1 and Level 2 % Change in Level 4 and Level 5 District State District State Grade 3

10.2%

2.8%

14.8%

6.8% Grade 4

14.3%

2.5%

22.5%

5.9% Grade 5

6.8%

2.3%

9.2%

6.2% Grade 6

8.7%

1.0%

10.4%

2.2% Grade 7

3.1%

0.9%

.2%

1.9% Grade 8

7.8%

1.3%

8%

2.1% Algebra I*

9.9%

5.0%

9.2%

5.2% Alg I (ABIS)

0% 12.5%

Alg I (MHS)

25.3% 11.8%

Algebra II

1.1%

0.1%

9.7%

1.1% Geometry

26.2%

6.3%

2.6%

4.6%

* Note: Approximately 30,000 New Jersey students participated in the PARCC Algebra 1 assessment while in middle

• school. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole.

English Language Arts / Literacy

Mathematics

SLIDE 14

2016 PARCC Outcomes English Language Arts / Literacy

ELA 03

Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 NJ % >= Level 4

Total

104 15.0% 16.8% 22.4% 43.9% 1.9% 45.8%

Hispanic

41 22.0% 19.5% 22.0% 34.1% 2.4% 36.6%

Special Ed.

26 30.8% 23.1% 15.4% 26.9% 3.8% 30.8%

Econ. Disadvan.

45 26.7% 20.0% 22.2% 28.9% 2.2% 31.1% 2015

District % >= Level 4

Total

47.5%

Hispanic

34.9%

Special Ed.

33.3%

Econ. Disadvan.

38.2%

SLIDE 15

2016 PARCC Outcomes English Language Arts / Literacy

ELA 04

Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 NJ % >= Level 4

Total

124 11.3% 14.5% 26.6% 41.1% 6.5% 47.6%

Hispanic

45 15.6% 13.3% 28.9% 37.8% 4.4% 42.2%

Special Ed.

23 26.1% 24.8% 13.0% 21.7% 4.3% 26.1%

Econ. Disadvan.

53 22.6% 15.1% 28.3% 28.3% 5.7% 34.0% 2015

District % >= Level 4

Total

38.3%

Hispanic

28.9%

Special Ed.

6.9%

Econ. Disadvan.

29.6%

SLIDE 16

2016 PARCC Outcomes English Language Arts / Literacy

ELA 05

Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 NJ % >= Level 4

Total

112 6.3% 16.1% 33.0% 42.9% 1.8% 44.6%

Hispanic

42 4.8% 16.7% 38.1% 40.5% 0.0% 40.5%

Special Ed.

24 29.2% 33.3% 29.2% 8.3% 0.0% 8.3%

Econ. Disadvan.

44 2.3% 15.9% 40.9% 40.9% 0.0% 40.9% 2015

District % >= Level 4

Total

42.9%

Hispanic

36.1%

Special Ed.

14.3%

Econ. Disadvan.

36.7%

SLIDE 17

2016 PARCC Outcomes English Language Arts / Literacy

ELA 06

Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 NJ % >= Level 4

Total

105 5.7% 20.0% 31.4% 39.0% 3.8% 42.9%

Hispanic

37 5.4% 10.8% 40.5% 40.5% 2.7% 43.2%

Special Ed.

23 26.1% 52.2% 13.0% 8.7% 0.0% 8.7%

Econ. Disadvan.

46 4.3% 23.9% 28.3% 43.5% 0.0% 43.5% 2015

District % >= Level 4

Total

38.8%

Hispanic

39.4%

Special Ed.

8.3%

Econ. Disadvan.

40.5%

SLIDE 18

2016 PARCC Outcomes English Language Arts / Literacy

ELA 07

Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 NJ % >= Level 4

Total

103 5.8% 21.4% 24.3% 35.9% 12.6% 48.5%

Hispanic

31 6.5% 25.8% 19.4% 38.7% 9.7% 48.4%

Special Ed.

• Econ.

Disadvan.

35 8.6% 31.4% 22.9% 34.3% 2.9% 37.1%

• - less than 20 students

2015

District % >= Level 4

Total

43.6%

Hispanic

37.5%

Special Ed.

• Econ.

Disadvan.

38.6%

SLIDE 19

2016 PARCC Outcomes English Language Arts / Literacy

ELA 08

Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 NJ % >= Level 4

Total

113 5.3% 16.8% 23.0% 44.2% 10.6% 54.9%

Hispanic

50 6.0% 10.0% 26.0% 44.0% 14.0% 58.0%

Special Ed.

• Econ.

Disadvan.

55 7.3% 18.2% 23.6% 43.6% 7.3% 50.9%

• - less than 20 students

2015

District % >= Level 4

Total

57.0%

Hispanic

42.4%

Special Ed.

• Econ.

Disadvan.

44.4%

SLIDE 20

2016 PARCC Outcomes English Language Arts / Literacy

ELA 09

Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 NJ % >= Level 4

Total

92 5.4% 15.2% 22.8% 43.5% 13.0% 56.5%

Hispanic

33 3.0% 18.2% 27.3% 45.5% 6.1% 51.5%

Special Ed.

• Econ.

Disadvan.

46 6.5% 19.6% 28.3% 34.8% 10.9% 45.7%

• - less than 20 students

2015

District % >= Level 4

Total

30.9%

Hispanic

30.0%

Special Ed.

• Econ.

Disadvan.

27.7%

SLIDE 21

2016 PARCC Outcomes English Language Arts / Literacy

ELA 10

Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 NJ % >= Level 4

Total

90 16.7% 12.2% 22.2% 38.9% 10.0% 48.9%

Hispanic

38 15.8% 13.2% 23.7% 39.5% 7.9% 47.4%

Special Ed.

• Econ.

Disadvan.

43 16.3% 14.0% 25.6% 41.9% 2.3% 44.2%

• - less than 20 students

2015

District % >= Level 4

Total

35.0%

Hispanic

25.0%

Special Ed.

• Econ.

Disadvan.

29.8%

SLIDE 22

2016 PARCC Outcomes English Language Arts / Literacy

ELA 11

Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 NJ % >= Level 4

Total

96 9.4% 16.7% 27.1% 30.2% 16.7% 46.9%

Hispanic

34 8.8% 17.6% 32.4% 32.4% 8.8% 41.2%

Special Ed.

• Econ.

Disadvan.

42 4.8% 21.4% 19.0% 38.1% 16.7% 54.8%

• - less than 20 students

2015

District % >= Level 4

Total

27.5%

Hispanic

15.4%

Special Ed.

• Econ.

Disadvan.

25.7%

SLIDE 23

2016 PARCC Outcomes Mathematics

MAT 03

Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 NJ % >= Level 4

Total

108 8.3% 26.9% 30.6% 29.6% 4.6% 34.4%

Hispanic

42 7.1% 35.7% 33.3% 16.7% 7.1% 23.8%

Special Ed.

26 19.2% 34.6% 23.1% 19.2% 3.8% 23.1%

Econ. Disadvan.

45 20.0% 31.1% 31.1% 15.6% 2.2% 17.8% 2015

District % >= Level 4

Total

49.2%

Hispanic

39.5%

Special Ed.

37.5%

Econ. Disadvan.

35.7%

SLIDE 24

2016 PARCC Outcomes Mathematics

MAT 04

Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 NJ % >= Level 4

Total

124 8.9% 21.8% 25.8% 41.1% 2.4% 43.5%

Hispanic

45 11.1% 24.4% 31.1% 31.1% 2.2% 33.3%

Special Ed.

23 34.8% 21.7% 8.7% 34.8% 0.0% 34.8%

Econ. Disadvan.

53 15.1% 32.1% 22.6% 28.3% 1.9% 30.2% 2015

District % >= Level 4

Total

20.7%

Hispanic

10.3%

Special Ed.

3.4%

Econ. Disadvan.

7.3%

SLIDE 25

2016 PARCC Outcomes Mathematics

MAT 05

Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 NJ % >= Level 4

Total

112 3.6% 19.6% 42.0% 33.0% 1.8% 34.8%

Hispanic

42 4.8% 26.2% 47.6% 21.4% 0.0% 21.4%

Special Ed.

24 8.3% 45.8% 33.3% 12.5% 0.0% 12.5%

Econ. Disadvan.

44 2.3% 25.0% 52.3% 20.5% 0.0% 20.5% 2015

District % >= Level 4

Total

43.4%

Hispanic

32.4%

Special Ed.

14.3%

Econ. Disadvan.

38.0%

SLIDE 26

2016 PARCC Outcomes Mathematics

MAT 06

Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 NJ % >= Level 4

Total

106 10.4% 17.9% 28.3% 32.1% 11.3% 43.4%

Hispanic

38 10.5% 10.5% 42.1% 34.2% 2.6% 36.8%

Special Ed.

23 39.1% 30.4% 17.4% 4.3% 8.7% 13.0%

Econ. Disadvan.

47 12.8% 14.9% 38.3% 34.0% 0.0% 34.0% 2015

District % >= Level 4

Total

32.4%

Hispanic

20.6%

Special Ed.

12.5%

Econ. Disadvan.

20.5%

SLIDE 27

2016 PARCC Outcomes Mathematics

MAT 07

Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 NJ % >= Level 4

Total

92 13.0% 26.1% 33.7% 23.9% 3.3% 27.2%

Hispanic

31 12.9% 32.3% 25.8% 22.6% 6.5% 29.0%

Special Ed.

• Econ.

Disadvan.

34 14.7% 35.3% 32.4% 17.6% 0.0% 17.6%

• - less than 20 students

2015

District % >= Level 4

Total

26.9%

Hispanic

23.4%

Special Ed.

• Econ.

Disadvan.

22.8%

SLIDE 28

2016 PARCC Outcomes Mathematics

MAT 08

Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 NJ % >= Level 4

Total

81 11.1% 40.7% 32.1% 16.0% 0.0% 16.0%

Hispanic

38 7.9% 36.8% 36.8% 18.4% 0.0% 18.4%

Special Ed.

• Econ.

Disadvan.

44 11.4% 40.9% 31.8% 15.9% 0.0% 15.9%

* Note: Approximately 30,000 New Jersey students participated in the PARCC Algebra 1 assessment while in middle school. Thus, PARCC Math 8

• utcomes are not representative of grade 8

performance as a whole.

• - less than 20 students

2015

District % >= Level 4

Total

7.8%

Hispanic

8.3%

Special Ed.

• Econ.

Disadvan.

6.1%

SLIDE 29

2016 PARCC Outcomes Mathematics

ALG 01

Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 NJ % >= Level 4

Total

106 4.7% 21.7% 26.4% 47.2% 0% 47.2%

Hispanic

39 5.1% 28.2% 28.2% 38.5% 0% 38.5%

Special Ed.

• Econ.

Disadvan.

51 3.9% 27.5% 37.3% 31.4% 0% 31.4%

• - less than 20 students

2015

District % >= Level 4

Total

32.4%

Hispanic

27.3%

Special Ed.

• Econ.

Disadvan.

32.4%

* Note: Approximately 30,000 New Jersey students participated in the PARCC Algebra 1 assessment while in middle school. Thus, PARCC Math 8

• utcomes are not representative of grade 8

performance as a whole.

SLIDE 30

2016 PARCC Outcomes Mathematics

7th – 8th Graders 9th – 11th Graders Total District

ALG 01

Count of Valid Test Scores ABIS % >= Level 4 Count of Valid Test Scores MHS % >= Level 4 Count of Valid Test Scores District % >= Level 4 NJ % >= Level 4

Total

42 90.5% 64 18.8% 106 47.2%

Hispanic

• 27

18.5% 39 38.5%

Special Ed.

• Econ.

Disadvan.

• 39

15.4% 51 31.4%

• - less than 20 students

2015

District % >= Level 4

Total

32.4%

Hispanic

27.3%

Special Ed.

• Econ.

Disadvan.

32.4%

SLIDE 31

2016 PARCC Outcomes Mathematics

GEO

Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 NJ % >= Level 4

Total

87 6.9% 29.9% 42.5% 19.5% 1.1% 20.7%

Hispanic

37 5.4% 32.4% 45.9% 16.2% 0.0% 16.2%

Special Ed.

• Econ.

Disadvan.

42 4.8% 38.1% 42.9% 14.3% 0.0% 14.3%

• - less than 20 students

2015

District % >= Level 4

Total

8.8%

Hispanic

5.4%

Special Ed.

• Econ.

Disadvan.

9.3%

SLIDE 32

2016 PARCC Outcomes Mathematics

ALG 02

Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 NJ % >= Level 4

Total

91 22.0% 31.9% 27.5% 18.7% 0.0% 18.7%

Hispanic

35 25.7% 48.6% 17.1% 8.6% 0.0% 8.6%

Special Ed.

• Econ.

Disadvan.

38 15.8% 39.5% 28.9% 15.8% 0.0% 15.8%

• - less than 20 students

2015

District % >= Level 4

Total

18.5%

Hispanic

17.6%

Special Ed.

• Econ.

Disadvan.

23.3%

SLIDE 33

Science Results

(NJASK4/8 & Biology)

33

SLIDE 34

Proficiency & Trends

% Proficient/Advanced RES DFG State Total Population 87.1% 90.1% 89.8% Special Education 72.7% 73.9% 77.6% Hispanic 77.8% 86.6% 82.5%

• Ec. Disadvantaged

77.2% 86.2% 81.1% District 3-Year Scale Score 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 Total Population 233.4 231.2 235.2 Special Education 214.5 210.2 230.6 Hispanic 223.8 218.6 222.4

• Ec. Disadvantaged

234.5 220.0 224.6

NJASK 4 Science

SLIDE 35

Proficiency & Trends

District 3-Year Scale Score 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 Total Population 216.5 212.8 212.0 Special Education 199.6 198.6 192.9 Hispanic 212.6 206.4 209.3

• Ec. Disadvantaged

212.7 206.7 201.5

NJASK 8 Science

% Proficient/Advanced ABIS DFG State Total Population 59.6% 67.6% 72.9% Special Education 36.8% 26.7% 38.1% Hispanic 58.8% 58.6% 57.9%

• Ec. Disadvantaged

50.0% 58.6% 45.2%

SLIDE 36

Proficiency & Trends

District 3-Year Scale Score 2014-2015 2015-2016 Total Population 191.5 202.4 Special Education 178.0 174.7 Hispanic 187.7 199.7

• Ec. Disadvantaged

189.4 191.3

EOC Biology

% Proficient/Advanced MHS DFG State Total Population 51% 47% 56.7% Special Education 22% 13.3% 22.1% Hispanic 45% 37.1% 37.7%

• Ec. Disadvantaged

39.1% 37.2% 35.6%

SLIDE 37

MHS – PSAT, SAT, AP, Accuplacer & ASVAB

37

SLIDE 38

PSAT – Overview of Data

PSAT (Female-38) 2015 Writing and Language 24 Reading 25 Math 23 PSAT (Male-51) 2015 Writing and Language 21 Reading 23 Math 23

PSAT (Preliminary Scholastic Achievement Test)

89 students tested

Students receiving a 22 or better on the PSAT (taken starting October 1, 2015) in Reading and/or Math can utilize this assessment as part of their State Assessment Requirement for graduation.

SLIDE 39

SAT – Overview of Data (Old SAT)

Students receiving a 400 or better on the (Old) SAT can utilize this assessment as part of their State Assessment Requirement. Date

# of Test Takers Mean Critical Reading Score Mean Math Score Mean Writing Score

% Met Both Benchmarks October 2016 10 521 526 499 60% November 2016 25 421 451 432 12% December 2016 9 467 434 437 11% January 2016 9 467 476 450 22%

SAT (Scholastic Achievement Test)

53 students tested

SLIDE 40

SAT – Overview of Data (New SAT)

Students receiving a 450 or better on the (New) SAT in Evidence-Based Reading and Writing Section (ERW) and a 440 or better on Math Section can utilize this assessment as part of their State Assessment Requirement. Date

# of Test Takers Mean Total Score Mean ERW Score Mean Math Score

% Met Both Benchmarks March 2016 17 1047 518 529 47% May 2016 25 1046 527 519 44% June 2016 16 1138 559 578 62%

SAT (Scholastic Achievement Test)

58 students tested

SLIDE 41

AP – Overview of Data

AP (Advanced Placement) – 2016

36 students tested

School Totals 5 4 3 2 1 Total*

Number of Exams 2 10 15 9

• 36

Percentage of Total Exams 5.6% 27.8% 41.7% 25%

• 100%

*Number of Total Exams is greater than number of students tested as students may have taken more than one AP Exam.

AP (Advanced Placement) – 2015

40 students tested

School Totals 5 4 3 2 1 Total*

Number of Exams 1 3 13 12 11 40 Percentage of Total Exams 2% 8% 32% 30% 28% 100% “Success” on an AP Exam is defined as an exam score of 3 or higher, which represents the score point that research finds predictive of college success and college graduation.

SLIDE 42

AP – Subject Area Results

AP (Advanced Placement) – 2016

36 students tested

Subject Totals 5 4 3 2 1 Total English Literature and Composition

1 4 9 1 15

European History

1 5 2 8

United States History

1 1 4 1 7

Physics 1

2 8 10

AP (Advanced Placement) – 2015

40 students tested

Subject Totals 5 4 3 2 1 Total English Literature and Composition

2 8 4 14

European History

2 3 4 9

United States History

2 6 4 12

Chemistry (VHS)

1 1

SLIDE 43

Accuplacer / ASVAB

Accuplacer ASVAB

94 students tested 27 students tested

Graduation Requirement % Passing Write Placer (need ≥ 6) 46.2% Elementary Algebra (need ≥ 76) 39.4% Graduation Requirement % Passing Composite Score (need ≥ 31) 81%

SLIDE 44

Current Graduation Requirements

Approved August 3, 2016

SLIDE 45

Graduation Assessment Requirements

English Language Arts Mathematics PARCC ELA Grade 09 PARCC Algebra I PARCC ELA Grade 10 PARCC Geometry PARCC ELA Grade 11 PARCC Algebra II PSAT10** or PSAT-NMSQT** PSAT10** or PSAT-NMSQT** SAT* –Reading SAT* – Math ACT or ACT PLAN– Reading ACT or ACT PLAN– Math ACT Aspire – Reading ACT Aspire – Math ASVAB-AFQT Composite Score ASVAB-AFQT Composite Score Accuplacer – Write Placer Accuplacer – Elementary Algebra OR Meet the Criteria of the NJDOE Portfolio Appeal

For the graduating classes of 2017, 2018, and 2019 (current 10th-12th graders) Students must achieve a passing score on one of the Competency Assessment as outlined in the chart below for each subject area, English Language Arts and Mathematics:

SLIDE 46

Proposed for Class of 2020 Graduation Assessment Requirements

English Language Arts Mathematics PARCC ELA Grade 09 PARCC Algebra I PARCC ELA Grade 10 PARCC Geometry PARCC ELA Grade 11 PARCC Algebra II

For the graduating class of 2020 (current 9th graders) Students must take

English Language Arts Mathematics PSAT10** or PSAT-NMSQT** PSAT10** or PSAT-NMSQT** SAT* –Reading SAT* – Math ACT or ACT PLAN– Reading ACT or ACT PLAN– Math ACT Aspire – Reading ACT Aspire – Math ASVAB-AFQT Composite Score ASVAB-AFQT Composite Score Accuplacer – Write Placer Accuplacer – Elementary Algebra OR Meet the Criteria of the NJDOE Portfolio Appeal

If a passing score is not met on any of the three, then the student can use one of the following:

SLIDE 47

Proposed for Class of 2021 Graduation Assessment Requirements

English Language Arts Mathematics PARCC ELA Grade 09 PARCC Algebra I PARCC ELA Grade 10 PARCC Geometry PARCC ELA Grade 11 PARCC Algebra II

Starting with the graduating class of 2020 (current 8th graders) Students must take all PARCC assessments and must pass Algebra 1 and ELA 10

Meet the Criteria of the NJDOE Portfolio Appeal

If a passing score is not met on the highlighted assessment, then the student must:

SLIDE 48

Where are we going with the data?

SLIDE 49

Unpacking the PARCC District Data

How are our students progressing? How do our students compare? Do the results align with our

• ther assessments?

What trends can be discerned from the data? What are student’s strengths and weaknesses?

SLIDE 50

• PARCC / NJASK Science /

DLM / APA

• Biology End of Course

Assessment

• Graduation Rate
• Demographic Reports
• Report Card
• Teaching Ratings
• SAT / ACT / AP /

Accuplacer

• Naviance
• I&RS Referrals
• Formative Assessments
• Student Writing Samples

(ELA)

• Extended-Constructed

Response (Math)

• Development Reading

Assessment (DRA)

• Lexile Scores

PARCC Is Only One Data Point: Types of Data Analyzed

SLIDE 51

Resources for Parents

• Information on the new 2015-16 PARCC Student Reports:

www.state.nj.us/education/assessment/parcc/scores/

• Understanding the student score reports (with translations):

understandthescore.org/

Sample report

SLIDE 52

Questions?

SLIDE 53

Th The e go goal l is to tur urn n data int nto inf nformat

• rmation,

ion, and nd inf nform

• rmatio

ation n int nto ins nsight ght.

Carly Fiorina, Former CEO of HP