School Committee Presentation 2015 PARCC Results December 8, 2015 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

school committee presentation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

School Committee Presentation 2015 PARCC Results December 8, 2015 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

School Committee Presentation 2015 PARCC Results December 8, 2015 Thomas Kenworthy, Ed.D. Assistant Superintendent Understanding PARCC Results PARCC results are reported in a number of ways so that districts, schools, teachers, and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

School Committee Presentation

2015 PARCC Results December 8, 2015

Thomas Kenworthy, Ed.D. – Assistant Superintendent

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • PARCC results are reported in a number of ways so that districts, schools,

teachers, and parents can see how students performed on each assessment.

  • PARCC uses five performance levels that delineate the knowledge, skills,

and practices students were able to demonstrate on the PARCC assessment.

  • PARCC assessments have scale scores that range from 650 to 850 for
  • verall performance in mathematics and ELA/Literacy. Scale scores are

useful to capture changes in performance over time.

  • Subclaims are a set of subject-specific skills that highlight important areas

within a content area to provide a deeper understanding of a student’s

  • score. The subclaim reports can be used with other information, such as

grades, teacher feedback, and scores on other assessments, to help determine each student’s unique academic strengths and needs.

Confidential and Proprietary Information

Understanding PARCC Results

Level 1: Did Not Yet Meet Expectations Level 2: Partially Met Expectations Level 3: Approached Expectations Level 4: Met Expectations Level 5: Exceeded Expectations

650 725 700 750 850

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • To date 46 states and the District of Columbia

have adopted the Common Core

  • There is a federal requirement to have a state

assessment in literacy and math (and science) but states have a choice in which assessment they use to satisfy this requirement

  • RI is one of 11 states plus the District of Columbia

in the PARCC consortium

  • 18 states are in the Smarter Balanced consortium
  • All other states are using their own assessment to

meet the federal requirement

Confidential and Proprietary Information

Which States Are Using PARCC?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

2015 Results for Portsmouth

English Language Arts

Grade % Met and Exceeded % Participation 3 (H) 48.8 88.9 3 (M) 59.4 97.1 4 48.1 91.3 5 47.5 85.6 6 35.3 82.5 7 54.4 88.9 8 46.3 92.2 9 52.3 72.6 10 60.2 27.3

Math

Grade % Met and Exceeded % Participation 3 (H) 67.1 87.8 3 (M) 50.7 97.1 4 39.3 94.8 5 30.3 86.6 6 40.1 81.3 7 54.4 86.5 8 23.6 85.9 Algebra (8) 96.8 95.5 Algebra 6.9 55.8 Geometry 40.0 46.8

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Elementary

*Grade configurations vary

MS

*Grade configurations vary

HS

Barrington 63.3% 73.6% 77.2% East Greenwich 62.6% 78.4% 65.7%

Exeter-West Greenwich

40.7% 57% 64.5% Narragansett 60.4% 53.9% 42.8% North Kingstown 59.9% 61.5% 38.1% South Kingstown 78.1% 57.4% 37.9% Portsmouth 52.3% 46.4% 53.6% RI 37.5% 36.3% 32%

5

2015 5 Dis istrict ict Compari mparisons sons ELA – Level els 4 & 5 & 5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Elementary

*Grade configurations vary

MS

*Grade configurations vary

HS

Barrington 59.9% 59.5% 46.5% East Greenwich 49.8% 64.4% 59.1%

Exeter-West Greenwich

45.4% 47.8% 54.5% Narragansett 49.7% 45.9% 29.1% North Kingstown 48.2% 49.4% 24.1% South Kingstown 71.9% 46.4% 29.1% Portsmouth 57.9% 43% 32.2% RI 30.2% 25.6% 12.4%

6

2015 5 Dis istrict ict Compari mparisons sons Mat ath – Level els 4 & 5 & 5

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • This a new test and we need to be careful about making

comparisons to previous results (NECAP or NSRE)

  • This year’s results will serve as a baseline for future years
  • We took the assessment on computer at all grades in Portsmouth
  • There is room for improvement in all of our results and we will

work to make those improvements

  • Our 8th grade Algebra scores at PMS were 2nd highest in the state
  • After levels 4 and 5 most of the rest of our students scored at a

level 3 (approaching expectations) and in some cases were close to proficiency in their scale score

  • Several students received a 5 in ELA, math, or both; One student

received a perfect score on the math portion!

Takeaways ys from

  • m the Data
slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • Continue to analyze the data down to the individual student

level

  • Look for ways we can continue to support all students and

areas to target in our curriculum review

  • Ensure that we have full participation at all grade levels this

year

  • Enhance dialogue with students and parents on the purposes

and importance of the assessment

  • Work with other districts and at the state level to ensure we

are up to date and ready for changes to the PARCC

  • Strive for continuous, sustainable improvement each year

Next Steps

slide-9
SLIDE 9

QUESTIONS?

THANK YOU !