parcc 2016 final results
play

PARCC 2016 Final Results District of Columbia Public Schools | - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Mar 01, 2023 •141 likes •432 views

August 2016 PARCC 2016 Final Results District of Columbia Public Schools | 1200 First Street, NE | Washington, DC 20002 | T 202.442.5885 | F 202.442.5026 | dcps.dc.gov 2016 PARCC Results | DCPS PARCC Performance Level Overview PARCC

  1. August 2016 PARCC 2016 Final Results District of Columbia Public Schools | 1200 First Street, NE | Washington, DC 20002 | T 202.442.5885 | F 202.442.5026 | dcps.dc.gov

  2. 2016 PARCC Results | DCPS PARCC Performance Level Overview PARCC reports results according to five performance levels that delineate the knowledge, skills, and practices students are able to demonstrate. Performance Levels Level 4/5 = College ‐ and ‐ career ready Level 5 Exceeded expectations Demonstrated the academic knowledge, skills and practices necessary to enter Level 4 Met expectations directly into and succeed in entry ‐ level, credit ‐ bearing courses in college or Level 3 Approached expectations technical courses requiring college ‐ level reading, writing, and math. Level 2 Partially met expectations Level 1 Did not yet meet expectations 2

  3. 2016 PARCC Results | DCPS Main Takeaways  DCPS improved in Mathematics (+ 3.0%) and held steady (+ 0.6%) in ELA  Most grade levels improved  Most subgroups improved  51 schools improved in both ELA and Math 3

  4. 2016 PARCC Results | DCPS Overall DCPS PARCC Performance (% Level 4/5+) Overall DCPS PARCC % L4 + L5 Math ELA 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% + 3.0% + 0.6% 40% 30% 25.5% 24.9% 23.9% 20.9% 20% 10% 0% 2015 (n = 17,702) 2016 (n = 19,475) 2015 (n = 17,525) 2016 (n = 20,192) 4

  5. 2016 PARCC Results | DCPS Overall DCPS PARCC Performance Level Distribution Overall DCPS PARCC Performance by Achievement Level Math ELA 100% 2.7% 3.6% 5.2% 4.9% 90% 18.2% 20.3% 19.7% 20.5% 80% 70% 24.1% 20.2% 21.7% 20.9% 60% 50% 23.1% 22.2% 40% 31.4% 29.2% 30% % L4 + L5 % L4 + L5 20% 2015: 20.9% 2015: 24.9% 31.8% 31.4% 25.2% 23.6% 2016: 25.5% 2016: 23.9% 10% ∆ : +0.6% ∆ : +3.0% 0% 2015 (n = 17,702) 2016 (n = 19,475) 2015 (n = 17,525) 2016 (n = 20,192) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 5

  6. 2016 PARCC Results | DCPS DCPS PARCC Performance, Grades 3 ‐ 8 & High School DCPS PARCC % L4 + L5 by Grade Band ELA Gr 3 ‐ 8 ELA HS (ELA II) Math Gr 3 ‐ 8 Math HS (Geo/Alg II) 100% 90% + 1.8% ‐ 6.9% + 4.3% + 3.4% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 27.0% 26.9% 26.5% 30% 24.6% 22.6% 20.1% 20% 11.1% 7.7% 10% 0% 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 (n: 15508) (n: 16446) (n: 2194) (n: 3029) (n: 15520) (n: 16422) (n: 2005) (n: 3770) 6

  7. 2016 PARCC Results | DCPS DCPS PARCC Performance Level Distribution, 3 ‐ 8 & High School DCPS PARCC Performance by Achievement Level and Grade Band Math HS (Geo/Alg II) ELA Gr 3 ‐ 8 ELA HS (ELA II) Math Gr 3 ‐ 8 100% 0.4% 0.6% 3.0% 4.7% 4.8% 4.3% 5.6% 7.3% 8.7% 10.6% 90% 14.5% 19.6% 19.9% 21.6% 22.5% 18.3% 21.8% 80% 18.1% 13.2% 70% 15.5% 24.4% 20.9% 22.3% 22.6% 60% 14.9% 50% 42.9% 17.4% 46.5% 23.9% 40% 23.5% 29.5% 26.0% 30% 51.7% 20% 40.1% 30.7% 27.7% 27.9% 24.5% 23.9% 23.6% 10% 0% 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 (n: 15508) (n: 16446) (n: 2194) (n: 3029) (n: 15520) (n: 16422) (n: 2005) (n: 3770) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 7

  8. 2016 PARCC Results | DCPS DCPS PARCC Performance by Grade (ELA) DCPS ELA PARCC % L4 + L5 by Grade ELA II (HS) Gr 3 Gr 4 Gr 5 Gr 6 Gr 7 Gr 8 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% + 0.4% + 0.4% + 1.4% + 2.3% + 4.3% + 2.8% ‐ 6.9% 40% 27.7% 29.1% 28.0% 27.0% 24.2% 26.5% 30% 22.9% 25.6% 23.9% 24.3% 24.3% 24.6% 23.7% 20.1% 20% 10% 0% 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 (n: 3402) (n: 3866) (n: 3137) (n: 3413) (n: 2636) (n: 2943) (n: 2055) (n: 1930) (n: 2048) (n: 2143) (n: 2230) (n: 2151) (n: 2194) (n: 3029) 8

  9. 2016 PARCC Results | DCPS DCPS PARCC Performance by Grade (Math) DCPS Math PARCC % L4 + L5 by Grade Geo + Alg II (HS) Gr 3 Gr 4 Gr 5 Gr 6 Gr 7 Gr 8 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% + 1.9% + 3.7% + 3.4% + 3.4% + 5.0% + 2.2% + 6.4% 50% 40% 36.1% 28.4% 30.6% 29.7% 28.3% 30% 23.3% 22.9% 19.6% 18.9% 20% 15.2% 12.2% 14.1% 11.1% 7.7% 10% 0% 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 (n: 3403) (n: 3855) (n: 3144) (n: 3399) (n: 2650) (n: 2932) (n: 2045) (n: 1935) (n: 2022) (n: 2145) (n: 2256) (n: 2156) (n: 2005) (n: 3770) 9

  10. 2016 PARCC Results | DCPS PARCC Performance Level Distribution by Grade (ELA) DCPS ELA PARCC Performance by Achievement Level and Grade Gr 8 ELA II (HS) Gr 4 Gr 5 Gr 6 Gr 7 Gr 3 100% 1.9% 2.6% 2.5% 3.1% 4.6% 4.6% 5.8% 5.7% 5.6% 6.9% 6.3% 7.3% 8.7% 9.2% 90% 14.5% 22.0% 21.7% 21.2% 24.9% 18.2% 21.0% 17.9% 20.8% 15.1% 17.4% 21.9% 22.2% 18.3% 80% 13.2% 70% 18.0% 19.7% 18.9% 20.7% 22.2% 19.2% 19.3% 15.5% 22.8% 25.2% 60% 23.9% 24.6% 24.4% 14.9% 50% 17.4% 21.2% 21.1% 21.8% 21.8% 23.5% 22.1% 27.0% 40% 27.9% 24.1% 22.7% 25.4% 27.6% 30% 51.7% 20% 40.1% 36.9% 34.8% 34.7% 32.6% 35.1% 30.7% 27.9% 23.7% 25.6% 20.0% 24.3% 23.6% 10% 0% 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 (n: 3402) (n: 3866) (n: 3137) (n: 3413) (n: 2636) (n: 2943) (n: 2055) (n: 1930) (n: 2048) (n: 2143) (n: 2230) (n: 2151) (n: 2194) (n: 3029) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 10

  11. 2016 PARCC Results | DCPS PARCC Performance Level Distribution by Grade (Math) DCPS Math PARCC Performance by Achievement Level and Grade Gr 8 Geo + Alg II (HS) Gr 4 Gr 5 Gr 6 Gr 7 Gr 3 100% 0.6% 1.0% 0.5% 0.8% 0.4% 0.6% 2.0% 3.4% 3.5% 3.9% 3.6% 5.0% 5.7% 8.4% 7.3% 10.6% 11.7% 13.3% 14.6% 17.9% 90% 17.6% 19.3% 19.8% 23.4% 25.0% 26.7% 23.9% 21.8% 18.1% 80% 27.7% 21.4% 20.2% 25.1% 23.6% 70% 23.5% 23.0% 26.1% 60% 23.9% 21.6% 25.6% 25.5% 21.7% 30.2% 25.0% 50% 46.5% 42.9% 34.7% 32.8% 31.7% 29.5% 40% 27.5% 24.7% 33.2% 28.2% 23.5% 20.5% 30% 20% 36.3% 40.7% 23.9% 27.9% 25.3% 24.6% 25.0% 24.7% 20.2% 23.1% 21.3% 21.7% 10% 17.3% 17.9% 0% 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 (n: 3403) (n: 3855) (n: 3144) (n: 3399) (n: 2650) (n: 2932) (n: 2045) (n: 1935) (n: 2022) (n: 2145) (n: 2256) (n: 2156) (n: 2005) (n: 3770) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 11

  12. 2016 PARCC Results | DCPS DCPS PARCC Performance by Race/Ethnicity (ELA) DCPS ELA PARCC % L4 + L5 by Race/Ethnicity Multi ‐ Racial Pac Isl Black Hispanic White Asian Am Ind 100% ‐ 5.1% + 1.2% ‐ 4.8% + 1.5% + 16.7% + 3.8% + 1.2% 90% 78.8% 80% 74.0% 70% 65.8% 60.7% 60% 52.6% 54.2% 50.0% 50% 40% 33.3% 26.5% 30% 21.7% 22.9% 22.7% 20% 13.9% 15.1% 10% 0% 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 (n: (n: (n: 2919) (n: 3448) (n: 2180) (n: 2430) (n: 319) (n: 364) (n: 342) (n: 373) (n: 12) (n: 12) (n: 22) (n: 34) 11908) 12814) 12

  13. 2016 PARCC Results | DCPS DCPS PARCC Performance by Race/Ethnicity (Math) DCPS Math PARCC % L4 + L5 by Race/Ethnicity Pac Isl Black Hispanic White Multi ‐ Racial Asian Am Indian 100% 90% + 2.2% + 2.0% + 3.9% + 2.4% + 7.7% + 9.6% ‐ 0.1% 80% 71.5% 67.6% 70% 54.8% 57.2% 60% 55.4% 55.3% 50% 40% 28.6% 30% 23.1% 20.3% 22.3% 19.0% 20% 15.4% 10.7% 12.9% 10% 0% 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 (n: (n: (n: 2928) (n: 3634) (n: 2133) (n: 2628) (n: 312) (n: 387) (n: 345) (n: 397) (n: 13) (n: 13) (n: 21) (n: 35) 11773) 13098) 13

  14. 2016 PARCC Results | DCPS PARCC Performance Level Distribution by Race/Eth (ELA) DCPS ELA PARCC Performance by Achievement Level and Race/Ethnicity Am Indian Pac Isl Hispanic White Multi ‐ Racial Asian Black 100% 0.0% 1.2% 1.5% 3.2% 3.0% 4.5% 8.3% 9.4% 13.9% 12.7% 13.5% 21.6% 17.9% 90% 27.0% 22.3% 18.6% 19.9% 18.2% 26.5% 33.3% 80% 20.5% 21.0% 41.7% 70% 43.3% 40.2% 25.1% 24.5% 27.3% 23.5% 60% 42.9% 44.2% 25.0% 26.8% 25.8% 51.7% 50% 51.8% 23.7% 22.2% 40% 23.5% 25.0% 21.1% 22.5% 31.8% 30% 17.9% 16.3% 33.3% 20% 38.8% 38.2% 14.0% 13.7% 12.5% 15.6% 9.4% 11.8% 29.5% 30.3% 26.5% 25.0% 10% 18.2% 6.3% 5.0% 12.3% 9.7% 9.6% 8.5% 8.3% 4.1% 3.7% 0% 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 (n: (n: (n: 2919) (n: 3448) (n: 2180) (n: 2430) (n: 319) (n: 364) (n: 342) (n: 373) (n: 12) (n: 12) (n: 22) (n: 34) 11908) 12814) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 14

  15. 2016 PARCC Results | DCPS PARCC Performance Level Distribution by Race/Eth (Math) DCPS Math PARCC Performance by Achievement Level and Race/Ethnicity Am Indian Pac Isl Hispanic White Multi ‐ Racial Asian Black 100% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 1.0% 1.8% 2.2% 2.9% 9.9% 11.3% 10.2% 12.0% 11.9% 11.1% 13.6% 16.7% 15.4% 90% 19.0% 18.4% 20.1% 23.1% 25.7% 80% 23.2% 21.2% 70% 44.9% 45.8% 43.6% 44.2% 28.8% 25.9% 38.5% 38.1% 60% 54.0% 54.8% 31.4% 46.2% 50% 36.4% 34.1% 40% 32.7% 30.6% 23.1% 22.7% 19.0% 27.8% 22.2% 30.8% 30% 28.6% 21.8% 18.2% 20% 23.1% 29.8% 31.8% 14.7% 13.4% 13.3% 14.9% 23.8% 18.3% 21.2% 10% 15.4% 7.1% 8.0% 11.4% 8.5% 7.7% 6.7% 5.8% 4.1% 3.2% 2.6% 0% 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 (n: (n: (n: 2928) (n: 3634) (n: 2133) (n: 2628) (n: 312) (n: 387) (n: 345) (n: 397) (n: 13) (n: 13) (n: 21) (n: 35) 11773) 13098) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 15

  16. 2016 PARCC Results | DCPS DCPS Performance by Subgroup (ELA) DCPS ELA PARCC % L4 + L5 by Subgroup Male Female Eco Disadvantaged ELL SPED 100% + 2.8% + 0.8% + 2.3% + 1.1% + 0.3% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30.5% 29.7% 30% 20.6% 20.3% 20% 14.6% 13.9% 11.8% 11.6% 10% 4.5% 3.4% 0% 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 (n: 2000) (n: 2495) (n: 2802) (n: 3170) (n: 13306) (n: 15045) (n: 8684) (n: 9549) (n: 9018) (n: 9926) 16

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend

Year Two of PARCC A Walk in the PARCC March 7, 2016 Agenda What is PARCC? How are the

Year Two of PARCC A Walk in the PARCC March 7, 2016 Agenda What is PARCC? How are the

Year Two of PARCC A Walk in the PARCC March 7, 2016 Agenda What is PARCC? How are the Sayreville Schools preparing? What can parents do to prepare their children for PARCC? Graduation Requirements Schedule Can I

1.12k views • 23 slides
PARCC 2017 Final Results District of Columbia Public Schools | 1200 First Street, NE |

PARCC 2017 Final Results District of Columbia Public Schools | 1200 First Street, NE |

September 2017 PARCC 2017 Final Results District of Columbia Public Schools | 1200 First Street, NE | Washington, DC 20002 | T 202.442.5885 | F 202.442.5026 | dcps.dc.gov 2017 PARCC Results | DCPS Overall Takeaways Significant

535 views • 27 slides
2016 DC PARCC Results Office of the State Superintendent of Education Tuesday, August 30, 2016 |

2016 DC PARCC Results Office of the State Superintendent of Education Tuesday, August 30, 2016 |

2016 DC PARCC Results Office of the State Superintendent of Education Tuesday, August 30, 2016 | Hanseul Kang, State Superintendent Overview Background PARCC measures real-world skills, such as problem solving and critical thinking

797 views • 62 slides
School Committee Presentation 2015 PARCC Results December 8, 2015 Thomas Kenworthy, Ed.D.

School Committee Presentation 2015 PARCC Results December 8, 2015 Thomas Kenworthy, Ed.D.

School Committee Presentation 2015 PARCC Results December 8, 2015 Thomas Kenworthy, Ed.D. Assistant Superintendent Understanding PARCC Results PARCC results are reported in a number of ways so that districts, schools, teachers, and

244 views • 9 slides
PARCC RESULTS: SPRING 2015 AND SPRING 2016 ADMINISTRATIONS Measuring College and CHARLES SEIPP

PARCC RESULTS: SPRING 2015 AND SPRING 2016 ADMINISTRATIONS Measuring College and CHARLES SEIPP

PARCC RESULTS: SPRING 2015 AND SPRING 2016 ADMINISTRATIONS Measuring College and CHARLES SEIPP Career Readiness ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT ROXBURY PUBLIC SCHOOLS SEPTEMBER 6, 2016 1 NEW JERSEYS STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM 2016

525 views • 21 slides
EHT PARCC SCORES SPRING 2016 Measuring College and Career Readiness September 27, 2016 1

EHT PARCC SCORES SPRING 2016 Measuring College and Career Readiness September 27, 2016 1

EHT PARCC SCORES SPRING 2016 Measuring College and Career Readiness September 27, 2016 1 PARCC BASICS PARCC stands for Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers Tests students in grades 3 through 11 in ELA and

597 views • 13 slides
BBA Aviation enabling flight; expanding horizons 2016 Final Results BBA Aviation 2016 Final

BBA Aviation enabling flight; expanding horizons 2016 Final Results BBA Aviation 2016 Final

BBA Aviation enabling flight; expanding horizons 2016 Final Results BBA Aviation 2016 Final Results 2016 a transformational year Major expansion of Signature Acquired Landmark Historical 1 Today 2 Flight Support Aftermarket

490 views • 25 slides
PARCC Research Results Karen E. Lochbaum Pearson June 22, 2016 Presented at that National

PARCC Research Results Karen E. Lochbaum Pearson June 22, 2016 Presented at that National

PARCC Research Results Karen E. Lochbaum Pearson June 22, 2016 Presented at that National Conference on Student Assessment, Philadelphia, PA 1 Research Questions Do scores assigned by the Intelligent Essay Assessor (IEA) agree with

437 views • 24 slides
PARCC A New Kind of Academic Check-Up 0 What are the objectives of PARCC? Determine whether

PARCC A New Kind of Academic Check-Up 0 What are the objectives of PARCC? Determine whether

PARCC A New Kind of Academic Check-Up 0 What are the objectives of PARCC? Determine whether students are college- and career-ready or on track Report growth in performance, as well as achievement Report comparable results

342 views • 20 slides
for District 65 Families PARCC Agenda Topic Interpreting your childs scores 6:30 6:50

for District 65 Families PARCC Agenda Topic Interpreting your childs scores 6:30 6:50

PARCC Information Session for District 65 Families PARCC Agenda Topic Interpreting your childs scores 6:30 6:50 District 65 results 6:50 7:00 Updates on 2015-16 PARCC testing 7:00 7:05 Questions about the results 7:05 7:30

608 views • 21 slides
PARCC RESULTS: YEAR FOUR Measuring College and Career Readiness MOUNTAINSIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT

PARCC RESULTS: YEAR FOUR Measuring College and Career Readiness MOUNTAINSIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT

PARCC RESULTS: YEAR FOUR Measuring College and Career Readiness MOUNTAINSIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2018 OVERVIEW PARCC 2018 Last year, Mountainside faculty focused efforts and energy into concerns identified in the 2017 PARCC

640 views • 38 slides
PARCC RESULTS: YEAR THREE Measuring College and Career Readiness MOUNTAINSIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT

PARCC RESULTS: YEAR THREE Measuring College and Career Readiness MOUNTAINSIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT

PARCC RESULTS: YEAR THREE Measuring College and Career Readiness MOUNTAINSIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT MONDAY, OCTOBER 25, 2017 OVERVIEW LAL 2017 RESULTS The first three slides show the 2017 PARCC Language Arts Literacy results as compared with

343 views • 33 slides
and Careers PARCC Results 2018 What is PARCC The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness

and Careers PARCC Results 2018 What is PARCC The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness

Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers PARCC Results 2018 What is PARCC The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) is a computer based assessment of Mathematics and English

557 views • 43 slides
PARCC RESULTS & Parent Information Session Measuring College and Career Readiness

PARCC RESULTS & Parent Information Session Measuring College and Career Readiness

PARCC RESULTS & Parent Information Session Measuring College and Career Readiness Allamuchy Township School District March 7, 2016 NEW JERSEYS STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM In 2015, New Jersey adopted the Partnership for Assessment

199 views • 17 slides
MCAS 2.0 2016-2017 PARCC Achievement Levels Level 5 Exceeded Expectations Level 4 Met

MCAS 2.0 2016-2017 PARCC Achievement Levels Level 5 Exceeded Expectations Level 4 Met

MCAS 2.0 2016-2017 PARCC Achievement Levels Level 5 Exceeded Expectations Level 4 Met Expectations Level 3 Approached Expectations Level 2 Partially Met Expectations Level 1 Did Not Yet Meet Expectations PARCC Results for Spring GRADE 3

608 views • 38 slides
Rel Release of 2014 e of 2014-2015 015 PARCC S CC Student Re Results Objectives By the end

Rel Release of 2014 e of 2014-2015 015 PARCC S CC Student Re Results Objectives By the end

Rel Release of 2014 e of 2014-2015 015 PARCC S CC Student Re Results Objectives By the end of this presentation, parents will be able to: Identify components of the 2014 2015 PARCC English and math student reports. Understand how

428 views • 19 slides
Peer-review-based examination in a PhD-level course: Introduction to Research Anna

Peer-review-based examination in a PhD-level course: Introduction to Research Anna

Peer-review-based examination in a PhD-level course: Introduction to Research Anna Karlsson, Professor, Assistant Dean Sahlgrenska Academy & Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Institute of Medicine, University of

605 views • 26 slides
BC Hydro - Vancouver Island Generation Dam Safety Presentation for Jordan River December 12, 2014

BC Hydro - Vancouver Island Generation Dam Safety Presentation for Jordan River December 12, 2014

BC Hydro - Vancouver Island Generation Dam Safety Presentation for Jordan River December 12, 2014 BC HYDRO DAM SAFETY PROGRAM 41 dam facilities province-wide in 23 watersheds Ongoing dam safety studies and modelling, maintenance and

648 views • 19 slides
Los Al Los Alam amitos Uni Unified School D ool Dist stric ict Presentation to the Orange

Los Al Los Alam amitos Uni Unified School D ool Dist stric ict Presentation to the Orange

Los Al Los Alam amitos Uni Unified School D ool Dist stric ict Presentation to the Orange County Committee on School District Organization April 29, 2020 Andrew Pulver, Ed.D., Superintendent Ronald D. Wenkart, AALRR Justin Levitt,

414 views • 27 slides
London Stroke Care Tony Rudd London Stroke Clinical Director The Case for Changing Stroke Care

London Stroke Care Tony Rudd London Stroke Clinical Director The Case for Changing Stroke Care

London Stroke Care Tony Rudd London Stroke Clinical Director The Case for Changing Stroke Care Above Target London Stroke Units Sentinel Audit Comparison 2004 and 2006 Below Target Target 91 90 89 88 88 86 84 83 90 80 80 77 76 76

605 views • 25 slides
Mayne Presentation Good evening. Im speaking in support of the short -link proposal between

Mayne Presentation Good evening. Im speaking in support of the short -link proposal between

Mayne Presentation Good evening. Im speaking in support of the short -link proposal between Mayne and Saturna. I support the concept because it deals with those early morning and late night deadhead runs, where BC Ferries move near empty

75 views • 4 slides
Charleston County Greenbelt Advisory Board November 13, 2019 Rules & Procedures

Charleston County Greenbelt Advisory Board November 13, 2019 Rules & Procedures

Charleston County Greenbelt Advisory Board November 13, 2019 Rules & Procedures Amendment incorporates the Greenbelt Application Review Procedure Rules and Procedures may be amended at any regular meeting of the GAB provided

537 views • 16 slides
2015-16 Diversity Report Presented to the University of Colorado Board of Regents June 17, 2016

2015-16 Diversity Report Presented to the University of Colorado Board of Regents June 17, 2016

2015-16 Diversity Report Presented to the University of Colorado Board of Regents June 17, 2016 1 Contents of the Report Campus Efforts to Support Diversity and Inclusiveness Enrollment Degrees Awarded Graduation Rates

385 views • 23 slides
Strict Locality & Phonological Maps Key Points: - Input Strictly Local functions can model

Strict Locality & Phonological Maps Key Points: - Input Strictly Local functions can model

Learnability Strict Locality & Phonological Maps Key Points: - Input Strictly Local functions can model phonological UR-SR maps that involve simultaneous rule applications. - Iterative/spreading processes with two-sided contexts and

284 views • 4 slides

More recommend