PARCC 2016 Final Results District of Columbia Public Schools | - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶

Mar 01, 2023 141 likes •432 views

SLIDE 1

PARCC 2016 Final Results

August 2016

SLIDE 2

PARCC Performance Level Overview

2016 PARCC Results | DCPS

Performance Levels Level 5 Exceeded expectations Level 4 Met expectations Level 3 Approached expectations Level 2 Partially met expectations Level 1 Did not yet meet expectations

Level 4/5 = College‐and‐career ready Demonstrated the academic knowledge, skills and practices necessary to enter directly into and succeed in entry‐level, credit‐bearing courses in college or technical courses requiring college‐level reading, writing, and math.

PARCC reports results according to five performance levels that delineate the knowledge, skills, and practices students are able to demonstrate.

SLIDE 3

Main Takeaways

DCPS improved in Mathematics (+ 3.0%) and held steady (+ 0.6%) in ELA
Most grade levels improved
Most subgroups improved
51 schools improved in both ELA and Math

2016 PARCC Results | DCPS

SLIDE 4

Overall DCPS PARCC Performance (% Level 4/5+)

2016 PARCC Results | DCPS

24.9% 25.5% 20.9% 23.9% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2015 (n = 17,702) 2016 (n = 19,475) 2015 (n = 17,525) 2016 (n = 20,192)

Overall DCPS PARCC % L4 + L5

ELA Math + 0.6% + 3.0%

SLIDE 5

Overall DCPS PARCC Performance Level Distribution

2016 PARCC Results | DCPS

31.8% 31.4% 23.6% 25.2% 23.1% 22.2% 31.4% 29.2% 20.2% 20.9% 24.1% 21.7% 19.7% 20.5% 18.2% 20.3% 5.2% 4.9% 2.7% 3.6% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2015 (n = 17,702) 2016 (n = 19,475) 2015 (n = 17,525) 2016 (n = 20,192)

Overall DCPS PARCC Performance by Achievement Level

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 % L4 + L5 2015: 24.9% 2016: 25.5% ∆: +0.6%

ELA Math % L4 + L5 2015: 20.9% 2016: 23.9% ∆: +3.0%

SLIDE 6

DCPS PARCC Performance, Grades 3‐8 & High School

2016 PARCC Results | DCPS

24.6% 26.5% 27.0% 20.1% 22.6% 26.9% 7.7% 11.1%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

2015 (n: 15508) 2016 (n: 16446) 2015 (n: 2194) 2016 (n: 3029) 2015 (n: 15520) 2016 (n: 16422) 2015 (n: 2005) 2016 (n: 3770)

DCPS PARCC % L4 + L5 by Grade Band

+ 1.8% ‐ 6.9% + 3.4% + 4.3% ELA Gr 3‐8 ELA HS (ELA II) Math Gr 3‐8 Math HS (Geo/Alg II)

SLIDE 7

DCPS PARCC Performance Level Distribution, 3‐8 & High School

2016 PARCC Results | DCPS

30.7% 27.7% 40.1% 51.7% 23.6% 24.5% 23.9% 27.9% 23.9% 23.5% 17.4% 14.9% 29.5% 26.0% 46.5% 42.9% 20.9% 22.3% 15.5% 13.2% 24.4% 22.6% 21.8% 18.1% 19.9% 21.6% 18.3% 14.5% 19.6% 22.5% 7.3% 10.6% 4.7% 4.8% 8.7% 5.6% 3.0% 4.3% 0.4% 0.6% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2015 (n: 15508) 2016 (n: 16446) 2015 (n: 2194) 2016 (n: 3029) 2015 (n: 15520) 2016 (n: 16422) 2015 (n: 2005) 2016 (n: 3770)

DCPS PARCC Performance by Achievement Level and Grade Band

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5

ELA Gr 3‐8 ELA HS (ELA II) Math Gr 3‐8 Math HS (Geo/Alg II)

SLIDE 8

DCPS PARCC Performance by Grade (ELA)

2016 PARCC Results | DCPS

23.9% 24.3% 27.7% 29.1% 23.7% 28.0% 22.9% 25.6% 24.3% 24.6% 24.2% 26.5% 27.0% 20.1%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

2015 (n: 3402) 2016 (n: 3866) 2015 (n: 3137) 2016 (n: 3413) 2015 (n: 2636) 2016 (n: 2943) 2015 (n: 2055) 2016 (n: 1930) 2015 (n: 2048) 2016 (n: 2143) 2015 (n: 2230) 2016 (n: 2151) 2015 (n: 2194) 2016 (n: 3029)

DCPS ELA PARCC % L4 + L5 by Grade

Gr 3 + 0.4% Gr 4 Gr 5 Gr 6 Gr 7 Gr 8 ELA II (HS) + 1.4% + 2.8% + 0.4% + 2.3% ‐ 6.9% + 4.3%

SLIDE 9

DCPS PARCC Performance by Grade (Math)

2016 PARCC Results | DCPS

29.7% 36.1% 28.4% 30.6% 23.3% 28.3% 19.6% 22.9% 15.2% 18.9% 12.2% 14.1% 7.7% 11.1%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

2015 (n: 3403) 2016 (n: 3855) 2015 (n: 3144) 2016 (n: 3399) 2015 (n: 2650) 2016 (n: 2932) 2015 (n: 2045) 2016 (n: 1935) 2015 (n: 2022) 2016 (n: 2145) 2015 (n: 2256) 2016 (n: 2156) 2015 (n: 2005) 2016 (n: 3770)

DCPS Math PARCC % L4 + L5 by Grade

Gr 3 + 6.4% Gr 4 Gr 5 Gr 6 Gr 7 Gr 8 Geo + Alg II (HS) + 2.2% + 3.4% + 3.7% + 1.9% + 3.4% + 5.0%

SLIDE 10

PARCC Performance Level Distribution by Grade (ELA)

2016 PARCC Results | DCPS

36.9% 34.8% 24.3% 23.6% 25.6% 20.0% 27.9% 23.7% 34.7% 32.6% 35.1% 30.7% 40.1% 51.7% 21.2% 21.1% 24.1% 22.7% 27.9% 27.6% 27.0% 25.4% 21.8% 23.5% 21.8% 22.1% 17.4% 14.9% 18.0% 19.7% 23.9% 24.6% 22.8% 24.4% 22.2% 25.2% 19.2% 19.3% 18.9% 20.7% 15.5% 13.2% 22.0% 21.7% 21.9% 22.2% 21.2% 24.9% 18.2% 21.0% 15.1% 17.4% 17.9% 20.8% 18.3% 14.5% 1.9% 2.6% 5.8% 6.9% 2.5% 3.1% 4.6% 4.6% 9.2% 7.3% 6.3% 5.7% 8.7% 5.6% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

DCPS ELA PARCC Performance by Achievement Level and Grade

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5

Gr 3 Gr 8 Gr 4 Gr 5 Gr 6 Gr 7 ELA II (HS)

SLIDE 11

PARCC Performance Level Distribution by Grade (Math)

2016 PARCC Results | DCPS

21.3% 21.7% 20.2% 23.1% 17.3% 17.9% 25.3% 24.6% 25.0% 24.7% 36.3% 40.7% 23.9% 27.9% 23.5% 20.5% 27.5% 24.7% 33.2% 28.2% 31.7% 29.5% 34.7% 32.8% 30.2% 25.0% 46.5% 42.9% 25.5% 21.7% 23.9% 21.6% 26.1% 25.6% 23.5% 23.0% 25.1% 23.6% 21.4% 20.2% 21.8% 18.1% 23.9% 27.7% 25.0% 26.7% 19.8% 23.4% 17.6% 19.3% 14.6% 17.9% 11.7% 13.3% 7.3% 10.6% 5.7% 8.4% 3.4% 3.9% 3.5% 5.0% 2.0% 3.6% 0.6% 1.0% 0.5% 0.8% 0.4% 0.6% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

DCPS Math PARCC Performance by Achievement Level and Grade

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5

Gr 3 Gr 8 Gr 4 Gr 5 Gr 6 Gr 7 Geo + Alg II (HS)

SLIDE 12

DCPS PARCC Performance by Race/Ethnicity (ELA)

2016 PARCC Results | DCPS

13.9% 15.1% 21.7% 22.9% 78.8% 74.0% 65.8% 60.7% 52.6% 54.2% 33.3% 50.0% 22.7% 26.5%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

2015 (n: 11908) 2016 (n: 12814) 2015 (n: 2919) 2016 (n: 3448) 2015 (n: 2180) 2016 (n: 2430) 2015 (n: 319) 2016 (n: 364) 2015 (n: 342) 2016 (n: 373) 2015 (n: 12) 2016 (n: 12) 2015 (n: 22) 2016 (n: 34)

DCPS ELA PARCC % L4 + L5 by Race/Ethnicity

Black + 1.2% Hispanic White Multi‐Racial Asian Am Ind Pac Isl + 1.2% ‐ 5.1% + 1.5% + 16.7% + 3.8% ‐ 4.8%

SLIDE 13

DCPS PARCC Performance by Race/Ethnicity (Math)

2016 PARCC Results | DCPS

10.7% 12.9% 20.3% 22.3% 67.6% 71.5% 55.4% 55.3% 54.8% 57.2% 15.4% 23.1% 19.0% 28.6%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

2015 (n: 11773) 2016 (n: 13098) 2015 (n: 2928) 2016 (n: 3634) 2015 (n: 2133) 2016 (n: 2628) 2015 (n: 312) 2016 (n: 387) 2015 (n: 345) 2016 (n: 397) 2015 (n: 13) 2016 (n: 13) 2015 (n: 21) 2016 (n: 35)

DCPS Math PARCC % L4 + L5 by Race/Ethnicity

Black + 2.2% Hispanic White Multi‐Racial Asian Am Indian Pac Isl + 2.0% ‐ 0.1% + 2.4% + 7.7% + 9.6% + 3.9%

SLIDE 14

PARCC Performance Level Distribution by Race/Eth (ELA)

2016 PARCC Results | DCPS

38.8% 38.2% 29.5% 30.3% 3.7% 4.1% 8.5% 9.6% 12.3% 9.7% 8.3% 25.0% 18.2% 26.5% 26.8% 25.8% 23.7% 22.2% 5.0% 6.3% 9.4% 11.8% 14.0% 13.7% 33.3% 25.0% 31.8% 23.5% 20.5% 21.0% 25.1% 24.5% 12.5% 15.6% 16.3% 17.9% 21.1% 22.5% 25.0% 27.3% 23.5% 12.7% 13.5% 18.6% 19.9% 51.8% 51.7% 44.2% 42.9% 43.3% 40.2% 33.3% 41.7% 18.2% 26.5% 1.2% 1.5% 3.2% 3.0% 27.0% 22.3% 21.6% 17.9% 9.4% 13.9% 0.0% 8.3% 4.5% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

2015 (n: 11908) 2016 (n: 12814) 2015 (n: 2919) 2016 (n: 3448) 2015 (n: 2180) 2016 (n: 2430) 2015 (n: 319) 2016 (n: 364) 2015 (n: 342) 2016 (n: 373) 2015 (n: 12) 2016 (n: 12) 2015 (n: 22) 2016 (n: 34)

DCPS ELA PARCC Performance by Achievement Level and Race/Ethnicity

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5

Black Am Indian Hispanic White Multi‐Racial Asian Pac Isl

SLIDE 15

PARCC Performance Level Distribution by Race/Eth (Math)

2016 PARCC Results | DCPS

29.8% 31.8% 18.3% 21.2% 2.6% 3.2% 6.7% 8.5% 4.1% 5.8% 15.4% 7.7% 23.8% 11.4% 36.4% 34.1% 32.7% 30.6% 8.0% 7.1% 14.7% 13.4% 13.3% 14.9% 30.8% 23.1% 19.0% 28.6% 23.2% 21.2% 28.8% 25.9% 21.8% 18.2% 23.1% 22.7% 27.8% 22.2% 38.5% 46.2% 38.1% 31.4% 10.2% 12.0% 18.4% 20.1% 54.0% 54.8% 43.6% 44.2% 44.9% 45.8% 15.4% 23.1% 19.0% 25.7% 0.4% 1.0% 1.8% 2.2% 13.6% 16.7% 11.9% 11.1% 9.9% 11.3% 0.0% 0.0% 2.9% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

2015 (n: 11773) 2016 (n: 13098) 2015 (n: 2928) 2016 (n: 3634) 2015 (n: 2133) 2016 (n: 2628) 2015 (n: 312) 2016 (n: 387) 2015 (n: 345) 2016 (n: 397) 2015 (n: 13) 2016 (n: 13) 2015 (n: 21) 2016 (n: 35)

DCPS Math PARCC Performance by Achievement Level and Race/Ethnicity

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5

Black Am Indian Hispanic White Multi‐Racial Asian Pac Isl

SLIDE 16

DCPS Performance by Subgroup (ELA)

2016 PARCC Results | DCPS

11.6% 13.9% 3.4% 4.5% 11.8% 14.6% 29.7% 30.5% 20.3% 20.6%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

2015 (n: 2000) 2016 (n: 2495) 2015 (n: 2802) 2016 (n: 3170) 2015 (n: 13306) 2016 (n: 15045) 2015 (n: 8684) 2016 (n: 9549) 2015 (n: 9018) 2016 (n: 9926)

DCPS ELA PARCC % L4 + L5 by Subgroup

ELL + 2.3% SPED Eco Disadvantaged Female Male + 1.1% + 0.8% + 0.3% + 2.8%

SLIDE 17

DCPS Performance by Subgroup (Math)

2016 PARCC Results | DCPS

17.4% 20.0% 2.8% 5.6% 11.0% 13.5% 21.9% 25.2% 19.8% 22.7%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

2015 (n: 2030) 2016 (n: 2588) 2015 (n: 2748) 2016 (n: 3207) 2015 (n: 13211) 2016 (n: 15412) 2015 (n: 8589) 2016 (n: 9916) 2015 (n: 8936) 2016 (n: 10276)

DCPS Math PARCC % L4 + L5 by Subgroup

ELL + 2.6% SPED Eco Disadvantaged Female Male + 2.8% +3.3% + 2.9% + 2.5%

SLIDE 18

PARCC Performance Level Distribution by Subgroup (ELA)

2016 PARCC Results | DCPS

40.7% 40.3% 72.0% 66.7% 40.0% 38.3% 25.2% 24.9% 38.2% 37.8% 27.1% 24.7% 18.3% 19.7% 27.5% 25.7% 22.9% 21.8% 23.2% 22.6% 20.7% 21.0% 6.3% 9.1% 20.7% 21.4% 22.2% 22.9% 18.3% 19.0% 10.9% 12.9% 2.9% 4.2% 11.1% 13.1% 23.0% 23.7% 16.5% 17.5% 0.7% 1.0% 0.4% 0.4% 0.7% 1.4% 6.7% 6.8% 3.8% 3.1% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

2015 (n: 2000) 2016 (n: 2495) 2015 (n: 2802) 2016 (n: 3170) 2015 (n: 13306) 2016 (n: 15045) 2015 (n: 8684) 2016 (n: 9549) 2015 (n: 9018) 2016 (n: 9926)

DCPS ELA PARCC Performance by Achievement Level and Subgroup

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5

ELL SPED Eco Disadvantaged Female Male

SLIDE 19

PARCC Performance Level Distribution by Subgroup (Math)

2016 PARCC Results | DCPS

22.6% 26.4% 53.5% 52.6% 29.3% 31.0% 20.4% 21.9% 26.7% 28.3% 34.5% 32.3% 35.2% 31.3% 36.5% 34.1% 31.5% 29.7% 31.4% 28.6% 25.5% 21.3% 8.5% 10.5% 23.2% 21.4% 26.1% 23.2% 22.1% 20.3% 15.8% 18.0% 2.7% 5.0% 10.4% 12.5% 19.4% 21.6% 17.1% 19.1% 1.6% 2.0% 0.1% 0.6% 0.6% 1.0% 2.5% 3.7% 2.8% 3.6% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

2015 (n: 2030) 2016 (n: 2588) 2015 (n: 2748) 2016 (n: 3207) 2015 (n: 13211) 2016 (n: 15412) 2015 (n: 8589) 2016 (n: 9916) 2015 (n: 8936) 2016 (n: 10276)

DCPS Math PARCC Performance by Achievement Level and Subgroup

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5

ELL SPED Eco Disadvantaged Female Male

SLIDE 20

PARCC Performance, 40/40 Schools

2016 PARCC Results | DCPS

5.8% 7.2% 34.0% 34.3% 5.9% 7.7% 28.0% 31.4%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

2015 (n: 5721) 2016 (n: 6324) 2015 (n: 11981) 2016 (n: 13151) 2015 (n: 5641) 2016 (n: 6346) 2015 (n: 11884) 2016 (n: 13846)

DCPS ELA PARCC % L4 + L5 by 40/40 Status

+ 1.4% + 0.3% + 3.4% + 1.8% ELA 40/40 ELA Non‐40/40 Math 40/40 Math Non‐40/40

SLIDE 21

PARCC Performance Level Distribution, 40/40 Schools

2016 PARCC Results | DCPS

49.3% 49.6% 23.5% 22.7% 37.5% 39.7% 17.0% 18.5% 29.0% 27.0% 20.2% 19.9% 38.6% 35.9% 28.0% 26.1% 15.9% 16.1% 22.3% 23.2% 18.0% 16.8% 27.0% 24.0% 5.6% 6.8% 26.4% 27.1% 5.8% 7.2% 24.1% 26.3% 0.1% 0.4% 7.7% 7.1% 0.2% 0.5% 3.8% 5.1% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

2015 (n: 5721) 2016 (n: 6324) 2015 (n: 11981) 2016 (n: 13151) 2015 (n: 5641) 2016 (n: 6346) 2015 (n: 11884) 2016 (n: 13846)

DCPS PARCC Performance by Achievement Level and 40/40 Status

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5

ELA 40/40 ELA Non‐40/40 Math 40/40 Math Non‐40/40

SLIDE 22

PARCC Performance, by Ward

2016 PARCC Results | DCPS

Ward ELA Math 2015 2016 Change 2015 2016 Change # Takers % L4 + L5 # Takers % L4 + L5 # Takers % L4 + L5 # Takers % L4 + L5 Ward 1 1,753 19.9% 2,031 23.1% 3.2% 1,731 14.8% 2,147 19.0% 4.1% Ward 2 1,045 40.1% 1,072 44.8% 4.7% 1,007 33.3% 1,229 41.8% 8.6% Ward 3 3,183 64.6% 3,433 59.9% ‐4.7% 3,152 49.4% 3,719 52.4% 3.0% Ward 4 2,319 23.2% 2,834 23.4% 0.2% 2,322 24.1% 2,865 24.7% 0.6% Ward 5 1,561 12.2% 1,767 12.1% ‐0.2% 1,573 7.8% 1,841 7.9% 0.1% Ward 6 2,681 21.3% 2,880 24.0% 2.7% 2,697 19.1% 2,873 22.8% 3.6% Ward 7 2,116 6.6% 2,199 8.1% 1.5% 2,068 8.0% 2,226 9.8% 1.8% Ward 8 2,849 4.9% 3,098 6.7% 1.8% 2,782 5.0% 3,120 7.6% 2.7%

SLIDE 23

Achievement Gap

2016 PARCC Results | DCPS

13.9% 15.1% 21.7% 22.9% 78.8% 74.0% 65.8% 60.7% 52.6% 54.2% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2015 2016

ELA

White (‐4.8%) Multi‐Racial (‐5.1%) Asian (+1.5%) Hispanic (+1.2%) Black (+1.2%) 10.7% 12.9% 20.3% 22.3% 67.6% 71.5% 55.4% 55.3% 54.8% 57.2% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2015 2016

Math

White (+3.9%) Multi‐Racial (‐0.2%) Asian (+2.4%) Hispanic (+2.0%) Black (+2.3%)

SLIDE 24

School‐Level Results

SLIDE 25

Schools Making Significant Gains in Both Subjects

2016 PARCC Results | DCPS

Change in % L4 & L5 School ELA Math Amidon‐Bowen ES +7.0% +6.8% Bancroft ES +8.2% +10.3% Barnard ES +7.1% +10.5% Beers ES +11.9% +9.5% Benjamin Banneker HS +24.1% +30% Brightwood EC +5.7% +4.8% Burroughs ES +11.1% +15.7% C.W. Harris ES +3.6% +7.1% Garrison ES +9.3% +8.3% H.D. Cooke ES +8.2% +17.2% Hardy MS +15.8% +9.3% Hearst ES +14.1% +12.3% Houston ES +4.7% +7.0% Hyde‐Addison ES +6.1% +24.1% Change in % L4 & L5 School ELA Math Ketcham ES +5.0% +18.0% Key ES +6.8% +7.3% King, M.L. ES +3.3% +7.4% LaSalle‐Backus EC +2.3% +6.4% Leckie ES +4.2% +4.4% Marie Reed ES +17.0% +9.9% McKinley Tech HS +5.7% +4.0% Nalle ES +4.2% +5.7% Oyster‐Adams Bilingual +5.2% +4.9% Raymond EC +6.2% +2.5% School‐Within‐School +19.7% +6.9% Seaton ES +5.6% +12.2% Stanton ES +5.6% +9.9% Stoddert ES +8.5% +3.5% Thomson ES +8.2% +10.4%

SLIDE 26

DCPS 3‐8 Schools

2016 PARCC Results | DCPS

26 ELA Math 2015 2016 Change 2015 2016 Change # Takers % L4 + L5 # Takers % L4 + L5 # Takers % L4 + L5 # Takers % L4 + L5 Aiton ES 75 4% 73 5% 1.5% 75 7% 73 14% 7.0% Amidon‐Bowen ES 131 2% 140 9% 7.0% 131 5% 140 12% 6.8% Bancroft ES 178 12% 190 20% 8.2% 178 20% 190 30% 10.3% Barnard ES 181 25% 213 32% 7.1% 189 23% 213 34% 10.5% Beers ES 148 5% 133 17% 11.9% 147 12% 133 21% 9.5% Brent ES 107 68% 128 61% ‐7.3% 107 57% 128 61% 3.9% Brightwood EC 281 6% 347 12% 5.7% 282 16% 353 20% 4.8% Brookland MS 281 15% 283 5% Browne EC 162 6% 146 7% 0.7% 163 6% 145 6% 0.1% Bruce‐Monroe ES 146 15% 171 14% ‐1.0% 148 18% 171 25% 6.9% Bunker Hill ES 58 17% 58 21% Burroughs ES 121 13% 78 24% 11.1% 122 16% 78 32% 15.7% Burrville ES 95 14% 90 10% ‐3.7% 95 13% 90 11% ‐1.5% C.W. Harris ES 88 1% 106 5% 3.6% 87 2% 106 9% 7.1% Capitol Hill Montessori 59 37% 94 35% ‐2.2% 59 20% 94 34% 13.7% Cleveland ES 96 31% 105 29% ‐2.7% 96 26% 105 33% 7.3% Deal MS 1,276 68% 1,307 63% ‐5.3% 1,276 44% 1,313 50% 6.5% Dorothy I Height ES 19% 149 23% 3.8% 20% 149 19% ‐0.5% Drew ES 54 13% 80 24% 10.8% 54 24% 79 19% ‐5.1% Eaton ES 207 71% 207 71% 0.5% 208 67% 202 71% 3.5% Eliot‐Hine MS 201 5% 173 9% 3.8% 200 1% 172 1% 0.2% Garfield ES 90 7% 116 16% 8.9% 90 11% 116 11% 0.1% Garrison ES 45 4% 58 14% 9.3% 47 11% 58 19% 8.3% H.D. Cooke ES 142 8% 138 16% 8.2% 142 17% 138 34% 17.2% Hardy MS 356 24% 335 40% 15.8% 356 22% 336 31% 9.3% Hart MS 388 1% 334 2% 1.1% 385 1% 334 1% 0.2% Hearst ES 116 41% 119 55% 14.1% 116 44% 119 56% 12.3% Hendley ES 194 2% 179 2% 0.2% 196 2% 179 2% 0.7% Houston ES 86 1% 86 6% 4.7% 86 5% 86 12% 7.0%

SLIDE 27

DCPS 3‐8 Schools

2016 PARCC Results | DCPS

27 ELA Math 2015 2016 Change 2015 2016 Change # Takers % L4 + L5 # Takers % L4 + L5 # Takers % L4 + L5 # Takers % L4 + L5 Hyde‐Addison ES 135 55% 128 61% 6.1% 136 49% 128 73% 24.1% J.O. Wilson ES 137 23% 163 24% 1.3% 136 34% 162 35% 0.7% Janney ES 258 81% 301 69% ‐11.2% 260 67% 299 77% 10.0% Jefferson MS Academy 255 16% 253 17% 0.1% 256 9% 253 16% 6.8% Johnson, John Hayden MS 212 3% 234 4% 0.5% 198 1% 245 2% 1.5% Kelly Miller MS 461 8% 401 8% ‐0.5% 459 7% 402 7% ‐0.4% Ketcham ES 85 8% 98 13% 5.0% 83 16% 98 34% 18.0% Key ES 145 65% 141 72% 6.8% 146 65% 141 72% 7.3% Kimball ES 131 4% 128 5% 0.9% 131 8% 128 13% 4.1% King, M.L. ES 135 5% 142 8% 3.3% 134 6% 142 13% 7.4% Kramer MS 272 2% 216 3% 0.6% 266 2% 217 0% ‐1.0% Lafayette ES 289 71% 287 67% ‐3.7% 291 73% 282 83% 9.8% Langdon ES 156 12% 107 11% ‐0.3% 156 12% 107 15% 3.4% Langley ES 69 19% 90 13% ‐5.5% 69 23% 86 20% ‐3.4% LaSalle‐Backus EC 177 8% 186 11% 2.3% 177 7% 182 13% 6.4% Leckie ES 138 24% 174 28% 4.2% 138 21% 173 25% 4.4% Ludlow‐Taylor ES 79 25% 96 42% 16.4% 79 41% 96 40% ‐0.9% Malcolm X ES 74 3% 78 5% 2.4% 74 4% 78 1% ‐2.8% Mann ES 97 80% 129 81% 1.0% 97 61% 129 77% 15.9% Marie Reed ES 123 18% 129 35% 17.0% 123 33% 132 42% 9.9% Maury ES 117 44% 126 44% 0.0% 117 44% 126 44% 0.1% McKinley MS 175 12% 204 9% ‐2.7% 174 6% 206 4% ‐2.4% Miner ES 118 10% 140 9% ‐0.9% 117 21% 137 24% 3.6% Moten ES 128 9% 148 3% ‐5.2% 128 2% 148 7% 4.4% Murch ES 251 66% 261 66% 0.1% 253 69% 262 70% 1.5% Nalle ES 113 5% 126 10% 4.2% 113 14% 126 20% 5.7% Noyes ES 140 8% 67 7% ‐0.4% 138 7% 65 14% 7.3% Orr ES 115 12% 142 14% 1.9% 115 8% 142 15% 7.7% Oyster‐Adams Bilingual 377 55% 388 60% 5.2% 376 49% 390 54% 4.9%

SLIDE 28

DCPS 3‐8 Schools

2016 PARCC Results | DCPS

28 ELA Math 2015 2016 Change 2015 2016 Change # Takers % L4 + L5 # Takers % L4 + L5 # Takers % L4 + L5 # Takers % L4 + L5 Patterson ES 118 8% 137 6% ‐2.6% 119 9% 135 7% ‐1.8% Payne ES 83 7% 107 8% 1.2% 85 14% 103 22% 8.2% Plummer ES 133 5% 151 5% 0.1% 136 4% 151 7% 2.2% Powell ES 138 15% 178 10% ‐5.7% 139 35% 178 28% ‐6.4% Randle Highlands ES 107 8% 126 7% ‐1.3% 105 14% 127 17% 2.2% Raymond EC 250 16% 266 22% 6.2% 253 13% 263 16% 2.5% Ross ES 51 71% 51 71% 0.0% 51 75% 51 75% 0.0% Savoy ES 140 4% 127 6% 1.2% 141 4% 127 9% 4.4% School‐Within‐School 39 46% 79 66% 19.7% 39 56% 79 63% 6.9% Seaton ES 77 18% 80 24% 5.6% 77 29% 81 41% 12.2% Shepherd ES 135 47% 137 46% ‐1.4% 135 39% 138 48% 8.6% Simon ES 110 7% 125 6% ‐1.7% 110 10% 125 14% 4.4% Smothers ES 84 8% 86 6% ‐2.5% 83 8% 86 8% ‐0.3% Sousa MS 247 6% 231 8% 1.7% 246 4% 230 3% ‐1.5% Stanton ES 222 4% 206 9% 5.6% 222 9% 206 19% 9.9% Stoddert ES 133 63% 166 72% 8.5% 134 72% 166 76% 3.5% Stuart‐Hobson MS 405 24% 405 24% 0.5% 401 10% 405 11% 0.6% SWW @ Francis‐Stevens 216 29% 240 26% ‐2.5% 216 18% 240 25% 6.9% Takoma EC 197 18% 227 17% ‐0.6% 197 12% 227 11% ‐0.7% Thomas ES 130 15% 136 11% ‐3.6% 130 8% 136 13% 4.0% Thomson ES 95 21% 99 29% 8.2% 97 33% 99 43% 10.4% Truesdell EC 220 13% 252 18% 4.7% 222 19% 254 16% ‐3.2% Tubman ES 164 15% 203 11% ‐3.3% 164 18% 203 18% 0.5% Turner ES 126 2% 156 5% 2.7% 125 1% 155 1% ‐0.2% Tyler ES 130 18% 162 23% 5.0% 130 27% 162 19% ‐8.4% Walker‐Jones EC 191 9% 174 8% ‐1.4% 194 6% 169 5% ‐0.9% Watkins ES 298 34% 280 30% ‐3.9% 299 35% 280 39% 4.1% West EC 116 28% 134 26% ‐2.3% 116 21% 134 25% 3.9% Wheatley EC 219 5% 183 4% ‐0.7% 217 6% 181 6% ‐0.5% Whittier EC 176 15% 164 15% ‐0.1% 172 12% 156 11% ‐1.3%

SLIDE 29

DCPS High Schools

2016 PARCC Results | DCPS

ELA Math 2015 2016 Change 2015 2016 Change # Takers % L4 + L5 # Takers % L4 + L5 # Takers % L4 + L5 # Takers % L4 + L5 Anacostia HS 97 2% 149 3% 0.6% 96 0% 152 0% 0.0% Ballou HS 122 0% 245 3% 2.9% 87 0% 251 0% 0.4% Ballou STAY 4 14 0% 2 15 0% Benjamin Banneker HS 109 74% 125 98% 24.1% 111 32% 130 62% 30.0% Cardozo EC 142 5% 236 7% 1.9% 186 2% 183 2% 0.6% Columbia Heights EC 507 13% 541 19% 5.5% 463 8% 696 5% ‐2.2% Coolidge HS 71 8% 90 11% 2.7% 53 0% 128 0% 0.0% Dunbar HS 97 8% 231 5% ‐3.5% 89 0% 237 1% 0.8% Eastern HS 233 11% 251 18% 6.8% 248 2% 261 1% ‐0.5% Ellington School of the Arts 125 50% 124 39% ‐10.9% 100 3% 125 9% 5.8% Luke Moore Alternative HS 24 4% 52 0% ‐4.2% 31 0% 46 0% 0.0% McKinley Tech HS 135 30% 147 36% 5.7% 157 6% 212 10% 4.0% Phelps ACE HS 118 17% 75 13% ‐3.6% 109 3% 91 1% ‐1.7% Roosevelt HS 65 0% 155 7% 7.1% 74 0% 159 1% 0.6% Roosevelt STAY 2 15 0% 1 14 0% School Without Walls HS 143 97% 157 84% ‐12.4% 100 76% 313 52% ‐23.9% Washington Metropolitan HS 9 11% 44 0% ‐11.1% 9 51 0% 0.0% Wilson HS 317 50% 411 21% ‐28.9% 279 8% 695 18% 10.5% Woodson, H.D. HS 118 0% 192 4% 3.6% 75 0% 215 1% 0.9%