5 th STREET BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT Decem ber 21, 20 10 5th - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶

Oct 11, 2022 241 likes •464 views

Yuba City & Ma ry sv ille, CA Project Study Report/ Project Report and Environm ental Docum ent 5 th STREET BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT Decem ber 21, 20 10 5th Street Brid ge Rep la cem ent Project Agenda What is a Project Study Report/

SLIDE 1

Project Study Report/ Project Report and Environm ental Docum ent

5th STREET BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT

Yuba City & Ma ry sv ille, CA Decem ber 21, 20 10

SLIDE 2

5th Street Brid ge Rep la cem ent Project

Agenda What is a Project Study Report/ Project Report? Schedule and Funding 4 Lane New Bridge under Railroad Tracks

―2 Lane could be a first phase

4 Lane New Bridge over Railroad Tracks Why a 4 Lane Bridge ? Bike & Pedestrian Pathway Public Input

SLIDE 3

5th Street Brid ge Rep la cem ent Project

PSR / PR Process

PSR = Project Study Report

Clearly define Need and Purpose Develop Alternatives Look at Environm ental Constraints River Hydraulics Public Input Narrow Alternatives

SLIDE 4

5th Street Brid ge Rep la cem ent Project

PSR/ PR Process

PR = Project Report

Environm ental Study & Docum entation Traffic Evaluations Engineering Estim ates Selection of Specific Project Description

After this – design starts!

SLIDE 5

5th Street Brid ge Rep la cem ent Project

Funding

$

Seismic Retrofit Program $ 30.0 Million High Priority Project Grant (Earmark) $ 3.6 Million $3.5 Million TOTAL Regional Surface Transportation Program $37.1 Million

FUNDING SECURED

SLIDE 6

5th Street Brid ge Rep la cem ent Project

Project Schedule

Start PSR/ PR 9 / 1 0 Draft PSR/ PR, Environ. Studies 6 / 1 1 1 0 / 1 1 1 / 1 2 6 / 1 2 5 / 1 4 2 0 1 5 Open Facility Start Construction PSR/ PR Approve d Final ED 2 nd Public Meetings Draft ED 1 st Public Meeting 1 / 1 1 Design

SLIDE 7

5th Street Brid ge Rep la cem ent Project

Option 1: Four Lane Crossing

Replace with New Bridge
Approach Work in Both Cities

Major Increase in Operational Perform ance

SLIDE 8

5th Street Brid ge Rep la cem ent Project

Option 2: 2-Lane as Phase 1

Replace the Bridge
Im prove Approaches in Both Cities

Minor Increase in Operational Perform ance

SLIDE 9

5th Street Brid ge Rep la cem ent Project

Option 3: 4-Lane Concept, Over Railroad

Cross Over UPR Tracks into Marysville
Replace with 4 Lane Bridge
Greater Im pacts to Marysville

SLIDE 10

5th Street Brid ge Rep la cem ent Project

Traffic Considerations

Eastbound Traffic Choke Points

―Intersection of Shasta/ Bridge Streets ―Merge Onto the Bridge

SLIDE 11

5th Street Brid ge Rep la cem ent Project

Traffic Considerations

Westbound Traffic Choke Point

– Lane drop after J Street

SLIDE 12

5th Street Brid ge Rep la cem ent Project

Why is a 4 Lane Bridge Necessary?

Northbound Hwy 70 = 2,496 PM peak hour
Over Half, 1,434 utilize the Fifth St. Bridge
Current System Restriction is the Bridge

SLIDE 13

5th Street Brid ge Rep la cem ent Project

Why is a 4 Lane Bridge Necessary?

Peak Hour System Capacity

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Existing 2 Lane w / App Work 2 Lane Theoretical 4 Lane Series1

SLIDE 14

5th Street Brid ge Rep la cem ent Project

Bike / Pedestrian Pathway Options

Path on New Bridge
Path on UPR Bridge
Either One is Feasible
$’s Now vs $’s Later

SLIDE 15

5th Street Brid ge Rep la cem ent Project

Public Outreach Plan Initial Public Meeting in each City

Listen to public input
Explain process & funding
Present why 2-Lanes is even a consideration

Second Public Meeting in each City

Present proposed project
Explain how their com m ents influenced project

Website, Mailers, Meet with Businesses

SLIDE 16

5th Street Brid ge Rep la cem ent Project

Questions ???

SLIDE 17

5th Street Brid ge Rep la cem ent Project

END OF PRESENTATION

SLIDE 18

5th Street Brid ge Rep la cem ent Project

Bike / Pedestrian Pathway Considerations

CONSIDERATION PATH ON NEW BRIDGE PATH ON EXISTING UPRR BRIDGE Hydraulics Removes constrictions in river Retains 37 bents in the river Maintenance Minor Trash Removal Repainting, Scour and Asphalt Max Credible EQ Best Protection Permanent Unrepairable Damage Major Flood Event Best Protection Closed During Flood Events Bike/Ped Experience Less Appealing Superior with less noise & exhaust Initial Capital Cost $3.5 Million $1.3 Million, including Lighting 75-Year Maintenance Cost $0.2 Million $2.1 Million Aesthetics Unrestricted view of new bridge Landmark structure preserved and re-used

SLIDE 19

5th Street Brid ge Rep la cem ent Project

Project Photos

SLIDE 20