scope of coverage and point of regulation scope of
play

Scope of Coverage and Point of Regulation Scope of Coverage and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Scope of Coverage and Point of Regulation Scope of Coverage and Point of Regulation for a Potential Greenhouse Gas for a Potential Greenhouse Gas Cap- -and and- -Trade Program Trade Program Cap Josh Bushinsky Josh Bushinsky Pew Center on


  1. Scope of Coverage and Point of Regulation Scope of Coverage and Point of Regulation for a Potential Greenhouse Gas for a Potential Greenhouse Gas Cap- -and and- -Trade Program Trade Program Cap Josh Bushinsky Josh Bushinsky Pew Center on Global Climate Change Pew Center on Global Climate Change 1 1

  2. Outline Outline • Definitions • Scope • Point of Regulation • Other considerations 2 2

  3. Scope of Coverage Scope of Coverage • What GHG emissions are included in the cap and trade program? – What greenhouse gases? – What sectors? – What facilities? What types and thresholds? – What fuels? – Combustion emissions included? Process-related emissions? – Embodied emissions? 3

  4. Point of Regulation Point of Regulation • Who has the obligation to surrender allowances to match emissions? – Upstream (where GHGs enter the economy, or close) – Downstream (where GHGs are emitted into the atmosphere) – Midstream (e.g. local distribution companies) – Other (e.g. vehicle manufacturers) – Hybrid (cover large sources downstream, address the rest of the economy at a different point of regulation or through other policy tools) 4 4

  5. Criteria Criteria • Integrity of emissions data – Availability of data before setting baseline key consideration – Ability to measure, monitor & report emissions data at the point of regulation • AB 32 requirements – Consider direct, indirect, cumulative and localized impacts – Prevent increase in toxic or criteria air pollutants – Maximize additional economic and environmental benefits for California 5

  6. Criteria Criteria • Breadth of coverage – Greater coverage increases availability of low-cost reductions • Number of covered sources – Too large a number administratively complex – Too small a number threatens viability of emissions commodities market • Acceptable risk of leakage • Interaction with existing and proposed policies – Policies may be complimentary or may interfere 6 6

  7. GHG Emissions Sources GHG Emissions Sources in California in California 2004 Emissions (480 MMT CO 2 E) Agriculture 6% Transportation Commercial 38% 3% Electricity Generation (Imports) 13% Residential Electricity 6% Generation (In State) Industrial 12% 20% 7 7

  8. Electricity Electricity • CPUC/CEC Joint Proceeding Proposed Decision – Include electricity as part of a multi-sector cap-and-trade program. – Exclude residential and commercial natural gas. – First deliverer approach to point of regulation. 8 8

  9. Large Industrial Point Sources Large Industrial Point Sources • Good candidates for inclusion in a market system – Significant amount of emissions from relatively few sources. – Accurate emissions monitoring methods for these facilities. • How should imports be treated? – Deliver approach for all goods is conceivable but highly complex administratively, but may be workable for some goods. 9 9

  10. Transportation Fuels Transportation Fuels • ARB recognizes the importance of achieving reductions from this sector – What are the appropriate ways to achieve these reductions • More than one tool will be necessary • Existing programs: – Low Carbon Fuel Standard – Pavley Tailpipe Standards 10

  11. Transportation Fuels Transportation Fuels • Part of a cap-and-trade? • Reductions depend in part on elasticity of demand for transportation fuels • How would this affect the transition to low carbon electricity-based vehicles? 11

  12. Agriculture and Forestry Agriculture and Forestry • Many, many sources • Often difficult to measure emissions, administer compliance • Thus may not be appropriate for inclusion in a cap-and-trade program • Potential offset opportunities • Initial forestry sequestration protocol, which was adopted by CARB in 2007, applies to a portion of California’s forest lands, provide potential approach 12 12

  13. Point of Regulation: What are Point of Regulation: What are “Upstream Upstream” ” and and “ “Downstream Downstream” ”? ? “ • Refers to position of greenhouse gases as they move through the economy from production or introduction into commerce, to emission into the atmosphere 13

  14. Point of Regulation: What are Point of Regulation: What are “Upstream Upstream” ” and and “ “Downstream Downstream” ”? ? “ • Downstream: – at the point of emission • Upstream: – at choke points toward the upstream end of the spectrum (refiners, importers, natural gas processors, coal prep plants) – Most fuels move through these facilities – Generally not all the way upstream 14

  15. Upstream/Downstream Upstream/Downstream UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Electricity Coal Generation Extracted Coal Preparation Large Industrial/ Natural Gas Commercial Extracted Transmission Processing Sources Natural Gas and Import LDC/ Small Industrial/ Distribution Petroleum Commercial/ Extracted Crude Refining Residential Sources Petroleum and Import Transportation 15

  16. Natural Gas Natural Gas UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Electricity Generation Large Industrial/ Natural Gas Commercial Extracted Transmission Processing Sources Natural Gas and Import LDC/ Small Industrial/ Distribution Commercial/ Residential Sources 16

  17. Why Upstream? Why Upstream? • Most comprehensive coverage at the smallest number of facilities – Greater coverage leads to lower costs • Possibility of lower administrative costs • View that response to price signal independent of point of regulation 17

  18. Why Downstream? Why Downstream? • View that point of regulation does affect behavior; that emitters generally have more compliance options than fuel providers; and that it’s appropriate for regulated entities to be the ones with options • Most real-world experience is with downstream (acid rain, eastern NO x program, EU ETS); or upstream where substitutes are available (lead in gasoline) 18

  19. Why Downstream? Why Downstream? • Facility-level data availability (already reported for electric power plants; protocols and data collection easily expandable to other large stationary combustors) • Automatically rewards CO 2 emissions- reducing technologies (CCS, etc.); not just technologies that reduce fuel C content 19

  20. Additional Considerations Additional Considerations • Is there an in-state entity able to legally and effectively cover emissions? • An upstream system at regional level requires covering imports into the region • For electricity a key issue is how to deal with imports 20

  21. Additional Considerations Additional Considerations • Thresholds – What size emissions source? – Implications for administrative costs and coverage • Phasing – Could additional sectors or sources be included over time? – Under what conditions? 21 21

  22. Western Climate Initiative Scope Western Climate Initiative Scope • WCI is releasing draft recommendations on scope and the electricity sector next week • WCI recommendations are being informed by ARB staff work • Coordination efforts are ongoing 22 22

  23. Questions? 23

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend