Scope of Coverage and Point of Regulation Scope of Coverage and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

scope of coverage and point of regulation scope of
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Scope of Coverage and Point of Regulation Scope of Coverage and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Scope of Coverage and Point of Regulation Scope of Coverage and Point of Regulation for a Potential Greenhouse Gas for a Potential Greenhouse Gas Cap- -and and- -Trade Program Trade Program Cap Josh Bushinsky Josh Bushinsky Pew Center on


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Scope of Coverage and Point of Regulation Scope of Coverage and Point of Regulation for a Potential Greenhouse Gas for a Potential Greenhouse Gas Cap Cap-

  • and

and-

  • Trade Program

Trade Program

Josh Bushinsky Josh Bushinsky Pew Center on Global Climate Change Pew Center on Global Climate Change

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Outline Outline

  • Definitions
  • Scope
  • Point of Regulation
  • Other considerations

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Scope of Coverage Scope of Coverage

  • What GHG emissions are included in the

cap and trade program?

– What greenhouse gases? – What sectors? – What facilities? What types and thresholds? – What fuels? – Combustion emissions included? Process-related emissions? – Embodied emissions?

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

  • Who has the obligation to surrender

allowances to match emissions?

– Upstream (where GHGs enter the economy, or close) – Downstream (where GHGs are emitted into the atmosphere) – Midstream (e.g. local distribution companies) – Other (e.g. vehicle manufacturers) – Hybrid (cover large sources downstream, address the rest of the economy at a different point of regulation or through other policy tools)

Point of Regulation Point of Regulation

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Criteria Criteria

  • Integrity of emissions data

– Availability of data before setting baseline key consideration – Ability to measure, monitor & report emissions data at the point of regulation

  • AB 32 requirements

– Consider direct, indirect, cumulative and localized impacts – Prevent increase in toxic or criteria air pollutants – Maximize additional economic and environmental benefits for California

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Criteria Criteria

  • Breadth of coverage

– Greater coverage increases availability of low-cost reductions

  • Number of covered sources

– Too large a number administratively complex – Too small a number threatens viability of emissions commodities market

  • Acceptable risk of leakage
  • Interaction with existing and proposed

policies

– Policies may be complimentary or may interfere

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

GHG Emissions Sources GHG Emissions Sources in California in California

7

2004 Emissions (480 MMT CO2E)

Electricity Generation (Imports) 13% Electricity Generation (In State) 12% Residential 6% Commercial 3% Agriculture 6% Transportation 38% Industrial 20%

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Electricity Electricity

  • CPUC/CEC Joint Proceeding Proposed

Decision

– Include electricity as part of a multi-sector cap-and-trade program. – Exclude residential and commercial natural gas. – First deliverer approach to point of regulation.

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Large Industrial Point Sources Large Industrial Point Sources

  • Good candidates for inclusion in a market

system

– Significant amount of emissions from relatively few sources. – Accurate emissions monitoring methods for these facilities.

  • How should imports be treated?

– Deliver approach for all goods is conceivable but highly complex administratively, but may be workable for some goods.

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Transportation Fuels Transportation Fuels

  • ARB recognizes the importance of

achieving reductions from this sector

– What are the appropriate ways to achieve these reductions

  • More than one tool will be necessary
  • Existing programs:

– Low Carbon Fuel Standard – Pavley Tailpipe Standards

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Transportation Fuels Transportation Fuels

  • Part of a cap-and-trade?
  • Reductions depend in part on elasticity of

demand for transportation fuels

  • How would this affect the transition to low

carbon electricity-based vehicles?

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Agriculture and Forestry Agriculture and Forestry

  • Many, many sources
  • Often difficult to measure emissions,

administer compliance

  • Thus may not be appropriate for inclusion

in a cap-and-trade program

  • Potential offset opportunities
  • Initial forestry sequestration protocol,

which was adopted by CARB in 2007, applies to a portion of California’s forest lands, provide potential approach

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Point of Regulation: What are Point of Regulation: What are “ “Upstream Upstream” ” and and “ “Downstream Downstream” ”? ?

  • Refers to position of greenhouse gases as

they move through the economy from production or introduction into commerce, to emission into the atmosphere

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Point of Regulation: What are Point of Regulation: What are “ “Upstream Upstream” ” and and “ “Downstream Downstream” ”? ?

  • Downstream:

– at the point of emission

  • Upstream:

– at choke points toward the upstream end of the spectrum (refiners, importers, natural gas processors, coal prep plants) – Most fuels move through these facilities – Generally not all the way upstream

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Upstream/Downstream Upstream/Downstream

15

Extracted Coal Extracted Natural Gas Extracted Crude Petroleum Coal Preparation Natural Gas Processing and Import Petroleum Refining and Import Transmission LDC/ Distribution Electricity Generation Large Industrial/ Commercial Sources Small Industrial/ Commercial/ Residential Sources Transportation UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Natural Gas Natural Gas

16

Extracted Natural Gas Natural Gas Processing and Import Transmission LDC/ Distribution Electricity Generation Large Industrial/ Commercial Sources Small Industrial/ Commercial/ Residential Sources UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Why Upstream? Why Upstream?

  • Most comprehensive coverage at the

smallest number of facilities

– Greater coverage leads to lower costs

  • Possibility of lower administrative costs
  • View that response to price signal

independent of point of regulation

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Why Downstream? Why Downstream?

  • View that point of regulation does affect

behavior; that emitters generally have more compliance options than fuel providers; and that it’s appropriate for regulated entities to be the ones with

  • ptions
  • Most real-world experience is with

downstream (acid rain, eastern NOx program, EU ETS); or upstream where substitutes are available (lead in gasoline)

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Why Downstream? Why Downstream?

  • Facility-level data availability (already

reported for electric power plants; protocols and data collection easily expandable to other large stationary combustors)

  • Automatically rewards CO2 emissions-

reducing technologies (CCS, etc.); not just technologies that reduce fuel C content

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Additional Considerations Additional Considerations

  • Is there an in-state entity able to legally

and effectively cover emissions?

  • An upstream system at regional level

requires covering imports into the region

  • For electricity a key issue is how to deal

with imports

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Additional Considerations Additional Considerations

21

  • Thresholds

– What size emissions source? – Implications for administrative costs and coverage

  • Phasing

– Could additional sectors or sources be included over time? – Under what conditions?

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Western Climate Initiative Scope Western Climate Initiative Scope

22

  • WCI is releasing draft recommendations
  • n scope and the electricity sector next

week

  • WCI recommendations are being informed

by ARB staff work

  • Coordination efforts are ongoing
slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Questions?