20 2016 6 OC OCUF UFA Study: udy: Publ blic ic Percept ptio - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

20 2016 6 OC OCUF UFA Study: udy: Publ blic ic Percept ptio ions ns of Precar ario ious us Ac Academi demic c Work Research Presentation February 11 th 2016

Ov Over erview iew 1. Methodology 2. Key Issues: Public Perceptions and Concerns 3. Post-Secondary Education in Ontario: Public Perceptions 4. Precarious Employment in Academia: Awareness and Impressions 5. Strategic Implications: Charting the Way Forward 2

Met ethodology odology  The 2016 OCUFA Study of Precarious Employment in Academia was undertaken by Mission Research on behalf of OCUFA.  Findings were derived from online interviews undertaken using a random sample of 1,000 English- speaking Ontarians 18 years of age and over. Data was collected between January 4 th and January 8 th , 2016.  A corresponding random sample of this size would yield results accurate to within ±3.1 percentage points, 19 times out of 20; the margin of error for sub-populations is higher due to smaller sample sizes. Data has been weighted by region, gender and age group using the latest Census figures from Statistics  Canada. In turn, results are representative of all adult English-speaking Ontarians. Detailed findings from the report can be found at: www.OCUFA.on.ca  3

Key ey Iss ssue ues Public Perceptions and Concerns 4

Mos ost Im Impor ortant tant Is Issu sue e In In On Ontario: ario: One In Four Ontarians Identify “Economy” or “Jobs/Unemployment” Most Important Issue In Ontario Economy and jobs = 25%  Issues related to education, schools, or tuition were mentioned by just 2% of respondents. 5

Maj ajor or Is Issu sues es of Co Conce cern: n: Quality of University Education of “Some Concern” to Ontarians Level of Concern About Issues (scale: 0 – 10) Very concerned (=>8.0) Concerned (7.0-8.0) Some concern (5.0-6.0)  Over half (52%) of Ontarians are concerned about the quality of university education in Ontario at present (rating of =>7.0). 6

Post st-Se Secondar condary y Edu ducat catio ion n in in Public Perceptions On Ontari rio 7

Th The e St Stat ate e of P Pos ost-Se Secon condar ary y Educ ucation ation In In On Ontario: ario: One In Four Believe Quality of University Education Has “Declined” Quality of university education in the last five years has… Overall Concern Rating: 6.0 Priority level for the quality of PSE in Ontario “Priority“ = 78%  Over two in five young Ontarians aged 18-29 believe that post-secondary education should be a “very high priority” for the provincial government (44%). 8

Ge Gener eral al Per erce ceptions tions Of Of Un Univer versit sity y Education ucation In In On Ontario: ario: Four In Five Believe Ontario Universities Provide “High Quality” Education % Agree Level of Agreement 76% 81% 70% 63% 55%  Three in five (61%) Ontarians with post- graduate certification believe that the province’s universities do an effective job preparing students for the workplace . 9

Precar ario ious us Empl ployme oyment nt in in Awareness and Impressions Ac Academ demia ia 10

Per erce ceptions tions of Pr Prec ecari arious ous Jo Jobs: s: Half Identify Jobs in “Hospitality Services”; Less Than One In Five Think Of Academic Jobs Types of precarious jobs Are professors’ jobs precarious?  Ontarians with post-graduate level education are twice as likely as less educated individuals to be aware of the potential precariousness of university faculty positions (30%). 11

Awar arenes eness s of Pr Prec ecario arious us Employ loyment ment In In Aca cademia: demia: Nea earl rly Two-Thir Thirds ds of f Ontaria arians ns Would ld Pref efer er Full ll-Ti Time e Fac aculty lty Instr tructor uctors Estimated proportion of courses taught by part-time faculty Preferred type of university faculty  Nearly nine in ten Ontarians with very high household income ($200K+/year) would prefer to be taught by faculty who are full-time with job- and earnings- security (88%) . 12

Fl Flex exible ible Emplo ployme yment nt or or Jo Job Se Secu curity rity?: ?: Three ee In Five e Ontar arians ians Think ink Long-T er erm m Rel elatio ationshi nships ps With h Fac aculty lty Are e Bes est Which employment model is better?  Two in three Ontarians with very high income ($200K+/year) believe that “long -term relationships with faculty” is the best employment model for Ontario’s universities (66%). 13

Su Suppor pport t Fo For Jo Job Se Secu curity rity Mea easu sures es In In Acade cademia: mia: Near Full Support For Universities As “Model Employers” Level of support % Support 96% 94% 88% 89% 85% 84% 14

Ps Psych chographic ographic Pr Profile ile – Type e of Fac acul ulty ty, , Pr Pref efer erence ence ”PT Faculty/No Preference” Segment Reports “Some” Trust In Private -Secto Sector “FT Secure Faculty” Segment “PT Faculty/No preference” Segment 36% 64% Psychographic profile Psychographic profile “university degree a necessary asset in today’s world” [disagree] “university degree is a necessary asset in today’s world” • • [disagree] “universities use public money effectively to educate” • “a lot” of trust in university professors • “some trus t ” in for -profit/private sector organizations • “a lot” of trust in student organizations • [oppose] “part - time faculty should have same access to benefits” • Strong support for all measures of job security in academia [oppose] “universities should convert PT to FT positions first” • • Socio-Demographic Profile Socio-Demographic Profile No distinguishing characteristics Aged 18-29 :: PC Voters 15

Ps Psych chographic ographic Pr Profile ile – Be Best st Emplo ployme yment nt Mod odel el “Flexible Employment” Segment Reports “No Trust” in the Ontario Government “Flexible Employment" Segment “Long - Term Employment” Segment 40% 60% Psychographic profile Psychographic profile “university degree a necessary asset in today’s world” [disagree] “university degree a necessary asset in today’s world” • • “no trust” in the Ontario government • “a lot” of trust in university professors • “little/no trust” in university professors or student organizations • “some” trust in the Ontario government • [oppose] “part -time faculty should have same access to benefits” • Strong support for all measures of job security in academia [oppose] “universities should convert PT to FT positions first” • • Socio-Demographic Profile Socio-Demographic Profile No distinguishing characteristics PC Voters 16

Su Suppor pport t Fo For Pu Publi blic c Fu Fundi nding ng Mea easu sures es: Three ee In Five e Ontar arians ians Do Do Not Supp pport Mo More e Publ blic ic Fundi ding ng If f Per ersonal sonal T ax axes es Increa ease se Support for more funding for Support for more funding for universities universities… if personal taxes increase to hire more full-time professors  Women are significantly less likely to favour a personal tax increase even if this means universities are able to hire more faculty full-time (33%, compared to 46% of men ). 17

Strate ategic gic Charting The Way Forward Impl plic icatio ations ns 18

Th The e ar argum gument ent for or fai airne ness ss (1): ): Focus s shoul ould d be e on n job b sec ecurity urity in ac acad adem emia a as s an n issue sue of f pr proced edura ral l justice stice  Issues of fairness, procedural justice resonate with the vast majority of Ontarians.  Description of proposed job security measures for part-time/temporary faculty will be effective with the public.  Ontarians will engage with the idea that precarity in academia has the potential to undermine education quality – trust in university professors is high; poor job quality could compromise the ability of faculty to make key education-related decisions. 19

Th The e ar argum gument ent for or fai airne ness ss (2): ): We c e can an ar argu gue e fo for r job b sec ecurity rity, , eq equal al pa pay, an and d be benef efits ts in the e short t term. erm. Despite majority support for more full- time faculty at Ontario’s universities, Ontarians have  very little appetite for increased taxes . In a period of fiscal restraint the creation of new full-time tenure-stream positions remains  a challenge; still, other key aspects of job security for part-time faculty can and should be implemented namely: fairness in the “hiring queue”  equal pay for equal work  provision of health and social security benefits (extended health- and pension-plan)  assurance of adequate course preparation time and the first option to teach familiar  courses. There is near universal support for these measures among Ontarians.  20