mil it ary oce an t e rminal sunny point joint l and use
play

MIL IT ARY OCE AN T E RMINAL SUNNY POINT JOINT L AND USE ST - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MIL IT ARY OCE AN T E RMINAL SUNNY POINT JOINT L AND USE ST UDY NEED SOME SORT OF IMAGE ADVI SORY COMMI T T E E ME E T I NG AUGUST 28, 2018 ME E T I NG AGE NDA Study Upda te s Pub lic Me e ting Summa ry


  1. MIL IT ARY OCE AN T E RMINAL SUNNY POINT JOINT L AND USE ST UDY NEED SOME SORT OF IMAGE ADVI SORY COMMI T T E E ME E T I NG AUGUST 28, 2018

  2. ME E T I NG AGE NDA • Study Upda te s • Pub lic Me e ting Summa ry • Re vie w Co mpa tib ility Ana lysis • Se t Upc o ming Me e ting Da te s • Ge ne ra l Disc ussio n • Adjo urn

  3. ST UDY UPDAT E S • Brie fing to MG F a rme n (SDDC Co mma nde r) • Sta ke ho lde r inte rvie w with NC DNCR re pre se nta tive s: – Chie f De puty Se c re ta ry – De puty Se c . fo r Arc hive s & Histo ry – Dire c to r o f Histo ric a l Re so urc e s – Dire c to r o f E a ste rn NC Histo ric Site s – NC Sta te Pa rks – Cle a n Wa te r Ma na g e me nt T rust F und – Offic e o f Sta te Arc ha e o lo g y – NC Aq ua riums • I nte rvie w with c o nsulta nt pre pa ring Brunswic k Co unty E c o no mic De ve lo pme nt Pla n

  4. PROJE CT SCHE DUL E Date Meeting 2018 February 23 Project Team Meeting April 11 Project Kickoff, Installation Tour & Committee Meetings May 21-24 Stakeholder Interviews June Advisory Committee Meeting – Review Background Research July 30 Public Meeting – Overview & Research - 1 Day (2 locations) August Advisory Committee Meeting – Review Compatibility Analysis October Advisory Committee Meeting - Review Conflict Resolution Strategies November Policy Committee Meeting – Review Conflict Resolution Strategies December Public Meetings – Interim Findings - 1 Day (2 locations) December Advisory Committee Meeting – Draft Recommendations 2019 January Policy Committee Meeting – Draft Recommendations February Advisory Committee Meeting – Present Draft Study Documents March Advisory & Policy Committee Meetings – Finalize Study Documents April/May Public Meetings – Final Presentation - 1 Day (2 locations)

  5. JUL Y 30 PUBL I C ME E T I NGS

  6. COMPAT I BI L I T Y ANAL YSI S

  7. I NST AL L AT I ON CHARACT E RI ST I CS • Purpo se -b uilt a mmunitio n tra nsshipme nt te rmina l – SAF E T Y • Ammunitio n is sta g e d te mpo rarily a t the te rmina l, while wa iting to b e shippe d. • Co mpo se d o f thre e g e o g ra phic a lly se pa ra te a re a s: – Ma in T e rmina l: 8,600 a c re s – Ple a sure I sla nd Buffe r Zo ne : 2,200 a c re s – L e la nd I nte rc ha ng e Ya rd: 650 a c re s • Ma in T e rmina l linke d to L e la nd I nte rc ha ng e b y a 16 mile ra il line .

  8. JL US ST UDY ARE A MOTSU Components LELAND YARD MAP GOES HERE RAIL CORRIDOR BUFFER ZONE MAIN TERMINAL

  9. MI SSI ON COMPAT I BI L I T Y • Prima ry po ints o f po te ntia l c o mpa tib ility c o nc e rn: – Ma inta ining use o f the full e xte nt o f E SQD fo r te mpo ra ry sta g ing , a s we ll a s lo a ding a nd unlo a ding ve sse ls during tra nsshipme nt o pe ra tio ns. – Ma inta ining sa fe a nd e ffic ie nt tra nspo rta tio n a c c e ss: • Hig hwa y • Ra il • Ma rine – Ma inta ining minima l le ve ls o f e nviro nme nta l c o nstra int.

  10. E XPL OSI VE S SAF E T Y ZONE S • E SQD = E xplo sive Sa fe ty Qua ntity Dista nc e • K F a c to r = Assume d de g re e o f risk use d in c a lc ula ting E SQD. • E xa mple E SQD Arc s: – Pub lic T ra ffic Ro ute (PT RD) (K 24/ 30) – I nha b ite d Building (I BD) (K 40/ 50) – K 88 – Ab so lute Sa fe Dista nc e = K 328 W 1/ 3 • E SQD F o rmula : D=K – D = Dista nc e (ft.) – W = Ne t E xplo sive We ig ht (lb s.)

  11. E XPL OSI VE S SAF E T Y ZONE S • E SQD Zo ne s a re no t a pplic a b le to munitio ns during the ir tra nspo rta tio n: – T ruc k tra ffic o n lo c a l hig hwa ys – Ra il tra ffic , inc luding in the L e la nd Ya rd a nd o n the Army ra ilro a d – Ship tra ffic in the Ca pe F e a r Rive r • Onc e o n the T e rmina l, a mmunitio n is te mpo rarily sta g e d pe r the lic e nse a nd a pplic a b le E SQD a rc s fo r e a c h ho lding a re a . • E SQD zo ne s e xpa nd a nd c o ntra c t a s munitio ns a re te mpo ra rily sta g e d a nd the n shippe d o ut.

  12. JL US ST UDY ARE A Inhabited Building Safety Zone MAP GOES HERE Inhabited Building Distance Arc Blast Easements

  13. I BD COMPAT I BI L I T Y • Do D Ma nua l 6055.09 / DA Pa mphle t 385-64 e sta b lish siting c rite ria fo r c e rta in use s within the I nha b ite d Building Dista nc e (a s we ll a s o the r sa fe ty zo ne s). • Prima rily fo c use d o n use s typic a lly fo und o n a milita ry insta lla tio n / a mmunitio n fa c ility. • Be st g uida nc e a va ila b le , a nd c a n b e tra nsla te d to a pply to c ivilia n use s.

  14. DA PAM 385-64 USE T ABL E S

  15. DA PAM 385-64 USE T ABL E E XAMPL E S RE CRE AT I ON USE S WAT E R ST ORAGE T ANK S

  16. JL US ST UDY ARE A IBD Non-MOTSU Uses MAP GOES HERE Inhabited Building Distance Arc Blast Easements Non-MOTSU Uses

  17. I BD USE CHARACT E RI ST I CS • I de ntifie d 19 site s / use s / struc ture s within the I nha b ite d Building Dista nc e E SQD a rc . – 17 pub lic / 2 priva te – 9 o n MOT SU la nd (e xc lude s USAF Re c . Are a ) – USAF re c re a tio n a re a is o n US Go ve rnme nt (no t MOT SU la nd) a nd is sub je c t to a se pa ra te c o mpa tib le use a g re e me nt – 9 within c o mpa tib le use e a se me nts – Use s o n MOT SU la nd sub je c t to lic e nse s g ra nte d b y the De pa rtme nt o f the Army

  18. I BD USE CHARACT E RI ST I CS • Pub lic wo rks fa c ilitie s (wa te r / wa ste wa te r) • Pub lic pa rk in K ure Be a c h • USAF Re c re a tio n Are a – no t pa rt o f MOT SU • F AA Jo int Surve illa nc e Syste m Ra da r F a c ility • F o rt F ishe r F e rry – la nding , a dmin b uilding , pa rking a re a , e tc . • NCWRC Bo a t Ra mp • Brunswic k T o wn / F o rt Ande rso n – histo ric site s a nd struc ture s, visito rs c e nte r, suppo rt b ldg s. • Duke E ne rg y firing ra ng e

  19. I BD COMPAT I BI L I T Y • Co mplia nc e with Do D / DA use g uida nc e • F re q ue nc y o f use / time o f o c c upa tio n • De nsity o f o c c upa tio n • Ca n it b e re lo c a te d? • I s it c ritic a l to pub lic sa fe ty? • Pub lic vs. priva te • E xisting mitig a tio n me a sure s / a g re e me nts • Ab ility to impro ve c o mpa tib ility thro ug h de sig n o r o pe ra tio na l c o nside ra tio ns.

  20. GL ASS F RAGME NT AT I ON HAZARDS Do D Ma nua l 6055.09 E xtra c t

  21. JL US ST UDY ARE A Tall Structure Glass Fragmentation Hazard MAP GOES HERE Inhabited Building Distance Tall Structures (5+ stories)

  22. E ME RGE NCY E VACUAT I ON CRI T E RI A • Do D Ma nua l 6055.09 / DA Pa mphle t 385-64 e sta b lish ide ntic a l “E me rg e nc y Withdra wa l Dista nc e s fo r No ne sse ntia l Pe rso nne l” • Dista nc e s a re inte nde d fo r initia l re spo nse to a n inc ide nt invo lving a mmunitio n/ e xplo sive s. • Sub stitute g uida nc e in the a b se nc e o f E SQD a rc s fo r the ra il line . • Applie s to b o th tra nspo rta tio n a nd fa c ilitie s

  23. E VACUAT I ON DI ST ANCE S • Ra ilc a r inc ide nt e va c ua tio n dista nc e whe n o ve r 500 lb s: 5,000 ft. • F a c ility inc ide nt e va c ua tio n dista nc e whe n o ve r 55,285 lb s: D=105W 1/ 3

  24. JL US ST UDY ARE A Rail Incident Withdrawal Distance MAP GOES HERE 5,000 Foot Emergency Withdrawal Distance

  25. RAI L I NCI DE NT WI T HDRAWAL ARE A • Dista nc e a pplie s to a ny g ive n po int o n the line whe re a n inc ide nt o c c urs, no t the e ntire line . • Withdra wa l dista nc e ma y b e inc re a se d b a se d o n the spe c ific situa tio n. • Are a Cha ra c te ristic s: – 2010 Po pula tio n: +/ - 11,200 – 2010 Dwe lling Units: +/ - 5,200 • Co nc e rns: – So uth Brunswic k Sc ho o l Ca mpus – No rthwe st Distric t Pa rk – US 17 Co mme rc ia l Are a – US 74/ 76 I ndustria l Are a

  26. JL US ST UDY ARE A Rail Incident Withdrawal Distance: Developed Areas MAP GOES HERE Developed Land Cover

  27. JL US ST UDY ARE A Rail Incident Withdrawal Distance: Population Density (2010) MAP GOES HERE Population Density High Low

  28. JL US ST UDY ARE A Facility Incident Withdrawal Distance MAP GOES HERE Facility Emergency Withdrawal Distance (D=105W 1/3 )

  29. F ACI L I T Y I NCI DE NT WI T HDRAWAL ARE A • Dista nc e a pplie s to a ny g ive n fa c ility – do c ks we re use d a s a n e xa mple . • Withdra wa l dista nc e ma y b e inc re a se d b a se d o n the spe c ific situa tio n. • Are a Cha ra c te ristic s: – 2010 Po pula tio n: +/ - 14,300 – 2010 Dwe lling Units: +/ - 10,850 • Co nc e rns – Brunswic k Nuc le a r Sta tio n – Ple a sure I sla nd E va c ua tio n Ro ute – So uth Brunswic k Sc ho o l Ca mpus

  30. JL US ST UDY ARE A Facility Incident Withdrawal Distance: Developed Areas MAP GOES HERE Developed Land Cover

  31. JL US ST UDY ARE A Facility Incident Withdrawal Distance: Population Density (2010) MAP GOES HERE Population Density High Low

  32. E XAMPL E E VACUAT I ON PL AN

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend