SLIDE 1 Gravity and Cosmology 2018 Kyoto, 2018 march 1st.
Massive and Partially Massless (PM) graviton
- n curved space-times
- 1. DOF counting for a Massive
graviton (à la Fierz-Pauli)
- n an Einstein spacetime
- 2. Consistent massive graviton on arbitrary
spacetime.
- 3. PM graviton on non Einstein spacetimes.
Cédric Deffayet (IAP and IHÉS, CNRS Paris)
FP7/2007-2013 « NIRG » project no. 307934
- L. Bernard, C.D., M. von Strauss + A. Schmidt-May
(2015-2016, PRD, JCAP)
- L. Bernard, C.D., K. Hinterbichler and M. von Strauss
arXiv:1703.02538 (PRD)
SLIDE 2
- 1. DOF counting for a massive graviton on an Einstein
space-time (Fierz-Pauli linear theory).
Consider an Einstein space-time obeying
SLIDE 3
- 1. DOF counting for a massive graviton on an Einstein
space-time (Fierz-Pauli linear theory).
Consider an Einstein space-time obeying Fierz-Pauli theory can be defined by
Fierz-Pauli (1939), Deser Nepomechie (1984), Higuchi (1987), Bengtsson (1995), Porrati (2001)
SLIDE 4
- 1. DOF counting for a massive graviton on an Einstein
space-time (Fierz-Pauli linear theory).
Consider an Einstein space-time obeying Field equations
Fierz-Pauli theory can be defined by
Fierz-Pauli (1939), Deser Nepomechie (1984), Higuchi (1987), Bengtsson (1995), Porrati (2001)
SLIDE 5
- 1. DOF counting for a massive graviton on an Einstein
space-time (Fierz-Pauli linear theory).
Consider an Einstein space-time obeying Field equations with
Kinetic
Mass term Cosmological constant
Fierz-Pauli theory can be defined by
Fierz-Pauli (1939), Deser Nepomechie (1984), Higuchi (1987), Bengtsson (1995), Porrati (2001)
SLIDE 6 Kinetic
Mass term Cosmological constant
Comes from expanding the Einstein-Hilbert action
SLIDE 7 Kinetic
Mass term Cosmological constant
Only consistent mass term among
SLIDE 8 DOF counting
The fierz Pauli theory for a massive graviton
- f mass m propagates
- 2 DOF if m = 0
Massless graviton
SLIDE 9 DOF counting
The fierz Pauli theory for a massive graviton
- f mass m propagates
- 2 DOF if m = 0
- 5 DOF if m 0 and m2 2 ¤ /3
Massless graviton Generic massive graviton
SLIDE 10 DOF counting
The fierz Pauli theory for a massive graviton
- f mass m propagates
- 2 DOF if m = 0
- 5 DOF if m 0 and m2 2 ¤ /3
- 4 DOF if m2 = 2 ¤ /3
Massless graviton Generic massive graviton Partially Massless graviton
SLIDE 11
How to count DOF ?
SLIDE 12 Kinetic
Mass term Cosmological constant
Comes from expanding the Einstein-Hilbert action This implies the (Bianchi) offshell identities
How to count DOF ?
SLIDE 13
Results in the off-shell identity
SLIDE 14
Results in the off-shell identity i.e.
SLIDE 15
NB: in this talk Equals off-shell up to undifferentiated or (only) once differentiated h¹ º but NOT twice differentiated h¹ º
SLIDE 16
Results in an the off-shell identity And the on-shell relation
4 vector constraints
Kills 4 out of 10 DOF of i.e.
SLIDE 17 Taking an extra derivative of the field equation
- perator yields (off shell)
SLIDE 18 Taking an extra derivative of the field equation
- perator yields (off shell)
While tracing it with the metric gives
SLIDE 19 Taking an extra derivative of the field equation
- perator yields (off shell)
While tracing it with the metric gives Hence we have the identity Yielding on shell
SLIDE 20
Generically: yields i.e. a “scalar constraint” reducing from 6 to 5 the number of propagating DOF
SLIDE 21
However, if Then this vanishes identically
SLIDE 22
However, if Then this vanishes identically As is
SLIDE 23
However, if Then this vanishes identically As is Shows the existence of a gauge symmetry
SLIDE 24 Hence, if
- ne has 6 - 2 = 4 DOF (and a gauge symmetry)
The massive graviton is said to be “Partially massless” (PM)
SLIDE 25
Two questions: Can a fully non linear PM theory exist ? Can a PM graviton exist on non Einstein space-times ?
SLIDE 26
Two questions: Can a fully non linear PM theory exist ? Can a PM graviton exist on non Einstein space-times ? Here we address the second one…
SLIDE 27
- 2. Consistent massive graviton h¹ º
º on an
arbitrary background specified by some given (non dynamical) metric g¹ º First, we need to introduce the theory of a massive graviton on arbitrary backgrounds
SLIDE 28
- 2. Consistent massive graviton h¹ º
º on an
arbitrary background specified by some given (non dynamical) metric g¹ º
Einstein-Hilbert kinetic operator Mass term
First, we need to introduce the theory of a massive graviton on arbitrary backgrounds
SLIDE 29 The theory has been obtained in
L.Bernard, CD, M. von Strauss 1410.8302 + 1504.04382 + 1512.03620 (with A. Schmidt-May) de Rahm, Gabadadze; de Rham, Gababadze, Tolley, 2010, 2011
SLIDE 30
Our massive graviton theory is defined by
SLIDE 31 Our massive graviton theory is defined by
- 1. A symmetric tensor obtained from the
background curvature solving with ¯0, ¯1 and ¯2 dimensionless parameters and m the graviton mass, en the symmetric polynomials
SLIDE 32
- 2. The following (linear) field equations
SLIDE 33
- 2. The following (linear) field equations
Linearized Einstein operator
SLIDE 34
- 2. The following (linear) field equations
SLIDE 35
With
SLIDE 36
Where with Has been shown to propagate 5 DOF in a fully non linear way (dRGT, Hassan, Rosen )… … evading Boulware-Deser no-go « theorem » How we got it out of dRGT theory ? Uses two metrics: g and f
SLIDE 37 Idea: expand dRGT theory around arbitrary backgrounds However
- The « square root » tensor S ¹ º
makes things unpleasant !
- Two metrics in the game !
SLIDE 38
Linearize around some background geometry (e.g. here for the « ¯1 » models)
Expand the dynamical metric g¹ º around arbitrary backgrounds for f¹ º and g¹ º A technical difficulty: expand the matrix square root S¹
º
from One has
Sylvester (Matrix) equation (A X + X B = C) Easy to get in terms of the linear perturbation h¹ º of g¹ º
SLIDE 39
Solving the Sylvester equation (which is possible iff the spectra of S and -S do not intersect) we get with
SLIDE 40
One thus obtains the linearized field equations
Linearized Einstein tensor (curvature dependent) Mass term
I.e. the field equations shown previously (where previous E¹ º is denoted above as ± E¹ º):
SLIDE 41 In these field equations … We got rid of the second metric f¹ º and … … expressed everything in terms
- f g¹ º and its curvature
- Using the background equations of motion:
SLIDE 42
- Expressions have been simplified using Cayley-
Hamilton theorem stating that S ¹ º obeys 4th power of S in the matricial sense Allowing to replace any power of S with i ¸ 4 by linear combinations of lower powers of S In these field equations …
SLIDE 43 This provides consistent (as we now show) field equations (and action) for a massive graviton on a background simply defined by just
NB: We cheked that (in the special cases of diagonal
metrics g and f) our equations (before getting rid
- f the non dynamical metric f) match those
- btained by Guarato & Durrer 2014 (which are
not fully general and not explicitly covariant)
SLIDE 44
DOF counting (consistency check) Start from the (linear) field equations
SLIDE 45
DOF counting (consistency check) Start from the (linear) field equations The linearized Bianchi identities Reading i.e.
SLIDE 46
DOF counting (consistency check) Start from the (linear) field equations The linearized Bianchi identities Reading i.e. Yield the (off-shell) identities
SLIDE 47
DOF counting (consistency check) Start from the (linear) field equations The linearized Bianchi identities Reading i.e. Yield the (off-shell) identities Yielding the four on shell vector constraints
SLIDE 48
Can one get an extra scalar constraint in a way analogous to Fierz-Pauli on Einstein space-time ?
SLIDE 49
Can one get an extra scalar constraint in a way analogous to Fierz-Pauli on Einstein space-time ? Need to trace over the field equations and their second derivatives and look for a linear combination of these traces yielding a constraints
SLIDE 50
Can one get an extra scalar constraint in a way analogous to Fierz-Pauli on Einstein space-time ? However, we can trace both with the metric g¹ º and with its Ricci curvature R¹ º (or equivalently S¹ º) Need to trace over the field equations and their second derivatives and look for a linear combination of these traces yielding a constraints
SLIDE 51
So we look for linear combinations of the scalars
SLIDE 52
So we look for linear combinations of the scalars Thanks again to Cayley Hamilton theorem, only 8 of them are independent … … I.e. we look for 4 ui and 4 vi such that
SLIDE 53
After some algebra we find : 26 « irreducible » scalars made by contracting with powers of S, e.g. … . …
SLIDE 54
After some algebra we find Are scalar functions of
SLIDE 55
After some algebra we find Are scalar functions of
SLIDE 56
After some algebra we find … . Are scalar functions of That should all vanish … ….i.e. 26 equations for the 8 unknown
SLIDE 57
After some algebra we find … . Are scalar functions of That should all vanish … ….i.e. 26 equations for the 8 unknown
SLIDE 58
After some algebra we find … . Are scalar functions of That should all vanish … ….i.e. 26 equations for the 8 unknown However !
SLIDE 59
The scalars are not all independent from each other thanks to identities (Syzygies) … … that we derived using again the Cayley- Hamilton Theorem (or the « second fundamental
theorem » of the theory of invariants)
SLIDE 60
i.e. we define a matrix M by With
SLIDE 61
i.e. we define a matrix M by With Then each term with a given homogeneity in the In the Cayley Hamilton identity: Yields some identity betwen the matrices A,B,C,D
SLIDE 62
Picking out the identities linear in h¹ º and acting on it with two derivatives we get non trivial identities between the
e.g. with …
SLIDE 63
At the end of the day, demanding that
SLIDE 64
At the end of the day, demanding that We get a unique solution for ui and vi yielding the off-shell identity
SLIDE 65
At the end of the day, demanding that We get a unique solution for ui and vi yielding the off-shell identity and the (on-shell scalar) constraint
SLIDE 66 To conclude part 2.
- We have obtained a theory for a massive
graviton with 5 (or less) d.o.f. on an arbitrary background (agrees at first order in curvature with
Buchbinder, Gitman, Krykhtin 1999)
- Can be used independently of dRGT as a
well behaved theory of a massive graviton in just one background metric
- Various applications, e.g. : the correct theory of a
massive graviton in FLRW space time
(does not agree with Guarato-Durrer 2014)
- See also the recent Mazuet-Volkov (2017) for the
same game played with vierbeins
SLIDE 67
- 3. PM graviton on non Einstein space-times ?
We use the theory introduced in part 2.
SLIDE 68
Hence we look for (non Einstein) space-times where the scalar constraint (here written with ¯1 and ¯2 non vanishing) Identically vanishes
Yielding the gauge symmetry with
SLIDE 69
Hence we look for (non Einstein) space-times where the scalar constraint (here written with ¯1 and ¯2 non vanishing) Identically vanishes
Yielding the gauge symmetry with
We need to look in detail at the structure of the constraint
SLIDE 70
The scalar constraint reads With
SLIDE 71
The scalar constraint reads With
SLIDE 72
The scalar constraint reads With
SLIDE 73
The scalar constraint reads With
SLIDE 74
To get a PM theory we need to look for space-times where and vanish identically.
SLIDE 75
To get a PM theory we need to look for space-times where and vanish identically. Most general solution ?
SLIDE 76
To get a PM theory we need to look for space-times where and vanish identically. Most general solution ? Assume (i.e. covariantly constant) makes and vanish.
SLIDE 77
Space-times possessing a covariantly constant tensor H¹ º are severely restricted… Non trivial integrability conditions
SLIDE 78 Space-times possessing a covariantly constant tensor are classified as (provided is not proportional to the metric)
- 1. Spacetime is decomposable
and
- 2. The spacetime admits a covariantly constant
vector and
SLIDE 79
Note further that the definition Imposes that Hence the space-time must be “Ricci Symmetric” …i.e. the Ricci tensor is covariantly constant …
SLIDE 80
The spacetimes of interest for us here will all have with and constant as a consequence of the integrability conditions And have to solve (in order to get a PM graviton)
SLIDE 81
The spacetimes of interest for us here will all have with and constant as a consequence of the integrability conditions And have to solve (in order to get a PM graviton) In order to get a vanishing
SLIDE 82
The spacetimes of interest for us here will all have with and constant as a consequence of the integrability conditions And have to solve (in order to get a PM graviton) From the definition of
SLIDE 83 The spacetimes of interest for us here will all have with and constant as a consequence of the integrability conditions And have to solve (in order to get a PM graviton) NB: this implies that the Ricci tensor
- beyes indeed the required relation
SLIDE 84
Explicit solutions (I) with
dimensionless dimensionful Analogous to
SLIDE 85
Explicit solutions (II) with
dimensionless dimensionful Analogous to
SLIDE 86
One simple example of the last kind is Einstein static Universe !
with
SLIDE 87
One simple example of the last kind is Einstein static Universe !
with The gauge symmetry reads
With e.g. one solution being
SLIDE 88
Conclusions PM exists on non Einstein spacetimes !
(in contrast with previous no-go claim by Deser, Joung, Waldron In 1208.1307 [hep-th]… … in particular some of our solution have a vanishing Bach tensor)
Solution for the vanishing Of and are not known in full generality !
SLIDE 89
Thank you ! and best wishes to Misao !