1. DOF counting for a Massive FP7/2007-2013 graviton ( la - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 dof counting for a massive fp7 2007 2013 graviton la
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

1. DOF counting for a Massive FP7/2007-2013 graviton ( la - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Gravity and Cosmology 2018 Massive and Kyoto, 2018 march 1st. Partially Massless (PM) Cdric Deffayet graviton (IAP and IHS, CNRS Paris) on curved space-times 1. DOF counting for a Massive FP7/2007-2013 graviton ( la Fierz-Pauli)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Gravity and Cosmology 2018 Kyoto, 2018 march 1st.

Massive and Partially Massless (PM) graviton

  • n curved space-times
  • 1. DOF counting for a Massive

graviton (à la Fierz-Pauli)

  • n an Einstein spacetime
  • 2. Consistent massive graviton on arbitrary

spacetime.

  • 3. PM graviton on non Einstein spacetimes.

Cédric Deffayet (IAP and IHÉS, CNRS Paris)

FP7/2007-2013 « NIRG » project no. 307934

  • L. Bernard, C.D., M. von Strauss + A. Schmidt-May

(2015-2016, PRD, JCAP)

  • L. Bernard, C.D., K. Hinterbichler and M. von Strauss

arXiv:1703.02538 (PRD)

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • 1. DOF counting for a massive graviton on an Einstein

space-time (Fierz-Pauli linear theory).

Consider an Einstein space-time obeying

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • 1. DOF counting for a massive graviton on an Einstein

space-time (Fierz-Pauli linear theory).

Consider an Einstein space-time obeying Fierz-Pauli theory can be defined by

Fierz-Pauli (1939), Deser Nepomechie (1984), Higuchi (1987), Bengtsson (1995), Porrati (2001)

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • 1. DOF counting for a massive graviton on an Einstein

space-time (Fierz-Pauli linear theory).

Consider an Einstein space-time obeying Field equations

  • n shell

Fierz-Pauli theory can be defined by

Fierz-Pauli (1939), Deser Nepomechie (1984), Higuchi (1987), Bengtsson (1995), Porrati (2001)

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • 1. DOF counting for a massive graviton on an Einstein

space-time (Fierz-Pauli linear theory).

Consider an Einstein space-time obeying Field equations with

  • n shell

Kinetic

  • perator

Mass term Cosmological constant

Fierz-Pauli theory can be defined by

Fierz-Pauli (1939), Deser Nepomechie (1984), Higuchi (1987), Bengtsson (1995), Porrati (2001)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Kinetic

  • perator

Mass term Cosmological constant

Comes from expanding the Einstein-Hilbert action

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Kinetic

  • perator

Mass term Cosmological constant

Only consistent mass term among

slide-8
SLIDE 8

DOF counting

The fierz Pauli theory for a massive graviton

  • f mass m propagates
  • 2 DOF if m = 0

Massless graviton

slide-9
SLIDE 9

DOF counting

The fierz Pauli theory for a massive graviton

  • f mass m propagates
  • 2 DOF if m = 0
  • 5 DOF if m  0 and m2  2 ¤ /3

Massless graviton Generic massive graviton

slide-10
SLIDE 10

DOF counting

The fierz Pauli theory for a massive graviton

  • f mass m propagates
  • 2 DOF if m = 0
  • 5 DOF if m  0 and m2  2 ¤ /3
  • 4 DOF if m2 = 2 ¤ /3

Massless graviton Generic massive graviton Partially Massless graviton

slide-11
SLIDE 11

How to count DOF ?

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Kinetic

  • perator

Mass term Cosmological constant

Comes from expanding the Einstein-Hilbert action This implies the (Bianchi) offshell identities

How to count DOF ?

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Results in the off-shell identity

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Results in the off-shell identity i.e.

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • n shell

NB: in this talk Equals off-shell up to undifferentiated or (only) once differentiated h¹ º but NOT twice differentiated h¹ º

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Results in an the off-shell identity And the on-shell relation

4 vector constraints

Kills 4 out of 10 DOF of i.e.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Taking an extra derivative of the field equation

  • perator yields (off shell)
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Taking an extra derivative of the field equation

  • perator yields (off shell)

While tracing it with the metric gives

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Taking an extra derivative of the field equation

  • perator yields (off shell)

While tracing it with the metric gives Hence we have the identity Yielding on shell

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Generically: yields i.e. a “scalar constraint” reducing from 6 to 5 the number of propagating DOF

slide-21
SLIDE 21

However, if Then this vanishes identically

slide-22
SLIDE 22

However, if Then this vanishes identically As is

slide-23
SLIDE 23

However, if Then this vanishes identically As is Shows the existence of a gauge symmetry

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Hence, if

  • ne has 6 - 2 = 4 DOF (and a gauge symmetry)

The massive graviton is said to be “Partially massless” (PM)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Two questions: Can a fully non linear PM theory exist ? Can a PM graviton exist on non Einstein space-times ?

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Two questions: Can a fully non linear PM theory exist ? Can a PM graviton exist on non Einstein space-times ? Here we address the second one…

slide-27
SLIDE 27
  • 2. Consistent massive graviton h¹ º

º on an

arbitrary background specified by some given (non dynamical) metric g¹ º First, we need to introduce the theory of a massive graviton on arbitrary backgrounds

slide-28
SLIDE 28
  • 2. Consistent massive graviton h¹ º

º on an

arbitrary background specified by some given (non dynamical) metric g¹ º

Einstein-Hilbert kinetic operator Mass term

First, we need to introduce the theory of a massive graviton on arbitrary backgrounds

slide-29
SLIDE 29

The theory has been obtained in

  • ut of the dRGT theory

L.Bernard, CD, M. von Strauss 1410.8302 + 1504.04382 + 1512.03620 (with A. Schmidt-May) de Rahm, Gabadadze; de Rham, Gababadze, Tolley, 2010, 2011

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Our massive graviton theory is defined by

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Our massive graviton theory is defined by

  • 1. A symmetric tensor obtained from the

background curvature solving with ¯0, ¯1 and ¯2 dimensionless parameters and m the graviton mass, en the symmetric polynomials

slide-32
SLIDE 32
  • 2. The following (linear) field equations
slide-33
SLIDE 33
  • 2. The following (linear) field equations

Linearized Einstein operator

slide-34
SLIDE 34
  • 2. The following (linear) field equations
slide-35
SLIDE 35

With

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Where with Has been shown to propagate 5 DOF in a fully non linear way (dRGT, Hassan, Rosen )… … evading Boulware-Deser no-go « theorem » How we got it out of dRGT theory ? Uses two metrics: g and f

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Idea: expand dRGT theory around arbitrary backgrounds However

  • The « square root » tensor S ¹ º

makes things unpleasant !

  • Two metrics in the game !
slide-38
SLIDE 38

Linearize around some background geometry (e.g. here for the « ¯1 » models)

Expand the dynamical metric g¹ º around arbitrary backgrounds for f¹ º and g¹ º A technical difficulty: expand the matrix square root S¹

º

from One has

Sylvester (Matrix) equation (A X + X B = C) Easy to get in terms of the linear perturbation h¹ º of g¹ º

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Solving the Sylvester equation (which is possible iff the spectra of S and -S do not intersect) we get with

slide-40
SLIDE 40

One thus obtains the linearized field equations

Linearized Einstein tensor (curvature dependent) Mass term

I.e. the field equations shown previously (where previous E¹ º is denoted above as ± E¹ º):

slide-41
SLIDE 41

In these field equations … We got rid of the second metric f¹ º and … … expressed everything in terms

  • f g¹ º and its curvature
  • Using the background equations of motion:
slide-42
SLIDE 42
  • Expressions have been simplified using Cayley-

Hamilton theorem stating that S ¹ º obeys 4th power of S in the matricial sense Allowing to replace any power of S with i ¸ 4 by linear combinations of lower powers of S In these field equations …

slide-43
SLIDE 43

This provides consistent (as we now show) field equations (and action) for a massive graviton on a background simply defined by just

  • ne arbitrary metric g¹ º

NB: We cheked that (in the special cases of diagonal

metrics g and f) our equations (before getting rid

  • f the non dynamical metric f) match those
  • btained by Guarato & Durrer 2014 (which are

not fully general and not explicitly covariant)

slide-44
SLIDE 44

DOF counting (consistency check) Start from the (linear) field equations

slide-45
SLIDE 45

DOF counting (consistency check) Start from the (linear) field equations The linearized Bianchi identities Reading i.e.

slide-46
SLIDE 46

DOF counting (consistency check) Start from the (linear) field equations The linearized Bianchi identities Reading i.e. Yield the (off-shell) identities

slide-47
SLIDE 47

DOF counting (consistency check) Start from the (linear) field equations The linearized Bianchi identities Reading i.e. Yield the (off-shell) identities Yielding the four on shell vector constraints

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Can one get an extra scalar constraint in a way analogous to Fierz-Pauli on Einstein space-time ?

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Can one get an extra scalar constraint in a way analogous to Fierz-Pauli on Einstein space-time ? Need to trace over the field equations and their second derivatives and look for a linear combination of these traces yielding a constraints

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Can one get an extra scalar constraint in a way analogous to Fierz-Pauli on Einstein space-time ? However, we can trace both with the metric g¹ º and with its Ricci curvature R¹ º (or equivalently S¹ º) Need to trace over the field equations and their second derivatives and look for a linear combination of these traces yielding a constraints

slide-51
SLIDE 51

So we look for linear combinations of the scalars

slide-52
SLIDE 52

So we look for linear combinations of the scalars Thanks again to Cayley Hamilton theorem, only 8 of them are independent … … I.e. we look for 4 ui and 4 vi such that

slide-53
SLIDE 53

After some algebra we find : 26 « irreducible » scalars made by contracting with powers of S, e.g. … . …

slide-54
SLIDE 54

After some algebra we find Are scalar functions of

slide-55
SLIDE 55

After some algebra we find Are scalar functions of

slide-56
SLIDE 56

After some algebra we find … . Are scalar functions of That should all vanish … ….i.e. 26 equations for the 8 unknown

slide-57
SLIDE 57

After some algebra we find … . Are scalar functions of That should all vanish … ….i.e. 26 equations for the 8 unknown

slide-58
SLIDE 58

After some algebra we find … . Are scalar functions of That should all vanish … ….i.e. 26 equations for the 8 unknown However !

slide-59
SLIDE 59

The scalars are not all independent from each other thanks to identities (Syzygies) … … that we derived using again the Cayley- Hamilton Theorem (or the « second fundamental

theorem » of the theory of invariants)

slide-60
SLIDE 60

i.e. we define a matrix M by With

slide-61
SLIDE 61

i.e. we define a matrix M by With Then each term with a given homogeneity in the In the Cayley Hamilton identity: Yields some identity betwen the matrices A,B,C,D

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Picking out the identities linear in h¹ º and acting on it with two derivatives we get non trivial identities between the

e.g. with …

slide-63
SLIDE 63

At the end of the day, demanding that

slide-64
SLIDE 64

At the end of the day, demanding that We get a unique solution for ui and vi yielding the off-shell identity

slide-65
SLIDE 65

At the end of the day, demanding that We get a unique solution for ui and vi yielding the off-shell identity and the (on-shell scalar) constraint

slide-66
SLIDE 66

To conclude part 2.

  • We have obtained a theory for a massive

graviton with 5 (or less) d.o.f. on an arbitrary background (agrees at first order in curvature with

Buchbinder, Gitman, Krykhtin 1999)

  • Can be used independently of dRGT as a

well behaved theory of a massive graviton in just one background metric

  • Various applications, e.g. : the correct theory of a

massive graviton in FLRW space time

(does not agree with Guarato-Durrer 2014)

  • See also the recent Mazuet-Volkov (2017) for the

same game played with vierbeins

slide-67
SLIDE 67
  • 3. PM graviton on non Einstein space-times ?

We use the theory introduced in part 2.

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Hence we look for (non Einstein) space-times where the scalar constraint (here written with ¯1 and ¯2 non vanishing) Identically vanishes

Yielding the gauge symmetry with

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Hence we look for (non Einstein) space-times where the scalar constraint (here written with ¯1 and ¯2 non vanishing) Identically vanishes

Yielding the gauge symmetry with

We need to look in detail at the structure of the constraint

slide-70
SLIDE 70

The scalar constraint reads With

slide-71
SLIDE 71

The scalar constraint reads With

slide-72
SLIDE 72

The scalar constraint reads With

slide-73
SLIDE 73

The scalar constraint reads With

slide-74
SLIDE 74

To get a PM theory we need to look for space-times where and vanish identically.

slide-75
SLIDE 75

To get a PM theory we need to look for space-times where and vanish identically. Most general solution ?

slide-76
SLIDE 76

To get a PM theory we need to look for space-times where and vanish identically. Most general solution ? Assume (i.e. covariantly constant) makes and vanish.

slide-77
SLIDE 77

Space-times possessing a covariantly constant tensor H¹ º are severely restricted… Non trivial integrability conditions

slide-78
SLIDE 78

Space-times possessing a covariantly constant tensor are classified as (provided is not proportional to the metric)

  • 1. Spacetime is decomposable

and

  • 2. The spacetime admits a covariantly constant

vector and

slide-79
SLIDE 79

Note further that the definition Imposes that Hence the space-time must be “Ricci Symmetric” …i.e. the Ricci tensor is covariantly constant …

slide-80
SLIDE 80

The spacetimes of interest for us here will all have with and constant as a consequence of the integrability conditions And have to solve (in order to get a PM graviton)

slide-81
SLIDE 81

The spacetimes of interest for us here will all have with and constant as a consequence of the integrability conditions And have to solve (in order to get a PM graviton) In order to get a vanishing

slide-82
SLIDE 82

The spacetimes of interest for us here will all have with and constant as a consequence of the integrability conditions And have to solve (in order to get a PM graviton) From the definition of

slide-83
SLIDE 83

The spacetimes of interest for us here will all have with and constant as a consequence of the integrability conditions And have to solve (in order to get a PM graviton) NB: this implies that the Ricci tensor

  • beyes indeed the required relation
slide-84
SLIDE 84

Explicit solutions (I) with

dimensionless dimensionful Analogous to

slide-85
SLIDE 85

Explicit solutions (II) with

dimensionless dimensionful Analogous to

slide-86
SLIDE 86

One simple example of the last kind is Einstein static Universe !

with

slide-87
SLIDE 87

One simple example of the last kind is Einstein static Universe !

with The gauge symmetry reads

With e.g. one solution being

slide-88
SLIDE 88

Conclusions PM exists on non Einstein spacetimes !

(in contrast with previous no-go claim by Deser, Joung, Waldron In 1208.1307 [hep-th]… … in particular some of our solution have a vanishing Bach tensor)

Solution for the vanishing Of and are not known in full generality !

slide-89
SLIDE 89

Thank you ! and best wishes to Misao !