Massive Graviton Geons: self-gravitating massive gravitational waves - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

β–Ά
massive graviton geons
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Massive Graviton Geons: self-gravitating massive gravitational waves - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Massive Graviton Geons: self-gravitating massive gravitational waves Katsuki Aoki, Waseda University KA, K. Maeda, Y. Misonoh, and H. Okawa, PRD 97, 044005 (2018), [arXiv: 1710.05606]. 2018/03/03 Introduction Vacuum solutions to the Einstein


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Katsuki Aoki, Waseda University

Massive Graviton Geons:

self-gravitating massive gravitational waves

2018/03/03

KA, K. Maeda, Y. Misonoh, and H. Okawa, PRD 97, 044005 (2018), [arXiv: 1710.05606].

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction

Vacuum solutions to the Einstein equation? LIGO and Virgo observed both of them!

2018/03/03

Black Holes Gravitational Waves GW150914 Initial mass: 65.3π‘βŠ™ = 36.2π‘βŠ™ + 29.1π‘βŠ™ β†’ Final mass: 62.3π‘βŠ™ The energy is radiated by GWs!

slide-3
SLIDE 3

GWs have their gravitational energy!

Due to the nonlinearities of the Einstein equation, GWs (=perturbations) themselves change the background geometry.

2018/03/03

Is it possible to realize self-gravitating gravitational waves?

+ =

Self-gravity Gravitational β€œGeons” The original idea of β€œgeon” is a gravitational electromagnetic entity. = a realization of classical β€œbody” by gravitational attraction.

Wheeler, 1955.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Gravitational Geons

2018/03/03

Gravitational geons are singular-free time periodic vacuum solutions to GR. Gravitational geons

Brill and Hartle, 1964, Anderson and Brill, 1997.

not stable and decay in time.

Gibbons and Stewart, 1984.

We consider gravitational geons composed of massive graviton. This may not be the case in modified gravity. Geons can be a proof of beyond GR? Geons can be dark matter? can be stable in asymptotically AdS?

e.g., Dias, Horowitz, Marolf and Santos, 2012.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Massive gravitons?

2018/03/03

It should break the gauge symmetry of graviton. β†’ At least, we have to introduce two β€œmetrics”: and . If only one of them is dynamical: massive gravity (5 dof) If both of them are dynamical: bigravity (2+5 dof) We only consider bigravity theory. In massive gravity, we may not find non-relativistic geons (not long-lived). L < Compton wavelength Localized scale ≃ Compton wavelength β†’ relativistic object Massive modes as with other gauge theories? as KK modes?

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Massive gravitons?

2018/03/03

Two dynamical tensors: (Hassan and Rosen, 2011) and Free parameters: Bigravity contains one massless graviton and one massive graviton. We consider self-gravitating massive gravitational waves. We do not assume any particular value of the graviton mass.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

In general, there is no way to decompose ``background`` and ``perturbations`` if backreaction is included.

High frequency approximation

However, they can be decomposed when perturbations are high-frequency. Gravitons propagating on background Backreaction from gravitons

(Isaacson, 1968)

18/10/2017@ICG

slide-8
SLIDE 8

In general, there is no way to decompose ``background`` and ``perturbations`` if backreaction is included.

High frequency approximation

However, they can be decomposed when perturbations are high-frequency. Gravitons propagating on background Backreaction from gravitons background perturbations

(Isaacson, 1968)

18/10/2017@ICG

slide-9
SLIDE 9

How to define energy of GW? (in GR)

The spacetime is decomposed into β€œbackground” and β€œperturbation”. with The high-frequency/momentum approximation (πœ‡ β‰ͺ 𝑀𝐢) : only low-frequency part : only high-frequency part : both low-frequency and high-frequency parts : high-frequency part : low-frequency part

01/12/2017οΌ Hokudai

slide-10
SLIDE 10

How to define energy of GW? (in GR)

Low-frequency part: High-frequency part: Einstein equation is decomposed into low- and high-frequency parts. The energy-momentum tensor is defined by nonlinear terms Non-local operation, e.g., spatial average or time average with πœ‡ β‰ͺ 𝑀𝐢

01/12/2017οΌ Hokudai

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Graviton 𝑼𝝂𝝃 in Bigravity

2018/03/03

Assuming (no Vainshtein effect) and taking Isaacson average, we find the Einstein and Klein-Gordon equations where The metrics are given by + TT conditions We shall ignore the massless gravitational waves .

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Newtonian limit of bigravity

2018/03/03

We then assume that the massive gravitons are non-relativistic. ↑ traceless, where Ξ¦, πœ”β‹…β‹… are slowly varying functions. The transverse-traceless condition leads to Finally, we obtain the Poisson-Schrodinger equations

slide-13
SLIDE 13

The mass of the localized πœ”π‘—π‘˜:

Scale invariance

18/10/2017@ICG

Note that the equations are invariant under Increasing mass β†’ small radius (compact object) Newtonian approximation is valid as long as 𝑆 β‰ͺ π‘›βˆ’1.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Self-gravitating bound state

2018/03/03

Spin-2 Cf. Spin-0 Only difference is the intrinsic spin symmetric traceless tensor scalar What is the most stable configuration? Stable? Unstable? The bound state of the Poisson-Schrodinger eqs. with intrinsic spin.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Angular momentum of bound state

2018/03/03

The most stable = The lowest energy eigenvalue = The lowest angular momentum However, it is NOT because of the intrinsic spin! Maybe… spherically symmetric configuration (monopole)? There are total angular momentum π‘˜ and orbital angular momentum β„“.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Angular momentum of bound state

18/10/2017@ICG

There are total angular momentum and orbital angular momentum. We consider the angular momentum eigenstate. The Laplace operator is given by

slide-17
SLIDE 17

The monopole configuration π‘˜ = 0 β†’ β„“ = 2 (𝑑 = βˆ’2) The quadrupole configuration π‘˜ = 2 β†’ β„“ = 0 (𝑑 = +2)

Self-gravitating bound state

18/10/2017@ICG

Spin-2 case Spin-0 case Lowest energy The monopole configuration π‘˜ = 0 β†’ β„“ = 0 (𝑑 = 0) Lowest energy The lowest energy state in massive graviton geons must be quadrupole!

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Monopole geon and Quadrupole geon

2018/03/03

The quadrupole configuration The monopole configuration

(We can also find excited states)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

The quadrupole configuration

Monopole geon and Quadrupole geon

18/10/2017@ICG

The monopole configuration The lower energy state must be more stable than the higher state. Is the monopole configuration unstable???

(We can also find excited states)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Stability of monopole geon

18/10/2017@ICG

We thus study the perturbations around the monopole configuration. We assume the perturbations do not spoil the Newtonian approx. We consider Background spherical symmetry β†’ perturbations can be expanded in terms of spherical harmonics.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Instability of monopole geon

18/10/2017@ICG

The system is reduced into the eigenvalue problem after the Fourier transformation in the time domain. The monopole geon is unstable against quadrupole mode perturbations.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Stability of geons

2018/03/03

The unstable perturbations may be the transition mode. Transit? (massive) GWs? monopole quadrupole The monopole may transit to the quadrupole by releasing binding energy.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Stability of geons

2018/03/03

(massless and/or massive) GWs? GWs could be emitted due to non-spherically symmetric oscillations. β†’ The non-relativistic quadrupole geon is an (approximately) stable object. But, the emission is small because of the large hierarchy between the time and the length scales. (GWs are emitted if πœ•2 = 𝑙2 or πœ•2 = 𝑙2 + 𝑛2) Anisotropic pressure quadrupole

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Production of geons

2018/03/03

Transit? (massive) GWs? quadrupole Jeans instability

(KA and Maeda, ’18)

Coherent massive GW Excited states? If the graviton mass is quite light, the scenario should be more complicated.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Geons as field dark matter

2018/03/03

If a mass is ~10βˆ’22eV, massive graviton can be a fuzzy dark matter. In FDM, the central part of DM halos is given by the β€œsoliton” (=geon). Ultralight axion: spin-0 DM Massive graviton: spin-2 DM core excited states (same as NFW)

From Schive et al, 2014

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Geons as field dark matter

2018/03/03

Although the field configuration is not spherically symmetric, the energy distribution is spherically symmetric. and the energy distribution is exactly the same as that of spin-0 case. not spherical spherical Spin-2 FDM could shear successes of spin-0 FDM. Is there any differences? GWs could (not?) be emitted during the formation of DM halos? Spin-0: isotropic oscillation, Spin-2: anisotropic oscillation DM is not new β€œparticle” but spacetime itself

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Summary

2018/03/03

The ground state must be non-spherical. Massive graviton geons = self-gravitating massive GWs Spin-0: ground state = monopole β‡’ β„“ = π‘˜ = 0 Spin-2: ground state = quadrupole β‡’ β„“ = 0, π‘˜ = 2 Ultralight massive graviton can be FDM as well. Note that DM is not new β€œparticle” but spacetime itself New vacuum solutions to bigravity theory. Possible prospects: Hairy BHs?, Geon as BE condensate? etc…