When to eat your brown dwarf: At breakfast, lunch or dinner? - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
When to eat your brown dwarf: At breakfast, lunch or dinner? - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
When to eat your brown dwarf: At breakfast, lunch or dinner? Tristan Guillot Observatoire de la Cte dAzur Doug Lin (UCSC), Pierre Morel (OCA) A&A stuff Increase font size (should be the same size as the text) Increase thickness
A&A stuff
Increase font size (should be the same size as the text) Increase thickness Avoid vector fonts (with IDL: !p.font=0)
M-Teff relation
3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 Teff [K] 0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00 M sini [MJup]
P [days] 1 10 100 [Fe/H]
- 0.5
0.0 0.5
Bouchy et al. (2011)
3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 Teff [K] 0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00 M sini [MJup]
P [days] 1 10 100 [Fe/H]
- 0.5
0.0 0.5
M-Teff relation
3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 Teff [K] 0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00 M sini [MJup]
CoRoT-11 b CoRoT-15 b CoRoT-2 b CoRoT-3 b OGLE-TR-122 b WASP-30 b CoRoT-14 b WASP-19 b WASP-18 b HAT-P-20 b CoRoT-14 b CoRoT-15 b CoRoT-27 b CoRoT-3 b HAT-P-20 b HAT-TR-205-013 b HD 41004 B b KELT-1 b NLTT 41135C b OGLE-TR-106 b OGLE-TR-123 b TYC 2930-00872 b WASP-14 b WASP-18 b WASP-30 b WASP-89 b XO-3 b tau Boo b
P [days] 1 10 100 [Fe/H]
- 0.5
0.0 0.5
M-Teff relation
3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 Teff [K] 0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00 M sini [MJup]
P [days] 1 10 100 [Fe/H]
- 0.5
0.0 0.5
M-Teff relation
Conjecture: Massive planets and brown dwarfs in this region have been swallowed by their star due to tidal interactions
Probabilities
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00 M2 [MJup] 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 P(Teff>6000K & M2>M2,i) Porb<5 days Porb>5 days
3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 Teff [K] 0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00 M sini [MJup]
P [days] 1 10 100 [Fe/H]
- 0.5
0.0 0.5
3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 Teff [K] 0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00 M sini [MJup]
P [days] 1 10 100 [Fe/H]
- 0.5
0.0 0.5
Porb<5days Porb>5days
Consequences of tidal interactions
- Circularization
- Orbital migration
- Critically depends on
period and Q parameter
- Q measures the efficiency of
dissipation
- Q is determined to be
around 105 to 106 for the circularization of binary stars
4000 5000 6000 7000 Teff [K] 104 106 108 1010 1012 tmigration [years]
tau Boo CoRoT-15 CoRoT-18 CoRoT-2 CoRoT-3 OGLE-TR-122 WASP-30 CoRoT-14 WASP-19 WASP-18 OGLE-TR-123 WASP-33 HAT-TR-205-013 WASP-12 M [Mjup] 1 10 100
Q'
*=106
Q’*=106: migration timescales
Model
Solves the tidal evolution of star +companion in the planar case (assumes Q α n) Stellar evolution models (CESAM2k) are included (radius, moment of inertia, convective zones) Magnetic breaking is taken into account The companion’s radius is fixed = 1Rjup Initial conditions are based on the
- bserved, present-day population
Guillot, Lin & Morel, in preparation Dynamical equations: Barker & Ogilvie (2009)
The sources of dissipation in the star
- Constant Q model
- Requires Q*>108
- Cannot explain the tmig-Teff correlation
- Dissipation of internal gravity
waves(Goodman & Dickson 1998, Barker &
Ogilvie 2010, 2011)
- Only in stars with a radiative center
- Only for companions with masses above a
critical mass (>3 Mjup for a 5Ga Sun)
- Dissipation of inertial waves (Ogilvie &
Lin 2004, 2007)
- Limited to a narrow frequency range
The IGWs prescription
The gravity waves break and dissipate near the stellar center if there is a radiative core and if the perturbing amplitude is large enough, i.e., for the present Sun: In that case the tidal dissipation factor is:
Otherwise, we assume
Q’=107 to 1010
Barker & Ogilvie (2010)
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 Radius [RSun]
- 0.0005
0.0000 0.0005 0.0010 0.0015 0.0020 Wave displacement [RSun]
1 Mjup 3 Mjup 10 Mjup 30 Mjup Non-linear
The critical mass for dissipation
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 Radius [RSun]
- 0.0005
0.0000 0.0005 0.0010 0.0015 0.0020 Wave displacement [RSun]
1 Mjup 3 Mjup 10 Mjup 30 Mjup Non-linear
Stellar evolution models
Magnetic braking
We assume a=1, n=1.5 and find Kw=1.5x10-14 yr-1, in agreement with Bouvier et al. 1997 We add a factor Min(1,mcz/m0) where mcz is the mass of the outer convective zone/total mass and m0=6x10-4 to account for the fact that massive stars have a slower braking
4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 Teff [K]
- 1
1 2 3 Log(vsini) [km/s]
mcz
*=0
mcz
*=10
- 2
mcz
*=10
- 3
SPOCS + Nordstrom
Constant dissipation model: Q’*=108
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 lifetime/main sequence age
0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Mstar [MSun]
- 1
1 2 log(Mp) [MJup]
CoRoT-14 b CoRoT-15 b CoRoT-27 b CoRoT-3 b HAT-P-20 b HAT-TR-205-013 b KELT-1 b OGLE-TR-106 b OGLE-TR-123 b TYC 2930-00872 b WASP-14 b WASP-18 b WASP-30 b WASP-89 b tau Boo b
Q’*=10
8
Pini=3days
Constant dissipation model: Q’*=106
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 lifetime/main sequence age
0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Mstar [MSun]
- 1
1 2 log(Mp) [MJup]
CoRoT-14 b CoRoT-15 b CoRoT-27 b CoRoT-3 b HAT-P-20 b HAT-TR-205-013 b KELT-1 b OGLE-TR-106 b OGLE-TR-123 b TYC 2930-00872 b WASP-14 b WASP-18 b WASP-30 b WASP-89 b tau Boo b
Q’*=10
6
Pini=3days
Internal gravity wave: full model
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 lifetime/main sequence age
0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Mstar [MSun]
- 1
1 2 log(Mp) [MJup]
CoRoT-14 b CoRoT-15 b CoRoT-27 b CoRoT-3 b HAT-P-20 b HAT-TR-205-013 b KELT-1 b OGLE-TR-106 b OGLE-TR-123 b TYC 2930-00872 b WASP-14 b WASP-18 b WASP-30 b WASP-89 b tau Boo b
IGW
Pini=3days
Internal gravity wave: full model
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 lifetime/main sequence age
0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Mstar [MSun]
- 1
1 2 log(Mp) [MJup]
CoRoT-14 b CoRoT-15 b CoRoT-27 b CoRoT-3 b HAT-P-20 b HAT-TR-205-013 b KELT-1 b OGLE-TR-106 b OGLE-TR-123 b TYC 2930-00872 b WASP-14 b WASP-18 b WASP-30 b WASP-89 b tau Boo b
IGW Close-in, massive companions are lost Too much orbital angular momentum F stars loose angular momentum more slowly and tidal dissipation by IGWs is not possible Low mass companions are below critical limit for IGWs dissipation except at old ages
Pini=3days
3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 Teff [K] 0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00 M sini [MJup]
CoRoT-11 b CoRoT-15 b CoRoT-2 b CoRoT-3 b OGLE-TR-122 b WASP-30 b CoRoT-14 b WASP-19 b WASP-18 b HAT-P-20 b CoRoT-14 b CoRoT-15 b CoRoT-27 b CoRoT-3 b HAT-P-20 b HAT-TR-205-013 b HD 41004 B b KELT-1 b NLTT 41135C b OGLE-TR-106 b OGLE-TR-123 b TYC 2930-00872 b WASP-14 b WASP-18 b WASP-30 b WASP-89 b XO-3 b tau Boo b
P [days] 1 10 100 [Fe/H]
- 0.5
0.0 0.5
Is it breakfast or dinner-time for CoRoT
- 2?
CoRoT
- 2
- CoRoT
- 2 is a wide binary (Poppenhaeger & Wolk 2014)
- CoRoT
- 2A is a G7V with a 3.5 Mjup companion
- Apparent age: 0.1-0.3 Ga
- CoRoT
- 2B is a K9V with a low X ray activity
- Apparent age: >5 Ga
- An old age helps putting back CoRoT
- 2Ab with the
- ther inflated hot Jupiters
0.001 10.000 1.0 1.8 0.010 0.100 1.000 Age [Ga] 1.2 1.4 1.6 Radius [RJup]
0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 Radius [100,000 km] 2x1029 erg s-1 1029 erg s-1 3x1028 erg s-1
- pacities x 30
- pacities x 30
1% K.E. (4.6x1027 erg s-1) standard model 3x1029 erg s-1
Guillot & Havel (2011)
Dynamical evolution of CoRoT
- 2
2000 4000 6000 8000 Age [Ma] 5 10 15 20 25 Period [days]
Orbital period Stellar spin period Planet spin period log(Q*)
2000 4000 6000 8000 Age [Ma] 2 4 6 8 10 12 Period [days]
Orbital period Stellar spin period Planet spin period log(Q*)
CoRoT
- 2 fiducial
3.5Mjup, Pini=5days, e=0 CoRoT
- 2 massive
35Mjup, Pini=5days, e=0
Does not agree with the lack of massive planets on close orbits around G dwarfs:
- Q’* dependence upon Pspin implies weaker dissipation in massive planet case
- When star & planet are locked, migration is governed by magnetic braking
timescale (see Damiani & Lanza 2015)
Planets for breakfast?
- Mazeh et al. (2015) show that “cool” KOIs are
more aligned than “hot” KOIs (Teff>6250K)
- up to Porb=50 days!
- Matsakos & Königl (2015) propose that this may
be due to an early ingestion of planets
- Swallowed planets would affect the angular momentum of
cool stars more than hot stars which have a faster rotation
- This assumes that the stellar rotation axis and the disk with
planets are tilted initially
Conclusions
- There are very few brown dwarfs & massive planets as close
companions to G dwarfs whereas they are present around F dwarfs
- This would be naturally explained by their engulfment
- Would explain the «close-in brown dwarf desert»
- Source of dissipation are still to be fully accounted for
- Low magnetic braking in F-dwarfs is a critical factor
- Internal gravity waves have the interesting properties but are unable to
account for all observations
- Inertial waves can potentially help
- Role of eccentricity?
- We still don’t know when brown dwarfs get eaten…