what matter s around galaxies shining a bright light on
play

What matter(s) around galaxies? Shining a bright light on the cold - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

What matter(s) around galaxies? Shining a bright light on the cold phase of the CGM Cantalupo et al., Nature , 2014 Sebastiano Cantalupo ETH Zurich In collaboration with: MUSE GTO Team (ETH, CRAL, Leiden, AIP, Toulouse, Gottingen) + Cosmic


  1. What matter(s) around galaxies? Shining a bright light on the cold phase of the CGM Cantalupo et al., Nature , 2014 Sebastiano Cantalupo ETH Zurich In collaboration with: MUSE GTO Team (ETH, CRAL, Leiden, AIP, Toulouse, Gottingen) + Cosmic Structure Formation group at ETH & J. Xavier Prochaska, Sammy B. Slug, Piero Madau, Fabrizio Arrigoni-Battaia, Joe Hennawi , Martin Haehnelt Sebastiano Cantalupo – What Matter(s) Around Galaxies - June 2017 14/06/2007

  2. Talk Outline & Key Questions What are the morphological and physical properties of the CGM on both small and large scales? (key questions #2 and #3) Introduction: detecting the CGM/IGM in emission Observational surveys (NB, MUSE, MOSFIRE) and inferred properties of the CGM Cantalupo et al., Nature , 2014 How do galaxies affect cooling in the CGM? (key question #4) Open questions/Summary Sebastiano Cantalupo – What Matter(s) Around Galaxies - June 2017 14/06/2007

  3. Detecting Cosmic Gas “Classical” approach: in absorption. quasar • pro: ability to detect low-density gas including metals. • con: typically only 1D information (or sparse 2D) LLS/DLAS = “Dark” galaxies? Filaments? IGM? CGM? ... difficult to say without direct detection. Direct detection in emission : Fluorescent Ly α ( Hogan & Weymann 1987;Gould & Weinberg 1996; Zheng & Miralda-Escude 2005; Cantalupo+05,07; Kollmeier+06,10; Cantalupo+12 ) external fluorescent QSO ionizing flux emission fluorescent emitters HI HI Absorption part (1D info) ionized region HII recombina- (HII) tions Self-shielded gas (slab): “mirror” emission -> ~60% of incident ionizing radiation “converted” to Ly α (but see Cantalupo+05). Fully ionized gas: proportional to gas density squared. Sebastiano Cantalupo – What Matter(s) Around Galaxies - June 2017 14/06/2007

  4. How bright is fluorescent emission: simulations Simulated Ly α images at z~2.5 (20Å NB; no noise/PSF) centred on a ~10 13 M sun halo hydro-simulation (RAMSES) + Radiative Transfer ( RADAMESH , SC+12 ) QSO fluorescence Cantalupo+12 log(SB) (cgs/arcsec 2 ) -17 NB & -18 MUSE 1h MUSE medium -19 MUSE deep -20 MUSE UVB+Stars FOV +QSO UVB+Stars -21 2 4 6 2 4 6 8 8 cMpc cMpc UVB fluorescence 1) Look around bright quasars How to detect it? 2) “Stack” for statistical detection (see Sofia Gallego’s talk) 3) Integrate for 100+ hours away from quasars Sebastiano Cantalupo – What Matter(s) Around Galaxies - June 2017 14/06/2007

  5. Highlights from Narrow-Band imaging survey of Quasar fields at z~2.3 Compact fluorescent emitters without CGM in emission around a bright galaxy stellar counterparts (“Dark galaxies”) SC+12 qso (3’) SC+12 Morphology and SB compatible with “cold filaments” Giant Quasar Nebulae: + other 25 QSOs (FLASHLIGHT Keck+GMOS survey; the Slug 1’ (500kpc) Cantalupo+, in prep.; Arrigoni-Battaia+, in prep.; see next talk) main results: - Giant Nebulae (>100kpc) are rare in NB surveys (<10%) qso - Morphology and “kinematics” compatible with CGM/IGM but SB is too high for expected gas densities —> dense clumps required (see later). Cantalupo+14, Nature Sebastiano Cantalupo – What Matter(s) Around Galaxies - June 2017 14/06/2007

  6. Are Giant Nebulae really rare? A MUSE snapshot survey around z~3.5 QSOs ~350 kpc 45” Targets: brightest radio-quiet QSOs at 3<z<4 (and two radio-loud, R1 & R2) Exposure times: 1h only total integration (“snapshot” survey) “White-light” images obtained by collapsing the datacube along the wavelength direction. Borisova, Cantalupo+, 2016 Sebastiano Cantalupo – What Matter(s) Around Galaxies - June 2017 14/06/2007

  7. MUSE observations of QSOs at z~3.5: 100% detection rate of giant nebulae! ~350 kpc 45” Targets: brightest radio-quiet QSOs at 3<z<4 (and two radio-loud, R1 & R2) Exposure times: 1h only total integration (“snapshot” survey) Optimally extracted pseudo-NB images with QSO PSF-subtraction obtained with CubExactor (Cantalupo in prep.) All nebulae larger than 100 kpc with various morphologies. Borisova, Cantalupo+, 2016 Sebastiano Cantalupo – What Matter(s) Around Galaxies - June 2017 14/06/2007

  8. A 3D view of the Muse Quasar Nebula 3 (MQN03), 350kpc in size: CubExtractor (Cantalupo, in prep.) + VisIt QSO PSF and continuum subtracted cube 350kpc 2 σ ~1x10 -18 cgs/arcsec 2 10A ~ 600km/s Borisova, Cantalupo+, 2016 Sebastiano Cantalupo – What Matter(s) Around Galaxies - June 2017 14/06/2007

  9. 2D Velocity maps: - no clear signs of “rotation” (with some exceptions); - radio-quiet nebulae (1-17) are kinematically “narrow”. Borisova, Cantalupo+, 2016 Sebastiano Cantalupo – What Matter(s) Around Galaxies - June 2017 14/06/2007

  10. How do they compare with other Ly α Nebulae and “haloes”? Circularly averaged SB profile “redshift-corrected” average profile (all scaled to z=3) QSO PSF All giant quasar nebulae have similar SB profile and are consistent with fluorescence (including LBG Stack “halo” of Steidel+11) Borisova, Cantalupo+, 2016 Sebastiano Cantalupo – What Matter(s) Around Galaxies - June 2017 14/06/2007

  11. Inferring the cold gas content of the Giant Nebulae: the Slug case Cantalupo+, Nature, 2014 “Photon-pumping / Ly α “Recombination” case scattering” case Observed SB (gas mostly ionized) (gas mostly neutral) cm -2 cm -2 Inferred N(HI) Inferred N(HII) a a b b NB: depends on Clumping Factor M(HII) ~ M(“cold” H) ~ 10 12 M ⊙◉☊ /C 0.5 M(HI) ~ M(“cold” H) ~ 2.5x10 11 M ⊙◉☊ Sebastiano Cantalupo – What Matter(s) Around Galaxies - June 2017 14/06/2007

  12. Comparison with simulations: more IGM “clumps” needed! Simulation (all) Slug Nebula C=1 “ionized” case Subgrid Clumping a Factor (<1kpc) N(H) cm -2 b Text Slug Nebula Slug Nebula C=50 “neutral” case “ionized” case Subgrid Clumping N(H) a a Factor cm -2 (<1kpc) b b Cantalupo+, Nature, 2014 Sebastiano Cantalupo – What Matter(s) Around Galaxies - June 2017 14/06/2007

  13. Breaking degeneracies with non-resonant lines: MUSE HeII search NB (Ly 𝛃 ) c Cantalupo+, in prep. Sebastiano Cantalupo – What Matter(s) Around Galaxies - June 2017 14/06/2007

  14. Extended HeII detected with MUSE from “part” of the Slug (no rotation!): continuum subtracted cube (9h) 12 + CubEx v1.6 (Cantalupo, in prep.) 6 4 2 150kpc 2 σ ~3x10 -19 c cgs/arcsec 2 10A ~ 600km/s Cantalupo+, in prep. Sebastiano Cantalupo – What Matter(s) Around Galaxies - June 2017 14/06/2007

  15. Why is HeII “missing” from the Slug “tail”? 1) “Tail” Ly α emission due to “photon-pumping / scattering” ruled out by MOSFIRE H α (and preliminary MUSE CIII) detection “tail” Ly α spectrum “tail” Ly α /H α ~10 qso b consistent with Case B Recombination H α spectrum Leibler, Cantalupo+, to be sumbitted Sebastiano Cantalupo – What Matter(s) Around Galaxies - June 2017 14/06/2007

  16. Why is HeII “missing” from the Slug “tail”? High densities required HeII/Ly α 2) High densities and larger distances ~0.08 Expected HeII/Ly α ratio 0 -0.5 (a) -1 log (HeII/Ly α ) -1.5 -2 <0.005! data -2.5 D = 50 kpc “single-density” D = 160 kpc clump scenario -3 D = 350 kpc D = 1 Mpc -3.5 -1 0 1 2 3 4 log(nH/cm -3 ) (a) n clump ~10 2 -10 4 cc ! (depending on data actual distance) (b) (b) <n> cold =0.1 cc <n> cold ~1-10 cc if log-normal σ >2.5 “turbulent/lognormal <n> cold =1 cc density distribution” scenario data Cantalupo+, in prep. Sebastiano Cantalupo – What Matter(s) Around Galaxies - June 2017 14/06/2007

  17. Open Questions and Future Directions What sets the frequency , size and luminosity of the giant quasar Nebulae? (quasar lifetime, opening angle, halo mass, redshift, quasar luminosity,…) What is the origin of the IGM/CGM clumps traced by the Nebulae? (thermal/gravitational instabilities, quasar radiation effects,…) How this affects galaxy and QSO formation? (fast gas accretion, violent disk instability,…) Exploring a larger parameter space: - include lower luminosity quasars; - extend the redshift range to 2<z<3 (not possible with MUSE, KWCI required) Improving our theoretical understanding of IGM “clump-formation”: - hydrodynamical and thermal stability analysis (see Ann-Christine Vossberg’s talk); - detailed comparison with observational data. Moving “away” from quasars: - detect “average” Cosmic Web filaments connecting galaxies and illuminated by the cosmic UVB (>50h-deep exposure with MUSE and/or KWCI required). Sebastiano Cantalupo – What Matter(s) Around Galaxies - June 2017 14/06/2007

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend