Wave Phenomena
Physics 15c
Lecture 8 LC transmission line
(H&L Section 9.2)
Wave Phenomena Physics 15c Lecture 8 LC transmission line (H&L - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Wave Phenomena Physics 15c Lecture 8 LC transmission line (H&L Section 9.2) What We Did Last Time Studied sound in solid, liquid and gas Youngs modulus Y , bulk modulus M B and volume density v determine everything Ideal
Lecture 8 LC transmission line
(H&L Section 9.2)
Studied sound in solid, liquid and gas
Young’s modulus Y, bulk modulus MB and volume density
ρv determine everything
Ideal gas is particularly simple: only need molecular mass
Analyzed transverse waves on string
Equation of motion looks the same as longitudinal waves
Just replace elastic modulus K with tension T
Solution has the same characteristics as well Energy and momentum densities are also identical
Explore another, totally different type of waves:
Electromagnetic waves on an LC transmission line
Start from coupled LC oscillators Find and solve the wave equation Calculate the wave velocity Introduce impedance Discuss real examples – parallel wires, coaxial cables What about the energy and momentum?
Imagine an infinite array of inductors and capacitors
C L C L C L C L C L C L
0V Vn qn In Electrical analogue of coupled pendulums
Voltage across C Voltage across L Charge conservation
Equation of “motion”
L C L C L
Vn qn In In-1 Vn+1 C q V
n n =
dt dI L V V
n n n
− = −
+1 1 n n n
dq I I dt
− −
=
( )
2 1 1 2
1 ( )
n n n n n
d V C V V V V dt L
+ −
= − − −
Similar to the coupled pendulums
Assume we have L’s and C’s
at every ∆x
Replace indices with position
The equations become:
L C L C L
Vn qn In In-1 Vn+1 ) (x V Vn → dt dI L V V
n n n
− = −
+1
( ) ( ) ( ) V x C I x x I x t ∂ = − ∆ − ∂
∆x
) (x I In → ) (x q qn → ( ) ( ) ( ) I x L V x x V x t ∂ − = + ∆ − ∂ dt dV C I I
n n n
= −
−1
( ) V x x x ∂ ∆ ∂ ( ) I x x x ∂ − ∆ ∂
L/∆x is the linear inductance density (Henry/m) C/∆x is the linear capacitance density (Farad/m)
Combine them to get the wave equation
( , ) ( , ) L I x t V x t x t x ∂ ∂ − = ∆ ∂ ∂ ( , ) ( , ) C V x t I x t x t x ∂ ∂ − = ∆ ∂ ∂
2 2 2 2 2
) , ( ) , ( ) , ( t t x V x C x t t x I x t x V L x ∂ ∂ ∆ − = ∂ ∂ ∂ = ∂ ∂ ∆ − x ∂ ∂ t ∂ ∂
2 2 2 2
) , ( ) , ( t t x V x C x L x t x V ∂ ∂ ∆ ∆ = ∂ ∂ For the voltage
For the current I(x, t)
2 2 2 2 2
) , ( ) , ( ) , ( x t x I C x t x t x V t t x I x L ∂ ∂ ∆ − = ∂ ∂ ∂ = ∂ ∂ ∆ − ( , ) ( , ) L I x t V x t x t x ∂ ∂ − = ∆ ∂ ∂ ( , ) ( , ) C V x t I x t x t x ∂ ∂ − = ∆ ∂ ∂ x ∂ ∂ t ∂ ∂
2 2 2 2
) , ( ) , ( x t x I t t x I x C x L ∂ ∂ = ∂ ∂ ∆ ∆
V(x, t) and I(x, t) satisfy the same wave equation
Correspondences between the constants in the
electromagnetic and mechanical wave equations:
Inductance ↔ mass Capacitance ↔ spring constant
Compare the wave equations
m L ↔
S
k C / 1 ↔
2 2 2 2
) , ( ) , ( x t x V t t x V x C x L ∂ ∂ = ∂ ∂ ∆ ∆
2 2 2 2
) , ( ) , ( x t x K t t x
l
∂ ∂ = ∂ ∂ ξ ξ ρ x m ∆ x kS∆
We know the normal mode solution
Throw them into the wave equations
2 2 2 2
) , ( ) , ( x t x V t t x V x C x L ∂ ∂ = ∂ ∂ ∆ ∆
2 2 2 2
) , ( ) , ( x t x I t t x I x C x L ∂ ∂ = ∂ ∂ ∆ ∆ )) ( exp( ) , ( t kx i V t x V ω ± = )) ( exp( ) , ( t kx i I t x I ω ± =
2 2
k x C x L = ∆ ∆ ω C x L x k cw ∆ ∆ = = ω
l
K ρ for mechanical waves
C x L x k cw ∆ ∆ = = ω
The solutions for V(x, t) and I(x, t) must be related
Throw in
to the first equation:
Voltage and current are proportional to each other
Sounds like Ohm’s law
L i I V ik x ω = ∆ m )) ( exp( ) , ( t kx i V t x V ω ± = )) ( exp( ) , ( t kx i I t x I ω ± = C L xk L I V m m = ∆ = ω ( , ) ( , ) L I x t V x t x t x ∂ ∂ − = ∆ ∂ ∂ ( , ) ( , ) C V x t I x t x t x ∂ ∂ − = ∆ ∂ ∂
C L I V e I e V t x I t x V
t kx i t kx i
m = = =
± ± ) ( ) (
) , ( ) , (
ω ω
Ohm’s law: V = RI We could call this resistance
We call it impedance Z The name implies that, unlike a real
resistor, it does not consume power
The transmission line is made entirely of reactive
(inductive and capacitive) components
We can now write the solution as
C L Z =
) (
) , ( ) , (
t kx i
e V t x ZI t x V
ω ±
= = m + if forward-going; − if backward-going
C L C L C L C L C L C L
I(t) V(t)
V(t) and I(t) are related by V(t) = ZI(t)
From the wave generator (= AC power supply), it looks
identical to a simple resistor I(t) An infinite LC transmission line is indistinguishable from a simple resistor to the circuit driving it V(t) C L R =
Cut an LC transmission line and attach a resistor
If R equals to the impedance, the finite-length LC
transmission line would look as if infinitely long
Which in turn looks like a simple resistor of value R
The line is terminated with a matching impedance
Properly terminated LC transmission line is easy to drive, as
it behaves just like a resistor
C L C L C L C L C L
I(t) V(t) C L R =
LC x C x L x k cw 1 ∆ = ∆ ∆ = = ω
Propagation velocity is proportional to ∆x
We can choose ∆x freely
Velocity can be made as big as we like
It cannot be true if we consider special relativity
cw can never be made faster than c Where is the catch?
We must look at an actual example
Imagine a pair of copper
wires running in parallel
Like a phone line
There are inductance and capacitance
We can calculate them using Physics 15b
It’s an easy exercise
Then we can calculate the wave velocity
Suppose the wires are strung in vacuum
radius a distance d
Inductance is defined by
the magnetic field
Suppose we ran current I
and –I on these wires
Calculate the magnetic flux in the d × ∆x rectangle Magnetic field at distance r and d – r from the two wires is Integrate between the wires to calculate the flux
) ( 2 2 r d I r I B − + = π µ π µ H/m 10 4 vacuum
ty Permeabili
7 −
× = = π µ
I −I
r r d −
( ) ( )
d a a
B r drdx x B r dr
−
Φ = = ∆
[ ]
a d I a a d I r d r I dr r d r I Bdr
a d a a d a a d a
ln ln ln ln 2 1 1 2 π µ π µ π µ π µ ≈ − = − − = − + =
− − −
I −I
r r d −
a d I x ln π µ ∆ = Φ
Total magnetic flux inside the rectangle is Inductance L is defined by
LI = Φ
0 ln d
L x I a µ π Φ = = ∆ a d x L ln π µ = ∆
Capacitance is defined by
the electric field
Suppose we have charge densities
ρ (C/m) and –ρ on these wires
Calculate the electric potential between the two wires Electric field at distance r and d – r from the two wires is Integrate between the wires to calculate the potential
) ( 2 2 r d r E − + = πε ρ πε ρ F/m 10 85 . 8 vacuum
ty Permittivi
12 −
× = = ε
r r d −
ρ −ρ
E ( )
d a a
V E r dr
−
= ∫
[ ]
a d a a d r d r dr r d r Edr V
a d a a d a a d a
ln ln ln ln 2 1 1 2 πε ρ πε ρ πε ρ πε ρ ≈ − = − − = − + = =
− − −
r
ρ
Total charge in a ∆x long piece is Capacitance C is defined by
x q ∆ = ρ CV q = a d C x ln πε ρ ρ = ∆
( )
a d x C / ln πε = ∆
r d −
E
−ρ
Got all what we need!
Impedance is Wave velocity is
( )
a d x C / ln πε = ∆ a d x L ln π µ = ∆ a d a d C L Z ln ) ( 377 ln 1 π ε µ π Ω = = = Vacuum impedance c C x L x cw = = ∆ ∆ = 1 µ ε speed of light!
A pair of parallel wires in vacuum transmit electromagnetic waves at the speed of light
One can run the wires in other medium than vacuum
ε0 and µ0 becomes ε and µ of the medium Wave velocity
Any electrical circuit has at least two wires
A parallel wire transmission line is the simplest possible Anything more complex has more inductance and
capacitance per unit length
Wave velocity of an LC transmission line never
exceeds the speed of light
Now we feel better…
εµ / 1 =
w
c always smaller than c smaller cw
Energy is in two forms
Electrostatic energy in C Magnetic energy in L
Both are easy to calculate We know
Energies in C and L are identical
L C L C L
Vn qn In In-1 Vn+1
∆x
2
2 1 CV EC =
2
2 1 LI EL = I C L ZI V = =
L C
E LI I C L C E = = =
2 2
2 1 2 1 Sounds familiar?
Consider a forward-going wave
Total energy density is given by Time average gives Multiply by the wave velocity to get the transfer rate
2 2 2
2 cos ( )
C
E dE CV C V kx t dx x x x ω × = = = − ∆ ∆ ∆ ) cos( ) , ( t kx V t x V ω − =
2
1 2 dE C V dx x = ∆ Average energy density
2 2 2 2
1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2
w
V dE C C C c V x V V V I dt x LC x L Z = = ∆ = = = ∆ ∆
The energy transfer rate is
This makes perfect sense if we consider the power needed to
create this wave
Consider an AC power supply driving this
transmission line
It must produce The power is given by (voltage) x (current)
2 1 I V t V t ZI t V ω cos ) ( ) ( = = t I V t I t V ω
2
cos ) ( ) ( = ×
average
2 1 I V
Energy conservation
Can electrical wires carry momentum?
What if they were feeding power to an electromagnet? We can sort-of argue that electricity carries force
Traveling waves on an LC transmission line do carry
momentum
But we cannot see any mass moving with it We can only see that forces are needed/produced at the ends
Let’s take a look at a parallel wire example…
Let’s drive a transmission line that is terminated
To create waves, the wires from the driving circuit must run
across the gap between the wires
Same for the terminating resistor Current flows across the wires There is B field between the wires
Lorentz force
Magnetic field between the wires is Lorentz force is
It’s parallel to the direction of the wires
Backward (into the screen) at the driver Forward (out of the screen) at the terminator
Integrate I × B to calculate the total force
I d – r r ) ( 2 2 r d I r I B − + = π µ π µ = × F I B B
d a r a
dr
− =
= ×
F I B
2 2 2
1 1 2 ln
d a d a a a
I F IBdr dr r d r I d L I a x µ π µ π
− −
= = + − ≈ = ∆
a d x L ln π µ = ∆
The driving circuit gets this force backward The terminating resistor gets this force forward
We can see this as the waves transmitting force
F F
The waves transmit force
This is also the momentum transfer rate
For normal mode waves, the driver must produce
The force is then
2
I x L F ∆ = t I x L F ω
2 2 0 cos
∆ = t V t ZI t V ω cos ) ( ) ( = =
w
c I V I x L
2
2 1 2 1 = ∆
average
I C L ZI V = = LC x cw 1 ∆ =
This is energy transfer rate divided by the velocity
Studied waves on an LC transmission line
Mechanism is totally different Same wave equation Voltage and current are proportional
Impedance is a convenient concept
Example: parallel wire transmission line
Wave velocity (in vacuum)
Energy and momentum
Transfer rates for normal mode are
C L Z = c C x L x cw = = ∆ ∆ = 1 µ ε 2 1 I V
w
c I V 2 1 and Momentum Velocity Energy =