voyager pad efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in
play

VOYAGER PAD Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban in Patients with PAD - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

VOYAGER PAD Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban in Patients with PAD undergoing Recurrent Lower Extremity Revascularization CIRSE August 2020 Marc P. Bonaca on behalf of the VOYAGER PAD Investigators, Executive and Steering Committees An


  1. VOYAGER PAD Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban in Patients with PAD undergoing Recurrent Lower Extremity Revascularization CIRSE August 2020 Marc P. Bonaca on behalf of the VOYAGER PAD Investigators, Executive and Steering Committees An Academic Research Organization Affiliated with the University of Colorado School of Medicine

  2. Disclosures • VOYAGER PAD was funded by a grant from Bayer to CPC Clinical Research • Grant support from: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Medtronic, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer 2

  3. PAD Patients with Prior Revascularization are at 4-Fold Risk of Acute Limb Ischemia TRA2P-TIMI 50 PAD PEGASUS-TIMI 54 PAD Characteristic Adjusted HR for ALI Prior revascularization Adjusted HR for ALI 3.76 Prior Peripheral HR 3.60 (2.26 – 6.25) Revascularization (2.10 – 6.18) p<0.001 P<0.001 ABI ≤ 0.5 HR 2.86 (1.81 – 4.51) Bonaca et al. JACC 2016 ABI ≥ 1.3 HR 2.71 (1.09 – 6.72) EUCLID Current Smoking HR 2.17 Prior revascularization (1.01 – 4.67) Adjusted HR for ALI 4.23 P=0.046 (2.86 – 6.25) p<0.001 Bonaca et al. Circulation 2016 Jones et al. Circulation 2016 3

  4. Heterogeneity in Risk of Major Adverse Limb Events by Severity of Limb Disease 4% 3.80% Incidence of MALE (%) 3% 2% 1.37% 1% N=86 N=37 N=5 0.50% 0% Prior Revascularization or Amputation Claudication but no History of Revascularization or Amputation Asymtomatic low ABI (<=0.90) N=2264 N=2705 N=1422 36% of Population 42% of Population 22% of Population Bonaca MP, Creager MA. JACC 2018 4

  5. Trial Design *PAD defined as: - Ischemic symptoms NCT02504216 6,564 Patients with Symptomatic Lower Extremity (functional limitation, PAD* Undergoing Peripheral Revascularization rest pain or ischemic ulceration) AND - Imaging evidence of occlusion AND ASA 100 daily for all Patients - Abnormal ABI/TBI Clopidogrel at Investigator’s Discretion Randomized 1:1 Double Blind Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg Stratified by Placebo twice daily Revascularization Approach (Surgical or Endovascular with and without clopidogrel) Follow up Q6 Months, Event Driven, Median f/u 28 Months Primary Efficacy Endpoint : Acute limb ischemia, major amputation of vascular etiology, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke or cardiovascular death Principal Safety Outcome: TIMI Major Bleeding Capell WH, Bonaca MP, Nehler MR…Hiatt WR. AHJ 2018 5 Bonaca MP…Hiatt WR NEJM 2020

  6. Primary Endpoint Acute limb ischemia, major amputation for vascular cause, myocardial 3 Year infarction, ischemic stroke, CV death ARR 2.6% NNT 39 19.9% 20 Placebo Rivaroxaban 18 17.3% 16 Cumulative Incidence (KM%) 1 Year 14 ARR 2.0% 12 NNT 50 6 Months 10 ARR 1.5% 8 NNT 65 HR 0.85 95% CI 0.76 – 0.96 6 P=0.009 4 2 0 0 0 3 90 182 6 274 9 12 366 15 456 18 547 21 639 24 731 821 27 912 30 1004 33 36 Months from Randomization Bonaca MP…Hiatt WR et al. NEJM 2020;382:1994–2004 Bonaca MP et al. Presented at ACC 2020. Slides available at 6 ARR – absolute risk reduction, www.clinicaltrialresults.org/Slides/ACC%202020/Bonaca_VOYAGER-PAD.pptx NNT number needed to treat

  7. Hypotheses Symptomatic PAD patients undergoing recurrent lower extremity revascularization (prior LER) versus those undergoing first LER: • Will have a higher rate of acute limb ischemia • Will derive even greater benefits with a rivaroxaban plus aspirin strategy versus aspirin alone, particularly for acute limb ischemia 7

  8. Methods • The presence of known prior LER was reported by investigators at baseline and was defined as any history of endovascular, hybrid or surgical LER • Primary outcome is composite of acute limb ischemia, major amputation of vascular etiology, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, CV death • COX model with interaction terms to assess for heterogeneity of efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban by prior LER status 8

  9. Baseline Characteristics Baseline Characteristics No Prior LER Prior LER P-value N=4226 N=2336 67 67 Median age, median (IQR) – yr 0.74 (61 – 73) (61 – 73) Female no. (%) 26 25 0.46 White Caucasian no. (%) 81 80 <0.001 Hypertension (%) 79 86 <0.001 Diabetes Mellitus (%) 35 51 0.066 Hyperlipidemia (%) 54 71 <0.001 Current smoking (%) 35 33 <0.001 eGFR < 60 ml/min.1.73m 2 19 22 0.0259 Coronary artery disease (%) 28 38 <0.001 Carotid stenosis ≥ 50% (%) 6 11 <0.001 History of heart failure (%) 8 8 0.42 9

  10. Baseline Characteristics No Prior LER Prior LER Baseline Characteristics P-value N=4226 N=2336 Qualifying revascularization <0.001 Surgical (%) 36 27 Endovascular (%) 64 73 Reason for revascularization <0.001 Critical limb ischemia (%) 26 18 PAD Characteristics Prior major amputation (%) 0.7 1.5 0.0026 Prior amputation (%) 5 7 0.0054 Prior bypass (%) 0 28 <0.001 Prior endovascular (%) 0 82 <0.001 0.53 0.58 ABI (median, IWR) <0.0001 (0.40 – 0.65) (0.45 – 0.70) Medications Statins 77 85 <0.001 ACE/ARB 61 68 <0.001 Clopidogrel at 47 56 <0.001 randomization 10

  11. Primary Endpoint – Placebo Patients Placebo 25 20 Cumulative Incidence (%) No Prior LER 17.7% 15 10 5 0 0 90 182 274 366 456 547 639 731 821 912 1004 1096 Days from Randomization 11

  12. Primary Endpoint – Placebo Patients Placebo Prior LER 25 25 23.8% +6.1% 20 20 Cumulative Incidence (%) No Prior LER 17.7% 15 15 10 10 5 5 0 0 0 0 90 90 182 182 274 274 366 366 456 456 547 547 639 639 731 731 821 821 912 912 1004 1004 1096 1096 Days from Randomization 12

  13. Primary Endpoint by Prior LER Placebo Rivaroxaban No Prior LER Prior LER P-interaction 0.0360 HR 0.94 HR 0.73 23.8 (0.81 – 1.10) (0.60 – 0.88) Cumulative Incidence (%) Cumulative Incidence (%) 17.7 18.1 16.9 Days from Randomization Days from Randomization 13

  14. Limb Outcomes with Rivaroxban with and without Prior LER Placebo All p-interaction > 0.05 Rivaroxaban No Prior LER Prior LER 4,226 2,336 HR 0.74 HR 0.91 HR 0.59 HR 0.86 (0.56 – 0.98) (0.65 – 1.27) (0.44 – 0.80) (0.56 – 1.31) 10.8 12 11 9 8.25 KM (%) at 3 years KM (%) at 3 years 6.6 6.0 6 5.5 4.5 4.5 3.7 3.4 3.3 3 2.75 0 0 ALI Vasc Amp ALI Vasc Amp Limb Outcomes Limb Outcomes 14

  15. Safety of Rivaroxaban With and Without CAD Placebo Rivaroxaban No Prior LER Prior LER N=4,187 N=2,316 P-interaction 0.16 P-interaction 0.38 P-interaction 0.93 10% HR 1.88 HR 1.08 HR 1.19 HR 0.66 HR 1.44 HR 1.41 (1.09 – 3.25) (0.62 – 1.89) (0.50 – 2.80) (0.23 – 1.84) (1.02 – 2.05) (0.97 – 2.06) 8.0% KM Rate at 3 Years (%) 8% 5.4% 5% 4.6% 3.3% 3.2% 3.1% 2.3% 3% 1.4% 1.2% 0.9% 0.7% 0.6% 36 20 26 24 75 54 65 46 11 10 9 6 0% TIMI major no prior LER ICH or Fatal no prior LER ISTH major no prior LER 15

  16. Summary Symptomatic PAD patients undergoing recurrent lower extremity revascularization (prior LER) versus those undergoing first LER: – Have higher rates of ischemic events, particularly acute limb ischemia – Derive even greater benefit of a rivaroxban plus aspirin versus aspirin alone for the composite of acute limb ischemia, major amputation of a vascular etiology, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke or cardiovascular death with the greatest absolute benefit for acute limb ischemia • The safety of rivaroxaban plus aspirin versus aspirin alone is consistent regardless of prior LER 16

  17. Conclusion • Prior analyses in stable PAD demonstrate that prior LER is an independent predictor of ALI even late after intervention • The current analysis demonstrates that within this population, those with a multiple revascularizations are at higher risk than those who have undergone a first revascularization only and may derive particularly robust benefit from rivaroxaban plus aspirin versus aspirin alone • These observations further demonstrate the heterogeneity of risk in the PAD population and may assist in clinical risk stratification and therapeutic decision making 17

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend