efficacy safety and tolerability of rimegepant 75 mg an
play

Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Rimegepant 75 mg, an Efficacy, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Rimegepant 75 mg, an Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Rimegepant 75 mg, an Oral CGRP Receptor Antagonist, for the Acute Treatment of Oral CGRP Receptor Antagonist, for the Acute Treatment of Migraine:


  1. Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Rimegepant 75 mg, an Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Rimegepant 75 mg, an Oral CGRP Receptor Antagonist, for the Acute Treatment of Oral CGRP Receptor Antagonist, for the Acute Treatment of Migraine: Results from a Phase 3, Double-Blind, Migraine: Results from a Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial, Study 302 Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial, Study 302 Richard B. Lipton, MD 1,2,3 ; Vladimir Coric, MD 4 ; Elyse G. Stock, MD 4 ; David Stock, PhD 4 ; Richard B. Lipton, MD 1,2,3 ; Vladimir Coric, MD 4 ; Elyse G. Stock, MD 4 ; David Stock, PhD 4 ; Beth A. Morris, BA 4 ; Timothy J. McCormack, BA 4 ; Marianne Frost, MA 4 ; Kimberly Beth A. Morris, BA 4 ; Timothy J. McCormack, BA 4 ; Marianne Frost, MA 4 ; Kimberly Gentile, BS 4 ; Gene M. Dubowchik, PhD 4 ; Charles M. Conway, PhD 4 ; Robert Croop, MD 4 Gentile, BS 4 ; Gene M. Dubowchik, PhD 4 ; Charles M. Conway, PhD 4 ; Robert Croop, MD 4 1 Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA; 2 Montefiore 1 Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA; 2 Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA; 3 Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA; 3 Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA; 4 Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc., New Haven, CT, USA Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA; 4 Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc., New Haven, CT, USA

  2. Disclosures • Biohaven Pharmaceuticals funded the study, was responsible for study oversight, and performed data management and analysis • Richard B. Lipton, MD, serves on the editorial board of Neurology and Cephalalgia and as senior advisor to Headache but is not paid for his roles on Neurology or Headache. He has received research support from the NIH. He also receives support from the Migraine Research Foundation and the National Headache Foundation. He receives research grants from Allergan, Amgen, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, and Novartis. He has reviewed for the NIA and NINDS and serves as consultant, advisory board member, or has received honoraria from Alder, Allergan, Amgen, Autonomic Technologies, Avanir, Boston Scientific, CoLucid, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, electroCore, Eli Lilly, eNeura Therapeutics, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis, Teva, and Vedanta. He receives royalties from Wolff’s Headache (8 th Edition, Oxford Press University, 2009) and Informa. He holds stock options in eNeura Therapeutics and Biohaven Pharmaceuticals. • All other authors are employed by and hold stock/stock options in Biohaven Pharmaceuticals Rimegepant is an investigational new drug, not approved or authorized for marketing in the U.S. or any country for any indication or treatment of any disease or condition. This material is being made available for informational purposes only. 2

  3. Triptans: Nonresponse, Recurrence, and Serious AEs for Many Patients Serotonin 5-HT 1B/1D receptor agonists (triptans) have been the most widely prescribed acute treatment of migraine for decades 1 34% 30%-40% ~3.5 million Do not respond 2 Have attack recurrence 3 Contraindicated or use with caution 4,5 1. Loder E. NEJM . 2010;363:63-70.; 2. Lipton RB et al. Headache . 2017;57:1026-40.; 3. Cameron C et al. Headache. 2015;55 Suppl 4:221-35.; 4. Buse DC et al. 3 Headache. 2017;57:31-44.; 5. Lipton RB et al. Headache . 2017;57:1507-21.

  4. Study Design • Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter Phase 3 study • Eligible subjects: – At least 18 years of age – At least a 1-year history of migraine (ICHD-3 beta 1 ) – 2-8 migraine attacks of moderate or severe intensity per month – Fewer than 15 days with headache per month (migraine or non-migraine) over the last 3 months – Any preventive migraine medication had to be stable for at least 3 months • Randomized to receive rimegepant 75 mg or placebo • Instructed to treat a single migraine attack ICHD-3 beta. Cephalalgia . 2013;33(9):629-808. 4

  5. Subject Demographics Rimegepant 75 mg Placebo Total Characteristic N=537 N=535 N=1072 Age, years (SD) 40.2 (11.9) 40.9 (12.1) 40.6 (12.0) Female, n (%) 479 (89.2) 472 (88.2) 951 (88.7) Body mass index, kg/m 2 (SD) 30.1 (7.9) 31.8 (8.5) 31.4 (8.2) Attacks per month, n (SD) 4.5 (1.9) 4.6 (1.8) 4.6 (1.8) Duration of untreated attacks, hr (SD) 32.0 (22.5) 32.9 (21.7) 32.5 (22.1) Historical MBS, n (%) Photophobia 316 (58.8) 303 (56.6) 619 (57.7) Phonophobia 79 (14.7) 90 (16.8) 169 (15.8) Nausea 142 (26.4) 142 (26.5) 284 (26.5) SD, Standard Deviation MBS, most bothersome symptom 5

  6. Subject Disposition Rimegepant 75 mg Placebo Randomized 594 592 Received study treatment 543 543 Did not receive study treatment a 51 49 Completed acute phase 538 542 Discontinued a 5 1 Analyzed Safety 543 543 Modified intent-to-treat 537 535 a Most common reasons were lost to follow-up and no qualifying migraine attack 6

  7. Superior to Placebo on Both Coprimary Efficacy Endpoints 70 Rimegepant Placebo N=537 N=535 60 Proportion of Subjects 50 P <0.0001 37.6 40 30 P =0.0006 25.2 19.6 20 12.0 10 0 Pain Freedom Freedom from the MBS at 2 hours postdose at 2 hours postdose MBS, most bothersome symptom 7

  8. Significant Superiority on Key Secondary Endpoints Durability Evident from 2 through 48 Hours Rimegepant 75 mg Placebo Endpoints P-value a N=537, n (%) N=535, n (%) Photophobia-free at 2 hours b 183 (37.4) 106 (22.3) <0.0001 Phonophobia-free at 2 hours c 133 (36.7) 100 (26.8) 0.0039 Pain relief at 2 hours <0.0001 312 (58.1) 229 (42.8) Nausea-free at 2 hours d 171 (48.1) 145 (43.3) 0.2084 Rescue medication within 24 hours 113 (21.0) 198 (37.0) <0.0001 Sustained pain-free, 2-24 hours 66 (12.3) 38 (7.1) 0.0040 Sustained pain relief, 2-24 hours 229 (42.6) 142 (26.5) <0.0001 Sustained pain-free, 2-48 hours 53 (9.9) 32 (6.0) 0.0181 Sustained pain relief, 2-48 hours <0.0001 195 (36.3) 121 (22.6) Pain relapse from 2 to 48 hours e 52 (49.6) 32 (50.0) 0.9648 Ability to function normally at 2 hours 175 (32.6) 125 (23.4) 0.0007 Nausea-free at 3 hours d,f 0.0156 209 (58.8) 167 (49.7) Sustained ability to function normally, 2-48 hours f 105 (19.6) 67 (12.5) 0.0016 Sustained freedom from the MBS, 2-48 hours f 112 (20.9) 65 (12.2) 0.0001 a Secondary endpoints were tested hierarchically in the order shown at P=0.05 b Rimegepant n=489, placebo n=477; c Rimegepant n=362, placebo n=374; d Rimegepant n=355, placebo n=336; e Rimegepant n=105, placebo n=64 8 f Exploratory endpoint

  9. Pain Freedom with Single Dose: Increasing Benefit Over Time Pain Freedom 2-8 Hours Post-Single Dosing with Rimegepant 75 mg 100 Rimegepant 75 mg (n=537) Percent (%) difference versus placebo at each time point Placebo (n=535) % of Patients Pain Free 80 Single Dose of Rimegepant, No Rescue Meds 60 48% 43% 37% 40 30% 20% 20 0 2 hr 3 hr 4 hr 6 hr 8 hr Time Pain Freedom represents subjects that report no pain at the timepoint of interest. Percentages represent Non-Completer = Failure (NC=F) estimates of pain freedom, and were based on the mITT population. 9

  10. Greater Proportion of Subjects Achieving Pain Relief and Normal Function Without Additional Dosing or Rescue Medications Pain Relief up to 8 Hours Postdose Disability Freedom up to 8 Hours Postdose Pain Relief represents the first report of either mild pain or Four-point scale: 0=normal function, 1=mild impairment, no pain. Probabilities are Kaplan-Meier estimates; subjects 2=severe impairment, 3=required bedrest were censored (not included) at the time they took rescue medication or provided their last data point. Data are Kaplan-Meier estimates of the first report of Normal Function. Subjects were censored (not included) at the time they took rescue medication or provided their last data point. 10

  11. Safety Profile Similar to Placebo Rimegepant 75 mg Placebo Adverse Event N = 543, n (%) N = 543, n (%) Subjects with AE 93 (17.1) 77 (14.2) AEs reported by ≥ 1% of subjects a Nausea 10 (1.8) 6 (1.1) Urinary tract infection 8 (1.5) 6 (1.1) AEs related to treatment 10 (1.8) 3 (.6) Serious AEs 1 (0.2) b 2 (0.4) AEs leading to discontinuation 0 0 AE, adverse event; a In either treatment group; b Back pain; unrelated to treatment 11

  12. Liver Safety Rimegepant 75 mg Placebo Liver Function Tests N = 543, n (%) N = 543, n (%) Serum AST or ALT > ULN 13 (2.4) 12 (2.2) Serum AST or ALT > 3x ULN 0 0 Serum AST or ALT > 5x ULN 0 0 Bilirubin elevations > 2x ULN 0 0 AST, aspartate transaminase; ALT, alanine transaminase; ULN, upper limit of normal 12

  13. Conclusions • Coprimary endpoints met – Pain Freedom at 2 hours postdose – Freedom From the Most Bothersome Symptom at 2 hours postdose • Broad and clinically important drug benefit with single dose of rimegepant – Majority of patients achieve Pain Relief – Durability of benefit (24 and 48 hours) – Lower use of rescue meds – Greater proportion of patients achieving normal function • Excellent safety profile similar to placebo including liver function tests • Tolerability profile similar to placebo and favorable compared to historical triptan experience • Consistent results across endpoints and all efficacy trials – Phase 3 Study 301 is presented as a late-breaking poster (PS123LB) 13

  14. Q & A

  15. Thank You!

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend